Skip to main content
Log in

Flaring Rates and the Evolution of Sunspot Group McIntosh Classifications

  • Published:
Solar Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sunspot groups are the main source of solar flares, with the energy to power them being supplied by magnetic-field evolution (e.g. flux emergence or twisting/shearing). To date, few studies have investigated the statistical relation between sunspot-group evolution and flaring, with none considering evolution in the McIntosh classification scheme. Here we present a statistical analysis of sunspot groups from Solar Cycle 22, focusing on 24-hour changes in the three McIntosh classification components. Evolution-dependent \(\ge \mathrm{C}1.0\), \(\ge \mathrm{M}1.0\), and \(\ge \mathrm{X}1.0\) flaring rates are calculated, leading to the following results: i) flaring rates become increasingly higher for greater degrees of upward evolution through the McIntosh classes, with the opposite found for downward evolution; ii) the highest flaring rates are found for upward evolution from larger, more complex, classes (e.g. Zurich D- and E-classes evolving upward to F-class produce \(\ge \mathrm{C}1.0\) rates of \(2.66\pm 0.28\) and \(2.31 \pm 0.09\) flares per 24 hours, respectively); iii) increasingly complex classes give higher rates for all flare magnitudes, even when sunspot groups do not evolve over 24 hours. These results support the hypothesis that injection of magnetic energy by flux emergence (i.e. increasing in Zurich or compactness classes) leads to a higher frequency and magnitude of flaring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note, there is no upper limit to the longitudinal extent of a B-class sunspot group indicated in Table 1, but these groups are typically of smaller extent.

References

  • Bloomfield, D.S., Higgins, P.A., McAteer, R.T.J., Gallagher, P.T.: 2012, Toward reliable benchmarking of solar flare forecasting methods. Astrophys. J. Lett. 747, L41. DOI . ADS .

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, D.S., Gallagher, P.T., Marquette, W.H., Milligan, R.O., Canfield, R.C.: 2016, Performance of major flare watches from the max millennium program (2001 – 2010). Solar Phys. 291, 411. DOI . ADS .

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Bornmann, P.L., Shaw, D.: 1994, Flare rates and the McIntosh active-region classifications. Solar Phys. 150, 127. DOI . ADS .

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Cortie, A.L.: 1901, On the types of sun-spot disturbances. Astrophys. J. 13, 260. DOI . ADS .

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Crown, M.D.: 2012, Validation of the NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center’s solar flare forecasting look-up table and forecaster-issued probabilities. Space Weather 10, S06006. DOI . ADS .

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Emslie, A.G., Dennis, B.R., Shih, A.Y., Chamberlin, P.C., Mewaldt, R.A., Moore, C.S., et al.: 2012, Global energetics of thirty-eight large solar eruptive events. Astrophys. J. 759, 71. DOI . ADS .

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D.A., Moore, R.L., Gary, G.A.: 2008, Magnetogram measures of total nonpotentiality for prediction of solar coronal mass ejections from active regions of any degree of magnetic complexity. Astrophys. J. 689, 1433. DOI . ADS .

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, P.T., Moon, Y.-J., Wang, H.: 2002, Active-region monitoring and flare forecasting, I: data processing and first results. Solar Phys. 209, 171. DOI . ADS .

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Georgoulis, M.K., Rust, D.M.: 2007, Quantitative forecasting of major solar flares. Astrophys. J. Lett. 661, L109. DOI . ADS .

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Giovanelli, R.G.: 1939, The relations between eruptions and sunspots. Astrophys. J. 89, 555. DOI . ADS .

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, M., Gaard, S., Jibben, P., Canfield, R.C., Nandy, D.: 2005, Spatial relationship between twist in active region magnetic fields and solar flares. Astrophys. J. 629, 1135. DOI . ADS .

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, G.E., Ellerman, F., Nicholson, S.B., Joy, A.H.: 1919, The magnetic polarity of sun-spots. Astrophys. J. 49, 153. DOI . ADS .

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Künzel, H.: 1960, Die Flare-Häufigkeit in Fleckengruppen unterschiedlicher Klasse und magnetischer Struktur. Astron. Nachr. 285, 271. DOI . ADS .

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., Moon, Y.-J., Lee, J.-Y., Lee, K.-S., Na, H.: 2012, Solar flare occurrence rate and probability in terms of the sunspot classification supplemented with sunspot area and its changes. Solar Phys. 281, 639. DOI . ADS .

