Skip to main content
Log in

GIS-Based Estimation of Soil Loss from Hilly Urban Area Incorporating Hill Cut Factor into RUSLE

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unplanned residential development in hilly areas leads to steep cuts in natural hillslopes, which in turn, results in excessive soil loss. GIS-based Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE), applied in such a case, underestimates soil loss since such near vertical surfaces are not completely projected in orthorectified satellite images. This paper introduces a "hill cut factor (Hf)", which is input into the cover management factor of RUSLE model. Model is validated with observed soil loss data of a mini hilly urban watershed located in Japorigog hill of Guwahati city. GIS-based soil loss estimation has been carried out for two scenarios: with and without consideration of Hf. Results reveal that consideration of Hf in GIS-based RUSLE replicates the picture of erosion more accurately and gives a similar result with observed soil loss data. Without consideration of Hf, RUSLE underestimates annual soil loss from the studied watershed by almost 28% than the observed value. Adequate design of drainage system by using more accurate soil loss information, derived in this way, can lower the urban flood problem caused due to blockage of drains and culverts with sediments brought down from the inhabited hills in a city.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold JG, Allen PM (1992) A comprehensive surface-groundwater flow model. J Hydrol 142:47–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beven K (1996) A discussion of distributed hydrological modelling. In: Abbott MB, Refsgaard JC (eds) Distributed hydrological modelling. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 255–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattarai R, Dutta D (2007) Estimation of soil erosion and sediment yield using GIS at catchment scale. Water Resour Manag 21(10):1635–1647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas SS, Pani P (2015) Estimation of soil erosion using RUSLE and GIS techniques: a case study of Barakar River basin, Jharkhand, India. Model Earth Syst Environ 1:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady NC, Weil RC (2008) The nature and properties of soils, 14th edn. Pearson Education Inc, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen T, Niu R, Li P, Zhang L, Du B (2011) Regional soil erosion risk mapping using RUSLE, GIS, and remote sensing: a case study in Miyun watershed, North China. Environ Earth Sci 63(3):533–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabral PP, Baithuri N, Pandey A (2008) Soil erosion assessment in a hilly catchment of north eastern India using USLE, GIS and remote sensing. Water Resour Manag 22:1783–1798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das N (1992) An investigation of soil characteristics of the Greater Guwahati landslide areas. Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, Assam Engineering College, Guwahati

  • De Roo AP, Wesseling CG, Ritsema CG (1996) LISEM: a single event physically-based hydrologic and soil erosion model for drainage basins. I: theory input and output. Hydrol Process 10(8):1107–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai R, Mahadevia D, Mishra A (2014) City profile: Guwahati (CUE Working Paper 24). Centre for Urban Equity (CUE), Ahmedabad. http://www.crdf.org.in/cue/saic/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/24CUEWP-24_City-Profile-Guwahati.pdf. Accessed 4 Nov 2016

  • Desmet PJJ, Govers G (1996) A GIS procedure for automatically calculating the USLE-LS factor on topographically complex landscape units. J Soil Water Conserv 51:427–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez C, Wu JQ, McCool DK, Stockle CO (2003) Estimating water erosion and sediment yield with GIS, RUSLE and SEDD. J Soil Water Conserv 58(3):128–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferro V, Porto P (2000) Sediment delivery distributed (SEDD) model. J Hydraul Eng 5(4):411–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Fistikoglu O, Harmancioglu NB (2002) Integration of GIS with USLE in assessment of soil erosion. Water Resour Manag 16:447–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster GR, McCool DK, Renard KG, Moldenhauer WC (1981) Conversion of the universal soil loss equation to SI metric units. J Soil Water Conserv 36(6):355–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganasri BP, Ramesh H (2016) Assessment of soil erosion by RUSLE model using remote sensing and GIS - a case study of Nethravathi Basin. Geosci Front 7(6):953–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelagay HS, Minale AS (2016) Soil loss estimation using GIS and remote sensing techniques: a case of Koga watershed, northwestern Ethiopia. Int Soil Water Conserv Res 4(2):126–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GMDA (2006) Building by-laws for Guwahati metropolitan area. Guwahati Metropolitan Development Authority, Guwahati

