A Comparison of Wet Deposition Collectors at a Coastal Rural Site
- 187 Downloads
Atmospheric deposition occurs in a variety of forms and is crucial for the evaluation of nutrient budgets, critical loads, and pollution inputs across space and time. Atmospheric wet deposition is typically quantified by analyzing the chemistry of precipitation that is collected in some type of container with a lid that opens in response to precipitation. However, collectors can vary in shape as well as in the sensor that signals when precipitation is occurring. Here, we compare the collectors made by Aerochem Metrics and N-CON Systems Company Inc. The former has been widely used for several decades, while the latter is relatively new and has been used in a variety of configurations depending on the solute of interest. Event-based samples were collected from August 2007 to October 2008 and analyzed for nitrate, ammonium, sulfate, chloride, and dissolved organic carbon (DOC). A variety of approaches were used to assess the comparability of the two collectors. Regressions of concentration versus concentration from the two collectors were strong, and the slope did not differ from 1 for nitrate, ammonium, or sulfate. The median concentrations of nitrate, ammonium, and sulfate were, however, significantly higher in the N-CON collector, while there were no overall differences between collectors for chloride or DOC. Although we have observed some statistically significant differences between solute concentrations of samples collected from the two collectors, our mixed results suggest that these differences are relatively small.
KeywordsPrecipitation chemistry Wet deposition Acidic deposition Collector comparison Dissolved organic carbon deposition
This research was funded in part by the New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station. Additional funds were provided by NOAA AIRMAP and the University of New Hampshire Water Quality Analysis Laboratory. We thank Jody Potter for laboratory assistance.
- Cook, R. D., & Weisberg, S. (1982). Residuals and influence in regression. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
- Dossett, S. R., & Bowersox, V. C., (1999). National Trends Network site operation manual. National Atmospheric Deposition Program Office at the Illinois State Water Survey, NADP Manual 1999–01c, revised, Champaign, IL. http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/lib/manuals/opman.pdf. Accessed 9/4/12.
- Krupa, S. V. (2002). Sampling and physico-chemical analysis of precipitation: a review. Environmental Pollution, 120, 565–594.Google Scholar
- Lynch, J. A., DeWalle, D. R., & Homer, K. (1990). Impact of NADP/NTN sampling protocols on winter storm estimates of wet deposition in central Pennsylvania. USEPA. EPA/600/S3-90/044.Google Scholar
- McDowell, W. H., Gines-Sanchez, C., Asbury, C. E., & Ramos-Perez, C. R. (1990). Influence of sea salt aerosols and long-range transport on precipitation chemistry at El Verde, Puerto Rico. Atmospheric Environment, 24A, 2813–2821.Google Scholar
- Nilles, M. A., See, R. B., Willoughby, T. C., & Gordon, J. D. (1992). Variability in wet atmospheric deposition data determined with co-located samplers: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 91-4143, 30 p.Google Scholar
- Pardo, L. H. (2010). Approaches for estimating critical loads of N and S deposition for forest ecosystems on U.S. federal lands. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-71. Newtown Square: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. 25 p.Google Scholar
- Schier, G. A., & Jensen, K. F. (1992). Atmospheric deposition effects on foliar injury and foliar leaching in red spruce. In C. Eagar & M. B. Adams (Eds.), Ecology and decline of Red Spruce in the Eastern United States, ecological studies 96. New York: Springer. 417 p.Google Scholar
- Seinfeld, J. H., & Pandis, S. N. (2006). Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from air pollution to climate change (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Wetherbee, G. A., Latysh, N. E., & Gordon, J. D. (2005). Spatial and temporal variability of the over- all error of National Atmospheric Deposition Program measurements determined by the USGS co-located-sampler program, water years 1989–2001. Environmental Pollution, 135, 407–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wetherbee, G. A., Shaw, M. J., Latysh, N. E., Lehmann, C. M. B., & Rothert, J. E. (2009). Comparison of precipitation chemistry measurements obtained by the Canadian Air and Precipitation Monitoring Network and the National Atmospheric Deposition Program for the period 1995–2004. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 164, 111–132. doi: 10.1007/s10661-009-0879-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wetherbee, G. A., Latysh, N. E., & Chesney, T. A. (2010). U.S. Geological Survey External Quality-Assurance Project Report to the National Atmospheric Deposition Program / National Trends Network and Mercury Deposition Network, 2007-08. NADP Quality Assurance Report 2010-01, Illinois State Water Survey Miscellaneous Report 190, 82p.Google Scholar