Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Water Markets as Effective Tools of Managing Water Shortages in an Irrigation District

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, the efficiency of water markets in an irrigation district is put under consideration. This efficiency is referred to the private economic losses arising from a reduction in the availability of water, so the most efficient or optimal allocation will be the one that minimizes these losses or the one that provides the maximum private benefit. On this view, the optimal allocation has been studied in an irrigation community, and it has been compared with the rule of fixing a same quota and the proportional reduction. Besides, from the water allocation made by these last two rules, a water market has been simulated. Formulation for all of them is provided. Results show that water markets will improve the suboptimal allocation made by the rule of fixing a same quota and the proportional rule, even when transaction costs are high. They also show that, mostly, the greater the water restrictions, the greater are the gains from trade. It can be inferred too that, as long as all determinants have been taken into account and transaction costs are low enough, the aggregate losses of income ensuing from any prescribed water reduction will be the lowest both by means of the optimal allocation as with a market. Anyhow, results and conclusions clearly dependent on the relations made between allocations and crop yields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler JH (2009) Warming up to water markets. Regulation, winter 2008–2009: 14–17. CATO Institute

  • Alarcón J, Garrido A, Juana L (2014a) Optimal water allocation in shortage situations as applied to an irrigation community. J Irrig Drain Eng 140(3):04013015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alarcón J, Garrido A, Juana L (2014b) Managing irrigation water shortage: a comparison between five allocation rules based on crop benefit functions. Water Resour Manag 28:2315–2329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arriaza M, Gómez-Limón JA, Upton M (2002) Local water markets for irrigation in southern Spain: a multicriteria approach. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 46(1):21–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babel MS, Das Gupta A, Nayak DK (2005) A model for optimal allocation of water to competing demands. Water Resour Manag 19:693–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beare S, Heaney A, Mues C (2003) Water rights, transaction costs and policy reform. Abare Conference Paper 03.10

  • Benli B, Kodal S (2003) A non-linear model for farm optimization with adequate and limited water supplies: application to the South-East Anatolian Project (GAP) Region. Agric Water Manag 62:187–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanco-Gutiérrez I, Varela-Ortega C, Flichman G (2011) Cost-effectiveness of groundwater conservation measures: a multi-level analysis with policy implications. Agric Water Manag 98:639–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase RH (1960) The problem of social cost. J Law Econ 3:1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colby BG, McGinnis MA, Ken AR (1989) Procedural aspects of state water law: transferring water rights in the western states. Arizona Law Rev 31(4):697–720

    Google Scholar 

  • CRVRB (2013) Memorias anuales de la Comunidad de Regantes n° V de los Riegos de Bardenas: 2010, 2011, 2012 [In Spanish]. http://www.comunidadv.com/. Accessed 16 Aug 2013

  • Curie MM (1985) A distinct policy which forms a market within the California State Water Project. Water Resour Res 21(11):1717–1720

  • EEA (2012) Towards efficient use of water resources in Europe. European Environment Agency Report, No 1/2012

  • Fedra K (2015) River basin management: what do we really want? Environ Process 2(3):511–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franco A, Zhu X (2015) Water markets: insights from an applied general equilibrium model for extremadura, Spain. Water Resour Manag 29(12):4335–4356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrick D, Whitten SM, Coggan A (2013) Understanding the evolution and performance of water markets and allocation policy: a transaction costs analysis framework. Ecol Econ 88:195–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobierno de Aragón (2012) Anuario estadístico agrario de Aragón [In Spanish], Departamento de Agricultura y Alimentación, Gobierno de Aragón, Zaragoza (Spain)

  • Goetz RU, Martínez Y, Rodrigo J (2005) Eficiencia de las reglas de asignación de agua en el regadío: asignación a través de mercados, de la regla proporcional y de la regla uniforme. Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales 5(9):115–138 [In Spanish]

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafton RQ, Horne J, Wheeler SA (2016) On the marketisation of water: evidence from the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Water Resour Manag 30(3):913–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin RC, Peck DE, Maestu J (2013) Myths, principles and issues in water trading. In: Maestu J (ed) Water trading and global water scarcity: international experiences. RFF Press, Abingdon, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearne RR, Easter KW (1995) Water allocation and water markets: an analysis of gains-from-trade in Chile, Technical Paper Number 315, The World Bank, Washington, D.C

  • IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

  • Lee TR, Jouravlev AS (1998) Prices, property and markets in water allocation. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean, United Nations, Serie Medio Ambiente y Desarrollo n° 6, Santiago, Chile

  • Lu HW, Huang GH, Lin YP, He L (2009) A two-step infinite α-cuts fuzzy linear programming method in determination of optimal allocation strategies in agricultural irrigation systems. Water Resour Manag 23(11):2249–2269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maestu J (ed) (2013) Water trading and global water scarcity: international experiences. RFF Press, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin P, Williams J, Stone C (2008) Transaction costs and water reform: the devils hiding in the details. Cooperative Research Centre for Irrigation Futures. Technical Report No. 08/08

  • McCann L, Easter WK (2004) A framework for estimating the transaction costs of alternative mechanisms for water exchange and allocation. Water Resour Res 40, W09S09

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molle F, Berkoff J (2006) Cities versus agriculture: revisiting intersectoral water transfers, potential gains and conflicts. Comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture. Research Report 10, IWMI

  • Ortega JF, de Juan JA, Martín-Benito JM, López-Mata E (2004) MOPECO: an economic optimization model for irrigation water management. Irrig Sci 23(2):61–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poddar R, Qureshi ME, Shi T (2014) A comparison of water policies for sustainable irrigation management: the case of India and Australia. Water Resour Manag 28(4):1079–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pujol J, Berbel J, Ramírez F, Viaggi D, Raggi M (2006) Evaluation of markets for irrigation water in the internal river basins of Catalonia, Spain. Span J Agric Res 4(1):3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reca J, Roldán J, Alcaide M, López R, Camacho E (2001) Optimization model for water allocation in deficit irrigation systems, I. Description of the model. Agric Water Manag 48:103–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rico M, Gómez-Limón JA (2005) Los mercados de agua: análisis de los condicionantes para su correcto desarrollo en España. Estudios Agrosociales y Pesqueros 206:33–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadegh M, Kerachian R (2011) Water resources allocation using solution concepts of Fuzzy Cooperative Games: Fuzzy Least Core and Fuzzy Weak Least Core. Water Resour Manag 25:2543–2573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shangguan Z, Shao M, Horton R, Lei T, Qin L, Ma J (2002) A model for regional optimal allocation of irrigation water resources under deficit irrigation and its applications. Agric Water Manag 52:139–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava P, Singh RH (2015) Optimization of cropping pattern in a canal command area using Fuzzy Programming Approach. Water Resour Manag 29(12):4481–4500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Huang GH (2012) Identifying optimal water resources allocation strategies through an Interactive Multi-Stage Stochastic Fuzzy Programming Approach. Water Resour Manag 26:2015–2038

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ETS de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaria y de Biosistemas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain

    J. Alarcón

  2. Departamento de Ingeniería Agroforestal, ETS de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaria y de Biosistemas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain

    L. Juana

Authors
  1. J. Alarcón
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. Juana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Alarcón.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alarcón, J., Juana, L. The Water Markets as Effective Tools of Managing Water Shortages in an Irrigation District. Water Resour Manage 30, 2611–2625 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1296-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1296-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation