Abstract
In this study, we examined the teaching emphasis of the history of science (HOS) in science lesson plans. The examination was based on a five-dimensional framework, which comprises conceptual, procedural, epistemological, affectional, and social dimensions. Content analysis was employed as the research methodology, targeting 71 copies of science lesson plans receiving awards between 2006 and 2020 in Macao. Both qualitative and quantitative results of content analysis were obtained. Some categories of teaching emphasis were identified within each dimension. It was found that the conceptual, procedural, and affectional dimensions occupy more proportions while the epistemological and social dimensions less. Moreover, some differences between three science subjects (biology, chemistry, and physics) and between the junior and senior secondary schools were identified. In addition, the percentage of the conceptual teaching emphasis showed a remarkably decreasing trend while the other four showed varying degrees of upward trends over the past 15 years. The findings are discussed against the social background of Macao and three conclusions have been drawn: (1) the nature of science has been ignored when including HOS in science teaching, (2) subjects and educational levels could be variables that influence the inclusion of HOS in science teaching, and (3) the effect of science curriculum reform is positive on the implementation of HOS in practice. It is suggested that the concept of the teaching emphasis of HOS and the five-dimensional framework created in this study can be used in future research and practice.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The official website of DSEDJ is: www.dsedj.gov.mo.
References
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 665–701
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Waters, M., & Le, A. P. (2008). Representations of nature of science in secondary school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 835–855
Aktamis, H., & Ergin, O. (2008). The effect of scientific process skills education on students’ scientific creativity, science attitudes and academic achievements. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 21
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1989). Science for all Americans: a Project 2061 Report on goals in science, mathematics, and technology. Washington: Author
Bybee, R. W. (1997). Toward an understanding of scientific literacy. In W. Graber & C. Bolte (Eds.), Scientific literacy (pp. 37–68). Kiel: FRG: IPN
Berg, L. B., & Lune, H. (2017). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (9th ed.). New York: Pearson
DSEDJ (2017a). Requirements of basic academic attainments of natural sciences for junior secondary schools. Available: http://www.DSEDJ.gov.mo
DSEDJ (2017b). Requirements of basic academic attainments of natural sciences for senior secondary schools. Available: http://www.DSEDJ.gov.mo
DSEDJ (2019). The regulation of the annual award scheme on instructional design. Available: http://www.DSEDJ.gov.mo
Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education: the important theories and their development. New York: Teacher College Press
Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. (2014). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education: Scientific knowledge, practices and other family categories. New York: Springer.
Heering, P. (2000). Teaching secondary school physics through history. Science & Education, 9, 363–373
Henke, A., & Höttecke, D. (2015). Physics teachers’ challenges in using history and philosophy of science in teaching. Science & Education, 24(4), 349–385
Hodson, D. (2014). Learning science, learning about science, doing science: different goals demand different learning methods. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2534–2553
Hosson, C., & Kaminski, W. (2007). Historical controversy as an educational tool: evaluating elements of a teaching-learning sequence conducted with the text “Dialogue on the ways that vision operates.” International Journal of Science Education, 29(5), 617–642
Höttecke, D., Henke, A., & Riess, F. (2012). Implementing history and philosophy in science teaching: strategies, methods, results and experiences from the European HIPST project. Science & Education, 21(9), 1233–1261
Höttecke, D., & Silva, C. C. (2011). Why implementing history and philosophy in school science education is a challenge: an analysis of obstacles. Science & Education, 20(3), 293–316
Irwin, R. A. (2000). Historical case studies: teaching the nature of science in context. Science Education, 84, 5–26
Izquierdo-Aymerich, M. (2013). School chemistry: an historical and philosophical approach. Science & Education, 22(7), 1633–1653
Jacobs, C. L., Martin, S. N., & Otieno, T. C. (2008). A science lesson plan analysis instrument for formative and summative program evaluation of a teacher education program. Science Education, 92(6), 1096–1126
Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2003). Models of teaching. Centers for Teaching and Technology – Book Library. 96. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ct2-library/96. Accessed on February 14, 2021
Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (1999). History and philosophy of science through models: the case of chemical kinetics. Science and Education, 8, 287–307
Klassen, S. (2006). A theoretical framework for contextual science teaching. Interchange, 37(1–2), 31–62
Klopfer, L. E. (1969). The teaching of science and the history of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 6, 87–95
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). London: Sage
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: a review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331–359
Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Mamlok-Naaman, R., Ben-Zvi, R., Hofstein, A., Menis, J., & Erduran, S. (2005). Learning science through a historical approach: does it affect the attitudes of non-science-oriented students towards science? International Journal of Science & Math Education, 3(3), 485–507
Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching: the role of history and philosophy of science. London: Routledge
Matthews, M. R. (Ed.). (2014). Handbook of research on history, philosophy and sociology of science. Dordrecht: Springer
McComas, W. F. (2008). Seeking historical examples to illustrate key aspects of the nature of science. Science Education, 17, 249–263
Ministry of Education (MoE). (2001). Science curriculum standards (7–9 grades) of full-time compulsory education (trial version). Beijing: Beijing Normal University. (in Chinese)
Monk, M., & Osborne, J. (1997). Placing the history and philosophy of science on the curriculum: a model for the development of pedagogy. Science Education, 81, 405–424
National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington: National Academic Press
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: for states, by states. Washington: National Academies Press
Pekdağ, B., & Azizoğlu, N. (2020). History-based instruction enriched with various sources of situational interest on the topic of the atom: the effect on students’ achievement and interest. Research in Science Education, 50(3), 1187–1215
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14
Simon, S., & Campbell, S. (2012). Teacher learning and professional development in science education. In B. J. Fraser, T. Tobin, & C. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 307–321). Dordrecht: Springer
Solbes, J., & Traver, M. (2003). Against a negative image of science: history of science and the teaching of physics and chemistry. Science & Education, 12, 703–717
Spiliotopoulou-Papantoniou, V., & Agelopoulos, K. (2009). Enhancement of pre-service teachers’ teaching interventions with the aid of historical examples. Science & Education, 18(9), 1153–1175
Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(17), 137–146
Stinner, A., McMillan, B. A., Metz, D., Jilek, J. M., & Klassen, S. (2003). The renewal of case studies in science education. Science & Education, 12(7), 617–643
Tolvanen, S., Jansson, J., Vesterinen, V. M., & Aksela, M. (2014). How to use historical approach to teach nature of science in chemistry education? Science & Education, 23(8), 1605–1636
Wang, H. A., & Cox-Petersen, A. M. (2002). A comparison of elementary, secondary and student teachers’ perceptions and practices related to history of science instruction. Science & Education, 11(1), 69–81
Wang, H. A., & Marsh, D. D. (2002). Science instruction with a humanistic twist: teachers’ perception and practice in using the history of science in their classrooms. Science & Education, 11, 169–189
Wei, B. (2019). Science teacher education in Macau: A critical review. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5, 10
Wei, B., Li, Y., & Chen, B. (2013). Presentations of nature of science in selected histories of science in the integrated science textbooks in China. School Science and Mathematics, 113(4), 170–179
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wei, B., Chen, X. Examining Teaching Emphases of History of Science in Award-Winning Science Lesson Plans in Macao. Sci & Educ 30, 639–657 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00208-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00208-z