Skip to main content
Log in

Progress in Measuring Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviours Concerning Sustainable Development Among Tenth Grade Students in Manitoba

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Following up on Michalos et al. (Soc Indic Res 100(3): 391–413, 2011; Soc Indic Res 106(2): 213–238, 2012), we present standardized measures of tenth grade students’ knowledge, attitudes and behaviours concerning sustainable development as those concepts are understood in the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO Education Sector in Framework for the UNDESD international implementation scheme. UNESCO, Paris, 2006) and we test the hypothesis that knowledge and favourable attitudes toward SD lead to favourable behaviours. Using a randomly drawn but not representative sample of 1,108 tenth grade students from the province of Manitoba, Canada, we crafted three indexes. There is a 20-item Index of Knowledge of SD with a good Cronbach α = 0.91, a 15-item Index of Attitudes Favourable Toward SD with an α = 0.81 and a 16-item Index of Behaviours Favourable Toward SD with an α = 0.81. About 25 % of the variation in our Behaviours Index scores could be accounted for by our Knowledge Index and Attitudes Index scores, with knowledge having relatively greater influence than attitudes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • CMEC. (2014). UN decade of education for sustainable development. Canada’s submission to the UN’s DESD final report. 2014, Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (not yet published).

  • Global Education First Initiative (GEFI): No date. http://www.globaleducationfirst.org. Accessed Aug 13, 2014.

  • MacDiarmid, A. (2014). Personal correspondence, Aug 7, 2014.

  • Michalos, A. C., Creech, H., McDonald, C., & Hatch Kahlke, P. M. (2011). Measuring knowledge, attitudes and behaviours concerning education for sustainable development: Two exploratory studies. Social Indicators Research, 100(3), 391–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C., Creech, H., Swayze, N., Kahlke, P. M., Buckler, C., & Rempel, K. (2012). Measuring knowledge, attitudes and behaviours concerning sustainable development among tenth grade students in Manitoba. Social Indicators Research, 106(2), 213–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Kerr, D., & Losito, B. (2010). ICCS 2009 International Report: Civic knowledge, attitudes, and engagement among lower-secondary school students in 38 countries. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudman, S., & Bradburn, N. M. (1983). Asking questions: A practical guide to questionnaire design. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tbilisi+35: Intergovernmental conference on environmental education and sustainable development. Tbilisi Communiqué: Educate today for a sustainable future. https://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/tbilisi_story_komunike_small.pdf. Accessed Aug 13, 2014.

  • UNESCO. (2009). Bonn seclaration. UNESCO world conference on education for sustainable development. Bonn, Germany. http://www.esd-world-conference-2009.org/fileadmin/download/ESD2009_BonnDeclaration080409.pdf. Accessed Aug 5, 2014.

  • UNESCO. (2012). Shaping the education of tomorrow: 2012 full length report on the UN decade of education for sustainable development. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2013). Education for sustainable development (ESD): A sound investment to accelerate African development. https://en.unesco.org/events/education-sustainable-development-esd-sound-investment-accelerate-african-development. Accessed Aug 5, 2014.

  • UNESCO Education Sector. (2006). Framework for the UNDESD International Implementation Scheme. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF, UNESCO: 2013. Making education a priority in the post—2015 development agenda: Report of the global thematic consultation on education in the post-2015 development agenda. http://www.unicef.org/education/files/Making_Education_a_Priority_in_the_Post-2015_Development_Agenda.pdf. Accessed Aug 13, 2014.

  • United Nations. Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals (2014). Outcome document. http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/focussdgs.html. Accessed Aug 13, 2014.

  • United Nations. Conference on Sustainable Development (2012). The future we want: outcome document. http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/futurewewant.html. Accessed Aug 13, 2014.

  • Viswanathan, M. (2005). Measurement error and research design. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wals, A. (2009). Review of contexts and structures for education for sustainable development 2009. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This Project was supported by the Government of Manitoba and the Centre for Aboriginal and Rural Education Studies, Faculty of Education, Brandon University. We are grateful for the support and collaboration with Manitoba Education and Advanced Learning, and would like to thank all the teachers and administrators who helped us undertake this survey and especially all the students who took the time to complete our questionnaire. As well, in our data collection, we benefited from help of our students Jessica Murray and Erin Paupanekis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex C. Michalos.

Appendices

Appendix 1

1.1 Summary for Student Sustainable Development Survey, 2014: Valid Answers (1–5) in %’s

1.1.1 Information

In the 1987 United Nations report on Environment and Development, sustainable development (SD) was described as “development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs”. We are interested in your understanding of the meaning of sustainable development, from what you have learned at school and from all other sources.

1.1.2 Instructions

Section A: For each sentence below in the space provided, please indicate with an appropriate number whether you strongly agree (1), agree (2), are neutral (3), disagree (4) or strongly disagree (5) with it. If you do not have an opinion, write (6) or do not understand the question, write (7).

Sentence

1–7

1. Improving people’s opportunities for long and healthy lives contributes to SD

 

2. Protecting the environment is necessary for SD

 

3. Economic development is necessary for SD

 

4. A culture of peace where people settle conflicts by discussion is necessary for SD

 

5. Human actions are contributing to changes in our atmosphere and climate systems

 

6. SD requires individuals to reduce all kinds of waste

 

7. Good citizenship is necessary for SD

 

8. Gender equality is important to SD

 

9. The elimination of poverty is necessary for SD

 

10. SD requires access to good quality education for everyone

 

11. SD requires businesses to behave responsibly to their employees, customers and suppliers

 

12. Conservation of fresh water is necessary for SD

 

13. ‘Maintaining biodiversity’ means maintaining the number and variety of living organisms. This is necessary for SD

 

14. Respect for cultural diversity (variety of cultures) is necessary for SD

 

15. SD requires respect for human rights

 

16. SD requires shifting to the use of renewable resources as much as possible

 

17. SD requires achieving the United Nations’ Millennium Development Goals

 

18. SD requires people to learn new things throughout their lives

 

19. SD requires people to reflect on what it means to improve the quality of life

 

20. SD requires that people understand how the economy works

 

21. I have taken a course in which sustainable development was discussed

 

Section A: Summary

Sentence

N

M

1

Strongly agree (%)

2

Agree (%)

3

Neutral (%)

4

Disagree (%)

5

Strongly disagree (%)

6

Don’t know

7

Don’t underst. + missing

1

950

1.98

28.6

48.5

19.9

2.0

0.9

60

95 + 3

2

1,038

1.74

46.9

36.5

13.9

1.5

1.2

36

31 + 3

3

990

2.20

21.5

45.7

26.5

4.1

2.2

59

56 + 3

4

991

2.12

29.7

38.7

23.4

5.9

2.3

52

61 + 4

5

1,012

1.85

45.5

32.3

16.3

3.3

2.7

45

49 + 2

6

984

2.11

29.1

39.9

23.7

5.2

2.1

73

46 + 5

7

1,005

2.10

28.9

41.5

22.8

4.6

2.3

59

39 + 5

8

1,000

2.03

39.1

33.0

17.4

6.8

3.7

52

51 + 5

9

975

2.10

29.6

40.8

21.7

5.6

2.2

70

58 + 5

10

1,015

1.91

36.7

42.6

14.8

4.4

1.5

51

35 + 7

11

997

2.01

31.6

43.4

19.4

4.0

1.6

67

38 + 6

12

1,019

1.66

53.8

32.2

9.8

2.5

1.8

44

39 + 6

13

934

2.07

32.1

36.4

25.2

4.6

1.7

67

103 + 4

14

999

1.92

37.7

40.7

15.8

3.2

2.5

52

51 + 6

15

1,021

1.73

48.7

36.2

10.6

2.6

1.9

45

36 + 6

16

948

2.03

33.4

37.9

23.4

3.2

2.1

63

92 + 5

17

737

2.38

17.0

38.0

36.8

6.2

2.0

165

199 + 7

18

1,009

2.10

27.4

43.0

23.8

4.0

1.9

59

36 + 4

19

998

2.12

27.3

42.3

23.9

4.6

1.9

62

44 + 4

20

988

2.28

21.6

41.1

28.3

6.3

2.7

70

45 + 5

21

902

2.72

18.8

31.5

19.6

19.4

10.6

118

80 + 8

  1. Mean calculations are not reverse calculated here

Section B: Again, for each sentence below in the space provided, please indicate with an appropriate number whether you strongly agree (1), agree (2), are neutral (3), disagree (4) or strongly disagree (5) with it. If you do not have an opinion, write (6) or do not understand the question, write (7).

Sentence

1–7

1. Every person should receive education that teaches the knowledge, values and skills necessary for sustainable living in a community

 

2. The present generation should make sure that the next generation can live in communities that are at least as healthy as those that exist today

 

3. Manufacturers should discourage the use of disposables

 

4. As long as resources are available, using more than we need now does not threaten the health and welfare of future generations

 

5. We don’t need stricter laws and regulations to protect the environment

 

6. It is important to find ways to reduce poverty

 

7. SD will not be possible until wealthier nations stop exploiting workers in poorer nations

 

8. Understanding and addressing the problems of climate change is not important

 

9. Use of fuel-efficient vehicles should be encouraged by governments

 

10. Governments should adopt SD as a national priority

 

11. Citizens should be well-informed and actively participate in democratic processes like voting

 

12. People who pollute our land, air or water should pay for damage done to communities and the environment

 

13. Males and females should have equal access to all kinds of education and employment

 

14. It is alright to use as much water as we want, as long as it is available

 

15. Household tasks should be equally shared among members of the household regardless of gender

 

Section B: Summary

Sentence

N

M

1

Strongly agree (%)

2

Agree (%)

3

Neutral (%)

4

Disagree (%)

5

Strongly disagree (%)

6

Don’t know

7

Don’t underst. + missing

1

1,029

1.65

51.1

37.1

9.0

1.5

1.3

32

30 + 17

2

1,020

1.68

51.0

35.1

10.4

1.6

2.0

44

27 + 17

3

919

2.23

27.2

35.8

26.6

7.4

3.0

84

83 + 22

4

967

3.44

10.3

17.3

18.9

25.1

28.3

70

52 + 19

5

988

3.19

14.1

19.2

20.5

25.6

20.5

70

32 + 18

6

1,008

1.83

40.6

41.7

13.4

2.7

1.7

45

37 + 18

7

886

2.26

25.3

36.5

28.1

7.0

3.2

108

90 + 24

8

984

3.51

7.9

15.4

20.6

29.5

26.5

66

35 + 23

9

975

2.25

28.7

37.1

20.3

7.7

6.2

73

35 + 25

10

933

2.34

22.1

36.2

31.1

6.9

3.8

93

52 + 30

11

959

2.09

30.7

38.7

23.9

4.8

2.0

79

45 + 25

12

988

2.28

30.1

32.2

23.7

8.1

6.0

71

24 + 25

13

1,013

1.56

63.6

22.3

10.2

2.4

1.6

40

32 + 23

14

983

3.23

13.8

16.8

22.1

26.9

20.4

67

35 + 23

15

963

1.99

38.9

34.2

19.1

4.8

3.0

86

33 + 26

  1. Mean calculations are not reverse calculated here

Section C: Using the same 5-point (plus 2) scale from Sections A and B, what is your level of agreement with the following possible descriptions of your own behaviour?

Sentence

1–7

1. I choose to walk or bike to places instead of using a motor vehicle

 

2. I never waste water

 

3. At home I recycle as much as I can

 

4. When I use the computer or phone for social networking or gaming I always treat everyone as respectfully as I would in person

 

5. I always make lifestyle choices that are good for my health

 

6. I try to do things that will help people living in poverty

 

7. I pick up litter when I see it in a park or a natural area

 

8. I do not think about how I might be damaging the natural environment

 

9. Even when I have the option, I do not always compost

 

10. I try to avoid buying goods from companies with poor track records on caring for their workers or the environment

 

11. I have changed my personal lifestyle to reduce waste

 

12. I participate in democratic activities related to student life at my school

 

13. I volunteer to work with local charities or environmental groups

 

14. I usually examine problems from many points of view

 

15. I have thought quite a bit about how to live sustainably

 

16. I give men and women, boys and girls the same level of respect

 

Section C: Summary

Sentence

N

M

1

Strongly agree (%)

2

Agree (%)

3

Neutral (%)

4

Disagree (%)

5

Strongly disagree (%)

6

Don’t know

7

Don’t underst. + missing

1

1,008

2.67

19.4

26.5

29.9

16.5

7.7

53

14 + 33

2

1,027

3.05

10.6

20.6

30.1

30.6

8.1

36

13 + 32

3

1,021

2.45

23.8

34.0

21.7

14.3

6.2

37

16 + 34

4

1,010

2.26

29.8

35.8

19.9

7.7

6.7

43

21 + 34

5

1,015

2.65

15.9

30.3

31.9

16.9

4.9

43

18 + 32

6

972

2.64

13.0

32.1

37.1

13.7

4.1

76

29 + 31

7

1,011

2.91

9.9

26.9

32.5

23.1

7.5

47

20 + 30

8

1,014

3.16

6.9

23.5

28.3

29.5

11.8

44

18 + 32

9

933

2.72

12.5

34.0

29.0

17.8

6.6

72

71 + 32

10

868

2.98

12.1

20.0

35.6

22.2

10.0

147

58 + 35

11

981

2.96

9.7

23.1

35.4

24.7

7.1

72

23 + 32

12

927

2.91

11.9

27.1

28.0

24.2

8.8

86

62 + 33

13

971

2.98

12.0

23.3

28.2

27.7

8.8

80

25 + 32

14

994

2.36

21.4

37.2

29.0

8.7

3.7

52

28 + 34

15

966

2.60

14.8

32.1

34.6

14.9

3.6

81

29 + 32

16

1,019

1.83

48.5

29.9

14.3

5.0

2.3

38

19 + 32

  1. Mean calculations are not reverse calculated here

1.2 Description of Sample

The following questions are used to describe the sample of students who have taken part in this survey and for statistical purposes.

  1. D1.

    Are you:        48.4 %   Female    51.6 %    Male       N = 1,057.

  2. D2.

    Your present age: _______ years N = 1,045, M = 15.7. Age ranged from 13 to 22 years.

  3. D3.

    How would you name your cultural, ethnic or national background? (e.g., Chinese, Cree, Métis, English Canadian, Greek, etc.) N = 1,061.

Ethnicity

Percentage (%)

Frequency

African

2.5

27

American

0.8

9

Asian

8.7

92

Australia/Oceania

0.1

1

Canadian

53.8

571

Caribbean

0.1

1

Central American/Mexico

1.0

11

European

5.5

58

First Nations

15.4

163

French Canadian

0.7

7

Metis

6.3

67

Middle Eastern

1.0

11

South American

0.8

8

Other

3.3

35

  1. D4.

    What is the name of your School Division? N = 1,069.

School division

Percentage (%)

Beautiful Plains

5.5

Brandon

14.1

Evergreen

0.9

Flin Flon

1.6

Frontier

17.5

Hanover

0.7

Kelsey

2.1

Lakeshore

2.0

Lord Selkirk

6.3

Mountain View

3.9

Mystery Lake

3.6

Park West

2.2

Pine Creek

0.9

Prairie Spirit

2.2

Rolling River

4.5

Southwest Horizon

4.2

Turtle Mountain

0.8

Turtle River

3.4

Winnipeg

23.5

  1. D5.

    What is the name of your School? N = 1,063 (Table includes School Groupings).

School name

% of tot.

School group

Of group

Group of total data

Alonsa School

1.0

Rural

1.8

 

Arborg Collegiate

0.1

Rural

0.2

 

Ashern Central School

1.0

Rural

1.8

 

Birtle Collegiate

2.0

Rural

3.5

 

Boissevain School

0.8

Rural

1.5

 

Carberry Collegiate

2.0

Rural

3.5

 

Cartwright School

1.3

Rural

2.4

 

Crocus Plains High School

3.7

Rural

6.6

 

Deloraine School

1.4

Rural

2.5

 

Elton Collegiate

0.1

Rural

0.2

 

Ethelbert School

0.7

Rural

1.2

 

Falcon Beach School

0.3

Rural

0.5

 

Gilbert Plains Collegiate

1.7

Rural

3.0

 

Glenboro School

0.9

Rural

1.7

 

Glenella School

0.4

Rural

0.7

 

Goose Lake High School

1.6

Rural

2.9

 

Hamiota Collegiate

0.1

Rural

0.2

 

Hartney School

0.5

Rural

0.08

 

Landmark Collegiate

0.8

Rural

1.3

 

Little Black River School

0.8

Rural

1.3

 

Lord Selkirk Regional Comprehensive School

6.3

Rural

11.3

 

