Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 71, Issue 3–4, pp 159–170 | Cite as

Experiencing and Coping with Sexually Objectifying Treatment: Internalization and Resilience

  • Dawn M. SzymanskiEmail author
  • Chandra E. Feltman
Original Article

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to extend Fredrickson and Robert’s (1997) Objectification Theory by examining coping with sexually oppressive experiences via internalization/self-blame as another important way, in addition to self-objectification and internalization of cultural standards of beauty, to possibly explain how sexual objectification experiences (SOEs) influence psychological distress. An additional purpose of this study was to examine the potential moderating or buffering role of resilience in the links between SOEs and psychological distress and between SOEs and coping with these experiences via internalization, self-objectification, and internalization of cultural standards of beauty. Our sample included 270 young adult heterosexual undergraduate women from the Southeast region of the United States who completed an online survey. Results revealed that both coping with sexist oppression via internalization and self-objectification uniquely mediated the SOEs-psychological distress link but internalization of cultural standards of beauty did not. Results from the moderation analyses indicated that the direct effect of SOEs and coping with via internalization and the conditional indirect effects of SOEs on psychological distress were contingent on resilience such that these relationships were only significant among women with low resilience or at the mean of resilience, suggesting that high resilience plays a buffering role whereas low resilience plays an exacerbating role.

