Abstract
The paper describes an upper-division university course in Mars literature taught online since Fall 2013. The course readings comprise six novels relating to Mars. Authors include H.G. Wells, Edgar Rice Burroughs, Ray Bradbury, Phillip K. Dick, Greg Bear, and Kim Stanley Robinson. After an introduction, sections of the paper discuss course organization and syllabus, Americanist conceptual approaches, anti-colonialism, habitat sustainability, and pedagogical possibilities for future discussion of Mars literature. The paper argues for a fiction-based approach to understanding historical and potential future relationships with Mars and Mars science.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
See Kurd Lasswitz, Two Planets [Auf zwei Planeten, 1897] (Southern Illinois University Press 1971, out of print), a novel with major pan-European influence; and Aleksandr Bogdanov, Red Star: The First Bolshevik Utopia [1908, 1923] (Indiana University Press, 1984, out of print), a Russian political utopia set on Mars.
See https://www.lpl.arizona.edu/sites/default/files/courses/Swindle_342_Sp_2019.pdf. Accessed 2 September 2021.
See http://techstyle.lmc.gatech.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/ENGL-1102-Syllabus-Spring-2016.pdf. Accessed 2 September 2021.
See http://academicaffairs.cofc.edu/documents/newfaculty/Syllabus2.doc. Accessed 2 September 2021.
We wish to acknowledge our colleague Dr. Paul Cook for his assistance and science fiction expertise. He helped conceptualize the course and contributed a short video lecture.
See https://www2.jpl.nasa.gov/snc/nasa1.html. Accessed 2 September 2021.
For Gil Scott Heron’s performance, see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=goh2x_G0ct4. Accessed 2 September 2021.
Personal communication from Tim Swindle, 8 September 2019.
References
Abbott, C. (2005). Homesteading on the extraterrestrial frontier. Science Fiction Studies, 32(2), 240–264.
Baker, K. (2003). The Empress of Mars. Asimov’s Science Fiction, 27(7), 78–128.
Baker, K. (2009). The empress of Mars. Tom Doherty.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
Barstow, D., & Chieck, D. (1997). Mars exploration: Students and scientists working together. In K. C. Cohen (Ed.), Internet Links for Science Education: Student-Scientist Partnerships (pp. 111–131). New York: Springer.
Bear, G. (1993). Moving Mars. Tom Doherty.
Benford, G. (2008). The Martian race. Hachette.
Brackett, L. (1951). “Black Amazon of Mars,” Planet Stories 4 (March) 11:72–108. See https://ia800503.us.archive.org/24/items/BlackAmazonOfMars_436/BlackAmazonOfMarsByLeighBrackett-PlanetStoriesmarch1951.pdf Accessed 3 September 2021.
Bradbury, R. (1950). The Martian chronicles (p. 1997). HarperCollins.
Bradbury, R. (1991). Yestermorrow: Obvious answers to impossible futures. Capra Press.
Brake, M., & Hook, N. (2006). Aliens and time in the machine age. International Journal of Astrobiology, 5(4), 277–286.
Burroughs, E. R. (1917). A princess of mars (p. 2003). Modern Library.
Čapek, K. (1936). Válka s Mloky. Fr. Borový.
CNBC (2020). “Elon Musk is ‘highly confident’ SpaceX will land humans on Mars by 2026,” 1 December. See https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/01/elon-musk-highly-confident-spacex-will-land-humans-on-mars-by-2026.html Accessed 2 September 2021.
Crossley, R. (2008). Mars and the paranormal. Science Fiction Studies, 35(3), 466–484.
Crossley, R. (2011). Imagining Mars: A literary history. Wesleyan University Press.
Dick, P. K. (1964). Martian time-slip (p. 2012). Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Diderot, D. (1796). Supplément au Voyage de Bougainville. Droz, 1955.
Fanon, F. (1961). Wretched of the Earth (p. 2004). Grove Press.
Federal Register (2017). Reinvigorating America’s human space exploration program. Presidential Memorandum. December 11, 2017.
Franko, C. (1994). Working the ‘in-between’: Kim Stanley Robinson’s Utopian fiction. Science Fiction Studies, 21(2), 191–211.
Hansson, L., Redfors, A., & Rosberg, M. (2011). Students socio-scientific reasoning in an astrobiological context during work with a digital environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(4), 388–402.
Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the chthulucene. Duke University Press.
Hendrix, H., Slusser, G., & Rabkin, E. (Eds.). (2014). Visions of Mars: Essays on the red planet in fiction and science. McFarland and Co.
Hunt, L., Karl, R. (2000). “Design and development of an interactive web-based curriculum in support of the space science education initiative mars millennium.” Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference: Proceedings of SITE 2000 (11th, San Diego, California February 8–12, 2000).
Jones, A. I., & Merchant, E. (1893). Unveiling a parallel: A romance by two women of the west. Arena Publishing Company.
Kilgore, D.W.D. (2008). “Queering the coming race: A Utopian historical imperative,” 233–251 in Queer universes: Sexualities in science fiction, Wendy Gay Pearson, Veronica Hollinger, and Joan Gordon, eds. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
Kolmerten, C.A. (2006). “Utopias and dystopias,” 1155–1160 in American History through Literature, 1870–1920, vol. 3, Tom Quirk and Gary Schonhorst, eds. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Kowal, M. R. (2018). The calculating stars. Tor.
Lowell, P. (1895). Mars. The canals I. Popular Astronomy, 2, 255–261.
Launius, R. D. (2007). Underlying assumptions of human spaceflight in the United States. Acta Astronautica, 62(2008), 341–356.
Markley, R. (2005). Dying planet: Mars in science and the imagination. Duke University Press.
Mathers, N., Goktogen, A., Rankin, J., & Anderson, M. (2012). Robotic mission to Mars: Hands-on, minds-on, web-based learning. Acta Astronautica, 80, 124–131.
Mckay, D. S., et al. (1996). Search for past life on mars: possible relic biogenic activity in Martian meteorite ALH4001. Science, 273((16 August) 5277), 924–930.
Miller, J. D. (2011). “Mars of science, Mars of dreams,” 17–28 in Visions of Mars: Essays on the red planet in fiction and science, eds. Howard Hendrix, Howard, George Slusser, and Eric Rabkin. Jefferson, NC: McFarland and Co.
Morton, O. (2008). Environmental hero. Time Magazine, 172(14), 64.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (2009). “The ‘Canali’ and the first Martians.” NASA Education. See https://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/postsecondary/features/F_Canali_and_First_Martians.html. Accessed 3 September 2021.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (1993). The exploration of Mars. Educational Brief Planetary Science, Grades 8–12. Washington, DC.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (1977). Skylab, classroom in space, ed. Lee. B. Summerlin. Washington, DC.
Newman, E. (2018). Before Mars. Ace.
Noyes, J. K. (2015). Herder: Aesthetics against imperialism. University of Toronto Press.
Orosei, R., et al. (2018). Radar evidence of subglacial liquid water on Mars. Science, 361((03 August) 6401), 490–493.
Pfitzer, G. (1995). The only good alien is a dead alien: Science fiction and the metaphysics of Indian-hating on the high frontier. Journal of American Culture, 18((Spring) 1), 51–67.
Planetary Society, The (2007). Visions of Mars, ed. Jon Lomberg. CD-ROM. Pasadena, CA.
Reger, G. (2016). Naked on the deserts of Mars. Extrapolation, 57(3), 305-337 (2021).
Robinson, K. S. (1993). Red Mars. Penguin Random House.
Robinson, K. S. (2011). “Martian musings and the miraculous conjunction,” 146–151 in Visions of Mars: Essays on the red planet in fiction and science, Howard Hendrix, Howard, George Slusser, and Eric Rabkin, eds. Jefferson, NC: McFarland and Co.
Seed, D. (2010). The course of empire: A survey of the imperial theme in early anglophone science fiction. Science Fiction Studies, 37((July) 2), 230–252.
Simpson, W. (1891). The Man from Mars: His Morals, Politics and Religion. Bacon & Company.
Smith, D. (2019). “’Whitey’s on the moon’: Why Apollo 11 looked so different to Black America,” Guardian, 14 July.
Thurs, D. P. (2007). Tiny tech, transcendent tech: Nanotechnology, science fiction, and the limits of modern science talk. Science Communication, 29((September) 1), 65–95.
van Djik, J. (2003). ‛After the two cultures’: Toward a (multi)cultural practice of science communication. Science Communication, 25(2), 177–190.
Washington Post (2021). “The Biden administration has set out to dismantle trump’s legacy, except in one area: Space.” March 2. See https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/03/02/biden-space-artemis-moon-trump/ Accessed 2 September 2021.
Weintraub, D. A. (2018). Life on Mars: What to know before we go. Princeton University Press.
Weiss, S. (1903). Journeys to the planet Mars, or our mission to ento. Bradford Press.
Weiss, S. (1906). Decimon huydas: A romance of Mars. Austin Publishing Company.
Wells, H. G. (1898). The war of the worlds (p. 2006). Prestwick House.
Whitmer, V. (2015). Channeling anti-fascism: MacLeish, Welles, and the disorienting power of the announcer. Historical Journal of Film, Radio, and Television, 35(2), 319–338.
Yost, Michelle. (2014). ‛Mars at last!’: Self-consciousness in the new Mars writing. Foundation: The International Review of Science Fiction, 42, 115.
Zubrin, R. (2001). First landing. Penguin.
Acknowledgements
We wish to acknowledge helpful comments from Tim Swindle, director of the Lunar and Planetary Lab at University of Arizona and a fellow Mars teacher.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1. Synopsis of course
Appendix 2
Sample discussion topic:
Module 5: Bear, Moving Mars — Discuss (required) The motive for the expedition in the film Red Planet is that humanity has polluted the Earth to the point of irredeemable toxicity. Long-distance efforts to terraform Mars into habitability have been attempted but seem to be failing. The goal of the expedition is to learn why this has happened. Highly improbable plot incidents (e.g., a ready-to-go Russian rescue vehicle parked in walking distance on the Mars surface) bring us to a triumphant conclusion that affirms an individual and collective human capacity to overcome the most daunting of technological challenges. If you have read Andy Weir’s The Martian or seen the film version (which is quite faithful to the novel, unlike John Carter), the focus on the actual science rather than Bear’s fanciful take on a genetically and nanotechnology enhanced future evokes a powerful message of technological determinism. In your opinion, to what extent do such films either inspire or delude viewers about the viability of Mars as an alternative to environmental catastrophe and corporate empire on Earth? Do the novels Moving Mars and Red Mars (for those who have read ahead) undertake similar work? To what extent are such Mars films and novels inspirational science fiction sermons and to what extent do they announce a possible future? Discuss.
Sample comprehensive exam question (final exam):
A common theme in all of the Mars literature we have read in this course is that of the frontier, or perhaps more accurately, the frontier myth. In Moving Mars and Red Mars, the authors grapple with the more scientifically based evidence of Mars as a “dry” and “lifeless” planet. This plays nicely into the notion of the “frontier” as virgin, unspoiled, pristine environment in which humans can enter absolved of the guilt of their past — a clean slate if you will. Drawing on Heise’s “Martian Ecologies and the Future of Nature,” and Robinson’s (2011) “Martian Musings and the Miraculous Conjunction,” and from the video lectures and other critical readings, analyze and discuss the connections between environment, frontier, wet and dry, and biology in these novels and how the authors employ Science Fiction not only as a form of entertainment, but as a “red mirror” on human society and our environmental concerns.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lockard, J., Goggin, P. Teaching Mars Literature. Sci & Educ 32, 821–844 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00333-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00333-3