Abstract
While research on school suspensions and its impact on students is not new, scholars have not yet explored whether there is a link between school suspensions and high school students’ preparation for success in STEM. Using nationally representative data, this study explored the relationship of suspensions to math outcomes while considering race–gender intersections and school social control. Our findings confirm that both in and out-of-school suspensions significantly lower math achievement in high school even after controlling for a host of individual and school factors. More so, the effect of suspensions on math achievement persists over time. The analysis reveals that suspended students scored lower in math 2 years after the suspensions occurred after controlling for individual and school characteristics, and prior math achievement. The study also found an overrepresentation of racialized students among those suspended. The paper concludes with a discussion and implications for policies, practice and research.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The standardized score provides a norm referenced measurement of achievement, that is, an estimate of achievement relative to the population (spring 2002 10th graders) as a whole. The standardized score is a transformation of the ability score, rescaled to a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 (NCES 2004).
References
American Community Survey. (2011). Racial and Ethnic Representation in STEM Workforce. U.S. Census Bureau (ACS Report 2011).
Anyon, Y., Jenson, J., Altschul, I., Farrar, J., McQueen, J., Greer, E., et al. (2014). The persistent effect of race and the promise of alternatives to suspension in school discipline outcomes. Children and Youth Service Review,44, 379–386.
Arcia, E. (2006). Achievement and enrollment status of suspended students: Outcomes in a large, multicultural school district. Education and Urban Society,38(3), 359–369.
Baker, M., Sigmon, J., & Nugent, M. (2001). Truancy reduction: Keeping students in school. Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Department of Justice, Washington, DC. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. NCJ-188947 2001-09-00.
Barshay, J. (2016). U.S. now ranks near the bottom among 35 industrialized nations in math. The Hechinger Report. Math Achievement.
Beyers, J. (2011). Student dispositions with respect to mathematics: What current literature says. In D. Brahier & R. Speer (Eds.), Motivation and disposition: Pathways to learning, 73rd NCTM yearbook. Reston: NCTM.
Bidwel, A. (2015). STEM Workforce, No More Diverse than Fourteen Years Ago. U.S. News and World Report. Retrieved July 20, 2017 from https://www.usnews.com/news/stem-solutions/articles/2015/02/24/stem-workforce-no-more-diverse-than-14-years-ago.
Blad, E., & Corey, M. (2018). Black students bear uneven brunt of discipline, data show. New York: Education Week Spotlight.
Brewley-Kennedy, D. (2005). The struggles of incorporating equity into practice in a university mathematics methods course [Monograph No. 1]. The Mathematics Educator,8, 16–28.
Butts, Jeffrey A. (2000). Youth crime drop. Washington, DC: Urban Institute, Justice Policy Center.
Centers for Disease Control. (2008). School-associated student homicides—United States, 1992–2006. CDC Weekly,57(02), 33–36.
Christie, C., Nelson, C., & Jolivette, K. (2004). School characteristics related to the use of suspension. Education and Treatment of Children,27(4), 509–526.
Collins, P. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.
Contenbader, V., & Markson, S. (1998). School suspension: A study with secondary school students. Journal of School Psychology,36(1), 59–82.
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review,43(6), 1241–1299.
Crenshaw, K. W. (1993). Beyond racism and misogyny: Black feminism and 2 live Crew. In M. J. Matsuda, C. R. Lawrence III, R. Delgado, & K. Crenshaw (Eds.), Words that wound: Critical race theory, assaultive speech, and the first amendment (pp. 111–132). Boulder, Colorado: Westview.
Cuellar, A. E., & Markowitz, S. (2015). School suspension and the school-to-prison pipeline. International Review of Law and Economics,43, 98–106.
Davis, J., & Jordan, W. (1994). The effects of school context, structure, and experiences on African American males in middle and high schools. Journal of Negro Education,63(4), 570–587.
DeNisco, A. (2015). School suspensions widen achievement gap. District Administration Leadership Institute. Issue: November 2015 Report.
Durkheim, E., Schnurer, H., & Wilson, E. (1961). Moral education. A study in the theory and application of the sociology of education. New York, NY: Free Press.
Fields, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: SAGE.
Fox, J. A., & Burstein, H. (2010). Violence and security on campus: From preschool through college. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
Garland, David. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gonzalez, T. (2012). Keeping kids in schools: Restorative justice, punitive discipline, and the school to prison pipeline. Journal of Law & Education, 41(2), 281–335.
Gregory, A., Clawson, K., Davis, A., & Gerewitz, J. (2014). The promise of restorative practices to transform teacher–student relationships and achieve equity in school discipline. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation,25(1–29), 2015.
Gregory, A., Skiba, R. J., & Noguera, P. A. (2010). The achievement gap and the discipline gap: Two sides of the same coin? Educational Researcher,39, 59–68.
Hirschfield, P. (2008). Preparing for prison? The criminalization of school discipline in the USA. Theoretical Criminology,12(1), 79–101.
Hughes, E. C. (1946). Institutions. In A. M. C. Lee (Ed.), New outline of the principles of sociology (pp. 225–267). New York: Barnes & Noble.
Ingels, S., Pratt, D., Wilson, D., Burns, L., Currivan, D., Rogers, R., et al. (2007). Education longitudinal study of 2002 (ELS:2002) base-year to second follow-up data file documentation. Washington: National Center for Education Statistics.
Jabbari, J., & Johnson, Jr., O. (Forthcoming). The collateral damage of in-school suspensions: A counterfactual analysis of high-suspension schools, math achievement and college attendance.
Janowitz, M. (1975). Sociological theory and social control. American Journal of Sociology,81(July), 82–108.
Jenkins, P. (1997). School delinquency and the school social bond. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency,34, 337–367.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
Kupchik, A. (2010). Homeroom security: School discipline in and age of fear. New York: New York University Press.
Lacoe, J., & Steinberg, M. (2018). Do suspensions affect student outcomes? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,41, 34–62.
Liu, X., & Koirala, H. (2009). The effect of mathematics self-efficacy on mathematics achievement of high school students. In North eastern educational conference proceeding 2009.
Losen, D. (2011). Discipline policies, successful schools, and racial justice. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center.
Losen, D. (2018). Disabling punishment: The need for remedies to the disparate loss of instruction experienced by black students with disabilities. UCLA: Civil Rights Project.
Losen, D., & Gillespie, J. (2012). Opportunities suspended: The disparate impact of disciplinary exclusion from school. Los Angeles: The Civil Rights Project.
Losen, D., Hodson, C., Keith, M. A., II, Morrison, K., & Belway, S. (2015). Are we closing the school discipline gap?. UCLA: Civil Rights Project.
Martin, D. (2009). Researching race in mathematics education. Teachers College Record,111(2), 295–338.
Martin, J., & Smith, J. (2017). Subjective discipline and the social control of black girls in pipeline schools. Journal of Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research,13(3–72), 2017.
Matthews, M., & Loftus, M. (2014). Survival course. Prism: American Society for Engineering Education, 23(8).
McGee, E. (2013). High-achieving black students, biculturalism, and out-of-school STEM learning experiences: Exploring some unintended consequences. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education,6(2), 20–41.
McGee, E. O., & Pearman, F. (2015). Understanding black male mathematics high achievers from the inside out: Internal risk and protective factors in high school. Urban Review,47(3), 513–540.
McLeod, D. (1992). Research on affect in mathematics education: A reconceptualization. In G. Douglas (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 575–596). Reston, Va: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Mizel, M. L., Miles, J. N. V., Pedersen, E. R., Tucker, J. S., Ewing, B. A., & D'Amico, E. J. (2016). To educate or to incarcerate: Factors in disproportionality in school discipline. Children and Youth Services Review,70, 102–111.
Morris, M. W. (2016). Pushout: The criminalization of black girls in schools. New York, NY: The New Press.
Morris, E., & Perry, B. (2016). The punishment gap: School suspensions and racial disparities in educations. Social Problem,63, 68–86.
Morrison, G., & Skiba, R. (2001). Predicting violence from school misbehavior: Promises and perils. Psychology in the Schools, 38(2), 173–184.
National Research Council. (2006). Learning progressions. In R. A. Duschl, H. A. Schweingruber, & A. W. Shouse (Eds.), Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Science Foundation. (2013). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2013. Washington, DC: National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences.
National Science Foundation. (2016). Women and Minorities in the S&E Workforce. Science and Engineering Indicators 2016 (NSB-2016-1) Digest (NSB-2016-2) January 2016. Arlington, VA: National Science Board, National Center for Science & Engineering Statistics.
National Science Foundation. (2017). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences. 2017 NSF 17-310.
National Science Foundation. (2018). Students learning in mathematics and science. Science and engineering indicators 2018. Washington, DC: National Science Board.
NCES. (2004). ELS:2002 Sample Design, Weights, Variance, and Missing Data. Educational Longitudinal Study of 2002. Washington D.C.: National Center for Educational Statistics.
Nichols, P. (2010). What is a learning progression? Test, Measurement and Research Services Bulletin, Issue 12 February 2010. Pearson Education, Inc. Retrieved July 9, 2018 from https://images.pearsonassessments.com/images/tmrs/tmrs_rg/Bulletin_12.pdf?WT.mc_id=TMRS_Bulletin_12_What_is_a_learning_progression.
Noguera, P. A. (2003). Schools, prisons, and social implications of punishment: Rethinking disciplinary practices. Theory into Practice,42(4), 341–350.
President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). (2010). Prepare and inspire: K-12 education in STEM for America’s future. Retrieved November 3, 2018 from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-stemed-report.pdf.
Perry, B., & Morris, E. (2014). Suspending progress: Collateral consequences of exclusionary punishment in public schools. American Sociological Review,79, 1067–1087.
Raffaele Mendez, L. M. (2003). Predictors of suspension and negative school outcomes: A longitudinal investigation. New Directions for Youth Development,2003(99), 17–33.
Ramey, D. M. (2015). The social structure of criminalized and medicalized school discipline. Sociology of Education,88(3), 181–201.
Rausch, M., & Skiba, R. (2004). Unplanned outcomes: suspensions and expulsions in Indiana. Bloomington: Indiana University, Center for Evaluation and Education Policy.
Rausch, M., & Skiba, R. (2005). The academic cost of discipline. The relationship between suspensions/expulsion and school achievement. In A paper presented at the annual meeting of the american educational research association, Montreal, Canada. April 2005.
Reed, R. J., & Oppong, N. (2005). Looking critically at teachers’ attention to equity in their classrooms. [Monograph No. 1]. The Mathematics Educator,2005, 2–15.
Reeves, R., & Halikias, D. (2017). Race gaps highlight inequality., Social mobility papers Washinghton: Brookings Institute.
Robers, S., Kemp, J., Rathbun, A., Morgan, R., & Snyder, T. (2014). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2013. Washington: National Center for Educational Statistics, U.S Department of Education.
Rocque, M., & Paternoster, R. (2011). Understanding the antecedents of the school-to-jail link: The relationship between race and school discipline. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology,101(2), 633–666.
Shollenberger, T. L. (2015). Racial disparities in school suspension and subsequent outcomes: Evidence from the national longitudinal survey of youth. In D. J. Losen (Ed.), Closing the school discipline gap: Equitable remedies for excessive exclusion (pp. 31–43). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Simon, Jonathan. (2007). Governing through crime: How the war on crime transformed American Democracy and created a culture of fear. New York: Oxford University Press.
Skiba, R., Michael, R., Nardo, A., & Peterson, R. (2002). The color of discipline: Sources of racial and gender disproportionality in school punishment. Urban Review,34, 317–342.
Skiba, R. J., & Rausch, M. K. (2004). The relationship between achievement, discipline, and race: An analysis of factors predicting ISTEP scores. Bloomington, IN: Center for Evaluation and Education Policy.
Skiba, R., Simmons, A., Staudinger, L., Rausch, M., Dow, G., & Feggins, R. (2003). Consistent removal: Contributions of School discipline to the school-prison pipeline. In: School to prison pipeline conference, Boston, MA.
States, J., Detrich, R., & Keyworth, R. (2015). School suspension and student outcomes. Oakland, CA: The Wing Institute. Retrieved March 10, 2018 from https://www.winginstitute.org/does-suspension-impact-student.
Sumner, M., Silverman, C., & Frampton, M. L. (2010). School-based restorative justice as an alternative to zero-tolerance policies: Lessons from West Oakland. Retrieved from Thelton E: Henderson Center for Social Justice, University of California, Berkeley.
U.S. Department of Education. (2014). Civil rights data collection: School discipline. Issue Brief No.1 March 2014.
U.S. Department of Education. (2018). 2015–2016 data collection: School climate and safety. News Release for 2018.
Watanabe, T. (2013). L.A. unified bans suspension for “willful defiance”. El Segundo: Los Angeles Times.
Welch, K., & Payne, A. (2010). Racial threats and punitive school discipline. Social Problems,57, 25–48.
Funding
Work on this paper has been funded by the National Science Foundation (#1619843).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ibrahim, H., Johnson, O. School Discipline, Race–Gender and STEM Readiness: A Hierarchical Analysis of the Impact of School Discipline on Math Achievement in High School. Urban Rev 52, 75–99 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-019-00513-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-019-00513-6