Skip to main content
Log in

Semi-Supervised Deep Learning for Multi-Tissue Segmentation from Multi-Contrast MRI

  • Published:
Journal of Signal Processing Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Segmentation of thigh tissues (muscle, fat, inter-muscular adipose tissue (IMAT), bone, and bone marrow) from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans is useful for clinical and research investigations in various conditions such as aging, diabetes mellitus, obesity, metabolic syndrome, and their associated comorbidities. Towards a fully automated, robust, and precise quantification of thigh tissues, herein we designed a novel semi-supervised segmentation algorithm based on deep network architectures. Built upon Tiramisu segmentation engine, our proposed deep networks use variational and specially designed targeted dropouts for faster and robust convergence, and utilize multi-contrast MRI scans as input data. In our experiments, we have used 150 scans from 50 distinct subjects from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA). The proposed system made use of both labeled and unlabeled data with high efficacy for training, and outperformed the current state-of-the-art methods. In particular, dice scores of 97.52%, 94.61%, 80.14%, 95.93%, and 96.83% are achieved for muscle, fat, IMAT, bone, and bone marrow segmentation, respectively. Our results indicate that the proposed system can be useful for clinical research studies where volumetric and distributional tissue quantification is pivotal and labeling is a significant issue. To the best of our knowledge, the proposed system is the first attempt at multi-tissue segmentation using a single end-to-end semi-supervised deep learning framework for multi-contrast thigh MRI scans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data sets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the BLSA with research agreement [2].

References

  1. Goodpaster, B.H., Krishnaswami, S., Resnick, H., Kelley, D.E., Haggerty, C., Harris, T.B., Schwartz, A.V., Kritchevsky, S., & Newman, A.B. (2003). Association between regional adipose tissue distribution and both type 2 diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance in elderly men and women. Diabetes Care, 26(2), 372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. BLSA. (2009). Longitudinal study of muscle strength, quality, and adipose tissue infiltration. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 90(6), 1579. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.2009.28047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamrick, M.W., McGee-Lawrence, M.E., & Frechette, D.M. (2016). Fatty infiltration of skeletal muscle: mechanisms and comparisons with bone marrow adiposity. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 7, 69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Porter, M.M., Vandervoort, A.A., & Lexell, J. (1995). Aging of human muscle: structure, function and adaptability. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 5(3), 129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Loughran, T., Higgins, D.M., McCallum, M., Coombs, A., Straub, V., & Hollingsworth, K.G. (2015). Improving highly accelerated fat fraction measurements for clinical trials in muscular dystrophy: origin and quantitative effect of r2* changes. Radiology, 275(2), 570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gadermayr, M., Disch, C., Müller, M., Merhof, D., & Gess, B. (2018). A comprehensive study on automated muscle segmentation for assessing fat infiltration in neuromuscular diseases. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 48, 20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Morrow, J.M., Sinclair, C.D., Fischmann, A., Machado, P.M., Reilly, M.M., Yousry, T.A., Thornton, J.S., & Hanna, M.G. (2016). Mri biomarker assessment of neuromuscular disease progression: a prospective observational cohort study. The Lancet Neurology, 15(1), 65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mhuiris, Á.N., Volken, T., Elliott, J.M., Hoggarth, M., Samartzis, D., & Crawford, R.J. (2016). Reliability of quantifying the spatial distribution of fatty infiltration in lumbar paravertebral muscles using a new segmentation method for t1-weighted mri. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 17(1), 234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Díaz-Manera, J., Llauger, J., Gallardo, E., & Illa, I. (2015). Muscle mri in muscular dystrophies. Acta Myologica, 34(2-3), 95.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anwar, S.M., Majid, M., Qayyum, A., Awais, M., Alnowami, M., & Khan, M.K. (2018). Medical image analysis using convolutional neural networks: a review. Journal of Medical Systems, 42(11), 226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hussain, S., Anwar, S.M., & Majid, M. (2018). Segmentation of glioma tumors in brain using deep convolutional neural network. Neurocomputing, 282, 248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hussein, S., Kandel, P., Bolan, C.W., Wallace, M.B., & Bagci, U. (2019). Lung and pancreatic tumor characterization in the deep learning era: novel supervised and unsupervised learning approaches. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

  13. Gadermayr, M., Li, K., Müller, M., Truhn, D., Krämer, N., Merhof, D., & Gess, B. (2019). Domain-specific data augmentation for segmenting mr images of fatty infiltrated human thighs with neural networks. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

  14. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015). U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention (pp. 234–241): Springer.

  15. Bocchieri, A.E., Parekh, V.S., Wagner, K.R., Braverman, S.A.V., Leung, D.G., & Jacobs, M.A. (2019). Multiparametric deep learning tissue signatures for muscular dystrophy: Preliminary results.

  16. Makrogiannis, S., Fishbein, K.W., Moore, A., Spencer, R., & Ferrucci, L. (2016). Image-based tissue distribution modeling for skeletal muscle quality characterization. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 63(4), 805.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Irmakci, I., Hussein, S., Savran, A., Kalyani, R.R., Reiter, D., Chia, C.W., Fishbein, K., Spencer, R.G., Ferrucci, L., & Bagci, U. (2018). A novel extension to fuzzy connectivity for body composition analysis: Applications in thigh, brain, and whole body tissue segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

  18. Ferrucci, L. (2008). The baltimore longitudinal study of aging (blsa): a 50-year-long journey and plans for the future. Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 63(12), 1416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lugauer, F., Nickel, D., Wetzl, J., Kannengiesser, S.A., Maier, A., & Hornegger, J. (2015). Robust spectral denoising for water-fat separation in magnetic resonance imaging. In International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention (pp. 667–674): Springer.

  20. Tustison, N.J., Avants, B.B., Cook, P.A., Zheng, Y., Egan, A., Yushkevich, P.A., & Gee, J.C. (2010). N4itk: improved n3 bias correction. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 29(6), 1310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Aurich, V., & Weule, J. (1995). Non-linear gaussian filters performing edge preserving diffusion. In Mustererkennung 1995 (pp. 538–545): Springer.

  22. Nyúl, L.G., Udupa, J.K., & Zhang, X. (2000). New variants of a method of mri scale standardization. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 19(2), 143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jégou, S., Drozdzal, M., Vazquez, D., Romero, A., & Bengio, Y. (2017). The one hundred layers tiramisu: Fully convolutional densenets for semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops (pp. 11–19).

  24. Cheplygina, V., de Bruijne, M., & Pluim, J.P. (2019). Not-so-supervised: A survey of semi-supervised, multi-instance, and transfer learning in medical image analysis. Medical Image Analysis, 54, 280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2019.03.009. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361841518307588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Orgiu, S., Lafortuna, C.L., Rastelli, F., Cadioli, M., Falini, A., & Rizzo, G. (2016). Automatic muscle and fat segmentation in the thigh from t1-weighted mri. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 43 (3), 601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2014). Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15(1), 1929.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Neelakantan, A., Vilnis, L., Le, Q.V., Sutskever, I., Kaiser, L., Kurach, K., & Martens, J. (2015). Adding gradient noise improves learning for very deep networks, arXiv:1511.06807.

  28. Kingma, D.P., Salimans, T., & Welling, M. (2015). Variational dropout and the local reparameterization trick. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 2575–2583).

  29. Gomez, A.N., Zhang, I., Swersky, K., Gal, Y., & Hinton, G.E. (2019). Learning sparse networks using targeted dropout. arXiv:1905.13678.

  30. Huttenlocher, D.P., Klanderman, G.A., & Rucklidge, W.J. (1993). Comparing images using the hausdorff distance. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 15(9), 850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yao, J., Kovacs, W., Hsieh, N., Liu, C.Y., & Summers, R.M. (2017). Holistic segmentation of intermuscular adipose tissues on thigh mri. In MICCAI (pp. 737–745).

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the Baltimore Longitudinal Aging Study (BLAS) for providing the data set used in this study. We would also like to thank NVIDIA for donating a Titan X GPU for our experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

UB is the PI of the project as a part of the larger effort for creating Musculoskeletal AI in multiple institutes, agreed by the participating institutes’ PIs: MA, JE, CA, SJ, and DAT. SMA structured the overall experiments and discussions while II, SJ, and SMA ran the image analysis pipelines and deep learning experiments. UB, SJ, DAT, JE, MA, GZP, and SMA analyzed the results, and evaluated the clinical relevance, reproducibility, and feasibility of the proposed method(s). DAT and JE participated to the study as radiologists while CA and SJ contributed as MRI physicists. All authors wrote and edited the manuscript, and agreed on the content prior to submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulas Bagci.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anwar, S.M., Irmakci, I., Torigian, D.A. et al. Semi-Supervised Deep Learning for Multi-Tissue Segmentation from Multi-Contrast MRI. J Sign Process Syst 94, 497–510 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-020-01612-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-020-01612-4

Keywords

Navigation