Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Autism and Child Psychopathology Series ((ACPS))

  • 4371 Accesses

Abstract

Informed consent is a topic which has taken on more significance over time. It is now well established that clients have a right to consent to participate in or withdraw from treatment. For persons with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), many of whom also display intellectual disabilities, special challenges exist. Many of these persons may not be able to completely comprehend what they are being asked to agree to. How these special challenges can be addressed, current professional and legal standards, and sample forms and procedures are addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahern, K. (2012). Informed consent: Are researchers accurately representing risks and benefits? Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 26, 671–678.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, B., & Varela, A. (2015). Caregiver perceptions of clinical decision-making for the treatment of children. Community Mental Health Journal, 51, 828–832.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved from http://apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx

  • Appelbaum, P. S. (2007). Assessment of patients’ competence to consent to treatment. New England Journal of Medicine, 357(18), 1834–1840.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, P., Grisso, P., & Hill-Fotouhi, C. (1997). The MacCAT-T: A clinical tool to assess patients’ capacities to make treatment decisions. Psychiatric Services, 48, 1415–1419.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, P. S., Grisso, T., Frank, E., O’Donnell, S., & Kupfer, D. J. (1999). Competence of depressed patients for consent to research. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 1380–1384.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bean, G., Nishisato, S., Rector, N. A., & Glancy, G. (1994). The psychometric properties of the Competency Interview Schedule. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry/La Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, 39, 368–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernat, J. L. (2001). Informed consent. Muscle & Nerve, 24(5), 614–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brody, B. A. (1998). The ethics of biomedical research: An international perspective. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruzzese, J. M., & Fisher, C. B. (2003). Assessing and enhancing the research consent capacity of children and youth. Applied Developmental Science, 7, 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, A. (2004). Mental capacity, legal competence and consent to treatment. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 97(9), 415–420.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Canterbury v. Spence. (1972). 464 F.2d 772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casarett, D. J., Karlawish, J. H. T., & Hirschman, K. B. (2003). Identifying ambulatory cancer patients at risk of impaired capacity-to-consent to research. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 26, 615–624.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cea, C. D., & Fisher, C. B. (2003). Health care decision-making by adults with mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 41, 78–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (2014). The nocebo effect of informed consent. Bioethics, 28, 147–154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Condie, L. O., & Koocher, G. P. (2008). Clinical management of children’s incomplete comprehension of confidentiality limits. Journal of Child Custody, 5, 161–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeRenzo, E. G., Conley, R. R., & Love, R. (1998). Assessment of capacity to give consent to research participation: State-of-the-art and beyond. J. Health Care L & Pol’y, 1, 66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, R. E., Williams, B. J., & Knowles, A. (2013). Adolescents, risk behavior and confidentiality: When would Australian psychologists breach confidentiality to disclose information to parents? Australian Psychologist, 48, 408–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fields, L. M., & Calvert, J. D. (2015). Informed consent procedures with cognitively impaired patients: A review of ethics and best practices. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 69(8), 462–471.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, C. B., Hoagwood, K., Boyce, C., Duster, T., Frank, D. A., Grisso, T., et al. (2002). Research ethics for mental health science involving ethnic minority children and youth. American Psychologist, 57, 1024–1040.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189–198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T., & Appelbaum, P. S. (1995). Comparison of standards for assessing patients’ capacity to make treatment choices. American Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 1033–1037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. E., Prochazka, A. V., & Fink, A. S. (2012). Informed consent for clinical treatment. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 184(5), 533–540.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, N. (1948). The development of a code of ethical standards for psychology. American Psychologist, 3(3), 80–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzer, J. C., Gansler, D. A., Moczynski, N. P., & Folstein, M. F. (1997). Cognitive functions in the informed consent evaluation process: A pilot study. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 25(4), 531–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacono, T., & Murray, V. (2003). Issues of informed consent in conducting medical research involving people with intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 16(1), 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, A. (2010). Conducting qualitative research with individuals with developmental disabilities: Methodological and ethical considerations. Developmental Disabilities Bulletin, 38(1), 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janofsky, J. S., McCarthy, R. J., & Foistein, M. F. (1992). The Hopkins competency assessment test: A brief method for evaluating patients’ capacity to give informed consent. Psychiatric Services, 43(2), 132–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jerskey, B. A., Correira, E. D., & Morrow, E. M. (2014). Informed consent in adults with Autism: Ethical and legal considerations in the United States. Atlanta, GA: Poster session presented at the International Meeting for Autism Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlawish, J. H. (2003). Research involving cognitively impaired adults. New England Journal of Medicine, 348(14), 1389–1392.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (1972). Experimentation with human beings. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, A., Duncan, R. E., & Hall, A. C. (2015). Ethical dilemmas of confidentiality with adolescent clients: Case studies from psychologists. Ethics and Behavior, 25, 197–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loue, S. (2000). Textbook of research ethics: Theory and practice. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marson, D. C., Ingram, K. K., Cody, H. A., & Harrell, L. E. (1995). Assessing the competency of patients with Alzheimer’s disease under different legal standards: A prototype instrument. Archives of Neurology, 52(10), 949–954.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S., Brian, J., Zwaigenbaum, L., Roberts, W., Szatmari, P., Smith, I., & Bryson, S. (2006). Early language and communication development of infants later diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics, 27, 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, L. G., II, & Cunningham-Williams, R. M. (2009). The capacity to give informed consent in a homeless population with developmental disabilities. Community Mental Health Journal, 45(5), 341–348.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, D. J., Schultz, S. K., Arndt, S., Benjamin, M. L., Fleming, F. W., Brems, C. S., … Andreasen, N. C. (2002). Capacity to provide informed consent for participation in schizophrenia and HIV research. American Journal of Psychiatry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, B. A. (2002). The ethics of surrogate decision making. Western Journal of Medicine, 176(2), 127.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, L. W., & Roberts, B. (1999). Psychiatric research ethics: An overview of evolving guidelines and current ethical dilemmas in the study of mental illness. Biological Psychiatry, 46(8), 1025–1038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, K. J., & Michels, K. B. (1994). The continuing unethical use of placebo controls. The New England Journal of Medication, 331, 394–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M. (2005). The developmental line of autonomy in the etiology, dynamics, and treatment of borderline personality disorders. Development and Psychopathology, 17(04), 987–1006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schloendorff v. Society of New York Hospital. (1914). 105 N.E. 92 (N.Y.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegal, G., Bonnie, R. J., & Appelbaum, P. S. (2012). Personalized disclosure by information-on-demand: Attending to patient’s needs in the informed consent process. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 40, 359–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturman, E. D. (2005). The capacity to consent to treatment and research: A review of standardized assessment tools. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 954–974.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Terry, H. T. (1915). Negligence. Harvard Law Review, 29(1), 40–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomoda, A., Yasumiya, R., Sumiyama, T., Tsukada, K., Hayakawa, T., Matsubara, K., … Kitamura, T. (1997). Validity and reliability of structured interview for competency incompetency assessment testing and ranking inventory. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53(5), 443–450.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wirshing, D. A., Wirshing, W. C., Marder, S. R., Liberman, R. P., & Mintz, J. (1998). Informed consent: assessment of comprehension. American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 1508–1511.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, C., Odom, S. L., Hume, K., Cox, A. W., Fettig, A., Kucharcyzk, S., … Schultz, T. R. (2014). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, Autism Evidence-Based Practice Review Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zayas, L. H., Cabassa, L. J., & Perez, M. C. (2005). Capacity-to-consent in psychiatric research: Development and preliminary testing of a screening tool. Research on Social Work Practice, 15, 545–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert D. Rieske PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rieske, R.D., Babbitt, S.C., Neal, J.H., Spencer, J.A. (2017). Informed Consent. In: Matson, J. (eds) Handbook of Treatments for Autism Spectrum Disorder . Autism and Child Psychopathology Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61738-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics