Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Role of women in schooling and child labour decision: the case of urban boys in India

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper uses household level data from National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO) of India, the 55th round (1999–2000), to show that for urban male children there exists significant wage incentive for schooling, though school dropout rate and child labour incidence are not so small. The parents’ level of education plays an important role in reducing this tendency; thus establishing the linkage between social and human capital outcomes in the family. We also look at the incidence of harmful and manual occupations among the child labour. Mother’s education now appears as a very important factor in curbing these incidences; supporting earlier findings that women’s empowerment (one important indicator of which would be female educational level) is indeed instrumental in increasing parental awareness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bhalotra S., Heady C. (1999). Child activities in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa: A comparative analysis. In: Lawrence P., Thirtle C. (eds.) Africa and Asia in Comparative Development. MacMillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P. (1986). The forms of capital. In: Richardson J.G. (eds) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Greenwood, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D.K., A.V. Deardorff and R.M. Stern: 2002, ‘The Determinants of Child Labour: Theory and Evidence’, Discussion Paper No. 480, Research Seminar in International Economics, School of Public Policy, The University of Michigan

  • Central Statistical Organisation, Updated National Industrial Classification-2004 (NIC-2004), Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Govt. of India (http://www.mospi.nic.in/nic_2004_struc_detail.pdf)

  • Coleman J.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 94:S95–S120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delap, E.: 1998, The Determinants and Effects of Children’s Income Generating Work in Urban Bangladesh, mimeo

  • Grootaert, C. and H.A. Patrinos: 1998, The Policy Analysis of Child Labor: A Comparative Study, St. Martin’s Press

  • Heady, C.: 2000, What is the Effect of Child Labour on Learning Achievement? Evidence from Ghana, Innocenti Working Paper No. 79 (UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre, Florence)

  • Heltberg, R. and N. Johannesen: 2002, How Parental Education Affects Child Human Capital: Evidence from Mozambique, Institute of Economics, University of Copenhagen, Discussion Paper 02-04

  • International Labor Organization – International Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour: 1996, Child Labour: What is to be Done, Document for Discussion at the Informal Tripartite Meeting at the Ministerial Level (International Labour Office, Geneva)

  • Janssens, W., J. van de Gaag and J.W. Gunning: 2004, The Role of Social Capital in Early Childhood Development: Evidence from Rural India, Amsterdam Institute of International Development

  • Loury G.C. (1977). A dynamic theory of racial income differences. In Wallace P.A., La Mond A.M. (eds) Women, Minorities, and Employment Discrimination. Heath Publishers, Lexington, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Loury G.C. (1981). Intergenerational transfers and distribution of earnings. Econometrica 49:843–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NSSO: 2001, Employment and Unemployment Situation in India, 1999–2000, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Govt. of India

  • National Sample Survey Organisation: 1997, Economic Activities and School Attendance by Children of India, Report No. 412, Fifth Quinquennial Survey, NSS 50th round 1993–1994, Department of Statistics, Government of India

  • The Probe Team (1999). Public Report on Basic Education in India. Oxford University Press, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, R.: 2000, The Determinants of Child Labour and Child Schooling in Ghana. University of Tasmania, mimeo

  • Ray R. (2000a). Child labour, child schooling and their interaction with adult labour: Empirical evidence for Peru and Pakistan. World Bank Economic Review 14:347–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith J.P., Welch F.R. (1989). Black economic progress after Myrdal. Journal of Economic Literature 27:519–564

    Google Scholar 

  • New York State Department of Labor, Workforce New York. (http://www.labor.state.ny.us/ workerprotection/laborstandards/workprot/stprhboc.shtm)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diganta Mukherjee.

Appendix: Detailed classification of Manual and Harmful work

Appendix: Detailed classification of Manual and Harmful work

Manual work will cover one or more of the following occupational groups of the National Classification of Occupations 1968 (NSSO, 2001):

  • Division 5: Service workers:

  • Group 52: cooks, waiters, bartenders and related workers;

  • Group 53: maids and other housekeeping service workers;

  • Group 54: building caretakers, sweepers, cleaners and related workers;

  • Group 55: launders, dry cleaners and pressers;

  • Group 56: hairdressers, barbers, beauticians and related workers;

  • Family 570: fire fighters;

  • Family 574: watchmen, gatekeepers;

  • Family 579: protective service workers not elsewhere classified;

  • Division 6: Farmers, Fishermen, Hunters, Loggers and related workers:

  • Group 63: agricultural labourers;

  • Group 64: plantation labourers and related workers;

  • Group 65: other farm workers;

  • Group 66: forestry workers;

  • Group 67: hunters and related workers;

  • Group 68: fishermen and related workers;

  • Divisions 7–9: Production & related workers, Transport equipment operators and Labourers:

  • All groups excluding Group 85 (electrical fitters and related workers) and Group 86 (broadcasting station and sound equipment operators and cinema projectionists).

  • In some cases occupation codes were not reported and in those cases 5-digit industry codes of National Industrial Classification, 2004 prepared by Central Statistical Organisation were consulted to identify whether those children were actually manual or non-manual labourers.

The list of harmful works in Indian context are given below:

  • 155 Manufacture of beverages;

  • 261 Manufacture of glass and glass products;

  • 269 Manufacture of non-metallic mineral products n.e.c.;

  • 281 Manufacture of structural metal products, tanks, reservoirs and steam generators;

  • 289 Manufacture of other fabricated metal products; metal working service activities;

  • 291 Manufacture of general purpose machinery;

  • 292 Manufacture of special purpose machinery;

  • 293 Manufacture of domestic appliances, n.e.c.;

  • 451 Site preparation in construction sector;

  • 452 Building of complete construction or parts thereof, civil engineering;

  • 453 Building installation;

  • 454 Building completion;

  • 455 Renting of construction or demolition equipment with operator;

  • 602 Other land transport;

  • 603 Transport via pipelines;

  • 1511 Production, processing and preservation of meat, fish, fruit vegetables, oils and fats;

  • 1512 Processing and preserving of fish and fish products;

  • 1541 Manufacture of bakery products;

  • 2011 Manufacture of veneer sheets; manufacture of plywood, laminated board, particle board and other panels and boards;

  • 2022 Manufacture of builders’ carpentry and joinery.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Das, S., Mukherjee, D. Role of women in schooling and child labour decision: the case of urban boys in India. Soc Indic Res 82, 463–486 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-006-9042-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-006-9042-x

Key words

Navigation