Skip to main content
Log in

Lost in affiliation: apatride publications in international databases

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Correct attribution of scientific publications with the countries of authors is vital for many scientometric tasks. Despite this, the Scopus and Web of Science databases contain a significant number of publications without affiliation with any country, which leads to their “loss” in the analysis results. This includes “scientific” types of documents—articles, reviews, conference proceedings, etc. It has been shown that the practice of excluding such publications from consideration in scientometric studies can lead to a significant distortion of their results. We propose a method that allows predicting, with reasonable accuracy, the connection between a publication and a country based on the affiliation history of the authors. This article analyses the significance of losses due to unaffiliated articles for the top 20 countries in terms of the number of publications indexed in Scopus over the past 20 years. The importance of this problem has been declining in recent years, but is still noticeable especially for developed countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aman, V. (2020). Transfer of knowledge through international scientific mobility: Introduction of a network-based bibliometric approach to study different knowledge types. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(2), 565–581. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calimport, S. R. G., Bentley, B. L., Stewart, C. E., Pawelec, G., Scuteri, A., Vinciguerra, M., et al. (2019). To help aging populations, classify organismal senescence. Science, 366(6465), 576–578. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay7319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, L., Wang, Y., Ding, S., & Qi, B. (2020). Productivity trends and citation impact of different institutional collaboration patterns at the research units’ level. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03609-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franceschini, F., Maisano, D., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2015a). Errors in DOI indexing by bibliometric databases. Scientometrics, 102(3), 2181–2186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1503-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franceschini, F., Maisano, D., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2015b). Influence of omitted citations on the bibliometric statistics of the major Manufacturing journals. Scientometrics, 103(3), 1083–1122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1583-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franceschini, F., Maisano, D., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2016a). The museum of errors/horrors in Scopus. Journal of Informetrics, 10(1), 174–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franceschini, F., Maisano, D., & Mastrogiacomo, L. (2016b). Empirical analysis and classification of database errors in Scopus and Web of science. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 933–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenken, K., Hardeman, S., & Hoekman, J. (2009). Spatial scientometrics: Towards a cumulative research program. Journal of Informetrics, 3(3), 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenken, K., & Hoekman, J. (2014). Spatial scientometrics and scholarly impact: A review of recent studies, tools, and methods. In Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, & D. Wolfram (Eds.), Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice (pp. 127–146). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1974). Errors—theirs, ours and yours. In Essays of an Information Scientist:1974–1976 (Vol. 2, pp. 80–81).

  • He, H., & Garcia, E. A. (2009). Learning from imbalanced data. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 21(9), 1263–1284. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2008.239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinze, S. (1994). Analysis of country specialisation in bioelectronics with special focus on German activities. Research Evaluation, 4(2), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1093/rev/4.2.107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Internationaler Währungsfonds. (2013). Hopes, realities, risks. Internat Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacso, P. (2009). Errors of omission and their implications for computing scientometric measures in evaluating the publishing productivity and impact of countries. Online Information Review, 33(2), 376–385. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520910951276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosyakov, D., & Guskov, A. (2019). Synchronous scientific mobility and international collaboration: Case of Russia. In 17th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2019—Proceedings (Vol. 1, pp. 1319–1328). Presented at the 17th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2019—Proceedings

  • Liu, W., Hu, G., & Tang, L. (2018). Missing author address information in web of science—An explorative study. Journal of Informetrics, 12(3), 985–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H. F., Markusova, V., & Akoev, M. (2018). Trends in russian research output indexed in Scopus and web of science. Scientometrics, 116(2), 1153–1180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2769-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskaleva, O. V. (2015). Loss of Russian publications: Why it occurs and how to avoid? In Proceedings of the 4-th International scientific and practical conference «World-class scientific publication—2015: current world trends and practice in editing, publishing and assessment of scientific publications» (pp. 87–91). Presented at the 4-th International scientific and practical conference «World-class scientific publication—2015: current world trends and practice in editing, publishing and assessment of scientific publications». https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=23791187. Accessed 27 August 2021

  • Nguyen, B. X., Dinneen, J. D., & Luczak-Roesch, M. (2020). A novel method for resolving and completing authors’ country affiliation data in bibliographic records. Journal of Data and Information Science. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2020-0020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prathap, G. (2009). Visibility score for countries using SCOPUS affiliation identifier and the h-threshold approach. Current Science, 96(9), 1184–1185.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, P. A., & Manganote, E. J. T. (2012). Revisiting country research profiles: Learning about the scientific cultures. Scientometrics, 93(2), 517–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0696-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selivanova, I. V., Kosyakov, D. V., & Guskov, A. E. (2019). The impact of errors in the Scopus database on the research assessment. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 46(3), 204–212. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688219030109

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Denis Kosyakov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Savchenko, I., Kosyakov, D. Lost in affiliation: apatride publications in international databases. Scientometrics 127, 3471–3487 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04392-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04392-9

Keywords

Navigation