Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Measuring and characterizing international collaboration patterns in Indian scientific research

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scientific collaboration at international level has increased manifolds during last two decades. Collaboration is not only associated with higher research productivity but has also been found to be positively correlated with impact. Considering the benefits and advantages of international collaboration for the national science and technology systems of a country, policymakers in different countries have designed programs to promote international collaboration in science. This paper attempts to measure and characterize the international collaboration patterns in Indian scientific research for the last 20 years (2001–2020) using data from WoS. The existing methods from scientometrics and a new formalism of boost in productivity, citations and visibility, is used for the purpose. Analytical results show that India’s international collaboration has grown with a CAGR of 12.27% during this period, rising from 20.73% internationally collaborated papers in 2001 to 32.35% internationally collaborated papers in 2020. USA, Germany, England, and China remain the top collaborating partners in terms of volume of papers, however, the relative intensity of collaboration with South Korea and Saudi Arabia has increased significantly. Among the internationally collaborated papers of India, about 50% papers have an Indian researcher as lead (first) author, and further the internationally collaborated papers of India have more than 50% authors from India. The Indian indigenous scholarly ecosystem is found to be significantly productive, but slight and heavy dependence for impact and visibility, respectively, is found on international collaborations. The probable factors shaping the Indian international collaboration and the major policy implications for India are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://sdgs.un.org/goals.

  2. https://dst.gov.in/international-st-cooperation.

  3. https://iusstf.org/.

  4. http://ukieri.org/.

  5. https://www.igstc.org/.

  6. http://www.cefipra.org/.

References

  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, A. C., & Murgia, G. (2017). The relationship among research productivity, research collaboration, and their determinants. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 1016–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, A. C., & Solazzi, M. (2011). The relationship between scientists’ research performance and the degree of internationalization of their research. Scientometrics, 86(3), 629–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2009). Research collaboration and productivity: Is there correlation? Higher Education, 57(2), 155–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J. (2012). The rise of research networks. Nature, 490(7420), 3350336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J., Gurney, K., Hook, D., & Leydesdorff, L. (2014). International collaboration clusters in Africa. Scientometrics, 98(1), 547–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J., Gurney, K., & Marshall, S. (2007). Patterns of international collaboration for the UK and leading partners. Science Focus, 2(6), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anuradha, K., & Urs, S. (2007). Bibliometric indicators of Indian research collaboration patterns: A correspondence analysis. Scientometrics, 71(2), 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arunachalam, S., & Doss, M. J. (2000). Mapping international collaboration in science in Asia through coauthorship analysis. Current Science, 79, 621–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arunachalam, S., Srinivasan, R., & Raman, V. (1994). International collaboration in science: Participation by the Asian giants. Scientometrics, 30(1), 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arunachalam, S., & Viswanathan, B. (2008). South-South cooperation: The case of Indo-Chinese collaboration in scientific research. Current Science, 95(3), 311–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balland, P. A., Boschma, R. A., & Frenken, K. (2015). Proximity and innovation: From statics to dynamics. Regional Studies, 49(6), 907–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, A., & Aggarwal, R. (2001). International collaboration in science in India and its impact on institutional performance. Scientometrics, 52(3), 379–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, A., & Kumar, B. V. (2000). International collaboration in Indian scientific papers. Scientometrics, 48(3), 381–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, D. D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration, (and its study): Past, present, and future. Scientometrics, 52(3), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014254214337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergé, L. R. (2017). Network proximity in the geography of research collaboration. Papers in Regional Science, 96(4), 785–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnholtz, J. P. (2007). When do researchers collaborate? Toward a model of collaboration propensity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(14), 2226–2239. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boekholt, P., Edler, J., Cunningham, P., & Flanagan, K. (2009). Drivers of international collaboration in research. European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2777/81914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bordons, M., Gomez, I., Fernandez, M. T., Zulueta, M. A., & Mendez, A. (1996). Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical research. Scientometrics, 37(2), 279–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R. A. (2005). Proximity and Innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bote, V. P. G., Olmeda-Gomez, C., & de Moya-Angeon, F. (2013). Quantifying the benefits of international scientific collaboration. Journal of American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 392–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouabid, H., Paul-Hus, A., & Larivière, V. (2016). Scientific collaboration and high-technology exchanges among BRICS and G-7 countries. Scientometrics, 106(3), 873–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., & Glaenzel, W. (1996). International collaboration: Will it be keeping alive East European research? Scientometrics, 36(2), 247–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caniëls, M. C., Kronenberg, K., & Werker, C. (2014). Conceptualizing proximity in research collaborations. In R. Rutten, P. Benneworth, D. Irawati, & F. Boekema (Eds.), The social dynamics of innovation networks (pp. 247–264). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canto, I., & Hannah, J. (2001). A partnership of equals? Academic collaboration between the United Kingdom and Brazil. Journal of Studies in International Education, 5(1), 26–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattaneo, E., & Corbellini, G. (2011). Science under politics: An Italian nightmare. Embo Reports, 12(1), 19–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2010.198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive-capacity—A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, J. L., & Teng, B. S. (2003). Transferring R&D knowledge: The key factors affecting knowledge transfer success. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20(1–2), 39–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0923-4748(03)00004-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, S. S., Gharawi, M. A., & Burke, G. B. (2012). Transnational public sector knowledge networks: Knowledge and information sharing in a multi-dimensional context. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), S112–S120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Ippolito, B., & Ruling, C. C. (2019). Research collaboration in large scale research infrastructures: Collaboration types and policy implications. Research Policy, 48(5), 1282–1296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DST-Clarivate Report (2019). Bibliometric Study of India’s Research Output and Collaboration (2011–2016), Vol. 01. A study commissioned by the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, Feb. 2019.

  • DST-Elsevier Report (2020). International comparative performance of India’s research base: Scholarly output, impact, collaboration, knowledge transfer. A study commissioned by the department of science and technology, Government of India, 2011–2016.

  • Dua, J., Lathabai, H. H., & Singh, V. K. (2022). Measuring and characterizing research collaboration in SAARC countries. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04606-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ductor, L. (2015). Does co-authorship lead to higher academic productivity? Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 77(3), 385–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Favaro, D., Ninka, E., & Turvani, M. (2012). Productivity in innovation: the role of inventor connections and mobility. MPRA Paper No. 38950. Retrieved May 23, 2012, from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/38950/.

  • Fernández, A., Ferrándiz, E., & León, M. D. (2016). Proximity dimensions and scientific collaboration among academic institutions in Europe: The closer, the better? Scientometrics, 106(3), 1073–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finardi, U. (2015). Scientific collaboration between BRICS countries. Scientometrics, 102(2), 1139–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finardi, U., & Buratti, A. (2016). Scientific collaboration framework of BRICS countries: An analysis of international coauthorship. Scientometrics, 109(1), 433–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, J. E., Sivertsen, G., & Rousseau, R. (2021). Measuring the relative intensity of collaboration within a network. Scientometrics, 126(10), 8673–8682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 51(1), 69–115.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2001). Double effort=double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry. Scientometrics, 50(2), 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Schubert, A., & Czerwon, H. J. (1999). A bibliometric analysis of international scientific cooperation of the European Union (1985–1995). Scientometrics, 45(2), 185–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gui, Q. C., Liu, C., & Du, D. B. (2019). Globalization of science and international scientific collaboration: A network perspective. Geoforum, 105, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.06.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, B., & Dhawan, S. (2003). India’s collaboration with People’s Republic of China in science and technology: A scientometric analysis of coauthored papers during 1994–1999. Scientometrics, 57(1), 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, B. M., Munshi, U. M., & Mishra, P. K. (2002). S&T collaboration of India with other South Asian countries. Current Science, 83(10), 1201–1209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heringa, P. W., Hessels, L. K., & van der Zouwen, M. (2016). The influence of proximity dimensions on international research collaboration: An analysis of European water projects. Industry and Innovation, 23(8), 753–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., & Tijssen, R. J. (2010). Research collaboration at a distance: Changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe. Research Policy, 39(5), 662–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou, L., Pan, Y., & Zhu, J. J. (2021). Impact of scientific, economic, geopolitical, and cultural factors on international research collaboration. Journal of Informetrics, 15(3), 101194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y., Shen, C., & Contractor, N. S. (2013). Distance matters: Exploring proximity and homophily in virtual world networks. Decision Support Systems, 55(4), 969–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, K. (2013). Effects of the language barrier on processes and performance of international scientific collaboration, collaborators’ participation, organizational integrity, and interorganizational relationships. Science Communication, 35(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012437442

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Institute history. (2014). IIT Bombay. Retrieved December 25, 2021, from https://www.iitb.ac.in/en/about-iit-bombay/institute-history.

