Abstract
Consent determination is a common practice that has been championed as a logical approach (Lyden in Sex Disabil 25(1):3–20, 2007) to the sexual activity of individuals with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities. These practices are paternalistic and ineffectual, and need to be replaced with viable alternatives, such as sex-education provision. In this piece, I deconstruct the logic of this practice utilizing the case of Ashley X, contemporary research findings, an analysis provided by Perlin and Lynch (Sexuality, disability, and the law: beyond the last frontier?, Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2016) and Deborah Stone’s policy analysis framework (Stone in Policy paradox: the art of political decision making, 3rd edn, Norton, New York, 2012). I argue that prevention of sexual activity is not synonymous with protection from sexual harm—and, in fact, may paradoxically cause harm to this population. I dispute the notion that people without intellectual disabilities are more equipped to make sex-related decisions for this population. Additionally, the notion of consent in this population is treated as flexible, and primarily bends to facilitate the needs of people without disabilities. I conclude with several recommendations, including a request for protective civil rights legislation to defend the sexual and relationship rights of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
502 S.E.2d 492, 232 Ga. App. 556 “Baise v. State.” https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1276999/baise-v-state/ (1998). Accessed May 2018
Ailey, S.H., Marks, B.A., Crisp, C., Hahn, J.E.: Promoting sexuality across the life span for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Nurs. Clin. North Am. 38, 229–252 (2003)
Bottoms, B.L., Nysse-Carris, K.L., Harris, T., Tyda, K.: Jurors’ perceptions of adolescent sexual assault victims who have intellectual disabilities. Law Hum. Behav. 27(2), 205–227 (2003)
Campbell, M.: Disabilities and sexual expression: a review of the literature. Sociol. Compass 11(9), 1–19 (2017)
Dukes, E., McGuire, B.E.: Enhancing capacity to make sexuality-related decisions in people with an intellectual disability. J. Intellect. Disabil. Res. 53(8), 727–734 (2009)
Eastgate, G.: Sex, consent and intellectual disability. Aust. Fam. Physician 34(3), 163–166 (2005)
Eastgate, G., Van Driel, M., Lennox, N., Scheermeyer, E.: Women with intellectual disabilities: a study of sexuality, sexual abuse and protection skills. Aust. Fam. Physician 40(4), 226–230 (2011)
English, B., Tickle, A., das Nair, R.: Views and experiences of people with intellectual disabilities regarding intimate relationships: a qualitative metasynthesis. Sex. Disabil. 20, 149–173 (2017)
Feely, M.: Sexual surveillance and control in a community-based intellectual disability service. Sexualities 19(5–6), 725–750 (2016)
Fischel, J.J., O’Connell, H.R.: Disabling consent, or restructuring sexual autonomy. Columbia J. Gend. Law 30(2), 402–528 (2016)
Gilbert, N., Terrell, P.: Dimensions of Social Welfare Policy. Pearson, Berkeley (2012)
Gill, M.: Rethinking sexual abuse, questions of consent, and intellectual disability. Sex. Res. Soc. Policy 7(3), 201–213 (2010)
Gilmore, L., Malcolm, L.: “Best for everyone concerned” or “Only as a last resort”? Views of Australian doctors about sterilisation of men and women with intellectual disability. J. Intellect. Dev. Disabil. 39(2), 177–187 (2014)
Kafer, A.: At the same time, out of time: Ashley X. In: Davis, L.J. (ed.) The Disability Studies Reader, pp. 282–304. Routledge, New York (2017)
Lyden, M.: Assessment of sexual consent capacity. Sex. Disabil. 25(1), 3–20 (2007)
McRuer, R.: Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability, vol. 9. New York University Press, New York (2006)
Murphy, G.H., O’Callaghan, A.: Capacity of adults with intellectual disabilities to consent to sexual relationships. Psychol. Med. 34(7), 1347–1357 (2004)
National Association of Councils on Developmental Disabilities: Councils on developmental disabilities addressing sexual violence & neglect. Retrieved from https://nacdd.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/DD-Councils-Special-Publication.pdf (2017). Accessed May 2018
Perlin, M.L., Lynch, A.J.: Sexuality, Disability, and the Law: Beyond the Last Frontier?. Palgrave Macmillan, London (2016)
Pillowangel.org: The ‘Ashley treatment’ and the wellbeing of ‘pillow angels’. Retrieved from http://pillowangel.org/AT-Summary.pdf (2017). Accessed May 2018
Pollock, A.J., Fost, N., Allen, D.B.: Growth attenuation therapy: practice & perspectives of pediatric endocrinologists. Retrieved from http://pillowangel.org/PAS2014GrowthAttenuationPraceticeandPerspectives4-23-14Poster.pdf (2015). Accessed May 2018
Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN): State Law Database. Retrieved from https://apps.rainn.org/policy/ (2018) Accessed May 2018
Schaafsma, D., Kok, G., Stoffelen, J.M.T., Curfs, L.M.G.: Identifying effective methods for teaching sex education to individuals with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review. J. Sex Res. 52(4), 412–432 (2015)
Schaafsma, D., Kok, G., Stoffelen, J.M.T., Curfs, L.M.G.: People with intellectual disabilities talk about sexuality: implications for the development of sex education. Sex. Disabil. 35(1), 21–38 (2017)
Starogiannis, H., Hill, D.B.: Sex and gender in an American State School (1951–1987): the Willowbrook class. Sex. Disabil. (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-008-9072-1
Stone, D.: Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making, 3rd edn. Norton, New York (2012)
Thompsona, V.R., Stancliffea, R.J., Broomb, A., Wilsonc, N.J.: Clinicians’ use of sexual knowledge assessment tools for people with intellectual disability. J. Intellect. Dev. Disabil. 41(3), 243–254 (2016)
Turner, G.W., Crane, B.: Sexually silenced no more, adults with learning disabilities speak up: a call to action for social work to frame sexual voice as a social justice issue. Br. J. Soc. Work 46, 2300–2317 (2016)
Waxman, B.F.: Up against eugenics: disabled women’s challenge to receive reproductive health services. Sex. Disabil. 12(2), 155–171 (1994)
Winges-Yanez, N.: Why all the talk about sex? An authoethnography identifying the troubling discourse of sexuality and intellectual disability. Sex. Disabil. 32(1), 107–116 (2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Author Andrea Onstot declares that she has no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Onstot, A. Capacity to Consent: Policies and Practices that Limit Sexual Consent for People with Intellectual/Developmental Disabilities. Sex Disabil 37, 633–644 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-019-09580-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-019-09580-9