Abstract
Hexavalent chromium or Cr (VI) is a serious health risk that has been identified in drinking water and generally originates as industrial by-products and hazardous waste sites, although natural sources have been reported. Common methods to remove Cr (VI) employ adsorption, filtration, ion exchange technologies, and redox reactions. We report on a macro porous polystyrene anion exchange resin, a solid-supported equivalent of tetra-alkyl ammonium carbonate (Biotage® MP-Carbonate), to effectively remove Cr (VI) from synthetic wastewater with bidentate or monodentate binding modes of chromate, depending on the pH environment. Sorption capacity is pH dependent with 332, 161, and 163 mg CrO42− per gram of MP-Carbonate adsorbed at pH 2, 6.8, and 10, respectively. Experimental data indicate an exergonic and endothermic adsorption process. Static vs. dynamic reaction conditions are discussed. Density functional theory calculations parallel the Gibbs free energy results of the bidentate binding of the large chromate ion compared to carbonate with the ammonium ions. These studies identify the potential uses of MP-Carbonate in the remediation of Cr (VI) wastewater unrelated to the pH of the water source.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Chromium (VI), or hexavalent chromium, is a well-known health risk in drinking water (Paine 2001). In response, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) set a standard of the maximum containment level goal (MCLG) of 0.1 mg/L, or 0.8 μM, of total chromium ions - Cr (VI) and Cr (III).(US-EPA) The World Health Organization recommends safe levels to be less than 0.05 mg/L, or 0.04 μM (World Heald Organization 2003). Cr (VI) is found naturally in ground water (Ball and Izbicki 2004; Robertson and Hexavalent 1975; Ku et al. 1978) and as by-products of many industrial processes such as metal plating, metal welding, alloy manufacturing, cooling tower blowdown, electroplating, and leather tanning (Owlad et al. 2009; McNeill et al. 2012). In aqueous solution hexavalent chromium exists in different ionic forms depending on pH (Beattie and Haight 1972). At values below 1, the dominant species is H2CrO4 and can serve as a strong oxidizing reagent of organic alcohols and aldehydes. Between 1 and 6.5, the HCrO41− ion is the main form and will dimerize to form the dichromate dianion (Cr2O72−) at concentrations above 10 mM. Above pH 6.5 the major ion is CrO42−.
Physical methods of Cr (VI) removal are widely applied at contamination sites (Palmer and Wittbrodt 1991), water treatment facilities (Pradhan et al. 2017; Johnson et al. 2008; Fu et al. 2014), and some point of use applications (Korngold et al. 2003). These approaches generally rely on adsorption (Pakade et al. 2019; Pakade and Chimuka 2013), with zirconium-organic frameworks (Yang et al. 2019; Zou et al. 2019; Sun et al. 2018), filtration or ion exchange technologies using weakly or strongly basic anionic polymeric exchange resins (Korngold et al. 2003; Pehlivan and Cetin 2009; Shi et al. 2009; Galán et al. 2006; Rengaraj et al. 2001) to remove Cr (VI). The inherent limitation of resins containing Cl− as the counter ion is the low pH requirements needed for the most efficient reduction of Cr (VI) levels. A chromate ion exchange resin in weakly alkaline media (Sengupta et al. 1986) has been described. Our work to adsorb Cr (VI) across a wide pH range relies on a macro porous polystyrene anion exchange resin that is a solid-supported equivalent of tetra-alkyl ammonium with CO32− as the counter ion. Biotage® MP-Carbonate is primarily utilized in organic synthesis as a base to quench reactions or scavenge acidic organic molecules such as carboxylic acids or phenols from reaction mixtures (Ley and Massi 2000). The carbonate ion (CO32−) is generally believed to be coordinated between two tetra-alkyl ammonium ions on the polystyrene surface (represented as Fig. 1). We reasoned that ions such as CrO42− might effectively bind to the resin surface at neutral and above pH values in a bidentate fashion (Korngold et al. 2003) and monodentate in acidic environments. To test this hypothesis MP-Carbonate was treated with solutions of 200 and 500 μM K2CrO4 at pH values from 2.0 to 12.0. From these experiments, loading values, rates of reactions, and thermodynamic properties were determined. Molecular modeling and semi-empirical calculation studies using density functional theory were employed to confirm the preferential binding mode at neutral pH of chromate ion vs. carbonate.
