Abstract
The article analyzes how civil society is constructed in two Danish civil society strategies from 2010 to 2017, the governmental programmes of the governments in question and the role civil society plays in the proposed upcoming reform of the Danish public sector, the Cohesion Reform. The article approaches civil society from a Foucauldian perspective meaning that it on the one hand analyzes civil society as a transactional reality, something which does not exist as such, but must be continually produced as a given thing with certain values. On the other hand, it means analyzing civil society as a central part of a governmental rationality, or governmentality, which represents the natural movements of society and which government must respect and govern according to. This means that the natural, vital and originary processes of civil society becomes a measurement for good and right government in contradistinction to the artificial, cold and bureaucratic state and thereby posited as the rescuer of welfare society.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
All translations from Danish in this article are, unless otherwise stated, the author’s own.
For a more thorough breakdown of the relationship and development of the state-civil society/third sector/voluntary sector in Denmark, see Bundesen et al. (2001), Fridberg and Skov Henriksen (2014), Habermann and Ibsen (1998), Henriksen et al. (2012, pp. 465–72), Henriksen (2015), Henriksen and Bundesen (2004), Kaspersen and Ottesen (2006), La Cour (2014, pp. 109–32), Villadsen (2016). The following section draws on this work.
Bourdieu’s comments are originally about the state, but they are equally relevant for speaking about civil society.
When I speak of the Cohesion Reform here, I refer to the document outlining the ideas behind it (Finansministeriet and Regeringen 2017) published in April 2017, since the actual reform is only starting to be suggested and rolled out from the fall of 2018.
I use the notion ‘liberalist’ instead of ‘liberal’, because I want to invoke their adherence to liberalist ideology and distinguish it from the American notion of ‘liberal’ (meaning progressive). However, it is perhaps important to mention that over the last 20 years, the two biggest parties—Venstre and the Social Democrats—have converged on most central policy questions, why I have also distinguished between center-right and center-left governments.
It should be mentioned that attempts to de-bureaucratize the public sector has been a mainstay in Danish politics since the 1980s from both sides of the political spectrum (Finansministeriet 2018, p. 6).
One of the other components to rendering civil society a ‘transactional reality’ to Foucault is that the notion of civil society also opens up for a questioning of government by civil society, and civil society in this sense becomes a plane of reference not only for a state-centerd governmental rationality, but also for practices of civil society either critical of government or attempting to justify their own actions. The ‘transactional reality’ of civil society is thereby as much created by representatives of civil society as those of the state. However, the focus of this article is on the state centered governmental rationality.
References
Andersen, N. Å. (2008). Partnerships: Machines of possibility. Bristol: Policy Press.
Barry, A., Osborne, T., & Rose, N. (Eds.). (1996a). Introduction. Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of government (pp. 1–17). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Barry, A., Osborne, T., & Rose, N. (Eds.). (1996b). Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism, and rationalities of government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Blyth, M. (2015). Austerity: The history of a dangerous idea. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
Boje, T. P. (2015). Citizenship, democratic participation, and civil society. In Voluntary work and youth unemployment—contributions from the conference on VERSO (pp. 27–44). Department of Education (DPU), Aarhus University.
Bourdieu, P. (1994). Rethinking the state: Genesis and structure of the bureaucratic field. Sociological Theory, 12(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/202032.
Brandsen, T., Trommel, W., & Verschuere, B. (2017). The state and the reconstruction of civil society. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(4), 676–693. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852315592467.
Brandsen, T., Trommel, W. A., & Verschuere, B. (2014a). Manufacturing civil society: Principles, practices and effects. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Brandsen, T., Verschuere, B., & Trommel, W. (2014b). Manufacturing civil society: An introduction. Manufacturing civil society: Principles, practices and effects (pp. 1–14). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bundesen, P., Henriksen, L. S. & Jørgensen, A. (2001). Filantropi, selvhjælp og interesseorganisering: Frivillige organisationer i dansk socialpolitik 1849–1990'erne. Odense: Odense Universitetsforlag
Burchell, G. (1991). Peculiar interests: Civil society and governing “the system of natural liberty”. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 119–150). Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Burchell, G., Gordon, C., & Miller, P. (Eds.). (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cohen, J. L., & Arato, A. (1999). Civil society and political theory. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Crouch, C. (2011). The strange non-death of neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.
Dean, M., & Villadsen, K. (2016). State phobia and civil society: The political legacy of Michel Foucault. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Finansministeriet. (2017). Pressemeddelelse—Mai Mercado og Sophie Løhde nedsætter task force for civilsamfundet. Finansministeriet. Retrieved August 31, 2017, from https://www.fm.dk/nyheder/pressemeddelelser/2017/06/mai-mercado-og-sophie-loehde-nedsaetter-task-force-for-civilsamfundet.
Finansministeriet. (2018). Færre regler og mindre bureaukrati. København: Finansministeriet.
Finansministeriet, & Regeringen. (2017). Sammenhængsreform: borgeren først—en mere sammenhængende offentlig sektor. København: Finansministeriet.
Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.
Foucault, M. (2009). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–1978. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Foucault, M. (2010). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Frederiksen, M. (2015). Dangerous, commendable or compliant: How Nordic people think about volunteers as providers of public welfare services. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(5), 1739–1758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9578-y.
Fridberg, T., & Henriksen, L. S. (2014). Udviklingen i frivilligt arbejde 2004–2012. København: SFI - Det Nationale Forskningscenter for Velfærd.
Gordon, C. (1991). Governmental rationality: An introduction. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 1–51). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Greve, C. (2006). Public management reform in Denmark. Public Management Review, 8(1), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030500518956.
Habermann, U. Ibsenm, B. (1998). “Den frivillige sektor i Danmark - 150 års historisk udvikling”. In Frivilligt socialt arbejde i fremtidens velfærdssamfund, Udvalget om frivilligt socialt arbejde. København:Socialministeriet
Habermas, J. (2001). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Henriksen, L. S. (2015). Contradictions and controversies in Danish civil society discourse. In Voluntary work and youth unemployment—Contributions from the conference on VERSO (pp. 17–25). Department of Education (DPU), Aarhus University.
Henriksen, L. S., & Bundesen, P. (2004). The moving frontier in Denmark: Voluntary-state relationships since 1850. Journal of Social Policy, 33(4), 605–625. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279404008025.
Henriksen, L. S., Smith, S. R., & Zimmer, A. (2012). At the eve of convergence? Transformations of social service provision in Denmark, Germany, and the United States. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(2), 458–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-011-9221-5.
Henriksen, L. S., Smith, S. R., & Zimmer, A. (2015). Welfare mix and hybridity. Flexible adjustments to changed environments. Introduction to the special issue. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(5), 1591–1600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9622-y.
Jensen, H. G. (2012). Menneskekærlighedens værk: det danske civilsamfund før velfærdsstaten. København: CEPOS.
Jensen, N. R. (2015). Introduction: Voluntary work, unemployment, and the changing welfare state—In search of an alternative solution. In Voluntary work and youth unemployment—contributions from the conference on VERSO (pp. 5–16). Department of Education (DPU), Aarhus University, 2015.
Kaspersen, L. B., & Ottesen, L. (2006). Associationalism for 150 years and still alive and kicking: Some reflections on Danish civil society. In P. Hirst & V. Bader (Eds.), Associative democracy: The real third way (pp. 105–130). London: Frank Cass.
La Cour, A. (2014). Frivillighedens logik og dens politik: en analyse af den personrettede frivillige sociale indsats og statens frivillighedspolitik. Frederiksberg: Nyt fra Samfundsvidenskaberne.
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2014). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics (2nd ed.). London: Verso.
Lemke, T. (2000). Neoliberalismus, Staat und Selbsttechnologien. Ein kritischer Überblick über die governmentality studies. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 41(1), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-000-0003-8.
Økonomi- og Indennrigsministeriet, & Erhvervsministeriet. (2018). Konkurrenceudsættelse—den bedst muligeservice for pengene. København: Økonomi- og Indenrigsministeriet: Erhvervsministeriet.
Regeringen. (2010). Danmark 2020: viden, vækst, velstand, velfærd. København: Regeringen.
Regeringen. (2016). For et friere, rigere og mere trygt Danmark: regeringsgrundlag, Marienborgaftalen 2016. København: Regeringen.
Regeringen, & Børne- og Socialministeriet. (2017). Strategi for et stærkere civilsamfund. København: Regeringen, & Børne- og Socialministeriet.
Regeringen, & Finansministeriet. (2017). Fair og lige konkurrence. København: Regeringen, & Finansministeriet.
Regeringen, & Socialministeriet. (2010). National civilsamfundsstrategi: en styrket inddragelse af civilsamfundet og frivillige organisationer i den sociale indsats. København: Regeringen, & Socialministeriet.
Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rose, N., & Miller, P. (1992). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. The British Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 173–205. https://doi.org/10.2307/591464.
Saar, M. (2011). Relocating the modern state: Governmentality and the history of political ideas. In U. Bröckling, S. Krasmann, & T. Lemke (Eds.), Governmentality: Current issues and future challenges (pp. 34–55). New York: Routledge.
Sevelsted, A. L. (2017). Interpreting bonds and boundaries of obligation: A genealogy of the emergence and development of protestant voluntary social work in Denmark as shown through the cases of the Copenhagen Home Mission and the blue cross (1850–1950), Doctoral dissertation. Frederiksberg: Department of Business and Politics, Copenhagen Business School.
Verschuere, B., Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2012). Co-production: The state of the art in research and the future agenda. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(4), 1083–1101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9307-8.
Villadsen, K. (2016). Michel Foucault and the forces of civil society. Theory, Culture & Society, 33(3), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276415581895.
Villadsen, K., & Dean, M. (2012). State-phobia, civil society, and a certain vitalism. Constellations, 19(3), 401–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/cons.12006.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank the two reviewers of this article for very thorough comments and constructive criticism that has helped improve this article.
Funding
This study was funded by The Carlsberg Foundation, Semper Ardens research project CISTAS—Civil Society in the Shadow of the State (http://www.cistas.dk/).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jessen, M.H. Rescuing Welfare Society: Political Strategies for Mobilizing Civil Society in Denmark, 2010–2018. Voluntas 30, 369–380 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-00064-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-00064-6