Abstract
In this paper we continue to review the phonetic similarity of trivial names of chemical substances, in the particular, the names of isotopes of selected elements (H, He, C, F, U) of the periodic table. Thermochemical properties are explicitly considered.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The writing of this series of papers began in the Fall of 2022. From then to the writing of this study, there are still 118 known elements that are uniquely defined by their atomic number (Z), i.e., the number of protons in the nucleus. Almost every element has at least one or even several isotopes that are defined as species with the same number of protons but a different number of neutrons. The difference in the number of neutrons generally has little effect on the chemistry of a given element. In the case of hydrogen, however, it must be acknowledged that hydrogen isotopes with 0, 1 and 2 neutrons respectively are sometimes referred to as protium, deuterium and tritium, and all three can be considered different elements. Exotic hydrogen-like species also include positronium, muonium and muonic helium, which can also be considered isotopes of hydrogen. Some of these names, as with the other more "classical" elements, are sensibly protium, deuterium and tritium. They refer to primary (one), second (two) and third (three) forms of elemental hydrogen. Many, indeed most, element names are not sensible.
Enormously higher than the number of elements or their isotopes is the number of chemical species, which is well over 108 known chemical species, and much more if DNA and protein sequences and fragments are included. In contrast, there are calorimetrically derived thermochemical data for not much more than 104 and certainly less than 105 species. The extremely demanding requirement for careful measurements on high-purity samples has meant that there are very few laboratories today whose goal and activity is to measure and understand these quantities. In this context, one of the most important research activities of the authors has been the understanding, but never the measurement, of the quantities that arise from these studies.
In the case of many chemical substances, it should be noted that their name or the name of their species can easily lead to a misconception of the actual composition or structure of a compound. In the chemical community; however, trivial and completely unsystematic names are preferred to the complicated systematic names. Often there is a certain similarity of names, but in most cases the only common feature is that these compounds are "chemicals." They often do not even have the same origin, e.g., "inorganic" as opposed to "organic".
In our recent multi-part study, we reported on selected examples of compounds/species with a subjective phonetic sound similarity for each element of the periodic table. In the first part [1, 2], we discussed the elements from hydrogen (H) to argon (Ar) (Z = 1 to 18). In the second part [3], we discussed the elements from potassium (K) to xenon (Xe) (Z = 19 to 54). In the third part [4], we discussed cesium (Cs) to radon (Rn) (Z = 55 to 86) and in the fourth part we discussed francium (Fr) to oganesson (Og) (Z = 87 to 118) [5]. In the present study in Structural Chemistry, we continue our efforts to find a compound with a subjective phonetic sound similarity for selected isotopes of the periodic table. We thus consider this paper as part 5 of our study having earlier planned only four parts. In this part we have instead of one category of compounds only, two major distinct categories: one of similar sounds as done before and one “playing” with numbers, e.g., C-12, 12 carbons; F-19, 19 fluorines.
At this point we also acknowledge that our interest is in etymology and that word origins for unsystematic and trivial names are not the aim of this study and would be an excessive diversion of our activity. This is so also because in many cases, the origin of trivial names is difficult to find and in some other cases we do not even know how to find it. Many of the compounds are rather “exotic” and from the conceptual point of view their names also far less important than the elements gathered in a periodic system masterpiece, for which chemist Peter Atkins wrote “The periodic table is arguably the most important concept in chemistry [6]”. Year 2019 has been even designated by UNESCO as the International Year of the Periodic Table. A lengthy and thorough multipart recent literature study on the origin of the names of the elements [7,8,9] was also published recently, and while we laud this study, we do not wish to emulate it for the names of the compounds (also for the above given reasons). Furthermore, although there may be alternative choices of compounds with appropriate names and some even with the desired calorimetric measurements, we have avoided such compounds of interest to pharmaceutical and agricultural chemistry because we are reluctant to "advertise" one company over another.
This study reflects our long-term interest in chemical energetics, etymology, and wordplay. The compounds in the current study were selected based on the similarity of the sound (and/or scientific origin) of the element name. These compounds for which a key energetics quantity (most generally the enthalpy of formation) is known from experiments served as the study subjects. In no case do we present a compound because that species "only" contains that element. In most cases primary sources were used as reference sources for thermochemical data; however, in some cases secondary sources, i.e., the "Domalski compendium" [10], the “Wagman et al. compendium” [11] or the “Pedley compendium” [12] were also used. The "missing" data are admittedly quite old and we are surprised that they are missing from these sources. We wish to encourage the remeasurement of these enthalpies of formation (Table 1).
