Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Measuring and characterizing research collaboration in SAARC countries

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scientific collaboration at regional and international levels has increased manifolds during the last 2 decades. The South Asian region, comprising of Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, habitats a significant part of the world population, and is emerging as a major knowledge producer. These South Asian countries are not only connected through shared history, language and culture, but also through an intergovernmental organization called South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC). This article attempts to measure and characterize the research collaboration in the SAARC countries during 2001–2019. The research publication data for analysis is obtained from the Web of Science database. Different kinds of collaboration- inter, mixed, intra and domestic- among the SAARC countries are measured and analyzed through a computational analysis. Results indicate that SAARC countries collaborate more with countries outside the region than within the region. The within region collaboration has grown in volume but is still less than 1% of the total research output from the region. The collaboration is also found to vary across subject areas, with Social Science & Mathematics having higher proportion of international collaboration, Medical Science & Physics having higher mixed-collaboration, and Social Science & Environment Science having higher intra collaboration. Major implications of the results are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://aric.adb.org/fta/south-asian-free-trade-area.

  2. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/SPROLLS/world-economic-outlook-databases#sort=%40imfdate%20descending

References

  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2009). Research collaboration and productivity: Is there correlation? Higher Education, 57(2), 155–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abramo, G., DÁngelo, A. C., & Murgia, G. (2017). The relationship among research productivity, research collaboration, and their determinants. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 1016–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abramo, G., DÁngelo, A. C., & Solazzi, M. (2011). The relationship between scientists’ research performance and the degree of internationalization of their research. Scientometrics, 86(3), 629–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acosta, M., Coronado, D., Ferrandiz, E., & Leon, M. D. (2011). Factors affecting inter-regional academic scientific collaboration within Europe: The role of economic distance. Scientometrics, 87(1), 63–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J. (2012). The rise of research networks. Nature, 490(7420), 3350336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J., Gurney, K., Hook, D., & Leydesdorff, L. (2014). International collaboration clusters in Africa. Scientometrics, 98(1), 547–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arunachalam, S., & Doss, M. J. (2000). Mapping international collaboration in science in Asia through coauthorship analysis. Current Science, 79(5), 621–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arunachalam, S., Srinivasan, R., & Raman, V. (1994). International collaboration in science: Participation by the Asian giants. Scientometrics, 30(1), 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balland, P. A., Boschma, R. A., & Frenken, K. (2015). Proximity and innovation: From statics to dynamics. Regional Studies, 49(6), 907–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, D. D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration, (and its study): Past, present, and future. Scientometrics, 52(3), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014254214337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergé, L. R. (2017). Network proximity in the geography of research collaboration. Papers in Regional Science, 96(4), 785–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnholtz, J. P. (2007). When do researchers collaborate? Toward a model of collaboration propensity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(14), 2226–2239. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boekholt, P., Edler, J., Cunningham, P., & Flanagan, K. (2009). Drivers of international collaboration in research. European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2777/81914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordons, M., Gomez, I., Fernandez, M. T., Zulueta, M. A., & Mendez, A. (1996). Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical research. Scientometrics, 37(2), 279–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R. A. (2005). Proximity and Innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouabid, H., Paul-Hus, A., & Larivière, V. (2016). Scientific collaboration and high-technology exchanges among BRICS and G-7 countries. Scientometrics, 106(3), 873–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., & Glaenzel, W. (1996). International collaboration: Will it be keeping alive East European research? Scientometrics, 36(2), 247–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caniëls, M. C., Kronenberg, K., & Werker, C. (2014). Conceptualizing proximity in research collaborations. In The social dynamics of innovation networks (pp. 247–264). Routledge.

  • Canto, I., & Hannah, J. (2001). A partnership of equals? Academic collaboration between the United Kingdom and Brazil. Journal of Studies in International Education, 5(1), 26–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattaneo, E., & Corbellini, G. (2011). Science under politics An Italian nightmare. Embo Reports, 12(1), 19–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2010.198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive-capacity—a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, J. L., & Teng, B. S. (2003). Transferring R&D knowledge: The key factors affecting knowledge transfer success. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20(1–2), 39–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0923-4748(03)00004-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, S. S., Gharawi, M. A., & Burke, G. B. (2012). Transnational public sector knowledge networks: Knowledge and information sharing in a multi-dimensional context. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), S112–S120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Ippolito, B., & Ruling, C. C. (2019). Research collaboration in large scale research infrastructures: Collaboration types and policy implications. Research Policy, 48(5), 1282–1296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong, Y., Ma, H., Shen, Z., & Wang, K. (2017, August). A century of science: Globalization of scientific collaborations, citations, and innovations. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 1437–1446).

  • Ductor, L. (2015). Does co-authorship lead to higher academic productivity? Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 77(3), 385–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dusdal, J., & Powell, J. J. (2021). Benefits, motivations, and challenges of international collaborative research: A sociology of science case study. Science and Public Policy, 48(2), 235–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Favaro, D., Ninka, E., & Turvani, M. (2012). Productivity in innovation: the role of inventor connections and mobility. MPRA Paper No. 38950. Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/38950/, posted 23 May 2012.

  • Fernández, A., Ferrándiz, E., & León, M. D. (2016). Proximity dimensions and scientific collaboration among academic institutions in Europe: The closer, the better? Scientometrics, 106(3), 1073–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finardi, U. (2015). Scientific collaboration between BRICS countries. Scientometrics, 102(2), 1139–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finardi, U., & Buratti, A. (2016). Scientific collaboration framework of BRICS countries: An analysis of international coauthorship. Scientometrics, 109(1), 433–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenken, K., Hölzl, W., & De Vor, F. (2005). The citation impact of research collaborations: The case of European biotechnology and applied microbiology (1988–2002). Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 22(1–2), 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenken, K., Ponds, R., & Van Oort, F. (2010). The citation impact of research collaboration in science-based industries: A spatial-institutional analysis. Papers in Regional Science, 89(2), 351–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, R., Araujo, V., Mascarini, S., Gomes Dos Santos, E., & Costa, A. (2018). Is cognitive proximity a driver of geographical distance of university–industry collaboration? Area Development and Policy, 3(3), 349–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 51(1), 69–115.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2001). Double effort=double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry. Scientometrics, 50(2), 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Schubert, A., & Czerwon, H. J. (1999). A bibliometric analysis of international scientific cooperation of the European Union (1985–1995). Scientometrics, 45(2), 185–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero Bote, V. P., Olmeda-Gómez, C., & de Moya-Anegón, F. (2013). Quantifying the benefits of international scientific collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 392–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gui, Q., Liu, C., & Du, D. (2018). International knowledge flows and the role of proximity. Growth and Change, 49(3), 532–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, B. M., Munshi, U. M., & Mishra, P. K. (2002). S&T collaboration of India with other South Asian countries. Current Science, 83(10), 1201–1209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, B. M., Munshi, U. M., & Mishra, P. K. (2004). Regional collaboration In S&T among South Asian countries. Anals of Library and Information Studies, 51(4), 121–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heringa, P. W., Hessels, L. K., & van der Zouwen, M. (2016). The influence of proximity dimensions on international research collaboration: An analysis of European water projects. Industry and Innovation, 23(8), 753–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., & Tijssen, R. J. (2010). Research collaboration at a distance: Changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe. Research Policy, 39(5), 662–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y., Shen, C., & Contractor, N. S. (2013). Distance matters: Exploring proximity and homophily in virtual world networks. Decision Support Systems, 55(4), 969–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, K. (2013). Effects of the Language barrier on processes and performance of international scientific collaboration, collaborators’ participation, organizational integrity, and interorganizational relationships. Science Communication, 35(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012437442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inzelt, A., Schubert, A., & Schubert, M. (2009). Incremental citation impact due to international co-authorship in Hungarian higher education institutions. Scientometrics, 78(1), 37–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, S., Choi, J. Y., & Kim, J. (2011). The determinants of research collaboration modes: Exploring the effects of research and researcher characteristics on co-authorship. Scientometrics, 89(3), 967–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, S., Choi, J. Y., & Kim, J. Y. (2014). On the drivers of international collaboration: The impact of informal communication, motivation, and research resources. Science and Public Policy, 41(4), 520–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha, U. C. (2004). Environmental issues and SAARC. Economic and Political Weekly, 39(17), 1666–1671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, L., Zhu, N. B., Yang, Z. L., Xu, S., & Jun, M. (2018). The relationships between distance factors and international collaborative research outcomes: A bibliometric examination. Journal of Informetrics, 12(3), 618–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. F., Wuchty, S., & Uzzi, B. (2008). Multi-university research teams: Shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science. Science, 322(5905), 1259–1262. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1158357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (1994). Geographical proximity and scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 31(1), 31–43.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoben, J., & Oerlemans, L. A. (2006). Proximity and inter-organizational collaboration: A literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(2), 71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S. R., Brennan, S. E., & Siegel, J. (2002). Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. Distributed work, 137–162.

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions. The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226458106.001.0001

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, K., Reichstein, T., & Salter, A. (2011). Exploring the effect of geographical proximity and university quality on university–industry collaboration in the United Kingdom. Regional Studies, 45(4), 507–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leahey, E., & Reikowsky, R. C. (2008). Research specialization and collaboration patterns insociology. Social Studies of Science, 38(3), 425–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312707086190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leta, J., Neves Machado das, R., & Canchumani, R. M. L. (2019). Scientific collaboration among BRICS: Trends and priority areas. In W. Glänzel, H. F. Moed, U. Schmoch, & M. Thelwall (Eds.), Springer handbook of science and technology indicators. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. S. (2008). International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 317–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marmolejo, F., Nagashima, Y., Lothrop, S. C., Alborta, S. X., Aedo, C., Miwa, K., ...& Blom, A. (2019). South Asia: Challenges and Benefits of Research Collaboration in a Diverse Region (No. 135570, pp. 1–52). The World Bank, Available at: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/735021553593295199/pdf/South-Asia-Challenges-and-Benefits-of-Research-Collaboration-in-a-Diverse-Region.pdf .

  • Mattsson, P., Laget, P., Nilsson, A., & Sundberg, C. J. (2008). Intra-EU vs. estra-EU scientific co-publication patterns in EU. Scientometrics, 75(3), 555–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mêgnigbêto, E. (2013). International collaboration in scientific publishing: The case of West Africa (2001–2010). Scientometrics, 96(3), 761–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagpaul, P. S. (2003). Exploring a pseudo-regression model of transnational cooperation in science. Scientometrics, 56(3), 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022335021834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narteh, B. (2008). Knowledge transfer in developed-developing country inter-firm collaborations: A conceptual framework. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(1), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270810852403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, T. V., Ho-Le, T. P., & Le, U. V. (2017). International collaboration in scientific research in Vietnam: An analysis of patterns and impact. Scientometrics, 110(2), 1035–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parish, A. J., Boyack, K. W., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2018). Dynamics of co-authorship and productivity across different fields of scientific research. PLoS ONE, 13(1), e0189742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, O. (2010). Are highly cited papers more international? Scientometrics, 83(2), 397–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, O., Glänzel, W., & Danell, R. (2004). Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, 60(3), 421–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plotnikova, T., & Rake, B. (2014). Collaboration in pharmaceutical research: Exploration of country level determinants. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1173–1202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1182-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponds, R., Van Oort, F., & Frenken, K. (2007). The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration. Papers in Regional Science, 86(3), 423–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, J. J. W., Baker, D. P., & Fernandez, F. (2017). The century of science: The global triumph of the research university. Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3679201733

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116–145. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. J. D. S. (1963). Little science, big science. Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rupika, U. A., & Singh, V. K. (2016). Measuring the university–industry–government collaboration in Indian research output. Current Science. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v110/i10/1904-1909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherngell, T., & Barber, M. J. (2011). Distinct spatial characteristics of industrial and public research collaborations: Evidence from the fifth EU framework programme. The Annals of Regional Science, 46(2), 247–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, M., & Hasan, N. (2015). Trend in research output and collaboration pattern among BRICS countries: A scientometric study. 2015 4th International Symposium on Emerging Trends and Technologies in Libraries and Information Services. https://doi.org/10.1109/ETTLIS.2015.7048201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, V. K., Arora, P., Uddin, A., & Bhattacharya, S. (2021). India’s rank and global share in scientific research: How publication counting method and subject selection can vary the outcomes. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 80(01), 42–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singhal, K., Banshal, S. K., Uddin, A., & Singh, V. K. (2014). The information technology knowledge infrastructure and research in South Asia. Journal of Scientific Research, 3(3), 134–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov, A., Shashnov, S., Kotsemir, M., & Grebenyuk, A. (2019). Quantitative analysis for a better-focused international STI collaboration policy: A case of BRICS. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 147, 221–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov-Mladenovic, S., Cvetanovic, S., & Mladenovic, I. (2016). R&D expenditure and economic growth: EU28 evidence for the period 2002–2012. Economic Research-EkonomskaIstrazivanja. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677x.2016.1211948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sud, P., & Thelwall, M. (2016). Not all international collaboration is beneficial: The Mendeley readership and citation impact of biochemical research collaboration. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(8), 1849–1857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suhay, E., & Druckman, J. N. (2015). The politics of science: political values and the production, communication, and reception of scientific knowledge introduction. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214559004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swar, B., & Khan, G. F. (2014). Mapping ICT knowledge infrastructure in South Asia. Scientometrics, 99(1), 117–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S., & Osland, J. S. (2012) The Impact of Intercultural Communication on Global Organizational Learning, In: M. Easterby Smith & M. A. Lyles (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management, John Wiley, NY

  • Uddin, A., & Singh, V. K. (2014). Measuring research output and collaboration in South Asian countries. Current Science, 107(1), 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieira, E.S., Cerdeira, J, & Teixeira, A.A.C. (2021). Which Distance Dimensions matter in international research collaboration? A cross-country analysis by scientific areas. Journal of Informetrics, in press.

  • Wagner, C. S., Brahmakulam, I. T., Jackson, B. A., Wong, A & Yoda, T. (2001), Science & Technology Collaboration: Building Capacity in Developing Countries?. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2001. https://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1357z0.html.

  • Wagner, C. S., & Jonkers, K. (2017). Open countries have strong science. Nature News, 550(7674), 32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy, 34(10), 1608–1618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whetsell, T. A., Dimand, A. M., Jonkers, K., Baas, J., & Wagner, C. S. (2021). Democracy, complexity, and science: exploring structural sources of national scientific performance. Science and Public Policy, 48(5), 697–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the support provided by the DST-NSTMIS funded project- ‘Design of a Computational Framework for Discipline-wise and Thematic Mapping of Research Performance of Indian Higher Education Institutions (HEIs)’, bearing Grant No. DST/NSTMIS/05/04/2019-20, for this work.

Funding

National Science and Technology Management Information System,DST/NSTMIS/05/04/2019-20,Vivek Kumar Singh

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005, India

    Jyoti Dua & Vivek Kumar Singh

  2. DST Centre for Policy Research, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 560012, India

    Hiran H. Lathabai

Authors
  1. Jyoti Dua
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hiran H. Lathabai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vivek Kumar Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vivek Kumar Singh.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 11.

Table 11 Categories with no publications
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dua, J., Lathabai, H.H. & Singh, V.K. Measuring and characterizing research collaboration in SAARC countries. Scientometrics 128, 1265–1294 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04606-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04606-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation