Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The art of the impossible: Utopia and instrumentalism in contemporary electoral politics

  • Published:
Theory and Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Utopian dreams of a fundamentally different world would seem to have little place in the de-radicalized political arena of the post-communist age. This article challenges this idea by ethnographically examining three cases of electoral politics in the contemporary United States, which can be seen as a “least likely” context for electoral utopianism. Evidence from these cases – the 2008 Obama campaign, 2016 Sanders campaign, and local organizing work of the Green Party – is used to make three claims: utopianism is present in the US electoral arena; utopianism and electoral instrumentalism are not incompatible and may “need” each other; and the relationship between utopianism and instrumentalism varies, resulting in multiple types of utopian politics. The article’s key contribution is to theorize and illustrate three such types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the author, GH, upon reasonable request.

Notes

  1. In his book, More points out the etymological similarity of the Greek words Utopia, meaning “no place” and Eutopia, meaning “good place.”.

  2. The concept of prefigurative politics comes from Boggs (1977), whose work is discussed below.

  3. David Harvey’s (2000) Spaces of Hope is another example of this utopian renaissance.

  4. See also Rosen (2016:1103) who points out that Sanders does not claim the mantle of utopianism. This critique is beside the point for the analysis presented in this article, which focuses not on whether Sanders styles himself utopian, but whether his campaign can be considered an example of utopian politics. Along with a few others I contend it can.

  5. The centrality of participatory democracy to Marx’s vision of socialism-cum-communism is particularly visible in his writings on the 1871 Paris Commune, e.g. “The Civil War in France.”.

  6. Tarlau (2019) provides an exemplary account of the Landless Workers’ Movement’s war of position within Brazilian educational institutions.

  7. Gramsci repeatedly discusses the need for the Modern Prince to avoid passivity and engage in “practical action”; see e.g. Gramsci (1971:127).

  8. Obama hired “former Fannie Mae CEO Jim Johnson, to head his vice presidential search” and “capped the month [of June 2008] by hiring Senator Max Baucus’s chief aide, Jim Messina, as his own chief of staff. Baucus, more than any other Democrat, was the chief enabler of George W. Bush’s upwardly tilted tax cuts, and Baucus has been the prime Democratic impediment to bolder Democratic legislative thinking on health policy, taxes, and trade.” Kuttner (2008:10).

  9. The following is based on the New York Times’ 2008 “On the Issues” comparison of Obama and McCain: https://www.nytimes.com/elections/2008/president/issues/climate.html

  10. Unlike Republicans in recent years, McCain expressed certainty that climate change was real, extremely serious, and due to human activity. He also pledged to take action to combat it.

  11. https://www.epolitics.com/2009/03/11/learning-from-obamas-volunteer-army-how-to-put-people-to-work-on-your-behalf/ (Accessed October 3, 2021).

  12. http://www.gp.org/tenkey.shtml

  13. http://www.greenparty.org/index.php

  14. http://www.gp.org/tenkey.shtml, emphasis added.

  15. The “bailout” is the 2008 financial bailout. See https://lee.house.gov/news/press-releases/congresswoman-barbara-lee-votes-in-support-of-bailout-plan

  16. For 2008 primary vote totals see https://www.acvote.org/acvote-assets/pdf/elections/2008/06032008/results/june-3-2008-summary-results-report.pdf. For the June 2010 election vote see: http://www.smartvoter.org/2010/06/08/ca/alm/ballot.html

  17. Clinton was also, of course, a polarizing figure, who was loved and hated by many, with significant opposition all but surely due to her gender. Sanders’ remarkable vote total in 2016 was at least partly due to Clinton’s high un-favorability ratings.

  18. https://berniesanders.com/issues/ Accessed October 2017.

  19. Social democracy is not equivalent to socialism. Sanders’ goal of making the US into a social democracy, or “democratic socialism” as he terms it, can nonetheless be considered utopian given the truly far-reaching changes that would be required to make this happen. Sanders’ call for a “political revolution” indicates his awareness of how far-reaching his demands are. It is also worth pointing out that what is considered utopian depends on historical context. What is key is the demand for change that is far-reaching or fundamental, with this subject to interpretation.

