Plant Ecology

, Volume 213, Issue 10, pp 1621–1632 | Cite as

Environmental correlates of tree species distributions vary among age classes in a northern temperate forest

Article

Abstract

Processes involved in the structuring of forest communities include: (1) ecological sorting, where species poorly suited to local conditions are subject to environmental filtering and competitive displacement; (2) disturbance, resulting in stochastic removal of individuals and reinitiating successional regimes and (3) dispersal limitation, inhibiting the infiltration of species into preferred sites. Temporal dynamics in these processes lead to difficulty inferring causal landscape–biota correlations. Complicating factors include potential for ontogenetic variation in habitat preferences among age classes, and inherent ambiguity regarding severity and coverage of historical disturbance events. Sorting species into age groups can provide relevant temporal information. Fundy National Park is a northern, mixed-temperate forest in Atlantic Canada (Acadian forest type), which was pervasively altered upon European settlement. Species frequency data for three tree age classes (saplings, juveniles and adults) in permanent sample plots (400 m2, n = 33) were compared to environmental data, including soil chemistry, understory light conditions, physiography and disturbance history using ordination and randomization techniques. Abiotic and disturbance-related predictors of species distributions differed among life stages. Specifically, in the adult stage, stand age was a critical predictor of distribution, whereas in younger age classes environmental variables such as nutrient availability and soil moisture and drainage were key drivers of distribution. It is concluded that older populations were increasingly less constrained by environmental conditions, suggesting that adult populations bear the legacy of stochastic landscape alteration, thus appearing randomly distributed along environmental gradients. As younger populations gradually expand in distribution, they are filtered into preferred conditions by ecological sorting. These findings indicate the importance of considering age-class effects and site history in further assessments of interactions between landscapes and flora.

Keywords

Canonical correspondence analysis Ecological sorting Disturbance legacy Life-history strategy Ontogenetic niche shift 

Supplementary material

11258_2012_117_MOESM1_ESM.doc (54 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 54 kb)

References

  1. Abadie JC, Machon N, Muratet A, Porcher E (2011) Landscape disturbance causes small-scale functional homogenization, but limited taxonomic homogenization, in plant communities. J Ecol 99:1134–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackerly DD (2003) Community assembly, niche conservatism and adaptive evolution in changing environments. Int J Plant Sci 164:S165–S185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baillie IC, Ashton PS, Court MN, Anderson JAR, Fitzpatrick EA, Tinsley J (1987) Site characteristics and the distribution of tree species in mixed dipterocarp forest on tertiary sediments in central Sarawak, Malaysia. J Trop Ecol 3:201–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baltzer JL, Thomas SC (2007a) Determinants of whole-plant light requirements in Bornean rain forest tree saplings. J Ecol 95:1208–1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baltzer JL, Thomas SC (2007b) Physiological and morphological correlates of whole-plant light compensation point in temperate deciduous tree seedlings. Oecologia 153:209–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bellemare J, Motzkin G, Foster DR (2002) Legacies of the agricultural past in the forested present: an assessment of historical land-use effects on rich mesic forests. J Biogeogr 29:1401–1420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bigelow SW, Canham CD (2002) Community organization of tree species along soil gradients in a northeastern USA forest. J Ecol 90:188–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Biswas SR, Mallik AU (2010) Disturbance effects on species diversity and functional diversity in riparian and upland plant communities. Ecology 91:28–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bush MB, Silman MR, McMichael C, Saatchi S (2008) Fire, climate change and biodiversity in Amazonia: a Late-Holocene perspective. Phil Trans R Soc B 363:1795–1802PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caspersen JP, Kobe RK (2001) Interspecific variation in sapling morality in relation to growth and soil moisture. Oikos 92:160–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chave J (2004) Neutral theory and community ecology. Ecol Lett 7:241–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chazdon RL (2003) Tropical forest recovery: legacies of human impact and natural disturbances. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 6:51–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen L, Mi X, Comita LS, Zhang L, Ren H, Ma K (2010) Community-level consequences of density dependence and habitat association in a subtropical broad-leaved forest. Ecol Lett 13:695–704PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chisholm RA, Lichstein JW (2009) Linking dispersal, immigration and scale in the neutral theory of biodiversity. Ecol Lett 12:1385–1393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Comita LS, Condit R, Hubbell SP (2007) Developmental changes in habitat associations of tropical trees. J Ecol 95:482–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Comita LS, Muller-Landau HC, Aguilar S, Hubbell SP (2010) Asymmetric density dependence shapes species abundances in a tropical tree community. Science 329:330–332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diaz-Ravina M, Acea MJ, Carballas T (1995) Seasonal changes in microbial biomass and nutrient flush in forest soils. Biol Fertil Soils 19:220–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eriksson S, Skanes H, Hammer M, Lonn M (2010) Current distribution of older and deciduous forests as legacies from historical use patterns in a Swedish boreal landscape (1725–2007). For Ecol Manage 260:1095–1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Foster DR (2002) Thoreau’s country: a historical–ecological perspective on conservation in the New England landscape. J Biogeogr 29:1537–1555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Friedman SK, Reich PB (2005) Regional legacies of logging: departure from presettlement forest conditions in northern Minnesota. Ecol Appl 15:726–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gilbert B, Lechowicz MJ (2004) Neutrality, niches, and dispersal in a temperate forest understory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:7651–7656PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grubb PJ (1977) Maintenance of species-richness in plant communities—importance of regeneration niche. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 52:107–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harms KE, Condit R, Hubbell S, Foster RB (2001) Habitat associations of trees and shrubs in a 50-ha neotropical forest plot. J Ecol 89:947–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. He FL, Duncan RP (2000) Density-dependent effects on tree survival in an old-growth Douglas fir forest. J Ecol 88:676–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Herault B, Honnay O (2007) Using life-history traits to achieve a functional classification of habitats. Appl Veg Sci 10:73–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Herault B, Bachelot B, Poorter L, Rossi B, Bongers F, Chave J, Timothy Paine CE, Wagner F, Baraloto C (2011) Functional traits shape ontogenetic growth trajectories of rain forest tree species. J Ecol 99:1431–1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hinsinger P, Plassard C, Tang C, Jaillard B (2003) Origins of root-mediated pH changes in the rhizosphere and their responses to environmental constraints: a review. Plant Soil 248:43–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hubbell SP (2005) Neutral theory in community ecology and the hypothesis of functional equivalence. Funct Ecol 19:166–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jackson DA (1993) Multivariate analysis of benthic invertebrate communities: the implication of choosing particular data standardizations, measures of association, and ordination methods. Hydrobiologia 268:9–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Janzen DH (1970) Herbivores and number of tree species in tropical forests. Am Naturalist 104:501–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kobe RK (1996) Intraspecific variation in sapling mortality and growth predicts geographic variation in forest composition. Ecol Monogr 66:181–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lai JS, Mi XC, Ren HB, Ma KP (2009) Species-habitat associations change in a subtropical forest of China. J Veg Sci 20:415–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Legendre P, Oksanen J, ter Braak JF (2011) Testing the signficance of canonical axes in redundancy analysis. Methods Ecol Evol 2:269–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lutz S (1996) Pre-European settlement and present forest composition in Kings County. University of New Brunswick, FrederictonGoogle Scholar
  35. Oliveira-Filho AT, Fontes AAL (2000) Patterns of floristic differentiation among Atlantic forests in southeastern Brazil and the influence of climate. Biotropica 32:793–810Google Scholar
  36. Oliveira-Filho AT, Vilela EA, Carvalho DA, Gavilanes ML (1994) Effects of soils and topography on the distribution of tree species in a tropical riverine forest in southeastern Brazil. J Trop Ecol 10:483–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Palmer MW (1993) Putting things in even better order—the advantages of canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 74:2215–2230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Paoli GD, Curran LM, Zak DR (2006) Soil nutrients and beta diversity in the Bornean Dipterocarpaceae: evidence for niche partitioning by tropical rain forest trees. J Ecol 94:157–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Paoli GD, Curran LM, Slik JW (2008) Soil nutrients affect spatial patterns of aboveground biomass and emergent tree density in southwestern Borneo. Oecologia 155:287–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Poorter L (2007) Are species adapted to their regeneration niche, adult niche, or both? Am Nat 169:433–442PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Qin X, Li G, Wang D, Liu R, Yang G, Feng Y, Ren G (2011) Determinism versus chance in canopy gap herbaceous species assemblages in temperate Abies-Betula forests. For Ecol Manage 262:1138–1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Quero JL, Gomez-Aparicio L, Zamora R, Maestre FT (2008) Shifts in the regeneration niche of an endangered tree (Acer opalus ssp granatense) during ontogeny: using an ecological concept for application. Basic Appl Ecol 9:635–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Russo SE, Davies SJ, King DA, Tan S (2005) Soil-related performance variation and distributions of tree species in a Bornean rain forest. J Ecol 93:879–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shipley B (2010) Community assembly, natural selection and maximum entropy models. Oikos 119:604–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shipley B, Vile D, Garnier E (2006) From plant traits to plant communities: a statistical mechanistic approach to biodiversity. Science 314:812–814PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sonnier G, Shipley B, Navas ML (2010) Plant traits, species pools and the prediction of relative abundance in plant communities: a maximum entropy approach. J Veg Sci 21:318–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Taylor SL, MacLean DA (2005) Rate and causes of decline of mature and overmature balsam fir and spruce stands in New Brunswick, Canada. Can J For Res 35:2479–2490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. ter Braak CJF (1986) Canonical Correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67:1167–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thomas SC (2010) Photosynthetic capacity peaks at intermediate size in temperate deciduous trees. Tree Physiol 30:555–573PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Webb CO, Peart DR (2000) Habitat associations of trees and seedlings in a Bornean rain forest. J Ecol 88:464–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wein RW, Elbayoumi MA, Dasilva J (1989) Simulated predictions of forest dynamics in Fundy National Park, Canada. For Ecol Manage 28:47–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biology DepartmentMount Allison UniversitySackvilleCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of ForestryUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Biology DepartmentWilfrid Laurier UniversityWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations