Skip to main content
Log in

Nitrogen availability and denitrification in urban agriculture and regreened vacant lots

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many cities demolish abandoned homes and create regreened vacant lots (RVLs), and an increasingly popular, high-intensity use of RVLs is as urban agriculture (UA) sites. UA may potentially result in higher nitrogen (N) runoff to aquatic ecosystems, but this potential has not been quantified. We examined the role that varying land reuse intensity plays in determining potential for N export via runoff or leaching, focusing on soil N availability and N removal capacity via denitrification. We contrasted three levels of land use intensity for vacant parcels: intact vacant properties, turfgrass RVLs, and regreened UA lots in Buffalo, NY. We examined soil N and C availability, denitrification potential, and isotopic evidence of denitrification. Land use intensity only affected soil properties in surficial soil horizons. Total N was 2.5x higher in UA soils (mean = 0.51%) than non-UA (mean = 0.21%). Soil nitrate was 2.6x higher in winter (mean = 12.4 µg NO3-N g−1) than summer (mean = 4.7 µg NO3-N g−1) and was generally higher in UA soils. Despite higher soil N availability at UA sites, there were no differences in denitrification potential between UA and non-UA sites (mean = 620 ng N g soil−1 h−1). Isotopic evidence further confirms that denitrification was not a major sink of N. As UA had high N availability compared to non-UA sites and low rates of denitrification, UA has potential for runoff-driven N export, particularly of organic N, though lower nitrate concentrations than values typical for conventional agricultural soils make nitrate leaching less of a concern by comparison.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data is provided within the supplementary information files.

Works cited

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank our community partners PUSH Buffalo, the Massachusetts Avenue Project, Common Roots Farm, and Heather Connor for sharing knowledge and access to sites. We also thank Fiona Ellsworth, Michael McDonald, Derek Zurenda, and Riley Jones for their help with field and lab work. This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Geological Survey under Grant/Cooperative Agreement No. G21AP10626-01 through the New York State Water Resources Institute. This work was also partially supported by NSF/Geological Society of America Graduate Student Geoscience Grant # 13221-21, which is funded by National Science Foundation Award # 1949901.

Funding

This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Geological Survey under Grant/Cooperative Agreement No. G21AP10626-01. This work was also partially supported by NSF/Geological Society of America Graduate Student Geoscience Grant # 13221-21, which is funded by National Science Foundation Award # 1949901.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Both authors contributed to the study conception and design. Data collection, analysis, and the first draft of the manuscript were completed by Philip Conrad. Both authors contributed to the final draft of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard E. Marinos.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Conrad, P.E., Marinos, R.E. Nitrogen availability and denitrification in urban agriculture and regreened vacant lots. Urban Ecosyst (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-024-01532-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-024-01532-2

Keywords

Navigation