Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Estimation of Soil Erosion and Sediment Yield Using GIS at Catchment Scale

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A GIS-based method has been applied for the determination of soil erosion and sediment yield in a small watershed in Mun River basin, Thailand. The method involves spatial disintegration of the catchment into homogenous grid cells to capture the catchment heterogeneity. The gross soil erosion in each cell was calculated using Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) by carefully determining its various parameters. The concept of sediment delivery ratio is used to route surface erosion from each of the discritized cells to the catchment outlet. The process of sediment delivery from grid cells to the catchment outlet is represented by the topographical characteristics of the cells. The effect of DEM resolution on sediment yield is analyzed using two different resolutions of DEM. The spatial discretization of the catchment and derivation of the physical parameters related to erosion in the cell are performed through GIS techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Soufi R (2004) Soil erosion and sediment transport in the Mekong basin. In: Proc. of 2nd APHW conference, Singapore, pp 47–56

  • Bartsch KP, Mietgroet HV, Boettinger J, Dobrowolski JP (2002) Using empirical erosion models and GIS to determine erosion at Camp William, Utah. J Soil Water Conserv 57(1):29–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley DB, Huggins LF, Monke EJ (1980) ANSWERS: a model for watershed planning. Trans ASAE 23(4):938–944

    Google Scholar 

  • Beven KJ (1989) Changing ideas in hydrology: the case of physically-based models. J Hydrol 105:157–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beven KJ (1996) A discussion of distributed hydrological modeling. In: Abott MB, Refsgaard JC (eds) Distributed hydrological modeling. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 278–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazier RE, Beven KJ, Freer J, Rowan JS (2000) Equifinality and uncertainty in physically-based soil erosion models: application of the GLUE methodology to WEPP, the Water Erosion Prediction Project for sites in the UK and USA. Earth Surf Process Landf 25:825–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferro V (1997) Further remarks on a distributed approach to sediment delivery. Hydrol Sci J 42(5):633–647

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferro V, Minacapilli M (1995) Sediment delivery processes at basin scale. Hydrol Sci J 40(6):703–717

    Google Scholar 

  • Fistikoglu O, Harmancioglu NB (2002) Integration of GIS with USLE in assessment of soil erosion. Water Resour Manag 16:447–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grayson RB, Moore ID, McMahon TA (1992) Physically based hydrologic modelling 2: is the concept realistic? Water Resour Res 26(10):2659–2666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haan CT, Barfield BJ, Hayes JC (1994) Design hydrology and sedimentology for small catchments. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadley RF, Lal R, Onstad CA, Walling DE, Yair A (1985) Recent developments in erosion and sediment yield study. UNESCO (IHP), Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrissanthou V, Mylopoulos N, Tolikas D, Mylopoulos Y (2003) Simulation modeling of runoff, groundwater flow and sediment transport into Kastoria Lake, Greece. Water Resour Manag 17:223–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain MK, Kothyari UC (2001) Estimation of soil erosion and sediment yield using GIS. Hydrol Sci J 45(5):771–786

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain SK, Kumar S, Varghese J (2001) Estimation of soil erosion for a Himalayan watershed using a GIS technique. Water Resour Manag 15:41–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain SK, Singh P, Saraf AK, Seth SM (2003) Estimation of sediment yield for a rain, snow and glacier fed river in the Western Himalayan Region. Water Resour Manag 17:377–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kothyari UC, Jain SK (1997) Sediment yield estimation using GIS. Hydrol Sci J 42(6):833–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh WM ,Grossa JJ (1996) Environmental geography: science land use, and earth systems. Wiley, Toronto, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshringni HS, Cruise JF (1997) Sediment yield modeling by grouped response units. J Water Resour Plan Manage 123(2):95–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCool DK, Brown LC, Foster GR, Mutchler CK, Mayer LD (1987) Revised slope steepness factor for the Universal Soil Loss Equation. Trans ASAE 30:1387–1396

    Google Scholar 

  • McCool DK, Foster GR, Mutchler CK, Mayer LD (1989) Revised slope length factor for Universal Soil Loss Equation. Trans ASAE 32:1571–1576

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RPC (1995) Soil erosion and conservation. Longman, Essex, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RPC, Quinton JN, Smith RE, Govers G, Poesen JWA, Auerswald K, Chisci G, Torri D, Styczen ME (1998) The European soil erosion model (EUROSEM): a process-based approach for predicting sediment transport from fields and small catchments. Earth Surf Process Landf 23:527–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MRC – Mekong River Commission (2003) State of the basin report, Mekong River Commission, Phnom Penh

    Google Scholar 

  • Musgrave GW (1947) The quantitative evaluation of factors in water erosion – a first approximation. J Soil Water Conserv 2(3):133–138, 170

    Google Scholar 

  • Nearing MA, Foster GR, Lane LJ, Flinkener SC (1989) A process based soil erosion model for USDA water erosion prediction project technology. ASCE 32(5):1587–1593

    Google Scholar 

  • Onyando JO, Kisoyan P, Chemelil MC (2005) Estimation of potential soil erosion for River Perkerra catchment in Kenya. Water Resour Manag 19:133–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panday A, Chowdary VM, Mal BC (2006) Identification of critical erosion prone areas in the small agricultural watershed using USLE, GIS and remote sensing. Water Resour Manag DOI 10.1007/s11269-006-9061-z (in press)

  • Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies GA, Porter JP (1991) RUSLE, Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation. J Soil Water Conserv 46(1):30–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies GA, McCool DK, Yoder DC (1996) Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation, US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Services, Agricultural handbook, p 703

  • Rewarts CC, Engel BA (1991) ANSWERS on GRASS: Integrating a watershed simulation model with a GIS. In: Proc. of American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan, USA. (ASAE paper no. 91-2621)

  • Schwab GO, Frevert RK, Edminster TW, Barnes KK (1981) Soil and water conservation engineering, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • SCS – Soil Conservation Service (1975) Urban hydrology for small watersheds. Technical release no. 55, Soil Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan R, Engel BA (1994) A spatial decision support system for assessing agricultural non point source pollution. Water Resour Bull 30(3):441–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Suntaree Y (1993) A catalogue of water retention functions of major soil series of Thailand, Department of Soil Science. Kasetsart University, Thailand

    Google Scholar 

  • Walling DE (1983) The sediment delivery problem. J Hydrol 65:209–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walling DE (1988) Erosion and sediment yield research – some recent perspectives. J Hydrol 100:113–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JR (1975) Sediment routing for agricultural watersheds. Water Resour Bull 11:965–974

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams R, Berndt HD (1972) Sediment yield computed with universal equation. J Hydrau Div, ASCE 98(HY12):2087–2098

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams JR, Jones CA, Dyke PT (1984) A modeling approach determining the relationship between erosion and soil productivity. Trans ASAE 27:129–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1965) Predicting rainfall-erosion losses from cropland east of Rocky Mountains: guide for selection of practices for soil and water conservation. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural handbook 282

  • Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses – a guide to conservation planning. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural handbook 537

  • Woolhiser DA, Smith RE, Goodrich DC (1990) KINEROS, A kinematic runoff and erosion model: documentation and user manual. USDA-Agricultural Research Service, ARS-77, p 130

  • Yang D, Kanae S, Oki T, Koikel T, Musiake T (2003) Global potential soil erosion with reference to land use and climate change. Hydrol Process 17(14):2913–2928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young RA, Onstad CA, Bosch DD, Anderson WP (1987) AGNPS: an agricultural non point source pollution model. Conservation research report 35, US Dept. Agric. Res. Services, Washington, DC, USA

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1304 W. Pennsylvania Avenue, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA

    Rabin Bhattarai

  2. School of Applied Sciences and Engineering, Monash University, Monash, VIC, 3842, Australia

    Dushmata Dutta

Authors
  1. Rabin Bhattarai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dushmata Dutta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rabin Bhattarai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bhattarai, R., Dutta, D. Estimation of Soil Erosion and Sediment Yield Using GIS at Catchment Scale. Water Resour Manage 21, 1635–1647 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9118-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9118-z

Key words

Search

Navigation