Conclusions
Similar phonetic of semi-systematic or trivial names of the names are similar to those of the elements but the differences in expected and actual composition surprises. Due to their simplicity, semi-systematic or trivial names remain preferred by the chemical community.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
References
Ponikvar-Svet M, Edwards KF, Liebman JF (2023) Paradoxes and paradigms: elements and compounds—similar names, very different energetics, Part I: hydrogen-to-argon (H-Ar) Z= 1–18. Struct Chem 34:1205–1217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-022-02103-x
Ponikvar-Svet M, Edwards KF, Liebman JF (2023) Correction to: Paradoxes and paradigms: elements and compounds—similar names, very different energetics, Part I: hydrogen-to-argon (H-Ar) Z= 1–18. Struct Chem 34:1219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-023-02140-0
Ponikvar-Svet M, Edwards KF, Liebman JF (2023) Paradoxes and paradigms: elements and compounds—similar names, very different energetics, Part II: potassium to xenon (K-Xe) Z = 19–54. Struct Chem. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-023-02168-2
Ponikvar-Svet M, Edwards KF, Liebman JF (2023) Paradoxes and paradigms: elements and compounds—similar names, very different energetics, Part III: cesium to radon (Cs–Rn) Z=55–86. Struct Chem. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-023-02196-y
Ponikvar-Svet M, Edwards KF, Liebman JF (2023) Paradoxes and paradigms: elements and compounds—similar names, very different energetics, Part IV: francium to oganesson (Fr-Og) Z = 87–118, accepted for publication in Struct Chem
Atkins P (1995) The periodic kingdom. Phoenix, London
Miśkowiec P (2023) Name game: the naming history of the chemical elements—part 1—from antiquity till the end of 18th century. Found Chem 25:29–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-022-09448-5
Miśkowiec P (2023) Name game: the naming history of the chemical elements: part 2—turbulent nineteenth century. Found Chem 25:215–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-022-09451-w
Miśkowiec P (2023) Name game: the naming history of the chemical elements—part 3—rivalry of scientists in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. Found Chem 25:235–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-022-09452-9
Domalski ES (1972) Selected values of heats of combustion and heats of formation of organic compounds containing the elements carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorus, and sulfur. J Phys Chem Ref Data 1:221–277
Wagman DD, Evans WH, Parker VB, Schumm RH, Halow I, Bailey SM, Churney KL, Nuttall RL (1982) The NBS tables of chemical thermodynamic properties: selected values for inorganic and C1 and C2 organic substances in SI units. J Phys Chem Ref Data 11(Suppl 2):1–392
Pedley JB (1994) Thermochemical data and structures of organic compounds. TRC data series, vol 1. TRC, College Station
Monte MJS, Gonçalves MV, Ribeiro da Silva MDMC (2010) Vapor pressures and enthalpies of combustion of the dihydroxybenzoic acid isomers. J Chem Eng Data 55:2246–2251. https://doi.org/10.1021/je900777q
Schäfer W, Hellmann H (1967) Hexamethyl-Dewar-Benzol (Hexamethylbicyclo[2.2.0]hexa-2,5-diene). Angew Chem Intl Ed 6:518–525. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.196705181
Verevkin SP, Beckhaus HD, Rüchardt C, Haag R, Kozhushkov SI, Zywietz T, de Meijere A, Jiao H, Schleyer PvR (1998) An experimental thermochemical and theoretical study of triquinacene: Definitive disproof of its neutral homoaromaticity. J Am Chem Soc 120:11130−11135. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja981680x
Colomina M, Jiménez P, Roux MV, Turrión C (1989) Thermochemical properties of 1,2,4,5-tetramethylbenzene, pentamethylbenzene, and hexamethylbenzene. J Chem Thermodyn 21:275–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9614(89)90017-7
Lukyanova VA, Druzhinina AI, Pimenova SM, Ioutsi VA, Buyanovskaya AG, Takazova RU, Sagadeev EV, Gimadeev AA (2018) Thermodynamic properties of L-threonine. J Chem Thermodyn 116:248–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jct.2017.09.022
Gheorghe D, Neacsu A, Contineanu I, Tanasescu S, Perisanu S (2017) A calorimetric study of L-, D- and DL-isomers of tryptophan. J Therm Anal Calorim 130:1145–1152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-017-6396-z
Dávalos JZ, Guerrero A, Valderrama-Negron AC, Romero V, Lago AF (2016) Energetics and structural properties of neutral and deprotonated phenyl carbinols. J Chem Thermodynam 97:315–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jct.2016.02.010
Kirklin DR, Chickos JS, Liebman JF (1996) Enthalpy of formation of triphenylphosphine sulfide. Struct Chem 7:355–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02275161