  • Jeong, S., Choi, J. Y., & Kim, J. Y. (2014). On the drivers of international collaboration: The impact of informal communication, motivation, and research resources. Science and Public Policy, 41(4), 520–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, L., Zhu, N. B., Yang, Z. L., Xu, S., & Jun, M. (2018). The relationships between distance factors and international collaborative research outcomes: A bibliometric examination. Journal of Informetrics, 12(3), 618–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. F., Wuchty, S., & Uzzi, B. (2008). Multi-University research teams: Shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science. Science, 322(5905), 1259–1262. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1158357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (1994). Geographical proximity and scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 31(1), 31–43.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. J. (2005). Korean science and international collaboration, 1995–2000. Scientometrics, 63(2), 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoben, J., & Oerlemans, L. A. (2006). Proximity and inter-organizational collaboration: A literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(2), 71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S. R., Brennan, S. E., & Siegel, J. (2002). Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 137–162). American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Lathabai, H. H., Nandy, A., & Singh, V. K. (2021). x-index: Identifying core competency and thematic research strengths of institutions using an NLP and network based ranking framework. Scientometrics, 126(12), 9557–9583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lathabai, H. H., Nandy, A., & Singh, V. K. (2022). Institutional collaboration recommendation: An expertise-based framework using NLP and network analysis. Expert Systems with Applications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, K., Reichstein, T., & Salter, A. (2011). Exploring the effect of geographical proximity and university quality on university–industry collaboration in the United Kingdom. Regional Studies, 45(4), 507–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leahey, E., & Reikowsky, R. C. (2008). Research specialization and collaboration patterns in sociology. Social Studies of Science, 38(3), 425–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312707086190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leta, J., & Chaimovich, H. (2002). Recognition and international collaboration: The Brazilian case. Scientometrics, 53(3), 325–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leta, J., das Neves Machado, R., & Canchumani, R. M. L. (2019). Scientific collaboration among BRICS: Trends and priority areas. In W. Glänzel, H. F. Moed, U. Schmoch, & M. Thelwall (Eds.), Springer handbook of science and technology indicators (pp. 485–504). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. S. (2008). International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 317–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahbuba, D., & Rousseau, R. (2010). Scientific research in the Indian subcontinent: Selected trends and indicators 1973–2007 comparing Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka with India, the local giant. Scientometrics, 84(2), 403–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marmolejo-Leyva, R., Perez-Angon, M. A., & Russell, J. M. (2015). Mobility and international collaboration: Case of the Mexican scientific diaspora. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0126720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattsson, P., Laget, P., Nilsson, A., & Sundberg, C. J. (2008). Intra-EU vs. estra-EU scientific co-publication patterns in EU. Scientometrics, 75(3), 555–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McManus, C., Neves, A. A. B., Maranhão, A. Q., Souza Filho, A. G., & Santana, J. M. (2020). International collaboration in Brazilian science: Financing and impact. Scientometrics, 125(3), 2745–2772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mêgnigbêto, E. (2013). International collaboration in scientific publishing: The case of West Africa (2001–2010). Scientometrics, 96(3), 761–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagpaul, P. S. (2003). Exploring a pseudo-regression model of transnational cooperation in science. Scientometrics, 56(3), 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1022335021834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narteh, B. (2008). Knowledge transfer in developed-developing country interfirm collaborations: A conceptual framework. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(1), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270810852403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, T. V., Ho-Le, T. P., & Le, U. V. (2017). International collaboration in scientific research in Vietnam: An analysis of patterns and impact. Scientometrics, 110(2), 1035–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ni, P., & An, X. (2018). Relationship between international collaboration papers and their citations from an economic perspective. Scientometrics, 116, 863–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parish, A. J., Boyack, K. W., & Ioannidis, J. P. (2018). Dynamics of co-authorship and productivity across different fields of scientific research. PLoS ONE, 13(1), e0189742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, O. (2010). Are highly cited papers more international? Scientometrics, 83(2), 397–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, O., Glänzel, W., & Danell, R. (2004). Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, 60(3), 421–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pislyakov, V., & Shukshina, E. (2014). Measuring excellence in Russia: Highly cited papers, leading institutions, patterns of national and international collaboration. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(11), 2321–2330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plotnikova, T., & Rake, B. (2014). Collaboration in pharmaceutical research: Exploration of country level determinants. Scientometrics, 98(2), 1173–1202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1182-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponds, R., Van Oort, F., & Frenken, K. (2007). The geographical and institutional proximity of research collaboration. Papers in Regional Science, 86(3), 423–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116–145. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, P. B. (2014). Current status of science, technology and Innovation in higher education of India. Arts & Education International Research Journal, 1(1), 68–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rupika, Uddin, A., & Singh, V. K. (2016). Measuring the university–industry–government collaboration in Indian research output. Current Science. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v110/i10/1904-1909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Science and Engineering Indicators (2020), Report by National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, Higher Education Research and Development Survey (HERD). Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/, Apr. 2020.

  • Singh, M., & Hasan, N. (2015). Trend in research output and collaboration pattern among BRICS countries: A scientometric study. In 2015 4th International Symposium on Emerging Trends and Technologies in Libraries and Information Services (pp. 217–221). IEEE.

  • Singh, V. K., Arora, P., Uddin, A., & Bhattacharya, S. (2021). India’s rank and global share in scientific research: How publication counting method and subject selection can vary the outcomes. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 80(01), 42–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov, A., Shashnov, S., Kotsemir, M., & Grebenyuk, A. (2019). Quantitative analysis for a better-focused international STI collaboration policy: A case of BRICS. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 147, 221–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokolov-Mladenovic, S., Cvetanovic, S., & Mladenovic, I. (2016). R&D expenditure and economic growth: EU28 evidence for the period 2002–2012. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 29(1), 1005–1020. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677x.2016.1211948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suhay, E., & Druckman, J. N. (2015). The politics of science: Political values and the production, communication, and reception of scientific knowledge introduction. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214559004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S., & Osland, J. S. (2015). The impact of intercultural communication on global organizational learning. In M. Easterby-Smith & M. A. Lyles (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (pp. 579–604). Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Uddin, A., & Singh, V. K. (2014). Measuring research output and collaboration in South Asian countries. Current Science, 107, 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieira, E. S., Cerdeira, J., & Teixeira, A. A. (2022). Which distance dimensions matter in international research collaboration? A cross-country analysis by scientific domain. Journal of Informetrics, 16(2), 101259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. S., Brahmakulam, I. T., Jackson, B. A., Wong, A & Yoda, T. (2001), Science & Technology Collaboration: Building Capacity in Developing Countries?. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2001. https://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1357z0.html.

  • Wagner, C. S., & Jonkers, K. (2017). Open countries have strong science. Nature News, 550(7674), 32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy, 34(10), 1608–1618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whetsell, T. A., Jonkers, K., Dimand, A.-M., Baas, J., & Wagner, C. S. (2020). Democracy, Complexity, and Science. arXiv:1909.04468v3.

  • Yamashita, Y., & Okubo, Y. (2006). Patterns of scientific collaboration between Japan and France: Inter-sectoral analysis using Probabilistic Partnership Index (PPI). Scientometrics, 68(2), 303–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A preprint of this paper is available at arXiv. See: Dua et al. (2022).

Funding

The authors declare that no funding was received for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 221005, India

    Jyoti Dua & Vivek Kumar Singh

  2. Amrita-CREATE, Amrita Vishwa Vidhyapeetham, Amritapuri, Kollam, 690525, India

    Hiran H. Lathabai

Authors
  1. Jyoti Dua
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vivek Kumar Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hiran H. Lathabai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vivek Kumar Singh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The manuscript complies with ethical standards of the journal and there is no conflict of interests whatsoever.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dua, J., Singh, V.K. & Lathabai, H.H. Measuring and characterizing international collaboration patterns in Indian scientific research. Scientometrics 128, 5081–5116 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04794-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04794-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation