Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of precipitation chemistry measurements obtained by the Canadian Air and Precipitation Monitoring Network and National Atmospheric Deposition Program for the period 1995–2004

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Precipitation chemistry and depth measurements obtained by the Canadian Air and Precipitation Monitoring Network (CAPMoN) and the US National Atmospheric Deposition Program/National Trends Network (NADP/NTN) were compared for the 10-year period 1995–2004. Colocated sets of CAPMoN and NADP instrumentation, consisting of precipitation collectors and rain gages, were operated simultaneously per standard protocols for each network at Sutton, Ontario and Frelighsburg, Ontario, Canada and at State College, PA, USA. CAPMoN samples were collected daily, and NADP samples were collected weekly, and samples were analyzed exclusively by each network’s laboratory for pH, H + , Ca2 + , Mg2 + , Na + , K + , \(\text{NH}_{4}^{+}\), Cl − , \(\text{NO}_{3}^{-}\), and \(\text{SO}_{4}^{2-}\). Weekly and annual precipitation-weighted mean concentrations for each network were compared. This study is a follow-up to an earlier internetwork comparison for the period 1986–1993, published by Alain Sirois, Robert Vet, and Dennis Lamb in 2000. Median weekly internetwork differences for 1995–2004 data were the same to slightly lower than for data for the previous study period (1986–1993) for all analytes except \(\text{NO}_{3}^{-}\), \(\text{SO}_{4}^{2-}\), and sample depth. A 1994 NADP sampling protocol change and a 1998 change in the types of filters used to process NADP samples reversed the previously identified negative bias in NADP data for hydrogen-ion and sodium concentrations. Statistically significant biases (α = 0.10) for sodium and hydrogen-ion concentrations observed in the 1986–1993 data were not significant for 1995–2004. Weekly CAPMoN measurements generally are higher than weekly NADP measurements due to differences in sample filtration and field instrumentation, not sample evaporation, contamination, or analytical laboratory differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnett, V., & Lewis, T. (1984). Outliers in statistical data (2nd ed., 464 p.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Air and Precipitation Monitoring Network (CAPMoN). (1985). CAPMoN operations instruction manual–precipitation. Canada: Atmospheric Environment Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, W. S. (1985). The elements of graphing data (323 p.). Monterey: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodison, B. E., Sevruk, B., & Klemm, S. (1989). Atmospheric deposition, proceedings of the Baltimore symposium (No. 179, p. 57). Wallingford: IAHS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, J. D., Nilles, M. A., Polacsek, D. K., & Ratcliff, M. E. (1997). External quality-assurance results for the national atmospheric deposition program/national trends network during 1994 (42 p.). Denver: USGS, US Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 97-4201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, J. D., Latysh, N. E., & Lindholm, S. J. (1999). External quality-assurance results for the national atmospheric deposition program/national trends network, 1995–96 (p. 42). Denver: USGS, US Geological survey water-resources investigations report99-4072.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, J. D., Latysh, N. E., & Lindholm, S. J. (2003). External quality-assurance results for the national atmospheric deposition program/national trends network, 1997–1999 (p. 24). Denver: USGS, US Geological survey water-resources investigations report 03-4027.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helsel, D. R., Mueller, D. K., & Slack, J. R. (2005). Computer program for the Kendall family of trend tests. Reston: US Geological Survey, US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanji, H. K. (1993). 100 statistical tests: Newbury park(216 p.). California: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis, M. S., & Keeler, G. J. (1997). Critical evaluation of a modified automatic wet- only precipitation collector for mercury and trace element determinations. Environmental Science & Technology 1997, 31, 2610–2615.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J. A., Bowersox, V. C., & Grimm, J. W. (1996). Trends in precipitation chemistry I the United States, 1983–94—An analysis of the effects in 1995 of phase I of the clan air act amendments of 1990 (100 p.). Reston, USGS, Title IV: US Geological Survey Open-File Report 96-0346.

  • National Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP) Central Analytical Laboratory Quality Assurance Plan (2002). NADP QA plan 2002-01. Champaign: Illinois State Water Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randles, R. H., & Wolf, D. A. (1979). Introduction to the theory of nonparametric statistics (450 p.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, Inc. (1989). SAS STAT user’s guide, version 6 (4th ed.). Cary: SAS Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, L. J., Brooks, M. H., Garbarino, J. R., & Willoughby, T. C. (1987). The influence of an urban environment in the chemical composition of precipitation. In R. C. Averett, & D. M. McKnight (eds), Chapter 3 in, chemical quality of the hydrologic cycle. Chelsea: Lewis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirois, A., & Vet, R. (1999). The precision of precipitation chemistry measurements in the Canadian Air and Precipitation Monitoring Network (CAPMoN). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 57, 301–329 (The Netherlands).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sirois, A., Vet, R., & Lamb, D. (2000). A comparison of the precipitation chemistry measurements obtained by the CAPMoN and NADP/NTN networks. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 62, 273–303 (The Netherlands).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vet, R. J. (1991). Wet deposition: Measurement techniques, the handbook of environmental chemistry (vol. 2, Part F, 255 pp.). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vet, R. J., Sirois, A., Jeffries, D. S., Semkin, R. G., Foster, N. W., Hazlett, P. et al. (1988). Comparison of bulk, wet-only, and wet-plus-dry deposition measurements at the Turkey Lakes Watershed. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 45(1), 26–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherbee, G. A., Latysh, N. E., & Gordon, J. D. (2004). External quality-assurance results for the national atmospheric deposition program/national trends network, 2000–01 (59 p.). Reston: USGS, US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5034.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherbee, G. A., Latysh, N. E., & Burke, K. P. (2005). External quality assurance results for the national atmospheric deposition program/national trends network, 2002-03 (59 p.). Reston: USGS, US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5061.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherbee, G. A., Latysh, N. E., & Greene, S. M. (2006). external quality assurance results for the national atmospheric deposition program/national trends network, 2004 (52 p.). Reston: USGS, US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2005-5067.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willoughby, T. C., Schroeder, L. J., & See, R. B. (1990). Chemical stability of wet-deposition samples subsampled daily for one week (19 p.). Denver: USGS, US Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations Report 90-4003.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory A. Wetherbee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wetherbee, G.A., Shaw, M.J., Latysh, N.E. et al. Comparison of precipitation chemistry measurements obtained by the Canadian Air and Precipitation Monitoring Network and National Atmospheric Deposition Program for the period 1995–2004. Environ Monit Assess 164, 111–132 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-0879-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-0879-8

Keywords

Navigation