Abstract
The influence of chlorine substituents on the molecular arrangement in the solid state of chlorinated benzoyl-ferrocene derivates with restricted molecular flexibility was investigated by crystal structure determinations and theoretical calculations. Four different chlorinated benzoyl-ferrocene derivates were crystallized from a saturated CHCl3 solution and analyzed by X-ray diffraction. Under consideration of the structural restrictions, a comparable trend of rearrangement in the crystal organization with increasing number of chlorine atoms is observed, which is analogous to findings for chlorine-substituted benzenes. More important, the molecules arrange in layers (1 and 4) and columns (2 and 3) and in all cases with repulsively orientated CF3···CF3 substituents. In addition, Cl···Cl interactions are visible in 1 (type I) and 4 (type II). Furthermore, the crystal packing motifs were also analyzed based on ab initio quantum-chemical calculations of the intermolecular interaction energy, using the B97-D3/def2-TZVP method. According to the topology of intermolecular interaction, the crystal structures have either columnar or layered structure depending on the presence of Cl substituent in para-position of benzene ring. It was also found that Cl···Cl interactions play a secondary role in crystal organization, and the substituent effect is maybe due to polarization of the aromatic ring, which leads ultimately to an increase in the energy of stacking interactions between the aryl substituents.
Graphical Abstract
Analysis of the crystal structures of chlorine substituents on the molecular arrangement in the solid state of restricted molecular flexible chlorinated benzoyl-ferrocene derivates shows a trend of rearrangement in the crystal organization with increasing number of chlorine atoms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Desiraju GR (2001) Nature 412(6845):397–400. doi:10.1038/35086640
Desiraju GR (1995) Angew Chem Int Ed 34(21):2311–2327. doi:10.1002/anie.199523111
Merz K, Vasylyeva V (2010) CrystEngComm 12(12):3989–4002. doi:10.1039/C0CE00237B
Merz K (2006) Cryst Growth Des 6(7):1615–1619. doi:10.1021/cg060067j
Milledge HJ, Pant LM (1960) Acta Cryst 13(4):285–290. doi:10.1107/S0365110X6000073X
Boese R, Kirchner MT, Dunitz JD, Filippini G, Gavezzotti A (2001) Helv Chim Acta 84(6):1561–1577. doi:10.1002/1522-2675(20010613)84:6<1561:aid-hlca1561>3.0.co;2-m
Andre D, Fourme R, Renaud M (1971) Acta Cryst B 27(12):2371–2380. doi:10.1107/S0567740871005909
Reddy CM, Kirchner MT, Gundakaram RC, Padmanabhan KA, Desiraju GR (2006) Chem Eur J 12(8):2222–2234. doi:10.1002/chem.200500983
Awwadi FF, Willett RD, Peterson KA, Twamley B (2006) Chem Eur J 12(35):8952–8960. doi:10.1002/chem.200600523
Price SL, Stone AJ, Lucas J, Rowland RS, Thornley AE (1994) J Am Chem Soc 116(11):4910–4918. doi:10.1021/ja00090a041
Vasylyeva V, Merz K (2010) J Fluor Chem 131(3):446–449. doi:10.1016/j.jfluchem.2009.12.013
Vasylyeva V, Merz K (2010) Cryst Growth Des 10(10):4250–4255. doi:10.1021/cg100794s
Vasylyeva V, Shishkin OV, Maleev AV, Merz K (2012) Cryst Growth Des 12(2):1032–1039. doi:10.1021/cg201623e
Shishkin OV, Shishkina SV, Maleev AV, Zubatyuk RI, Vasylyeva V, Merz K (2013) ChemPhysChem 14(4):847–856. doi:10.1002/cphc.201200581
Mocilac P, Tallon M, Lough AJ, Gallagher JF (2010) CrystEngComm 12(10):3080–3090. doi:10.1039/c002986f
Merz K (2003) Acta Cryst C 59(2):o65–o67. doi:10.1107/s0108270102023041
Mocilac P, Lough AJ, Gallagher JF (2011) CrystEngComm 13(6):1899–1909. doi:10.1039/c0ce00326c
Shishkin OV, Medvediev VV, Zubatyuk RI (2013) CrystEngComm 15(1):160–167. doi:10.1039/c2ce26126j
Shishkin OV, Zubatyuk RI, Shishkina SV, Dyakonenko VV, Medviediev VV (2014) PCCP 16(14):6773–6786. doi:10.1039/c3cp55390f
Sheldrick GM (1997) shelxtl-97. University of Göttingen, Germany
Dyakonenko VV, Maleev AV, Zbruyev AI, Chebanov VA, Desenko SM, Shishkin OV (2010) CrystEngComm 12(6):1816–1823. doi:10.1039/b922131j
Shishkin OV, Dyakonenko VV, Maleev AV (2012) CrystEngComm 14(5):1795–1804. doi:10.1039/c2ce06336k
Grimme S (2006) J Comput Chem 27(15):1787–1799. doi:10.1002/jcc.20495
Grimme S, Ehrlich S, Goerigk L (2011) J Comput Chem 32(7):1456–1465. doi:10.1002/jcc.21759
Grimme S, Antony J, Ehrlich S, Krieg H (2010) J Chem Phys. doi:10.1063/1.3382344
Boys SF, Bernardi F (1970) Mol Phys 19(4):553–566. doi:10.1080/00268977000101561
Neese F (2012) WIREs Comput Mol Sci 2(1):73–78. doi:10.1002/wcms.81
Maschke M, Alborzinia H, Lieb M, Wolfl S, Metzler-Nolte N (2014) ChemMedChem 9(6):1188–1194. doi:10.1002/cmdc.201402001
Biehl ER, Reeves PC (1973) Synthesis. doi:10.1055/s-1973-22216
Desiraju GR, Vittal JJ, Ramanan A (2011) Crystal Engineering: A Textbook. World Scientific Pub Co, Singapore
Acknowledgments
This research was in part supported by the Research Department “Interfacial Systems Chemistry” at Ruhr University Bochum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Oleg Valerievich Shishkin: Deceased in July 2014.
This contribution is for the special issue honoring Oleg Shishkin’s memory.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
11224_2015_587_MOESM1_ESM.doc
Supporting Information: Table with pairwise strongest interactions in crystal 1-4, calculated energies of dimers of 1, 2, 3, and 4, cif files giving X-ray data with details of refinement procedures for 1-4. CCDC Nos. 1002383 (1), 1002384 (2), 1002385 (3), and 1002386 (4). (DOC 91 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maschke, M., Merz, K., Shishkin, O.V. et al. Influence of chlorine substituents on the aggregation behavior of chlorobenzoyl-substituted ferrocene derivates. Struct Chem 27, 377–387 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-015-0587-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-015-0587-7