Lundar School

0.9

Rural

1.7

 

Melita School

0.9

Rural

1.7

 

Minegoziibe Anishinabe School

1.0

Rural

1.8

 

Minnedosa Collegiate

2.5

Rural

4.5

 

Neepawa Area Collegiate

3.6

Rural

6.4

 

Pierson School

0.6

Rural

1.0

 

Rivers Collegiate

1.8

Rural

3.2

 

Riverton Collegiate

0.8

Rural

1.5

 

Rorketon School

1.1

Rural

2.0

 

Shoal Lake School

0.3

Rural

0.5

 

Ste. Rose School

2.0

Rural

3.5

 

Vincent Massey Collegiate

10.1

Rural

18.0

 

Wanipigow School

1.4

Rural

2.5

 

Waskada School

0.8

Rural

1.3

 

William Morton Collegiate Institute

0.8

Rural

1.3

 

School group rural

   

56.0, N = 595

Children of the Earth High School

1.2

Winnipeg

5.2

 

Churchill High

4.7

Winnipeg

20.1

 

Ecole Churchill

0.7

Winnipeg

2.8

 

Kelvin High School

13.5

Winnipeg

57.4

 

R.B. Russell Vocational

1.4

Winnipeg

6.0

 

St. John’s High School

2.0

Winnipeg

8.4

 

School group Winnipeg

   

23.4, N = 249

Cormorant Lake School

0.8

Northern/remote

3.7

 

Frontier Collegiate Institute

9.9

Northern/remote

47.9

 

Gillam School

0.8

Northern/remote

3.7

 

Grand Rapids School

0.1

Northern/remote

0.5

 

Hapnot Collegiate Institute

1.5

Northern/remote

7.3

 

Helen Betty Osborne Ininiw Education Resource Centre

0.6

Northern/remote

2.7

 

Joseph H. Kerr School

0.5

Northern/remote

2.3

 

Leaf Rapids Education Centre

0.4

Northern/remote

1.8

 

Margaret Barbour Collegiate Institute

1.7

Northern/remote

8.2

 

Mary Duncan School

0.4

Northern/remote

1.8

 

Mel Johnson School

0.1

Northern/remote

0.5

 

Oscar Blackburn School

0.4

Northern/remote

1.8

 

R.D. Parker Collegiate

3.7

Northern/remote

17.8

 

School group northern/remote

   

20.6, N = 219

Appendix 2

2.1 Summary for Student Sustainable Development Survey, 2014: Valid AND Don’t Know and Don’t Understand Answers in %’s

Section A: Summary

Sentence

N

1

Strongly agree (%)

2

Agree (%)

3

Neutral (%)

4

Disagree (%)

5

Strongly disagree (%)

6

Don’t know (%)

7

Don’t underst. (%)

Missing (%)

1

1,108

24.5

41.6

17.1

1.7

0.8

5.4

8.6

0.3

2

1,108

44.0

34.2

13.0

1.4

1.1

3.2

2.8

0.3

3

1,108

19.2

40.8

23.6

3.7

2.0

5.3

5.1

0.3

4

1,108

26.5

34.7

20.9

5.2

2.1

4.7

5.5

0.4

5

1,108

41.5

29.5

14.9

3.0

2.4

4.1

4.4

0.2

6

1,108

25.8

35.5

21.0

4.6

1.9

6.6

4.2

0.5

7

1,108

26.2

37.6

20.7

4.2

2.1

5.3

3.5

0.5

8

1,108

35.3

29.8

15.7

6.1

3.3

4.7

4.6

0.5

9

1,108

26.1

35.9

19.1

5.0

1.9

6.3

5.2

0.5

10

1,108

33.7

39.0

13.5

4.1

1.4

4.6

3.2

0.6

11

1,108

28.4

39.1

17.4

3.6

1.4

6.0

3.4

0.5

12

1,108

49.5

29.6

9.0

2.3

1.6

4.0

3.5

0.5

13

1,108

27.1

30.7

21.2

3.9

1.4

6.0

9.3

0.4

14

1,108

34.0

36.7

14.3

2.9

2.3

4.7

4.6

0.5

15

1,108

44.9

33.4

9.7

2.4

1.7

4.1

3.2

0.5

16

1,108

28.6

32.4

20.0

2.7

1.8

5.7

8.3

0.5

17

1,108

11.3

25.3

24.5

4.2

1.4

14.9

18.0

0.6

18

1,108

24.9

39.2

21.7

3.6

1.7

5.3

3.2

0.4

19

1,108

24.5

38.1

21.6

4.2

1.7

5.6

4.0

0.4

20

1,108

19.2

36.6

25.3

5.6

2.4

6.3

4.1

0.5

21

1,108

15.3

25.6

16.0

15.8

8.7

10.6

7.2

0.7

Section B: Summary

Sentence

N

1

Strongly agree (%)

2

Agree (%)

3

Neutral (%)

4

Disagree (%)

5

Strongly disagree (%)

6

Don’t know (%)

7

Don’t underst. (%)

Missing (%)

1

1,108

47.5

34.5

8.4

1.4

1.2

2.9

2.7

1.5

2

1,108

46.9

32.2

9.6

1.4

1.8

4.0

2.4

1.5

3

1,108

22.6

29.7

22.0

6.1

2.5

7.6

7.5

2.0

4

1,108

9.0

15.1

16.5

21.9

24.7

6.3

4.7

1.7

5

1,108

12.5

17.1

18.3

22.8

18.3

6.3

2.9

1.6

6

1,108

36.9

37.9

12.2

2.4

1.5

4.1

3.3

1.6

7

1,108

20.2

29.2

22.5

5.6

2.5

9.7

8.1

2.2

8

1,108

7.0

13.7

18.3

26.2

23.6

6.0

3.2

2.1

9

1,108

25.3

32.7

17.9

6.8

5.4

6.6

3.2

2.3

10

1,108

18.6

30.5

26.2

5.8

3.2

8.4

4.7

2.7

11

1,108

26.5

33.5

20.7

4.2

1.7

7.1

4.1

2.3

12

1,108

26.8

28.7

21.1

7.2

5.3

6.4

2.2

2.3

13

1,108

58.1

20.4

9.3

2.2

1.4

3.6

2.9

2.1

14

1,108

12.3

14.9

19.6

23.8

18.1

6.0

3.2

2.1

15

1,108

33.8

29.7

16.6

4.2

2.6

7.8

3.0

2.3

Section C: Summary

Sentence

N

1

Strongly agree (%)

2

Agree (%)

3

Neutral (%)

4

Disagree (%)

5

Strongly disagree (%)

6

Don’t know (%)

7

Don’t underst. (%)

Missing (%)

1

1,108

17.7

24.1

27.2

15.0

7.0

4.8

1.3

3.0

2

1,108

9.8

19.1

27.9

28.3

7.5

3.2

1.2

2.9

3

1,108

21.9

31.3

20.0

13.2

5.7

3.3

1.4

3.1

4

1,108

27.2

32.7

18.1

7.0

6.1

3.9

1.9

3.1

5

1,108

14.5

27.8

29.2

15.5

4.5

3.9

1.6

2.9

6

1,108

11.4

28.2

32.6

12.0

3.6

6.9

2.6

2.8

7

1,108

9.0

24.5

29.7

21.1

6.9

4.2

1.8

2.7

8

1,108

6.3

21.5

25.9

27.0

10.8

4.0

1.6

2.9

9

1,108

10.6

28.6

24.5

15.0

5.6

6.5

6.4

2.9

10

1,108

9.5

15.7

27.9

17.4

7.9

13.3

5.2

3.2

11

1,108

8.6

20.5

31.3

21.8

6.3

6.5

2.1

2.9

12

1,108

9.9

22.7

23.5

20.2

7.4

7.8

5.6

3.0

13

1,108

10.6

20.4

24.7

24.3

7.7

7.2

2.3

2.9

14

1,108

19.2

33.4

26.0

7.8

3.3

4.7

2.5

3.1

15

1,108

12.9

28.0

30.1

13.0

3.2

7.3

2.6

2.9

16

1,108

44.6

27.5

13.2

4.6

2.1

3.4

1.7

2.9

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Michalos, A.C., Kahlke, P.M., Rempel, K. et al. Progress in Measuring Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviours Concerning Sustainable Development Among Tenth Grade Students in Manitoba. Soc Indic Res 123, 303–336 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0752-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0752-1

Keywords

Navigation