Abstract
Tetraploid plants of Antirrhinum majus L. were obtained from the seeds of the F1 variety ‘Maryland True Pink’ by amiprophos-methyl (APM) treatment and subsequent in vitro culture. Seeds were treated with 0, 10 and 20 mgl−1 APM for 1, 3, or 7 d (day) with or without osmopriming. Overall, the seedlings established from the seeds treated with 10 or 20 mgl−1 APM for 3–7 d exhibited malformation with rudimentary roots and swollen hypocotyls that eventually produced adventitious shoots. The highest adventitious shoot formation frequency reached 71.6% in non-primed seeds treated with 10 mgl−1 APM for 7 d; this decreased to 54.4% in osmoprimed seeds that received the same APM treatment. The plantlets from the adventitious shoots were identified as tetraploids at frequencies of 51.4% and 90.4%, respectively. Tetraploid frequency increased with higher concentration and/or longer duration of APM treatment and ranged from 0 to 65.9% in the non-primed seeds and 10.3% to 100% in the osmoprimed seeds. Osmopriming of seeds accelerated the induction of tetraploids by APM treatment at the same concentration and duration by 10.3–39.0%, except in the case of treatment with 20 mgl−1 APM for 3 d treatment. In the osmoprimed seeds treated with 20 mgl−1 APM for 7 d, all the plantlets from the adventitious shoots were revealed to be tetraploids. This study revealed that APM has dual effects, namely the inhibitory effect on the growth of seedlings and the stimulatory effect on the induction of adventitious shoots on the hypocotyl of seedlings.
Key message
APM induced adventitious shoots on the hypocotyl of seedling by seed treatment and the induced-adventitious shoots were identified to be tetraploids. Osmopriming accelerated the frequency of tetraploid induction.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aina O, Quesenberry K, Gallo M (2012) In vitro induction of tetraploids in Arachis paraguariensis. Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult 111(2):231–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-012-0191-0
Bino RJ, Bergervoet JHW, De Vos CHR, Kraak HL, Lanteri S, Van Der Burg WJ, Zheng XY (1996) Comparison of nuclear replication activity and protein expression patterns during tomato seed germination. Field Crops Research 45:71–77
Bino RJ, De Vries JN, Kraak HL, Van Pijlen JG (1992) Flow cytometric determination of nuclear replication stages in tomato seeds during priming and germination. Ann Bot 69(3):231–236. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a088335
Bray CM (1995) Biochemical processes during the osmopriming of seeds. In: Kigel J, Galili G (eds) Seed development and germination. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, pp 767–789
Busse JS, Figueroa-Cabanas M, Stimart DP (2005) Developmental anatomy of adventitious shoot formation on snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus L.) hypocotyls in vitro. J Am Soc for Horticultural Science 130(2):147–151. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.130.2.147
Chen CH, Goeden-Kallemeyn YC (1979) In vitro induction of tetraploid plants from colchicine-treated diploid daylily callus. Euphytica 28(3):705–709. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00038937
Cui M, Takayanagi K, Handa T (2004) High frequency of shoot regeneration from hypocotyls and stem segments of Antirrhinum majus (Snapdragon). Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult 78:51–53
de Castro RD, van Lammeren AAM, Groot SPC, Bino RJ, Hilhorst HWM (2000) Cell division and subsequent radicle protrusion in tomato seeds are inhibited by osmotic stress but DNA synthesis and formation of microtubular cytoskeleton are not. Plant Physiol 122(2):327–335
Dewey DR (1980) Some applications and misapplications of induced polyploid to plant breeding. In: Lewis WH (ed) Polyploidy: biological relevance. Basic Life Sciences 13. Plenum, New York, pp 445–470
Dudley JW (1963) Basic problems in quantitative genetics of autotetraploids. In: Hanson WD and Robinson HF (ed) Statistical genetics and plant breeding: a symposium and workshop sponsored by the committee of plant breeding and genetics of the agricultural board at the North Carolina state college, Raleigh, N.C. National academy of science, Washington D.C.pp 519–520
Eeckhaut T, Samyn G, Van Bockstaele E (2002) In vitro polyploidy induction Rhododendron simsii hybrids. Acta Hort 572:43–49. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.572.4
El-Araby MM, Moustafa SMA, Ismail AI, Hegazi AZA (2006) Hormone and phenol levels during germination and osmopriming of tomato seeds, and associated variations in protein patterns and anatomical seed features. Acta Agron Hung 54(4):441–457. https://doi.org/10.1556/AAgr.54.2006.4.7
Falconer MM, Seagull RW (1987) Amiprophos-methyl (APM): A rapid, reversible, anti-microtuble agent for plant cell cultures. Protoplasma 136:118–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01276360
Fujikura Y, Karssen CM (1992) Effects of controlled deterioration and osmopriming on protein synthesis of cauliflower seeds during early germination. Seed Science Research 2(1):23–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960258500001070
Gallardo K, Job C, Groot SPC, Puype M, Demol H, Vandekerckhove J, Job D (2001) Proteomic analysis of Arabidopsis seed germination and priming. Plant Physiol 126(2):835–848. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.126.2.835
Griffin AR, Chi NQ, Harbard JL, Son DH, Harwood CE, Price A, Vuong TD, Koutoulis A, Thinh HH (2015) Breeding polyploid varieties of tropical acacias: progress and prospects. Southern Forests: a Journal of Forest Science 77(1):41–50. https://doi.org/10.2989/20702620.2014.999303
Hansen AL, Gertz A, Joersbo M, Andersen SB (1998) Antimicrotubule herbicides for in vitro chromosome doubling in Beta vulgaris L ovule culture. Euphytica 101(2):231–237. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018380103304
Hansen AL, Gertz A, Joersbo M, Andersen SB (2000) Chromosome doubling in vitro with amiprophos-methyl in Beta vulgaris ovule culture. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B, Soil and Plant Science 50(2):89–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710050505035
Kamada H, Ishikawa K, Saga H, Harada H (1993) Induction of somatic embryogenesis in carrot by osmotic stress. Plant Tissue Cult Lett 10(1):38–44
Kamada H, Tachikawa Y, Saitou T, Harada H (1994) Heat stress somatic induction of carrot embryogenesis. Plant Tissue Culture Letters 11(3):229–232
Kermani MJ, Sarasan V, Roberts AV, Yokoya K, Wentworth J, Sieber VK (2003) Oryzalin-induced chromosome doubling in Rosa and its effect on plant morphology and pollen viability. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107(7):1195–1200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-003-1374-1
Khosravi P, Jafarkhani M, Ali G, Mohammad N, Bihamta R (2008) Role of mitotic inhibitors and genotype on chromosome doubling of Rosa. Euphytica 160:267–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9571-7
Kiyosue T, Kamada H, Harada H (1989) Induction of somatic embryogenesis from carrot seeds by hypochlorite treatment. Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult 6(3):138–143
Kiyosue T, Takano K, Kamada H, Harada H (1990) Induction of somatic embryogenesis in carrot by heavy metal ions. Can J Bot 68(10):2301–2303. https://doi.org/10.1139/b90-293
Kondo H, Phlaetita W, Mii M, Kikuchi S, Deguchi A, Miyoshi K (2020) Efficient chromosome doubling of an interspecific hybrid Dendrobium Stardust ‘Fire Bird’ by treatment of amiprofos-methyl to PLBs. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology-Plant, In print
Laere KV, Franc SC, Vansteenkiste H, Huylenbroeck JV, Steppe K, Labeke M (2011) Influence of ploidy level on morphology, growth and drought susceptibility in Spathiphyllum wallisii. Acta Physiol Plant 33:1149–1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-010-0643-2
Lanteri S, Kraak HL, De Vos CHR, Bino RJ (1993) Effects of osmotic preconditioning on nuclear replication activity in seeds of pepper (Capsicum annuum). Physiol Plant 89(3):33–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1993.tb05195
Mitrofanova IV, Zilbervarg IR, Yemets AI, Mitrofanova OV, Blume YB (2003) The effect of dinitroaniline and phosphorothioamidate herbicides on polyploidisation in vitro of Nepeta plants. Cell Biol Int 27(3):229–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1065-6995(02)00317-7
Mizuta D, Ban T, Miyajima I, Nakatsuka A, Kobayashi N (2009) Comparison of flower color with anthocyanin composition patterns in evergreen azalea. Sci Hortic 122(4):594–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2009.06.027
Morejohn LC, Fosket DE (1984) Inhibition of plant microtubule polymerization in vitro by the phosphoric amide herbicide amiprophos-methyl. Science 224(10):874–876
Mori S, Yamane T, Yahata M, Shinoda K, Murata N (2016) Chromosome doubling in Limonium bellidifolium (Gouan) Dumort by colchicine treatment of seeds. Hortic J 85(4):366–371. https://doi.org/10.2503/hortj.MI-117
Nimura M, Kato J, Horaguchi H, Mii M, Sakai K (2006) Induction of fertile amphidiploids by artificial chromosome-doubling in interspecific hybrid between Dianthus caryophyllus L. and D. japonicus Thunb. Breed Sci 56:303–310
Nonaka T, Oka E, Asano M, Kuwayama S, Tasaki H, Han D, Nakano M (2011) Chromosome doubling of Lychnis spp by in vitro spindle toxin treatment of nodal segments. Sci Hortic 129(4):832–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2011.05.004
Okubo H, Wada K, Uemoto S (1991) In vitro morphogenetic response and distribution of endogenous plant hormones in hypocotyl segments of snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus L.). Plant Cell Rep 10:501–504
Özbingöl N, Corbineau F, Groot SPC, Bino RJ, Côme D (1999) Activation of the cell cycle in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) seeds during osmoconditioning as related to temperature and oxygen. Ann Bot 84(2):245–251. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1999.0916
Pintos B, Manzanera JA, Bueno MA (2007) Antimitotic agents increase the production of doubled-haploid embryos from cork oak anther culture. J Plant Physiol 164(12):1595–1604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2006.11.012
Podwyszyńska M (2012) In vitro tetraploid induction in tulip (Tulipa gesneriana L.). Acta Hortic 961:391–396. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2012.961.51
Podwyszyńska M, Gabryszewska E, Dyki B, Stępowska AA, Kowalski A, Jasiński A (2015) Phenotypic and genome size changes (variation) in synthetic tetraploids of daylily (Hemerocallis) in relation to their diploid counterparts. Euphytica 203:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-014-1212-3
Podwyszyńska M, Sowik I, Machlańska A, Kruczyńska D, Dyki B (2017) In vitro tetraploid induction of Malus × domestica Borkh. using leaf or shoot explants. Sci Hortic 226:379–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.08.042
Powell AA, Yule LJ, Jing HC, Groot SPC, Bino RJ, Pritchard HW (2000) The influence of aerated hydration seed treatment on seed longevity as assessed by the viability equations. J Exp Bot 51(353):2031–2043. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/51.353.2031
Sree Ramulu K, Verhoeven HA, Dijkhuis P (1991) Mitotic blocking, micronucleation, and chromosome doubling by oryzalin, amiprophos-methyl, and colchicine in potato. Protoplasma 160:65–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01539957
Tatsuzawa F, Saito N, Toki K, Shinoda K, Honda T (2012) Flower colors and their anthocyanins in Matthiola incana cultivars (Brassicaceae). Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science 81(1):91–100. https://doi.org/10.2503/jjshs1.81.91
Thao NTP, Ureshino K, Miyajima I, Ozaki Y, Okubo H (2003) Induction of tetraploids in ornamental Alocasia through colchicine and oryzalin treatments. Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult 72(1):19–25. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021292928295
Varier A, Vari AK, Dadlani M (2010) The subcellular basis of seed priming. Curr Sci 99(4):450–456
Acknowledgements
This work was conducted at Laboratory of Floriculture, Chiba University and supported by Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) scholarship program of Japanese Government.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Maria Antonietta Germanà.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hlaing, T.S., Kondo, H., Deguchi, A. et al. The efficient induction of tetraploid plants via adventitious shoots in Antirrhinum majus L. by in vitro seed treatment with amiprophos-methyl. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 142, 157–166 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-020-01849-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-020-01849-8