Keywords

Sexism Objectification Coping behaviors Resilience Psychological distress 

References

  1. Agaibi, C. E., & Wilson, J. P. (2005). Trauma, PTSD, and resilience: A review of the literature. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 6, 195–216. doi: 10.1177/1524838005277438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychological Association. (2007). Guidelines for psychological practice with girls and women. American Psychologist, 62, 949–979. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.62.9.949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin, D. R., Jackson, D., Okoh, I., & Cannon, R. L. (2011). Resiliency and optimism: An African American senior citizen’s perspective. Journal of Black Psychology, 37, 24–41. doi: 10.1177/0095798410364394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell-Sills, L., Cohan, S. L., & Stein, M. B. (2006). Relationship of resilience to personality, coping, and psychiatric symptoms in young adults. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 585–599. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.05.001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carr, E. R., & Szymanski, D. M. (2011). Sexual objectification and substance use in young adult women. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 39–66. doi: 10.1177/0011000010378449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carr, E. R., Szymanski, D. M., Taha, F., West, L., & Kaslow, N. (2014). Understanding the link between multiple oppressions and depression among low-income African American women: The role of internalization. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38, 233–245. doi: 10.1177/0361684313499900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Casey, G. W., Jr. (2011). Comprehensive soldier fitness: A vision for psychological resilience in the US army. American Psychologist, 66, 1–3. doi: 10.1037/a0021930.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cicchetti, D., & Garmezy, N. (1993). Prospects and promises in the study of resilience. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 497–502. doi: 10.1017/S0954579400006118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark, R., Anderson, N. B., Clark, V. R., & Williams, D. R. (1999). Racism as a stressor for African Americans: A biopsychosocial model. American Psychologist, 54, 805–816. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.54.10.805.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. T. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety, 18(2), 76–82. doi: 10.1002/da.10113.
  11. Deane, F. P., Leathem, J., & Spicer, J. (1992). Clinical norms, reliability and validity for the Hopkins symptom checklist-21. Australian Journal of Psychology, 44, 21–25. doi: 10.1080/00049539208260158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Derogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S., Rickets, K., Uhlenhuth, E. H., & Covi, L. (1974). The Hopkins symptom checklist (HSCL): A self-report symptom inventory. Behavioral Science, 19, 1–14. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830190102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Flach, F. F. (1988). Resilience: Discovering a new strength at times of stress. New York: Fawcett Columbine.Google Scholar
  15. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Green, D. E., Walkey, F. H., McCormick, I. A., & Taylor, A. J. W. (1988). Development and evaluation of a 21-item version of the Hopkins symptom checklist with New Zealand and United States respondents. Australian Journal of Psychology, 40, 61–70. doi: 10.1080/00049538808259070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harms, P. D., Herian, M. N., Krasikova, D. V., Vanhove, A., & Lester, P. B. (2013). The comprehensive soldier and family fitness program evaluation report# 4: Evaluation of resilience training and mental and behavioral health outcomes. United States army comprehensive soldier fitness program. Monterrey, CA: Office of the deputy under secretary of the army. Retrieved from http://csf2.army.mil/supportdocs/TR4.pdf.
  18. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation and conditional process analysis: A regression based approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  19. Heinberg, L. J., Thompson, J. K., & Stormer, S. (1995). Development and validation of the sociocultural attitudes toward appearance questionnaire. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 17, 81–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kozee, H. B., & Tylka, T. L. (2006). A test of objectification theory with lesbian women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 348–357. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00310.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kozee, H. B., Tylka, T. L., Augustus-Horvath, C. L., & Denchik, A. (2007). Development and psychometric evaluation of the interpersonal sexual objectification scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 176–189. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00351.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lopez, S. J., & Snyder, C. R. (Eds.). (2011). The Oxford handbook of positive psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Luthar, S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71, 543–562. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00164.
  24. Mallinckrodt, B., Abraham, W. T., Wei, M., & Russell, W. (2006). Advances in testing the statistical significance of mediation effects. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 372–378. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.53.3.372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00467.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 674–697. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Moradi, B., & Huang, Y. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women:A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moradi, B., Dirks, D., & Matteson, A. V. (2005). Roles of sexual objectification experiences and internalization of standards of beauty in eating disorder symptomology: A test and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 420–428. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Parent, M. C. (2013). Handling item-level missing data: Simpler is just as good. The Counseling Psychologist, 41, 568–600. doi: 10.1177/0011000012445176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pinquart, M. (2009). Moderating effects of dispositional resilience on associations between hassles and psychological distress. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2008.10.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi: 10.3758/BRM,40.3.879.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reivich, K. J., Seligman, M. E., & McBride, S. (2011). Master resilience training in the US army. American Psychologist, 66, 25–34. doi: 10.1037/a0021897.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smith, B. W., Dalen, J., Wiggins, K., Tooley, E., Christopher, P., & Bernard, J. (2008). The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15, 194–200. doi: 10.1080/10705500802222972.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Szymanski, D. M., & Henning, S. L. (2007). The role of self-objectification in women’s depression: A test of objectification theory. Sex Roles, 56, 45–53. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9147-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Szymanski, D. M., & Henrichs-Beck, C. (2014). Exploring sexual minority women’s experiences of external and internalized heterosexism and sexism and their links to coping and distress. Sex Roles, 70, 28–42. doi: 10.1007/s11199-013-0329-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Szymanski, D. M., & Obiri, O. (2011). Do religious coping styles moderate or mediate the external and internalized racism-distress links? The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 438–462. doi: 10.1177/0011000010378895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Szymanski, D. M., Carr, E. R., & Moffitt, L. B. (2011a). Sexual objectification of women: Clinical implications and training considerations. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 107–126. doi: 10.1177/1534765609358464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Szymanski, D. M., Moffitt, L. B., & Carr, E. R. (2011b). Sexual objectification of women: Advances to theory and research. The Counseling Psychologist, 39, 6–38. doi: 10.1177/0011000010378402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  41. Thomas, A. J., Witherspoon, K. M., & Speight, S. L. (2008). Gendered racism, psychological distress, and coping styles of African American women. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 14, 307–314. doi: 10.1037/1099-9809.14.4.307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Utsey, S. O., Giesbrecht, N., Hook, J., & Stanard, P. M. (2008). Cultural, sociofamilial, and psychological resources that inhibit psychological distress in African Americans exposed to stressful life events and race-related stress. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55, 49–62. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.55.1.49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wagnild, G. (2009). A review of the resilience scale. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 17, 105–113. doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.17.2.105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Watson, L. B., Robinson, D., Dispenza, F., & Nazari, N. (2012). African American women’s sexual objectification experiences: A qualitative study. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 458–475. doi: 10.1177/0361684312454724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Watson, L. B., Ancis, J. R., White, D. N., & Nazari, N. (2013). Racial identity buffers African American women from body image problems and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 337–350. doi: 10.1177/036184312474799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wei, M., Alvarez, A. N., Ku, T., Russell, D. W., & Bonett, D. G. (2010). Development and validation of a coping with discrimination scale: Factor structure, reliability, and validity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57, 328–344. doi: 10.1037/a0019969.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Weston, R., & Gore, P. A. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 719–751. doi: 10.1177/0011000006286345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Windle, G., Bennett, K. M., & Noyes, J. (2011). A methodological review of resiliencemeasurement scales. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 9, 2–18. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wingo, A. P., Wrenn, G., Pelletier, T., Gutman, A. R., Bradley, B., & Ressler, K. J. (2010). Moderating effects of resilience on depression in individuals with a history of childhood abuse or trauma exposure. Journal of Affective Disorders, 126, 411–414. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.04.009.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations