Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviours Concerning Sustainable Development among Tenth Grade Students in Manitoba

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we present standardized measures of tenth grade students’ knowledge, attitudes and behaviours concerning sustainable development as those concepts are understood in the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, and we test the hypothesis that knowledge and favourable attitudes toward SD lead to favourable behaviours. Using a fairly representative random sample of 1,551 tenth grade students from the province of Manitoba, Canada, we crafted 3 indexes. There is a 20-item Index of Knowledge of SD with a good Cronbach alpha = 0.89, a 15-item Index of Attitudes Favourable Toward SD with alpha = 0.84 and a 15-item Index of Behaviours Favourable Toward SD with an alpha = 0.83. About 21% of the variation in our Behaviours Index scores could be accounted for by our Knowledge Index and Attitudes Index scores.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bollen, K. A. (1984). Multiple indicators: Internal consistency or no necessary relationship. Quality & Quantity, 18, 377–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • CMEC. (2010). Report to UNECE and UNESCO on Indicators of Education for Sustainable Development: Report for Canada 2007–2010, Draft 2–June 2010. Canada: Council of Ministers of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fayers, P. M., & Hand, D. J. (2002). Causal variables, indicator variables and measurement scales: An example from quality of life. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 165 (Part 2), pp. 233–261.

  • Manitoba Education (2010) Enrolment report September 30, 2009, http://www.edu.gov.mb.ca/k12/finance/sch_enrol/index.html.

  • Michalos, A. C., Creech, H., McDonald, C., & Hatch Kahlke, P. M. (2009). Measuring knowledge, attitudes and behaviours towards sustainable development: Two exploratory studies. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg, http://www.iisd.org.

  • Michalos, A. C., Creech, H., McDonald, C., & Hatch Kahlke, P. M. (2011). Measuring knowledge, attitudes and behaviours concerning education for sustainable development: Two exploratory studies. Social Indicators Research, 100(3), 391–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudman, S., & Bradburn, N. M. (1983). Asking questions: A practical guide to questionnaire design. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2009). Final draftBonn declaration, http://www.esd-world-conference-2009.org/fileadmin/download/ESD2009_BonnDeclaration080409.pdf.

  • UNESCO Education Sector. (2006). Framework for the UNDESD International Implementation Scheme. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan, M. (2005). Measurement error and research design. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wals, A. (2009). Review of contexts and structures for education for sustainable development 2009. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was supported through the designated grant portion of the Government of Manitoba’s support for IISD, in addition to the province’s core institutional support to the Institute. We are grateful for the support and collaboration with Manitoba Education, and would like to thank all the teachers and administrators who helped us undertake this survey and especially all the students who took the time to complete our questionnaire. As well, we benefited from suggestions by Judith Tobin and Alcyone Vasconcelos on the fourth draft of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alex C. Michalos.

Additional information

An earlier version of this paper was circulated on the IISD website.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Summary for Student Sustainable Development Survey, 2010 Valid Answers (1–5) in %’s

1.1 Information

In the 1987 United Nations report on Environment and Development, sustainable development (SD) was described as “development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. We are interested in your understanding of the meaning of sustainable development, from what you have learned at school and from all other sources.

1.2 Instructions

For each sentence below in the space provided, please indicate with an appropriate number whether you strongly agree (1), agree (2), are neutral (3), disagree (4) or strongly disagree (5) with it. If you do not have an opinion, write (6) or do not understand the question, write (7).

Section A

Sentence

1–7

1. Economic development is necessary for sustainable development (SD)

 

2. Improving people’s opportunities for long and healthy lives contributes to SD

 

3. Protecting the environment is necessary for SD

 

4. A culture of peace where people settle conflicts by discussion is necessary for SD

 

5. Human actions are contributing to changes in our atmosphere and climate systems

 

6. SD requires individuals to reduce all kinds of waste

 

7. Good citizenship is necessary for SD

 

8. SD is not dependent on gender equality

 

9. The elimination of poverty is necessary for SD

 

10. SD requires access to good quality education for everyone

 

11. SD requires businesses to behave responsibly to their employees, customers and suppliers

 

12. Conservation of fresh water is necessary for SD

 

13. ‘Maintaining biodiversity’ means maintaining the number and variety of living organisms. This is necessary for SD

 

14. Respect for cultural diversity is necessary for SD

 

15. SD results in fair distribution of goods and services to all people around the world

 

16. SD requires respect for human rights

 

17. SD requires shifting to the use of renewable resources as much as possible

 

18. SD requires achieving the United Nations’ Millennium Development Goals

 

19. SD requires people to learn new things throughout their lives

 

20. SD requires people to reflect on what it means to improve the quality of life

 

21. Cell phone production and usage does not consume a lot of resources

 

22. SD requires that people understand how the economy works

 

23. I have taken a course in which sustainable development was discussed

 

24. SD allows the environment to be radically altered in order to create/maintain jobs

 

Section A Summary: [NOTE: Mean calculations are not reverse calculated here]

Sentence

N

M

1 Strongly agree (%)

2 Agree (%)

3 Neutral (%)

4 Disagree (%)

5 Strongly disagree (%)

6 Don’t know

7 Don’t Underst. +missing

1

1,293

2.13

18.3

56.5

19.8

4.0

1.3

96

162

2

1,400

2.04

23.8

54.1

17.1

3.9

1.1

65

86

3

1,466

1.71

46.7

39.6

11.2

1.4

1.1

32

53

4

1,379

2.26

22.0

43.5

24.1

7.5

2.8

86

86

5

1,470

1.90

42.4

36.1

14.0

4.0

3.5

40

41

6

1,417

2.06

28.1

46.4

18.8

4.5

2.2

59

75

7

1,440

2.25

21.0

45.2

23.5

8.0

2.2

52

59

8

1,336

2.52

24.6

32.0

19.2

14.9

9.3

103

112

9

1,362

2.37

18.7

43.6

22.8

11.7

3.2

120

69

10

1,437

2.07

26.8

48.3

17.5

5.8

1.7

55

59

11

1,377

2.17

22.9

47.7

21.4

5.7

2.3

92

82

12

1,451

1.76

44.1

40.4

12.0

2.5

1.0

43

57

13

1,276

1.99

32.7

42.9

19.4

3.2

1.8

116

159

14

1,409

2.23

24.1

42.9

22.1

7.9

3.1

71

71

15

1,446

2.28

18.1

48.6

22.3

8.7

2.2

88

+17

16

1,434

2.01

32.6

43.4

16.2

5.4

2.3

52

65

17

1,384

1.94

34.3

43.4

17.7

3.3

1.3

68

99

18

976

2.40

14.4

43.0

33.4

6.3

2.9

314

261

19

1,406

2.24

18.6

49.6

23.3

6.7

1.8

76

69

20

1,364

2.21

18.2

50.5

25.2

4.5

1.5

99

88

21

1,262

3.28

7.5

19.8

25.5

31.3

15.8

216

72 + 1

22

1,402

2.37

13.3

50.0

25.6

8.5

2.6

81

68

23

1,289

2.57

18.1

39.3

18.3

15.8

8.5

181

81

24

1,235

2.79

10.0

35.2

29.6

15.7

9.4

170

146

Section B: Again, for each sentence below in the space provided, please indicate with an appropriate number whether you strongly agree (1), agree (2), are neutral (3), disagree (4) or strongly disagree (5) with it. If you do not have an opinion, write (6) or do not understand the question, write (7)

Sentence

1–7

1. Every person should receive education that teaches the knowledge, values and skills necessary for sustainable living in a community

 

2. The present generation should make sure that the next generation can live in communities that are at least as healthy as those that exist today

 

3. Manufacturers should discourage the use of disposables

 

4. As long as resources are available, using more than we need now does not threaten the health and welfare of future generations

 

5. We don’t need stricter laws and regulations to protect the environment

 

6. It is important to find ways to reduce poverty

 

7. SD will not be possible until wealthier nations stop exploiting workers in poorer nations

 

8. Understanding and addressing the problems of climate change is not important

 

9. Use of fuel-efficient vehicles should be encouraged by governments

 

10. Governments should adopt SD as a national priority

 

11. Citizens should be well-informed and actively participate in democratic processes like voting

 

12. People who pollute our land, air or water should pay for damage done to communities and the environment

 

13. It is possible to protect the environment and create jobs even when the economy is doing poorly

 

14. Males and females should have equal access to all kinds of education and employment

 

15. It is useful to estimate the dollar value of the services that the ecosystem provides to us

 

16. It is alright to use as much water as we want, as long as it is available

 

17. Household tasks should be equally shared among members of the household regardless of gender

 

18. I believe that the household tasks in my home should be equally shared among family members regardless of gender

 

Section B: Summary: [NOTE: Mean calculations are not reverse calculated here]

Sentence

N

M

1 Strongly agree (%)

2 Agree (%)

3 Neutral (%)

4 Disagree (%)

5 Strongly disagree (%)

6 Don’t know

7 Don’t Underst. +missing

1

1,440

1.80

39.8

44.9

11.7

2.5

1.2

35

36 + 40

2

1,435

1.84

38.3

45.2

12.5

2.6

1.5

36

40 + 40

3

1,411

2.26

23.2

41.7

24.3

7.7

3.2

100

+40

4

1,356

3.71

6.5

16.7

15.3

22.1

39.4

82

73 + 40

5

1,406

3.42

10.2

17.1

18.6

29.0

25.0

58

47 + 40

6

1,422

1.87

36.4

46.4

12.9

2.2

2.1

45

44 + 40

7

1,236

2.38

19.9

40.4

25.5

9.9

4.4

162

112 + 41

8

1,393

3.72

6.0

14.3

15.6

29.4

34.7

61

57 + 40

9

1,402

2.10

33.7

37.6

18.2

6.5

4.1

66

43 + 40

10

1,302

2.25

21.9

42.9

26.4

5.5

3.3

129

79 + 41

11

1,366

2.21

23.0

44.1

24.8

5.3

2.9

81

64 + 40

12

1,392

2.40

24.4

34.1

25.1

10.3

6.1

80

39 + 40

13

1,328

2.28

19.0

48.1

22.0

8.2

2.7

131

52 + 40

14

1,441

1.67

56.9

26.7

11.0

2.9

2.4

31

39 + 40

15

1,101

2.43

13.0

44.1

33.2

6.0

3.7

215

195 + 40

16

1,420

3.60

6.5

16.1

18.9

28.0

30.4

54

37 + 40

17

1,403

2.14

31.4

39.1

18.7

5.8

5.0

56

52 + 40

18

1,416

2.16

30.9

38.3

19.4

6.9

4.5

51

44 + 40

Section C: Using the same 5-point (plus 2) scale from Sections A and B, what is your level of agreement with the following possible descriptions of your own behaviour?

Sentence

1–7

1. I choose to walk or bike to places instead of using a motor vehicle

 

2. I never waste water

 

3. At home I recycle as much as I can

 

4. When I use the computer or phone for social networking or gaming I always treat everyone as respectfully as I would in person

 

5. I make lifestyle choices that are not good for my health

 

6. I try to do things that will help people living in poverty

 

7. I pick up litter when I see it in a park or a natural area

 

8. I do not think about how I might be damaging the natural environment

 

9. I treat people respectfully, except those who have racial backgrounds different from my own

 

10. Even when I have the option, I do not always compost

 

11. I try to avoid buying goods from companies with poor track records on caring for their workers or the environment

 

12. I have changed my personal lifestyle to reduce waste

 

13. I participate in democratic activities related to student life at my school

 

14. I volunteer to work with local charities or environmental groups

 

15. I usually examine problems from many points of view

 

16. I have thought quite a bit about how to live sustainably

 

17. I give men and women, boys and girls the same level of respect

 

Section C Summary : [NOTE: Mean calculations are not reverse calculated here]

Sentence

N

M

1 Strongly agree (%)

2 Agree (%)

3 Neutral (%)

4 Disagree (%)

5 Strongly disagree (%)

6 Don’t know

7 Don’t Underst. +missing

1

1,430

2.66

17.5

32.0

25.7

16.6

8.3

28

30 + 63

2

1,423

3.31

5.4

16.9

29.1

38.8

9.8

31

34 + 63

3

1,430

2.51

22.2

35.4

19.9

14.5

8.0

28

30 + 63

4

1,423

2.67

19.8

34.2

18.3

14.4

13.2

31

34 + 63

5

1,425

2.80

11.9

32.0

28.9

18.9

8.3

35

28 + 63

6

1,357

2.81

7.4

31.6

39.0

16.6

5.5

89

42 + 63

7

1,403

3.16

7.2

21.4

31.6

27.8

12.0

41

44 + 63

8

1,404

3.22

6.6

21.4

27.4

32.4

12.2

49

35 + 63

9

1,398

3.74

9.8

13.5

13.4

19.2

44.1

28

62 + 63

10

1,294

2.69

11.2

37.6

28.7

15.5

7.0

101

93 + 63

11

1,214

3.06

7.9

22.2

35.9

24.3

9.6

204

70 + 63

12

1,371

3.00

5.7

27.9

34.6

24.2

7.5

80

37 + 63

13

1,305

3.16

7.2

21.9

31.1

27.0

12.8

100

83 + 63

14

1,394

3.19

7.7

20.9

27.3

32.6

11.5

48

46 + 63

15

1,390

2.45

15.9

41.9

27.3

11.4

3.5

53

45 + 63

16

1,353

2.77

8.2

36.0

32.2

17.9

5.7

78

56 + 64

17

1,429

2.03

38.4

35.4

15.6

6.4

4.2

23

36 + 63

1.3 Description of Sample

The following questions are used to describe the sample of students who have taken part in this survey and for statistical purposes.