Steed JM, Dixon TA, Klemperer WJ (1979) Molecular beam studies of benzene dimer, hexafluorobenzene dimer, and benzene-hexafluorobenzene. Chem Phys 70:4940–5946. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.437383
Bor G (1986) Metal carbonyl clusters: thermodynamics of their formation and stability. Some novel results on cobalt, rhodium, ruthenium, and mixed clusters. Pure Appl Chem 58:543–552. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac198658040543
Baev AK, Connor JA, El-Saied NI, Skinner HA (1981) Microcalorimetric studies of dodecacarbonyl(diiron)ruthenium and dodecacarbonyl(iron)diruthenium. Enthalpy contribution of heterometallic metal-metal bonds. J Organomet Chem 213:151–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-328x(00)93956-1
Kohno M, Suzuki S, Shiromaru H, Moriwaki T, Achiba Y (1998) Ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy on the linear conformer of negatively charged carbon clusters Cn- (10 ≤ n ≤ 16). Chem Phys Lett 282:330–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2614(97)01273-6
Prosen EJ, Rossini FD (1945) Heats of combustion and formation of the paraffin hydrocarbons at 25 °C. J Res NBS 263–267
Benedikt J, Agarwal S, Eijkman D, Vandamme W, Creatore M, van de Sanden MCM (2005) Threshold ionization mass spectrometry of reactive species in remote Ar/C2H2 expanding thermal plasma. J Vac Sci Techn 23:1400–1412. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.2006138
Belau L, Wheeler SE, Ticknor BW, Ahmed M, Leone SR, Allen WD, Schaefer HF III, Duncan MIA (2007) Ionization thresholds of small carbon clusters: Tunable vuv experiments and theory. J Am Chem Soc 129:10229–10243. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja072526q
Chickos JS, Hesse DG, Panshin SY, Rogers DW, Saunders M, Uffer PM, Liebman JF (1992) The strain energy of cyclotetradecane is small. J Org Chem 57:1897–1899. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo00032a052
Eliel EL, Engelsman JJ (1996) The heats of combustion of gaseous cyclotetradecane and trans-stilbene - a tale of long-standing confusion. J Chem Educ 73:903–905. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed073p903
Zhogina EV, Papina TS, Kolesov VP, Gervits LL, Makarov KN, Vorob’eva VP (1990) Standard heats of formation of hexafluoropropene oligomers. Zh Fiz Khim 64:2812–2816
Allayarov SR, Gordon DA, Henderson PB, Fernandez RE, Jackson VE, Dixon DA (2015) Photochemistry of long-lived [(CF3)2CF]2C·C2F5 radicals. J Fluor Chem 180:240–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluchem.2015.10.003
Cherstkov VF, Tumanskii BL, Delyagina NI, Sterlin SR, German LS (1996) Perfluoro-1,2-di-t-butylvinyl radical stable in an inert medium 1. J Fluor Chem 79:93–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1139(96)03477-x
Lau KH, Hildenbrand DL (1987) Thermochemistry of the gaseous uranium bromides UBr through UBr5. J Chem Phys 86:2949–2954. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.452046
Huang J, Yamawaki M, Yamaguchi K, Yasumoto H, Suzuki Y (1997) Investigation of vaporization thermodynamics of SrUO3 by means of mass spectrometry. J Nucl Matls 247:17–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(97)00060-3
Cordfunke EHP, Booij AS, Huntelaar ME (1989) The standard enthalpies of formation of uranium compounds. XV Strontium uranates J Chem Thermodyn 31:1337–1345. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcht.1999.0545
Acknowledgements
We also wish to thank Arthur Greenberg for helpful comments on our study. All authors are likewise grateful to the UMBC library science reference staff for supporting our extensive use of SciFindern.
Funding
MPS gratefully acknowledges the Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS Grant P1-0045, Inorganic Chemistry and Technology) for financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors (MPS, KFE, JFL) have contributed equally to writing and reviewing the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
We did not perform any experiments when preparing this article, so neither ethics review nor informed consent was necessary.
Consent to participate
All authors agreed with participation in research and publication of the results.
Consent to publish
All authors have approved the manuscript before submission, including the names and order of authors.
Competing interests
All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ponikvar‑Svet, M., Edwards, K.F. & Liebman, J.F. Paradoxes and paradigms: elements and compounds: similar names, very different energetics. Part 5, selected examples of exotic species and isotopes (H, He, C, F, U). Struct Chem 34, 2365–2374 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-023-02208-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-023-02208-x