2 Experimental Procedures
Biotage® MP-Carbonate, a macro-porous poly(styrene-co-divinylbenzene) triethylammonium methylpolystyrene carbonate resin (Fig. 1), was purchased from Biotage USA and used without further purification. The specifications are as follows: capacity 2.9 mmol/g; particle size 350–1250 μm; bulk density 500 g/L; water solubility none; color off-white or buff colored with slight odor. Potassium chromate was purchased from Fisher Scientific. Deionized water is employed throughout. Spectroscopic measurements of the chromate concentrations were measured on a Metash Model V-5000 Visible Spectrophotometer at 372 nm (Fournier-Salaün and Salaün 2007; Sanchez-Hachair and Hofmann 2018) using standard calibration curves of Cr (VI) concentrations from 5.0 to 300 μM at the indicated pH value. Stirring was conducted with a 12 cm × 9 cm × 9 cm magnetic stir bar at the indicated rpm on a Corning Hot Plate Stirrer. The temperatures were controlled on the Corning Hot Plate Stirrer with the Cr (VI) and MP-Carbonate in a 50-mL beaker immersed in a 500-mL beaker of water that was either heated to the specified temperature, cooled in ice, or at ambient temperature. Averages of duplicate or triplicate experiments, and the range, of chromate reductions are reported. Aqueous HCl or NaOH was used to adjust pH values that were measured on a Denver Instrument Model UB-10 pH/mV Meter.
A typical procedure for the removal of Cr (VI): To a solution (20 mL) of aqueous K2CrO4 (200 μM) in a 50-mL beaker was added MP-Carbonate (0.020 g). The mixture is stirred between 500 and 700 rpm at ambient temperature and an aliquot is removed for spectroscopic analysis. The percent Cr (VI) removal was calculated according to Eq. (1)
where λmax [stock] is the light absorption at 372 nm of the stock solution of Cr (VI) at the given pH. The λmax [sample] is the UV absorption at 372 nm of the sample treated with MP-Carbonate. Visually, the yellow CrO42− solution fades to clear and the surface of the off-white MP-Carbonate beads changes to bright yellow during the adsorption process.
To ascertain the loading capacity of MP-Carbonate for Cr (VI), a solution of 500 μM K2CrO4 (175 mL) at pH 2.0 and 200 μM K2CrO4 (175 mL) at pH 6.8 and pH 10 and 0.020 g of MP-Carbonate were kept under static conditions for 7 days in a sealed beaker. The concentration of remaining Cr (VI) was determined from standard calibration curves. The breakthrough values at each pH were calculated from the amount of adsorbed Cr (VI) per gram of MP-Carbonate as shown in Eq. (2).
where [Cr (VI)]in is the initial concentration of chromate, [Cr (VI)]re the remaining concertation of Cr (VI), and [Cr (VI)]ad the concentration of chromate adsorbed. Conversion of [Cr (VI)]ad to grams of Cr (VI) adsorbed/g of MP-Carbonate is indicated.
Initial rate values (Rin) were calculated using Eq. (3), where [Cr (VI)]t1 and [Cr (VI)]t2 are the initial and final concentrations at time zero and 10 or 20 min.
Values for thermodynamic parameters, such as free energy change (△G0), enthalpy change (△H0), and changes in entropy (△S0), were calculated from Eqs. (4)–(6) (Khan and Singh 1987) using Van’t Hoff relationships. Kc is the equilibrium constant, CAe is the equilibrium concentration (mg/L) of chromate on MP-Carbonate, and Ce is the equilibrium concentration (mg/L) in the reaction mixture. △H0 and △S0 were obtained from the Van’t Hoff plot of log Kc vs. 1/T from Eq. (6) where the Y-intercept = △S0/2.303R and the slope of the line = − △H0/2.303R.