D1:

Are you:—49.9% Female 50.1% Male N = 1,439

D2:

Your present age:—years N = 1,440, M = 15.6 Age ranged from 14 to 32 years

D3:

How would you name your cultural, ethnic or national background? (e.g., Chinese, Cree, Métis, English Canadian, Greek, etc.) N = 1,384

  

 

Percentage

Frequency

African

1.7

24

American

0.5

7

Asian

10.1

140

Australia/Oceania

0.1

2

Canadian

50.9

705

European

19.1

264

First Nations

6.7

93

Metis

7.7

106

Middle Eastern

1.4

20

South American

0.7

9

Central Am/Mexico/

  

Caribbean

1.0

14

D4:

What are the first 3 characters of your postal code at your residence? N = 1,355

  

Code

Freq

%

Code

Freq

%

Code

Freq

%

r0a

47

3.5

r2l

43

3.2

r3m

15

1.1

r0b

5

.4

r2m

3

.2

r3n

7

.5

r0c

212

15.6

r2p

8

.6

r3p

7

.5

r0g

19

1.4

r2r

30

2.2

r3r

18

1.3

r0h

3

.2

r2v

4

.3

r3t

8

.6

r0j

2

.1

r2w

43

3.2

r3v

1

.1

r0k

13

1.0

r2x

17

1.3

r3y

3

.2

r0m

80

5.9

r2y

117

8.6

r4h

15

1.1

r0v

1

.1

r3a

2

.1

r4j

14

1.0

r0z

1

.1

r3b

7

.5

r5g

1

.1

r1a

1

.1

r3c

13

1.0

r5h

1

.1

r1n

2

.1

r3e

41

3.0

r7a

57

4.2

r2b

1

.1

r3f

1

.1

r7b

40

3.0

r2e

1

.1

r3g

40

3.0

r7c

1

.1

r2g

2

.1

r3h

1

.1

r7v

1

.1

r2h

3

.2

r3j

184

13.6

r8n

60

4.4

r2j

3

.2

r3k

108

8.0

   

r2k

5

.4

r3l

43

3.2

   
D5:

What is the name of your School Division? N = 1,421

  

Winnipeg

Winnipeg

24.2%

Group 60.4%

N = 858

 

St. James-Assiniboia

36.2%

  

Rural

Brandon

8.5%

Group 36.3%

N = 516

 

Border land

3.9%

  
 

Evergreen

3.8%

  
 

Fort la Bosse

1.5%

  
 

Interlake

12.3%

  
 

Mountain view

0.1%

  
 

Prairie rose

1.1%

  
 

Rolling river

1.2%

  
 

Southwest horizon

3.9%

  

Northern/Remote

Mystery lake

3.2%

Group 3.3%

N = 47

 

Frontier

0.1%

  

Appendix 2: Summary for Student Sustainable Development Survey, 2010 Valid and Don’t Know & Don’t Understand answers in %’s

Section A: Summary

Sentence

N

1 Strongly agree (%)

2 Agree (%)

3 Neutral (%)

4 Disagree (%)

5 Strongly disagree (%)

6 Don’t know (%)

7 Don’t underst. (%)

# Miss.

1

1,551

15.3

47.1

16.5

3.4

1.1

6.2

10.4

 

2

1,551

21.5

48.9

15.4

3.5

1.0

4.2

5.5

 

3

1,551

44.2

37.4

10.6

1.4

1.0

2.1

3.4

 

4

1,551

19.5

38.7

21.5

6.7

2.5

5.5

5.5

 

5

1,551

40.2

34.2

13.3

3.8

3.3

2.6

2.6

 

6

1,551

25.7

42.4

17.2

4.1

2.0

3.8

4.8

 

7

1,551

19.5

42.0

21.9

7.4

2.1

3.4

3.8

 

8

1,551

21.1

27.6

16.6

12.8

8.0

6.6

7.2

 

9

1,551

16.4

38.3

20.1

10.3

2.8

7.7

4.4

 

10

1,551

24.8

44.7

16.2

5.4

1.5

3.5

3.8

 

11

1,551

20.4

42.4

19.0

5.1

2.0

5.9

5.3

 

12

1,551

41.3

37.8

11.2

2.3

1.0

2.8

3.7

 

13

1,551

26.9

35.3

16.0

2.6

1.5

7.5

10.3

 

14

1,551

21.9

39.0

20.1

7.2

2.8

4.6

4.6

 

15

1,534

17.1

45.8

21.1

8.2

2.1

5.7

17

16

1,551

30.1

40.2

15.0

5.0

2.1

3.4

4.2

 

17

1,551

30.6

38.7

15.8

3.0

1.2

4.4

6.4

 

18

1,551

9.1

27.1

21.0

3.9

1.8

20.2

16.8

 

19

1,551

16.8

44.9

21.1

6.1

1.7

4.9

4.4

 

20

1,551

16.0

44.4

22.2

4.0

1.4

6.4

5.7

 

21

1,550

6.1

16.1

20.8

25.5

12.9

13.9

4.6

1

22

1,551

12.1

45.2

23.1

7.7

2.3

5.2

4.4

 

23

1,551

15.0

32.6

15.2

13.2

7.1

11.7

5.2

 

24

1,551

8.0

28.0

23.6

12.5

7.5

11.0

9.4

 

Section B: Summary

Sentence

N

1 Strongly agree (%)

2 Agree (%)

3 Neutral (%)

4 Disagree (%)

5 Strongly disagree (%)

6 Don’t know (%)

7 Don’t underst. (%)

# Miss.

1

1,511

37.9

42.8

11.1

2.4

1.1

2.3

2.4

40

2

1,511

36.3

42.9

11.8

2.4

1.5

2.4

2.6

40

3

1,511

21.6

38.9

22.7

7.1

3.0

6.6

40

4

1,511

5.8

15.0

13.8

19.8

35.3

5.4

4.8

40

5

1,511

9.5

15.9

17.3

27.0

23.3

3.8

3.1

40

6

1,511

34.2

43.7

12.2

2.1

2.0

3.0

2.9

40

7

1,510

16.3

33.0

20.9

8.1

3.6

10.7

7.4

41

8

1,511

5.6

13.2

14.4

27.1

32.0

4.0

3.8

40

9

1,511

31.2

34.9

16.9

6.0

3.8

4.4

2.8

40

10

1,510

18.9

37.0

22.8

4.8

2.8

8.5

5.2

41

11

1,511

20.8

39.8

22.4

4.8

2.6

5.4

4.2

40

12

1,511

22.4

31.4

23.2

9.5

5.6

5.3

2.6

40

13

1,511

16.7

42.3

19.3

7.2

2.4

8.7

3.4

40

14

1,511

54.3

25.5

10.5

2.8

2.3

2.1

2.6

40

15

1,511

9.5

32.1

24.2

4.4

2.7

14.2

12.9

40

16

1,511

6.2

15.2

17.8

26.3

28.5

3.6

2.4

40

17

1,511

29.2

36.3

17.4

5.4

4.6

3.7

3.4

40

18

1,511

28.9

35.9

18.1

6.5

4.2

3.4

2.9

40

Section C: Summary

Sentence

N

1 Strongly agree (%)

2 Agree (%)

3 Neutral (%)

4 Disagree (%)

5 Strongly disagree (%)

6 Don’t know (%)

7 Don’t underst. (%)

# Miss.

1

1,488

16.8

30.7

24.7

15.9

7.9

1.9

2.0

63

2

1,488

5.2

16.2

27.8

37.1

9.3

2.1

2.3

63

3

1,488

21.4

34.0

19.1

13.9

7.7

1.9

2.0

63

4

1,488

19.0

32.7

17.5

13.8

12.6

2.1

2.3

63

5

1,488

11.4

30.6

27.7

18.1

7.9

2.4

1.9

63

6

1,488

6.7

28.8

35.6

15.1

5.0

6.0

2.8

63

7

1,488

6.8

20.2

29.8

26.2

11.3

2.8

3.0

63

8

1,488

6.3

20.2

25.9

30.6

11.5

3.3

2.4

63

9

1,488

9.2

12.7

12.6

18.0

41.4

1.9

4.2

63

10

1,488

9.7

32.7

25.0

13.5

6.0

6.8

6.3

63

11

1,488

6.5

18.1

29.3

19.8

7.9

13.7

4.7

63

12

1,488

5.2

25.7

31.9

22.3

6.9

5.4

2.5

63

13

1,488

6.3

19.2

27.3

23.7

11.2

6.7

5.6

63

14

1,488

7.3

19.6

25.5

30.5

10.8

3.2

3.1

63

15

1,488

14.9

39.1

25.5

10.7

3.2

3.6

3.0

63

16

1,487

7.5

32.8

29.3

16.3

5.2

5.2

3.8

64

17

1,488

36.9

34.0

15.0

6.1

4.0

1.5

2.4

63

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Michalos, A.C., Creech, H., Swayze, N. et al. Measuring Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviours Concerning Sustainable Development among Tenth Grade Students in Manitoba. Soc Indic Res 106, 213–238 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9809-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9809-6

Keywords

Navigation