In this work we present a novel adaptive ground clutter removal (AGCR) algorithm for ground penetrating radar (GPR) applications. The reduction or even removal of the disturbing ground clutter, which mostly obscures the wanted reflections of buried targets, is very important especially for the detection of shallowly buried anti-personnel mines (APMs). Most of the ground clutter removal algorithms used nowadays, show weak performances in the case of a rough ground surface or suffer from high computation complexity. This algorithm is not designed to detect flush buried APMs. Further work is needed to ensure that the algorithm can detect all APM mines from flush buried to the maximum depth of cover of 13 cm as required by the UN SOPs. The algorithm presented in this contribution is capable to remove the ground clutter resulting from undulated surfaces by estimating not only the position but also the varying signal shape. This technique enables a near optimal ground clutter reduction with a moderate computation complexity. Furthermore, the proposed AGCR algorithm preserves the characteristic impulse responses of the buried objects, which affords a following target classification based on these significant reflections. The performance improvements of the proposed AGCR algorithm compared to standard algorithms are shown on measured data. The GPR data were collected with a laboratory test set-up which is also described briefly in this work.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
U.S. Humanitarian Demining R&D Program, online: http://www.humanitarian-demining.org/.
UNICEF, 1996, The state of the world’s children, online: http://www.unicef.org/sowc96pk/hidekill.htm.
USDOS, 1998, Hidden Killers: The Global Landmine Crisis: Report released by the U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, Office of Humanitarian Demining Programs, Washington, DC.
Daniels, D. J. (ed.), 2004, Ground Penetrating Radar, 2nd edn.: ser. IEE Radar, Sonar and Navigation, The Institution of Electrical Engineers, London, UK.
Daniels D.J. (1996). Surface-penetrating radar. Electronics and Communication Engineering Journal, 8(4):165–182
Feldbach, D. and Detlefsen, J., 1998, Methods of background subtraction for ground penetrating radar: Proc. of International Radar Symposium IRS 98, Munich, Germany, p. 659–664.
van Kempen L., Sahli H. (1999) Ground penetrating radar data processing: a selective survey of the state of the art literature: Tech. Rep.: IRIS-TR-0060. Vrije University Brussels, Belgium.
Brooks J.W. (2000). The detection of buried non-metallic anti-personnel land mines. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Alabama, Huntsville USA.
van Kempen, L. and Sahli, H., 2001, Signal processing techniques for clutter parameters estimation and clutter removal in GPR data for landmine detection: Proc. of the 11th IEEE Workshop on Statistical Signal Processing, p. 158–161.
Brooks J.W., van Kempen L., Sahli H. (1999). Ground penetrating radar data processing: clutter characterization and removal: Tech. Rep.: IRIS-TR-0059. Vrije University Brussels, Belgium.
Zoubir A.M., Chant I.J., Brown C.L., Barkat B., Abeynayake C. (2002). Signal processing techniques for landmine detection using impulse ground penetrating radar. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2(1):41–51
Sai B., Ligthart L.P. (2004). GPR Phased-Based Techniques for Profiling Rough Surface and Detecting Small, Low-Contrast Landmines Under Flat Ground. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42(2):318–326
United Nations Mine Action Service, 2003, IMAS 09.10 Clearance requirements, 2nd ed., online: http://www.mineactionstandards.org/imas.htm.
Fritzsche M. (2001). Anwendung von Verfahren der Mustererkennung zur Detektion von Landminen mit Georadaren. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Karlsruhe, Germany.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oßberger, G., Buchegger, T., Schimbäck, E. et al. Adaptive Ground Clutter Removal Algorithm for Ground Penetrating Radar Applications in Harsh Environments. Sens Imaging 7, 71–89 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11220-006-0023-6
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11220-006-0023-6