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, P.S.: 1990, The classification of sunspot groups. Solar Phys. 125, 251. DOI . ADS .

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S.A., Bloomfield, D.S., Gallagher, P.T.: 2012, The evolution of sunspot magnetic fields associated with a solar flare. Solar Phys. 277, 45. DOI . ADS .

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, S.A., Bloomfield, D.S., Gallagher, P.T.: 2013, Evidence for partial Taylor relaxation from changes in magnetic geometry and energy during a solar flare. Astron. Astrophys. 550, A119. DOI . ADS .

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Sammis, I., Tang, F., Zirin, H.: 2000, The dependence of large flare occurrence on the magnetic structure of sunspots. Astrophys. J. 540, 583. DOI . ADS .

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmieder, B., Hagyard, M.J., Guoxiang, A., Hongqi, Z., Kalman, B., Gyori, L., et al.: 1994, Relationship between magnetic field evolution and flaring sites in AR 6659 in June 1991. Solar Phys. 150, 199. DOI . ADS .

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Schrijver, C.J.: 2007, A characteristic magnetic field pattern associated with all major solar flares and its use in flare forecasting. Astrophys. J. Lett. 655, L117. DOI . ADS .

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Schrijver, C.J., De Rosa, M.L., Title, A.M., Metcalf, T.R.: 2005, The nonpotentiality of active-region coronae and the dynamics of the photospheric magnetic field. Astrophys. J. 628, 501. DOI . ADS .

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass, H.B., Ulrich, R.K.: 1990, Rotation of Doppler features in the solar photosphere. Astrophys. J. 351, 309. DOI . ADS .

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Vršnak, B., Žic, T., Vrbanec, D., Temmer, M., Rollett, T., Möstl, C., et al.: 2013, Propagation of interplanetary coronal mass ejections: the drag-based model. Solar Phys. 285, 295. DOI . ADS .

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Waldmeier, M.: 1947, Heliographische Karten der Photosphäre für das Jahr 1946. Publ. Zür. Obs. 9, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatland, M.S.: 2001, Rates of flaring in individual active regions. Solar Phys. 203, 87. DOI . ADS .

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Chris Balch (NOAA/SWPC) for providing the data used in this research. A.E. McCloskey was supported by an Irish Research Council Government of Ireland Postgraduate Scholarship, while D.S. Bloomfield was supported by the European Space Agency PRODEX Programme as well as the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 640216 (FLARECAST project).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aoife E. McCloskey.

Appendices

Appendix A: Zurich Class

Here we present accompanying tables and figures for the McIntosh Zurich class analysis. Evolution-dependent occurrence numbers and flaring rates of sunspot groups within \(\pm75^{\circ}\) longitude are provided in Tables 4 and 5, respectively. These data correspond directly to that presented in Figures 2 and 3, respectively. In addition, evolution-dependent flaring rates for the east and west limb regions (i.e. \(>75^{\circ}\) heliographic longitude) are displayed in Figures 4 and 5, respectively, for direct comparison to the “within \(\pm75^{\circ}\) longitude” case presented in Figure 3.

Figure 4
figure 4

Zurich evolution-dependent 24-hour flaring rates from groups at the east limb. Each column concerns different flaring levels: \(\ge\mathrm{C}1.0\) (left); \(\ge\mathrm{M}1.0\) (centre); \(\ge\mathrm{X}1.0\) (right). As in Figure 2, each row shows evolution from a different starting class and histogram bars are coloured by evolution: no change (black); upward evolution (red); downward evolution (blue).

Figure 5
figure 5

Zurich evolution-dependent 24-hour flaring rates from groups at the west limb. Each column concerns different flaring levels: \(\ge\mathrm{C}1.0\) (left); \(\ge\mathrm{M}1.0\) (centre); \(\ge\mathrm{X}1.0\) (right). As in Figure 2, each row shows evolution from a different starting class and histogram bars are coloured by evolution: no change (black); upward evolution (red); downward evolution (blue).

Table 4 Evolution-dependent McIntosh modified Zurich class occurrence numbers of sunspot groups within \(\pm75^{\circ}\) heliographic longitude.
Table 5 Evolution-dependent McIntosh modified Zurich class flaring rates of sunspot groups within \(\pm75^{\circ}\) heliographic longitude.

Appendix B: Penumbral Class

Here we present equivalent tables and figures for the McIntosh penumbral class analysis. Frequency histograms of each penumbral class are shown in the left column of Figure 6, while overall evolution steps on a 24-hour timescale are given in the right column of Figure 6 as percentage occurrence. Evolution-dependent occurrence numbers are provided in Table 6 and graphically represented in Figure 7 (equivalent to the Zurich class Table 4 and Figure 2, respectively). Finally, flaring rates of sunspot groups within \(\pm75^{\circ}\) longitude are provided in Table 7 and graphically represented in Figure 8 (equivalent to the Zurich class Table 5 and Figure 3, respectively).

Figure 6
figure 6

Frequency histograms of each penumbral class in the McIntosh classification scheme (left column) and occurrence percentage histograms of their overall evolution steps on 24-hour timescales (right column). Each row presents data from different spatial locations on the Sun: full disk (panels a – b); within \(\pm75^{\circ}\) heliographic longitude (panels c – d); east limb (panels e – f); west limb (panels g – h). Positive evolution steps correspond to moving downwards through penumbral classes in Table 2.

Figure 7
figure 7

Penumbral class 24-hour evolution histograms. Each column concerns different locations on the Sun: within \(\pm75^{\circ}\) longitude (left); east limb (centre); west limb (right). Each row presents evolution from a different starting class, while bars give the percentage of that starting class coloured by evolution: no change (black); upward evolution (red); downward evolution (blue).

Figure 8
figure 8

Penumbral evolution-dependent 24-hour flaring rates from groups within \(\pm75^{\circ}\) longitude. Each column concerns different flaring levels: \(\ge\mathrm{C}1.0\) (left); ⩾ M1.0 (centre); \(\ge\mathrm{X}1.0\) (right). As in Figure 7, each row shows evolution from a different starting class and histogram bars are coloured by evolution: no change (black); upward evolution (red); downward evolution (blue).

Table 6 Evolution-dependent McIntosh penumbral class occurrence numbers of sunspot groups within \(\pm75^{\circ}\) heliographic longitude.
Table 7 Evolution-dependent McIntosh penumbral class flaring rates of sunspot groups within \(\pm75^{\circ}\) heliographic longitude.

Appendix C: Compactness Class

Here we present equivalent tables and figures for the McIntosh compactness class analysis. Frequency histograms of each compactness class are shown in the left column of Figure 9, while overall evolution steps on a 24-hour timescale are given in the right column of Figure 9 as percentage occurrence. Evolution-dependent occurrence numbers are provided in Table 8 and graphically represented in Figure 10 (equivalent to the Zurich class Table 4 and Figure 2, respectively). Finally, flaring rates of sunspot groups within \(\pm75^{\circ}\) longitude are provided in Table 9 and graphically represented in Figure 11 (equivalent to the Zurich class Table 5 and Figure 3, respectively).

Figure 9
figure 9

Frequency histograms of each compactness class in the McIntosh classification scheme (left column) and occurrence percentage histograms of their overall evolution steps on 24-hour timescales (right column). Each row presents data from different spatial locations on the Sun: full disk (panels a – b); within \(\pm75^{\circ}\) heliographic longitude (panels c – d); east limb (panels e – f); west limb (panels g – h). Positive evolution steps correspond to moving downwards through compactness classes in Table 3.

Figure 10
figure 10

Compactness class 24-hour evolution histograms. Each column concerns different locations on the Sun: within \(\pm75^{\circ}\) longitude (left); east limb (centre); west limb (right). Each row presents evolution from a different starting class, while bars give the percentage of that starting class coloured by evolution: no change (black); upward evolution (red); downward evolution (blue).

Figure 11
figure 11

Compactness evolution-dependent 24-hour flaring rates from groups within \(\pm75^{\circ}\) longitude. Each column concerns different flaring levels: \(\ge\mathrm{C}1.0\) (left); \(\ge\mathrm{M}1.0\) (centre); \(\ge\mathrm{X}1.0\) (right). As in Figure 10, each row shows evolution from a different starting class and histogram bars are coloured by evolution: no change (black); upward evolution (red); downward evolution (blue).

Table 8 Evolution-dependent McIntosh compactness class occurrence numbers of sunspot groups within \(\pm75^{\circ}\) heliographic longitude.
Table 9 Evolution-dependent McIntosh compactness class flaring rates of sunspot groups within \(\pm75^{\circ}\) heliographic longitude.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McCloskey, A.E., Gallagher, P.T. & Bloomfield, D.S. Flaring Rates and the Evolution of Sunspot Group McIntosh Classifications. Sol Phys 291, 1711–1738 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-016-0933-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-016-0933-y

Keywords

Navigation