Skip to main content
Log in

Combined Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ground-Level Impacts of Management Transfer to Poor Farmers in Developing Countries

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The responsibility transfer of irrigation management from the state to farmers emerged as a mutually beneficial strategy to enhance food production while reducing pressure on central budgets. Yet the impacts of participatory approaches are not sufficiently investigated to understand the real-term gains of farmers. A systematic review combined with meta-analysis is undertaken to array what has been learned on the success of management transfer at the ground level. Based on the findings collated from 42 case studies in developing countries, the impact indicators of management transfer show an overall positive contribution to productivity, system efficiency, profitability, and cost of service, as direct proxies of farmers’ benefits. However, such impacts require the analysis of the research shortcomings. The existing literature fails to rebalance the geographical concentration of research interest, position management transfer in pro-poor contexts, explore the critical influence of water availability and craft a robust methodology for assessments. The paper revealed three key features of the assessments affecting the reported impacts. The assessments conducted long after the management transfer and the more recent assessments have a positive and significant relationship with the measured impacts. Conversely, the rigour of applied methodology has a negative and significant relationship with the impacts. The paper suggests research pathways to better understand the farmers-related impacts of management transfer, including the involvement of subsistence farms, application of pro-poor indicators, investigation of the implications of water scarcity, and the development of a framework for more rigorous assessments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

(source: Moher et al. 2009)

Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Notes

  1. As IMT and PIM have the same objectives but represent different stages of the process, this article investigates them together. It uses the terms IMT, PIM, “responsibility transfer”, “management transfer”, and “participatory management” synonymously.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the reviewers for their careful reading and detailed recommendations.

Funding

“The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscripts”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: ÉP, IF; Data curation: ÉP, IF, SG; Formal analysis: ÉP, IF, SG; Investigation: ÉP, IF; Methodology: ÉP, IF; Project administration: SG, MS; Resources: MS; Software: ÉP, IF; Supervision: IF, MS; Validation: IF, MS; Visualization: ÉP, SG; Writing—original draft, ÉP; Writing—review & editing: ÉP, SG. The first and second authors had the idea for the article, the first and third authors performed the literature search and data analysis, and drafted the work, the second and fourth authors supervised and critically revised it.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefania Giusti.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

The authors confirm that the submission is original work and not published elsewhere.

Consent to Participate

All authors consented to participate in this study.

Consent for publication

All authors consented to publish this study.

Competing interests

“The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose”.

Open Access

Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pék, É., Fertő, I., Giusti, S. et al. Combined Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Ground-Level Impacts of Management Transfer to Poor Farmers in Developing Countries. Water Resour Manage 38, 1737–1752 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-024-03763-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-024-03763-6

Keywords

Navigation