    Google Scholar 

  • Haith DA, Shoemaker LL (1987) Generalized watershed loading functions for stream nutrients. Water Resour Bull 23(3):471–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irvem A, Topaloglu F, Uygur V (2007) Estimating spatial distribution of soil loss over Seyhan River basin in Turkey. J Hydrol 336:30–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kothyari UC (1996) Erosion and sedimentation problems in India. IAHS Publications-Series of Proceedings and Reports-Intern Assoc Hydrological Sciences 236:531–540

  • Lim KJ, Sagong M, Engel BA, Tang Z, Choi J, Kim KS (2005) GIS-based sediment assessment tool. Catena 64:61–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore ID, Burch FJ (1986) Physical basis of the length-slope factor in the universal soil loss equation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50(5):1294–1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore ID, Wilson JP (1992) Length-slope factors for the revised universal soil loss equation: simplified method of estimation. J Soil Water Conserv 47:423–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RPC, Quinton JN, Smith RE, Govers G, Poesen JWA, Auerswald K, Chisci G, Torri D, Styczen ME (1998) The European soil Erosion model (EUROSEM): a dynamic approach for predicting sediment transport from fields and small catchments. Earth Surf Process Landf 23:527–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayana DVV, Babu R (1983) Estimation of soil loss in India. J Irrig Drain Eng 109(4):419–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nearing MA, Foster GR, Lane LJ, Finkner SC (1989) A process-based soil erosion model for USDA-water erosion prediction project technology. Trans ASAE 32:1587–1593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson EJ, Booth DB (2002) Sediment sources in an urbanizing, mixed land-use watershed. J Hydrol 264:51–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey A, Chowdary VM, Mal BC (2007) Identification of critical erosion prone areas in the small agricultural watershed using USLE, GIS and remote sensing. Water Resour Manag 21:729–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies GA, Porter JP (1991) RUSLE, revised universal soil loss equation. J Soil Water Conserv 46(1):30–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Renard K, Foster G, Weesies G, McDool D, Yoder, D (1997) Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). Agricultural Handbook No. 703

  • Sarma B (2011) Optimal ecological management practices for controlling sediment and water yield from a hilly urban system within sustainable limit. Dissertation, IIT Guwahati, Guwahati

  • Sarma AK, Chandramouli V, Singh B, Goswami P, Rajbongshi N (2005) Urban Flood Hazard Mitigation of Guwahati City by Silt monitoring and watershed modeling. Report submitted to Ministry of Human Resources Department (MHRD) by Dept. of Civil Engg., IIT Guwahati

  • Sarma B, Sarma AK, Singh VP (2013) Optimal ecological management practices (EMPs) for minimizing the impact of climate change and watershed degradation due to urbanization. Water Resour Manag 27(11):4069–4082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarma B, Sarma AK, Mahanta C, Singh VP (2015) Optimal ecological management practices for controlling sediment yield and peak discharge from hilly urban areas. J Hydrol Eng 20(10):04015005–1–04015005–14

  • Simanton JR, Osborn HB, Renard KG (1980) Application of the USLE to south western rangelands. Hydrol Water Resour Arizona SW 10:213–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh R, Phadke VS (2006) Assessing soil loss by water erosion in Jamni River basin, Bundelkhand region, India, adopting universal soil loss equation using GIS. Res Commun 90(10):1431–1435

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith HJ (1999) Application of empirical soil loss models in southern Africa: a review. S Afr J Plant Soil 16:158–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart BA, Woolhiser DA, Wischmeier WH, Caro JH, Frere MH (1976) Control of water pollution from cropland: volume I--a manual for guideline development. US Dept. of Agr. Agr. Res. Service, Report No. ARS-H-5-1

  • Williams JR (1975) Sediment routing for agricultural watersheds. Water Resour Bull 11:965–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JR, Jones CA, Dyke PT (1984) A modeling approach determining the relationship between erosion and soil productivity. Trans ASAE 27:129–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1961) A universal equation for predicting rainfall-erosion losses – an aid to conservation farming in humid regions. U.S. Dept of Agric, Agr Res Serv ARS Special Report 22–66

  • Zhang Y, Degroote J, Wolter C, Sugumaran R (2009) Integration of modified universal soil loss equation (MUSLE) into a GIS framework to assess soil Erosion risk. Land Degrad Dev 20(1):84–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sagarika Patowary.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patowary, S., Sarma, A.K. GIS-Based Estimation of Soil Loss from Hilly Urban Area Incorporating Hill Cut Factor into RUSLE. Water Resour Manage 32, 3535–3547 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2006-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2006-5

Keywords

Navigation