Abstract
Magnetic flux synoptic charts are critical for a reliable modeling of the corona and heliosphere. Until now, however, these charts were provided without uncertainty estimates. The uncertainties are due to instrumental noise in the measurements and to the spatial variance of the magnetic flux distribution that contributes to each bin in the synoptic chart. We describe here a simple method to compute synoptic magnetic flux maps and their corresponding magnetic flux spatial variance charts that can be used to estimate the uncertainty in the results of coronal models. We have tested this approach by computing a potential-field source-surface model of the coronal field for a Monte Carlo simulation of Carrington synoptic magnetic flux maps generated from the variance map. We show that these uncertainties affect both the locations of source-surface neutral lines and the distributions of coronal holes in the models.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The function arg is defined such that arg(x,y)=arctan(y/x)∈[−180∘,180∘], and thus resolves the ambiguity of which quadrant the result should lie in.
References
Adams, J.C.: 1989, MUDPACK: Multigrid portable FORTRAN software for the efficient solution of linear elliptic partial differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 34, 113 – 146. 10.1016/0096-3003(89)90010-6 .
Altschuler, M.D., Newkirk, G.: 1969, Magnetic fields and the structure of the solar corona. I: Methods of calculating coronal fields. Solar Phys. 9, 131 – 149. 10.1007/BF00145734 .
Arge, C.N., Pizzo, V.J.: 2000, Improvement in the prediction of solar wind conditions using near-real time solar magnetic field updates. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 10465 – 10480. 10.1029/1999JA000262 .
Arge, C.N., Henney, C.J., Koller, J., Compeau, C.R., Young, S., MacKenzie, D., Fay, A., Harvey, J.W.: 2010, Air Force Data Assimilative Photospheric Flux Transport (ADAPT) model. In: Maksimovic, M., Issautier, K., Meyer-Vernet, N., Moncuquet, M., Pantellini, F. (eds.) Twelfth International Solar Wind Conference, AIP Conf. Proc. 1216, 343 – 346. 10.1063/1.3395870 .
Balasubramaniam, K.S., Pevtsov, A.: 2011, Ground-based synoptic instrumentation for solar observations. In: Fineschi, S., Fennelly, J. (eds.) Solar Physics and Space Weather Instrumentation IV., Proc. SPIE 8148, 814809. 10.1117/12.892824 .
Gosain, S., Pevtsov, A.A.: 2013, Resolving azimuth ambiguity using vertical nature of solar quiet-Sun magnetic fields. Solar Phys. 283, 195 – 205. 10.1007/s11207-012-0135-1 .
Harvey, J., Worden, J.: 1998, New types and uses of synoptic maps. In: Balasubramaniam, K.S., Harvey, J., Rabin, D. (eds.) Synoptic Solar Physics, ASP Conf. Ser. 140, 155 – 160.
Harvey, J., Gillespie, B., Miedaner, P., Slaughter, C.: 1980, Synoptic solar magnetic field maps for the interval including Carrington Rotation 1601 – 1680, May 5, 1973 – April 26, 1979, Report UAG-77, World Data Center A for Solar-Terrestrial Physics, Boulder, CO.
Hoeksema, J.T., Wilcox, J.M., Scherrer, P.H.: 1982, Structure of the heliospheric current sheet in the early portion of sunspot cycle 21. J. Geophys. Res. 87, 10331 – 10338. 10.1029/JA087iA12p10331 .
Lee, C.O., Luhmann, J.G., Hoeksema, J.T., Sun, X., Arge, C.N., de Pater, I.: 2011, Coronal field opens at lower height during the solar cycles 22 and 23 minimum periods: IMF comparison suggests the source surface should be lowered. Solar Phys. 269, 367 – 388. 10.1007/s11207-010-9699-9 .
Liu, Y., Hoeksema, J.T., Zhao, X., Larson, R.M.: 2007, MDI synoptic charts of magnetic field: Interpolation of polar fields. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 39, 129.
Petrie, G.J.D.: 2013, Solar magnetic activity cycles, coronal potential field models and eruption rates. Astrophys. J. 768, 162. 10.1088/0004-637X/768/2/162 .
Petrie, G.J.D., Patrikeeva, I.: 2009, A comparative study of magnetic fields in the solar photosphere and chromosphere at equatorial and polar latitudes. Astrophys. J. 699, 871 – 884. 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/871 .
Schatten, K.H., Wilcox, J.M., Ness, N.F.: 1969, A model of interplanetary and coronal magnetic fields. Solar Phys. 6, 442 – 455. 10.1007/BF00146478 .
Sun, X., Liu, Y., Hoeksema, J.T., Hayashi, K., Zhao, X.: 2011, A new method for polar field interpolation. Solar Phys. 270, 9 – 22. 10.1007/s11207-011-9751-4 .
Svalgaard, L., Duvall, T.L., Jr., Scherrer, P.H.: 1978, The strength of the Sun’s polar fields. Solar Phys. 58, 225 – 239. 10.1007/BF00157268 .
Thompson, W.T.: 2006, Coordinate systems for solar image data. Astron. Astrophys. 449, 791 – 803. 10.1051/0004-6361:20054262 .
Tóth, G., van der Holst, B., Huang, Z.: 2011, Obtaining potential field solutions with spherical harmonics and finite differences. Astrophys. J. 732, 102. 10.1088/0004-637X/732/2/102 .
Worden, J., Harvey, J.: 2000, An evolving synoptic magnetic flux map and implications for the distribution of photospheric magnetic flux. Solar Phys. 195, 247 – 268. 10.1023/A:1005272502885 .
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge fruitful discussions with Anna Hughes, Jack Harvey, Janet Luhmann, and Thomas Wentzel. This work uses SOLIS/VSM data obtained by the NSO Integrated Synoptic Program (NISP), managed by the National Solar Observatory, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy (AURA), Inc. under a cooperative agreement with the National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Estimated Variance in Magnetic Flux Synoptic Charts
Appendix: Estimated Variance in Magnetic Flux Synoptic Charts
Using the notation described in Section 2.2, one can generalize Equation (3) to compute the variance \(\sigma_{k}^{2}\) of a heliographic bin k in the synoptic chart given the contribution of N individual observations. That is,
With some manipulation, the previous formula can be written as
or simply,
The standard deviation is simply the square root of the variance above.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bertello, L., Pevtsov, A.A., Petrie, G.J.D. et al. Uncertainties in Solar Synoptic Magnetic Flux Maps. Sol Phys 289, 2419–2431 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-014-0480-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-014-0480-3