Arbuckle, J. L. (2006). Amos 7.0 user’s guide. Chicago: SPSS.
Google Scholar
Barrows, H. S. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. In W. H. Gijselaers (Ed.), New directions for teaching and learning (Vol. 68, pp. 3–11). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Beishuizen, J., Stoutjesdijk, E., & Van Putten, K. (1994). Studying textbooks: Effects of learning styles, study task, and instruction. Learning and Instruction,
4, 151–174.
Article
Google Scholar
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fix indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,
107, 238–246.
Article
Google Scholar
Block, S. D. (1996). Using problem-based learning to enhance the psychosocial competence of medical students. Academic Psychiatry,
20, 65–75.
Google Scholar
Boyle, E. A., Duffy, T., & Dunleavy, K. (2003). Learning styles and academic outcome: The validity and utility of Vermunt’s inventory of learning styles in a British higher education setting. British Journal of Educational Psychology,
73, 267–290.
Article
Google Scholar
Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Cantwell, R. H., & Moore, P. J. (1996). The development of measures of individual differences in self-regulatory control and their relationship to academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology,
21, 500–517.
Article
Google Scholar
Clarebout, G., Elen, J., Leonard, R., & Lowyck, J. (2007). Assessing instructional conceptions: A task-based approach. Educational Research and Evaluation,
13, 109–125.
Article
Google Scholar
Crawford, K., Gordon, S., Nicholas, J., & Prosser, M. (1994). Conceptions of mathematics and how it is learned: The perspectives of students entering university. Learning and Instruction,
4, 331–345.
Article
Google Scholar
Dart, B. C., Burnett, P. C., Purdie, N., Boulton-Lewis, G., Campbell, J., & Smith, D. (2000). Students’ conceptions of learning, the classroom environment, and approaches to learning. Journal of Educational Research,
93, 262–270.
Google Scholar
Driscoll, M. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Google Scholar
Duke, M., Forbes, H., Hunter, S., & Prosser, M. (1998). Problem-based learning (PBL): Conceptions and approaches of undergraduate students of nursing. Advances in Health Sciences Education,
3, 59–70.
Article
Google Scholar
Entwistle, N. J., & Peterson, E. R. (2004). Conceptions of learning and knowledge in higher education: Relationships with study behaviour and influences of learning environments. International Journal of Educational research,
41, 407–428.
Article
Google Scholar
Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling,
6, 56–83.
Google Scholar
Ferla, J., Valcke, M., & Schuyten, G. (2008). Relationships between student cognitions and their effects on study strategies. Learning and Individual Differences,
18, 271–278.
Article
Google Scholar
Gijbels, D., van de Watering, G., Dochy, F., & van den Bossche, P. (2006). New learning environments and constructivism: The students’ perspective. Instructional Science,
34, 213–226.
Article
Google Scholar
Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent systems. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future—a Festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog (pp. 195–216). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
Google Scholar
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review,
16, 235–266.
Article
Google Scholar
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling,
6, 1–55.
Google Scholar
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Kuhn, D. (2007). Is direct instruction an answer to the right question? Educational Psychologist,
42, 109–113.
Google Scholar
Lowyck, J., Elen, J., & Clarebout, G. (2004). Instructional conceptions: A prospective analysis. International Journal of Educational Research,
41, 429–444.
Article
Google Scholar
Loyens, S. M. M., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Schmidt, H. G. (2007a). Students’ conceptions of distinct constructivist assumptions. European Journal of Psychology of Education,
12, 179–199.
Article
Google Scholar
Loyens, S. M. M., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Schmidt, H. G. (2007b). The impact of students’ conceptions of constructivist assumptions on academic achievement and dropout. Studies in Higher Education,
32, 581–602.
Article
Google Scholar
Marshall, H. H. (Ed.). (1992). Redefining student learning: Roots of educational change. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Google Scholar
Marton, F., Dall’Alba, G., & Beaty, E. (1993). Conceptions of learning. International Journal of Educational Research,
19, 277–300.
Google Scholar
McLean, M. (2001). Can we relate conceptions of learning to student academic achievement? Teaching in Higher Education,
6, 399–413.
Article
Google Scholar
Norman, G. R., & Schmidt, H. G. (1992). The psychological basis of problem-based learning: A review of the evidence. Academic Medicine,
67, 557–565.
Article
Google Scholar
Pintrich, P. R., & de Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology,
82, 33–40.
Article
Google Scholar
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (1996). Motivation in Education. Theory, research, and applications. Englewoods Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Google Scholar
Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 250–284). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Google Scholar
Purdie, N., Hattie, J., & Douglas, G. (1996). Student conceptions of learning and their use of self-regulated learning strategies: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Educational Psychology,
88, 87–100.
Article
Google Scholar
Schmidt, H. G. (1983). Problem-based learning: Rationale and description. Medical Education,
17, 11–16.
Article
Google Scholar
Schraw, G., Bendixen, L. D., & Dunkle, M. E. (2002). Development and validation of the Epistemic Belief Inventory (EBI). In P. R. Pintrich & B. K. Hofer (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 261–275). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Google Scholar
Steffe, L. P., & Gale, J. E. (1995). Constructivism in education. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research,
25, 173–180.
Article
Google Scholar
Tenenbaum, G., Naidu, S., Jegede, O., & Austin, J. (2001). Constructivist pedagogy in conventional on-campus and distance learning practice: An exploratory investigation. Learning and Instruction,
11, 87–111.
Article
Google Scholar
Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika,
38, 1–10.
Article
Google Scholar
Van Rossum, E. J., & Schenk, S. M. (1984). The relationship between learning conception, study strategy and learning outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology,
54, 73–83.
Google Scholar
VanZile-Tamsen, C., & Livingston, J. A. (1999). The differential impact of motivation on the self-regulated strategy use of high- and low-achieving college students. Journal of College Student Development,
40, 54–60.
Google Scholar
Vermetten, Y. J., Lodewijks, H. G., & Vermunt, J. D. (1999). Een structureel model over de relaties tussen leeropvattingen, regulatie en cognitieve verwerking [A structural model of the relationships among learning conceptions, regulation, and cognitive processing]. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch,
24, 8–20.
Google Scholar
Vermunt, J. D. H. M. (1992). Leerstijlen en sturen van leerprocessen in het hoger onderwijs – naar procesgerichte instructie in zelfstandig denken [Learning styles and regulation of learning in higher education – towards process-oriented instruction in autonomous thinking]. Amsterdam/Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Google Scholar
Vermunt, J. D. (1996). Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies, a phenomenographic analysis. Higher Education,
17, 647–682.
Article
Google Scholar
Vermunt, J. D. (1998). The regulation of constructive learning processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology,
68, 149–171.
Google Scholar
Vermunt, J. D. (2007). The power of teaching-learning environments to influence student learning. In P. Tomlinson & N. Entwistle (Eds.), Student learning and university teaching (pp. 73–90). Leicester, England: British Psychological Society.
Google Scholar
Vermunt, J. D., & Vermetten, Y. J. (2004). Patterns in student learning: Relationships between learning strategies, conceptions of learning, and learning orientations. Educational Psychology Review,
16, 359–384.
Google Scholar
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., & Pintrich, P. R. (1996). Development between the ages of 11 and 25. In R. C. Calfee & D. C. Berliner (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 148–185). New York: Macmillan.
Google Scholar
Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research,
72, 131–175.
Article
Google Scholar
Winne, P. H. (1995). Self-regulation is ubiquitous but its forms may vary with knowledge. Educational Psychologist,
30, 217–221.
Article
Google Scholar