All calculations for the binding of CO32− and CrO42− to MP-Carbonate were geometry optimized and were performed at the ω97d/6-31G* level of theory using the Spartan ′18 software package (Wavefunction Inc n.d.). All molecular energies do not include a dielectric constant representation of the aqueous environment and, hence, its possible effects. Specifically, the quantum chemical electronic energy calculations of each reactant and product aggregate were executed at the above level of theory. To quantify the results △E, the quantum mechanical calculation of the energy change of products minus reactants at 0 K and in vacuo is reported.
3 Results and Discussion
The use of MP-Carbonate (Fig. 1) has been restricted to organic synthesis serving as an insoluble base to quench acidic reactions or scavenge acidic by-products, such as carboxylic acids or phenols from reaction mixtures, thereby bypassing the need for aqueous extractions (Ley and Massi 2000). To examine the usefulness of MP-Carbonate as a heavy metal adsorbent, varying amounts were added to 20 mL of a 200 μM K2CrO4 solution at pH values from 2.0–12.0. As shown in Fig. 2 with 0.010 g of MP-Carbonate, partial chromate removal (57–79%) was achieved. When the amount of adsorbent was increased to 0.020 g, nearly complete elimination (90–100%) was observed. At 0.030 g of MP-Carbonate, the complete removal of Cr (VI) was accomplished in 2 h among all pH conditions.
Figure 3 a and b show the chromate adsorbent profiles of MP-Carbonate (0.020 g in 20 mL of 200 μM K2CrO4) at pH values from 2.0–12.0. Reduction of CrO42− levels at low pH value is in keeping with the optimum environment of recent reports of ion exchange resins (Pehlivan and Cetin 2009; Shi et al. 2009; Galán et al. 2006). However, the near equally effective removal of chromate under higher pH value conditions(Sengupta et al. 1986) can afford additional versatility during water remediation processes (McNeill et al. 2012).
To establish the kinetics of Cr (VI) adsorption by MP-Carbonate, the initial rates were calculated from Fig. 3 a and b and are shown in Table 1. From zero to 10 min, chromate adsorption occurs rapidly at pH 2.0 (16.4 μM min−1) compared with pH 4.0 (8.4 μM min−1) and above (3.6–5.6 μM min−1). The initial rapid rate reflects the ability of Cr (VI) to react with readily accessible carbonate/ammonium ions on or near the surface of the bead. From this we calculate that initially 1.90, 0.548, and 0.652 mg of Cr (VI) are adsorbed per minute per gram of MP-Carbonate at pH 2.0, 6.8, and 10.0, respectively. We propose that under HCl conditions the tetra-alkyl ammoniums’ counter ion, CO32−, is rapidly replaced by Cl− and subsequently exchanges with the HCrO41− ion, as shown in Fig. 1 as MP-Carbonate˖2Cr(VI). The increased rate suggests a faster displacement of the Cl− leaving group coupled with a doubling of the available ammonium sites on the adsorbent. At values at or above neutral pH, CO32− exchanges with CrO42− for adsorption. Support for this is seen in the increase from pH 6.8 to pH 7.5 of a Cr (VI) solution after MP-Carbonate (0.02 g) has been statically exposed to chromate (120 mL of 200 μM K2CrO4 solution). Taken together, the data suggests the displacement of chloride ion by HCrO41− at low pH values is the most facile process. Nevertheless, the slightly slower adsorption rate—carbonate replaced by CrO42−—at neutral or basic conditions provides for good adsorption without a significant effect on time. It is of interest to note that the rate of Cr (VI) absorption at pH 10.0 is faster than other values, except pH 2.0. We surmise in this pH range the equilibrium binding dynamics of CO32− vs. OH− with ammonium ions is favorably affecting displacement by CrO42−.
To identify the maximum chromate adsorption capacity of MP-Carbonate, a solution of K2CrO4 at pH values of 2.0, 6.8, and 10.0 was added to 0.020 g of MP-Carbonate and kept under static conditions for 7 days. Higher concentrations (500 μM) of Cr (VI) were used at pH 2 due to the larger adsorption capacity of MP-Carbonate in an acidic environment. The concentration of non-adsorbed Cr (VI) was calculated from standard calibration curves and the breakthrough values established. As seen in Table 2, the calculated maximum CrO42− loading capacity per gram of MP-Carbonate at pH 2.0, 6.8, and 10.0 is 330, 161, and 163 mg, respectively. We reason, as shown in Fig. 1, that under HCl conditions the bidentate coordination of CO32− with two tetra-alkyl ammonium ions is initially replaced by two Cl− ions which are subsequently exchanged with two HCrO41− ions in a monodentate binding fashion (Fig. 1, MP-Carbonate+2Cr(VI)). The arrangement allows for maximum utilization of the tetra-alkyl ammonium ions in MP-Carbonate to bind with HCrO41− and accounts for the doubling of the adsorption capacity at low pH solutions compared with neutral and above. At pH values near neutral and above, CO32− exchanges with CrO42− in a bidentate arrangement with the tetra-alkyl ammonium ions, as shown as MP-Carbonate+Cr (VI) in Fig. 1. At these pH levels, a pair of tetra-alkyl ammonium ions is required for CrO42− adsorption, hence with a lower breakthrough value compared with pH 2.
In separate experiments, we sought to correlate changes to Cr (VI) adsorption with varying temperatures. Towards this goal, initial rates were measured (zero to 20 min to allow sufficient Cr (VI) adsorption to occur at 0 °C) at pH 6.8 at temperatures of 0 °C, 25 °C, and 50 °C. As seen in Table 3, the initial rate increases from 2.9 μM min−1 at 0 °C to 6.9 μM min−1 at elevated temperatures (50 °C).
The effects of temperature change on the thermodynamic sorption properties at pH 6.8 of Cr (VI) by MP-Carbonate were calculated (see “Experimental Procedures”). As shown in Fig. 4, the equilibrium constant (log Kc) increases as temperature increased from 273 K (0 °C) to 323 K (50 °C). The thermodynamic values (Khan and Singh 1987) of free energy change (△G0), enthalpy change (△H0), and changes in entropy (△S0) values are summarized in Table 4. The negative △G0 indicates an exergonic adsorption process. The positive △H0 value, representing an endothermic reaction, supports the observation that by increasing the temperature of the adsorption process the Kc values and initial rate also increase. The relatively small △S0 value suggests the replacement of CO32− on MP-Carbonate with CrO42− does not significantly alter the net amount of ordered water molecules associated with chromate or carbonate solutions.
We have previously observed that the fluid dynamics of resin-based Cr (VI) removal agents, specifically Cr (VI) reduction to Cr (III), contributed to the efficiency of the remediation (Regan et al. 2019). Specifically, heterogeneous solutions containing resins that were in motion (stirring) were more efficient than static conditions due to a faster diffusion rate of chromate into the porous cavities. To confirm this observation with adsorption of Cr (VI) with MP-Carbonate, we varied the speed in which the water was stirred. Table 5 shows that in a static environment Cr (VI) removal is negligible at pH 6.8. Increasing stirring speeds accelerates the efficiency (Kocaoba and Akcin 2003) of adsorption of Cr (VI) suggesting that need for extensive diffusion of solvent throughout the macro porous resin for optimal sorption. At very high stirring speed (1100 rpm), the adsorption is nearly complete after 60 min.
The characteristic loss of efficacy of Cr (VI) sorption by exchange resins using chloride as the counter ion at high pH (Pehlivan and Cetin 2009; Shi et al. 2009; Galán et al. 2006; Rengaraj et al. 2001; Sengupta et al. 1986; Meshram et al. 2018) is likely due to Cl− displacement by OH−. Under these scenarios, CrO42− is less able to replace OH− from the tetra-alkyl ammonium ion and withstands adsorption. However, with MP-Carbonate, the counter ion CO32− is likely in equilibrium with OH− in a basic environment thereby facilitating CrO42− adsorption.
To verify the preferred energy of binding of CrO42− with tetra-alkyl ammoniums ions compared with CO32−, calculations were performed using density functional theory (Wavefunction Inc n.d.). The calculated △E (products minus reactants) is − 82.16 kJ/mol and parallels the thermodynamic parameters of Cr (VI) adsorption by MP-Carbonate (Table 4). Molecular modeling depictions of the adsorption process are shown in Fig. 5 with space filling and electrostatic potential energy maps of MP-Carbonate (Fig. 5a) and MP-Carbonate+Cr (VI) in Fig. 5b. The covalent bond lengths and ionic bonding distances of CO32− compared with CrO42− with ammonium ions are shown in Fig. 6 a and b and summarized in Table 6. The molecular geometry of CO3(US-EPAn.d.) has trigonal planar symmetry (point group D3h)(Fortes et al. 2014) with bond angles of 118–122°. Chromate adopts a tetrahedral molecular orientation with bond angles between 106 and 112°(McGinnety 1972). A 4.6% longer C-O1 bond is observed compared with C–O2 and C–O3 (Fig. 6a) and may signify an optimization of the ionic interactions between the oxygen anion and the two ammonium ions. The Cr–O bond lengths are within normal ranges (McGinnety 1972). The distance between the ammonium ions in each case is 6.42 Å indicating that the scaffold in the model (see Fig. 6) did not undergo molecular movement to accommodate the larger chromate ion during the sorption process.
Details of the ionic bond distances of the carbonate oxygen ion and the two ammonium ions, CO1-N1 and CO1-N2, are seen in Fig. 6a with distances of 3.84 Å and 3.32 Å. The other carbonate oxygen ions and the two ammonium ions bonds, CO2–N2 and CO3–N1, have ionic bond distances of 3.48 Å and 3.65 Å, respectively. The chromate oxygen ionic bond lengths, CrO1-N1 and CrO4-N1, are 3.35 Å and 3.64 Å while the CrO2-N2 and CrO3-N2 are 3.57 Å and 3.95 Å (Fig. 6b). This data shows that the ionic bond distances between the oxygen ions of carbonate and chromate and the ammonium ions remain nearly identical, but are generally longer than those seem with carboxylate and ammonium ions (Oxton et al. 1977; Debiec et al. 2014). This may reflect the sterically congested environment around each ammonium ions by the three ethyl groups attached to it and thereby preventing shorter ionic distances. Nevertheless, the ionic binding of four chromate oxygen anions with two ammonium ions of MP-Carbonate is a key factor in the △E = −82.97 kJ/mol calculation compared with three carbonate oxygen anions with two ammonium ions.
4 Conclusion
MP-Carbonate has been shown to be an effective adsorbent of synthetic Cr (VI) wastewater (200 and 500 μM K2CrO4) at pH values from 2.0–12.0. Initial chromate adsorption occurs rapidly at pH 2 and slows somewhat at a higher pH environment. Specifically, 1.90, 0.548, and 0.652 mg of Cr (VI) are adsorbed per minute per gram of MP-Carbonate at pH 2.0, 6.8, and 10.0, respectively. The loading capacity is also pH dependent: 332, 161, and 163 mg CrO42− per gram MP-Carbonate at pH 2.0, 6.8, and 10.0, respectively. At low pH environments, the binding of chromate forms a monodentate composition with the tetra-alkyl ammonium ions while at neutral and higher pH values, binding occurs in a monodentate assembly. The CO32− counter ion is believed to contribute to the sorption effectiveness of Cr (VI) by MP-Carbonate at high pH levels. Based on thermodynamic calculations, the adsorption is a spontaneous (negative △G0) and endothermic (positive △H0) process. The rate of Cr (VI) adsorption is dependent on fluid dynamics and temperature. Stirring solutions were more effective at chromate removal than static conditions due to the improved solvent diffusion efficiencies. During the adsorption process, the tetrahedral CrO42− ion replaces the trigonal planar CO32− ion on MP-Carbonate with similar ionic bond lengths to the ammonium ions. In the case of MP-Carbonate, three oxygen ions bind to two ammonium ions, whereas, for chromate sorption, four oxygen ions bind to two ammonium ions and contribute to the calculated △E = − 82.97 kJ/mol value for the adsorption process. Taken together, the results show the potential usefulness of MP-Carbonate in the remediation of Cr (VI) wastewater, regardless of the pH of the water source.
References
Ball, J. W., & Izbicki, J. A. (2004). Occurrence of hexavalent chromium in ground water in the western Mojave Desert, California. Appl. Geochemistry, 19, 1123–1135.
Beattie, J. K. & Haight, G. P. Chromium (VI) Oxidations of inorganic substrates. in Inorganic Reaction Mechanisms, Part II (ed. Edwards, J. O.) 93–145 (John Wiley and Sons, 1972). doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470166185.ch3.
Debiec, K. T., Gronenborn, A. M., & Chong, L. T. (2014). Evaluating the strength of salt bridges: a comparison of current biomolecular force fields. J. Phys. Chem. B,118, 6561–6569.
Fortes, A., et al. (2014). Structure, hydrogen bonding and thermal expansion of ammonium carbonate monohydrate. Acta Crystallogr. B. Struct. Sci. Cryst. Eng. Mater., 70, 948–962.
Fournier-Salaün, M. C., & Salaün, P. (2007). Quantitative determination of hexavalent chromium in aqueous solutions by UV-Vis spectrophotometer. Central European Journal of Chemistry, 5, 1084–1093.
Fu, F., Dionysiou, D. D., & Liu, H. (2014). The use of zero-valent iron for groundwater remediation and wastewater treatment: A review. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 267, 194–205.
Galán, B., Calzada, M., & Ortiz, I. (2006). Separation and concentration of Cr (VI) from ground waters by anion exchange using Lewatit MP-64: Mathematical modelling at acidic pH. Solvent Extraction and Ion Exchange, 24, 621–637.
Johnson, P. D., et al. (2008). Enhanced removal of heavy metals in primary treatment using coagulation and flocculation. Water Environment Research, 80, 472–479.
Khan, A. A., & Singh, R. P. (1987). Adsorption thermodynamics of carbofuran on Sn (IV) arsenosilicate in H+, Na+ and Ca2+ forms. Colloids and Surfaces, 24, 33–42.
Kocaoba, S., & Akcin, G. (2003). A kinetic investigation of chromium. Adsorption, 9, 143–151.
Korngold, E., Belayev, N., & Aronov, L. (2003). Removal of chromates from drinking water by anion exchangers. Separation and Purification Technology, 33, 179–187.
Ku, H. F. H., Katz, B. G., Sulam, D. J., & Krulikas, R. K. (1978). Scavenging of chromium and cadmium by aquifer material — South Farmingdale-Massapequa area, Long Island, New York. Groundwater, 16, 112–118.
Ley, S. V., & Massi, A. (2000). Parallel solution-phase syntheses of functionalized bicylco-[2.2.2]octanes: generation of a library using orchestrated multi-step sequences of polymer-supported reagents and sequesterants. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans, 1, 3645–3654.
McGinnety, J. A. (1972). Redetermination of the structures of potassium sulphate and potassium chromate: the effect of electrostatic crystal forces upon observed bond lengths. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B, 28, 2845–2852.
McNeill, L. S., McLean, J. E., Parks, J. L., & Edwards, M. A. (2012). Hexavalent chromium review, part 2: Chemistry, occurrence, and treatment. Journal of American Water Works Association, 104, E395–E405.
Meshram, P., et al. (2018). Removal of hexavalent chromium from mine effluents by ion exchange resins-comparative study of Amberlite IRA 400 and IRA 900. Russ. J. Non-Ferrous Met., 59(533–542).
Owlad, M., Aroua, M. K., Daud, W. A. W., & Baroutian, S. (2009). Removal of hexavalent chromium-contaminated water and wastewater: a review. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 200, 59–77.
Oxton, I. A., Cameron, T. S., Knop, O., & McCulloch, A. W. (1977). Ammonium salts of benzoic acid and the crystal structure of ammonium hydrogen bisbenzoate. Canadian Journal of Chemistry, 55, 3831–3837.
Paine, A. J. (2001). Mechanisms of chromium toxicity, carcinogenicity and allergenicity: review of the literature from 1985 to 2000. Human & Experimental Toxicology, 20, 439–451.
Pakade, V., & Chimuka, L. (2013). Polymeric sorbents for removal of Cr (VI) from environmental samples. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 85, 2145–2160.
Pakade, V. E., Tavengwa, N. T., & Madikizela, L. M. (2019). Recent advances in hexavalent chromium removal from aqueous solutions by adsorptive methods. RSC Advances, 9, 26142–26164.
Palmer, C. D., & Wittbrodt, P. R. (1991). Processes affecting the remediation of chromium-contaminated sites. Environmental Health Perspectives, 92, 25–40.
Pehlivan, E., & Cetin, S. (2009). Sorption of Cr (VI) ions on two Lewatit-anion exchange resins and their quantitative determination using UV-visible spectrophotometer. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 163, 448–453.
Pradhan, D., Sukla, L. B., Sawyer, M., & Rahman, P. K. S. M. (2017). Recent bioreduction of hexavalent chromium in wastewater treatment: A review. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 55, 1–20.
Regan, J., Dushaj, N., & Stinchfield, G. (2019). Reducing hexavalent chromium to trivalent chromium with zero chemical footprint: borohydride exchange resin and a polymer-supported base. ACS Omega, 4, 11554–11557.
Rengaraj, S., Yeon, K. H., & Moon, S. H. (2001). Removal of chromium from water and wastewater by ion exchange resins. Journal of Hazardous Materials, B87, 273–287.
Robertson, F., & Hexavalent, N. (1975). Chromium in the ground water in Paradise Valley, Arizona. Groundwater, 16, 516–527.
Sanchez-Hachair, A., & Hofmann, A. (2018). Hexavalent chromium quantification in solution: comparing direct UV–visible spectrometry with 1,5-diphenylcarbazide colorimetry. Comptes Rendus Chim,21, 890.
Sengupta, A. K., Clifford, D., & Subramonian, S. (1986). Chromate ion-exchange process at alkaline pH. Water Research, 20, 1177–1184.
Shi, T., Wang, Z., Liu, Y., Jia, S., & Changming, D. (2009). Removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solutions by D301, D314 and D354 anion-exchange resins. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 161, 900–906.
Sun, X., et al. (2018). An ultrastable Zr-MOF for fast capture and highly luminescence detection of Cr2O72- simultaneously in an aqueous phase. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 6, 6363–6369.
US-EPA. (n.d.) Basic information about chromium in drinking water ( http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basicinformation/chromium.cfm ).
Wavefunction Inc. (n.d.) Irvine California. No Title.
World Heald Organization. Chromium in drinking-water. background document for development of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality (2003) WHO/SDE/WSH/03.04/05.
Yang, P., Shu, Y., Zhuang, Q., Li, Y., & Gu, J. (2019). Metal–organic frameworks bearing dense alkyl thiol for the efficient degradation and concomitant removal of toxic Cr (VI). Langmuir, 35, 16226–16233.
Zou, Y. H., Liang, J., He, C., Huang, Y. B., & Cao, R. (2019). A mesoporous cationic metal-organic framework with a high density of positive charge for enhanced removal of dichromate from water. Dalt. Trans., 48, 6680–6684.
Acknowledgments
All calculations were performed using the facilities of the Michael J. ′58 and Aimee Rusinko Kakos Center for Scientific Computing in the School of Science at Manhattan College. The authors thank the School of Science for financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Stinchfield, G., Capitani, J.F. & Regan, J. Bidentate and Monodentate Binding of Chromium (VI) on the Acid Scavenger Exchange Resin, MP-Carbonate, as a Function of pH. Water Air Soil Pollut 231, 360 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-04721-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-020-04721-9