References

  • Aschoff, N. (2018). The utopian impulse: From the Soviet Union to Silicon Valley. Socialism and Democracy, 32(1), 99–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman, B. (2013). Reviving Democratic Citizenship? Politics & Society, 42(2), 309–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aleem, Z. (2015). “Bernie Sanders’ Response to Black Lives Matter Shows that Their Disruptions are Working.” Mic.com. August 10

  • Baiocchi, G., (ed.) (2003). Radicals in Power: The Workers’ Party and Experiments in Urban Democracy in Brazil. Zed Books.

  • Baiocchi, G., (ed.) (2005). Militants and Citizens: The Politics of Participatory Democracy in Porto Alegre. Stanford University Press.

  • Baiocchi, G., Heller, P., & Silva, M. (2011). Bootstrapping Democracy: Transforming Local Governance and Civil Society in Brazil. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baiocchi, G., & Ganuza, E. (2014). Participatory Budgeting as If Emancipation Mattered. Politics & Society, 42(1), 29–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Y. (2013). Practical Anarchism: Peer Mutualism, Market Power, and the Fallible State. Politics & Society, 42(2), 213–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, F. (2014). Democratizing Finance. Politics & Society, 42(1), 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boggs, C. (1977). Revolutionary Process, Political Strategy, and the Dilemma of Power. Theory and Society, 4(3), 359–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M. (2003). For a Sociological Marxism: The Complementary Convergence of Antonio Gramsci and Karl Polanyi. Politics & Society, 31(2), 193–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, L. (2019). How Jeremy Corbyn brought Labour back to the future: Visions of the future and concrete utopia in Labour’s 2017 electoral campaign. British Politics, 14, 250–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chavez, D., & Goldfrank, B. (Eds.). (2004). The Left in the City: Participatory Local Governments in Latin America. Latin America Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. (2013). After the Corporation. Politics & Society, 42(2), 283–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, B. A. (2015). “Presidential Candidate Bernie Sanders: Sheepdogging for Hillary and the Democrats in 2016.” Black Agenda Report. May 7

  • Eidlin, B. (2016). Why Is There No Labor Party in the United States? Political Articulation and the Canadian Comparison, 1932 to 1948. American Sociological Review, 81(3), 488–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fantasia, R., & Voss, K. (2004). Hard Work. University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrara, Mark. (2013). Barack Obama and the Rhetoric of Hope. McFarland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup. (2019). “Socialism as Popular as Capitalism Among Young Adults in U.S.” Gallup.Com, November 25, 2019.

  • Gastil, J., & Richards, R. (2013). Making Direct Democracy Deliberative through Random Assemblies. Politics & Society, 42(2), 253–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. (1971). Prison Notebooks. International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, J. S. (2004). Privatizing Risk without Privatizing the Welfare State: The Hidden Politics of Social Policy Retrenchment in the United States. American Political Science Review, 98(2), 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, Jacob S., & Pierson, Paul. (2010). Winner-Take-All Politics: Inequality, Political Organization and the Rise of the Top Incomes in the United States. Politics & Society, 38(2), 152–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2000). Spaces of Hope. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, W. (2010). The Transformation of the Workers’ Party in Brazil, 1989–2009. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. (1979). Reification and Utopia in Mass Culture. Social Text, 1, 130–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. (2005). Archaeologies of the Future: The Desire Called Utopia and Other Science Fictions. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. (2016). An American utopia. In S. Žižek (Ed.), An American Utopia: Dual Power and the Universal Army (pp. 1–96). Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, R. (1999). The End of Utopia. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreiss, D. (2015). Structuring Electoral Participation: The Formalization of Democratic New Media Campaigning, 2000–2008. In Caroline W. Lee, Michael McQuarrie, & Edward T. Walker (Eds.), Democratizing Inequalities: Dilemmas of the New Public Participation (pp. 125–142). NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolozi, Peter. (2017). Conservatives Against Capitalism: From the Industrial Revolution to Globalization. Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuttner, R. (2008). Obama’s Challenge: America’s Economic Crisis and the Power of a Transformative Presidency. Chelsea Green Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, M. (2008). “Obama Hauls in Record $750 Million for Campaign.” The New York Times. December 4.

  • Mannheim, K. (1936). Ideology and Utopia. Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, S., Pesce, A., Moore, M. & Zhang, C. (2016). “Who Gives Money to Bernie Sanders?” LA Times. June 3.

  • Michels, Robert. (1915). Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudge, S. L. (2018). Leftism Reinvented: Western Parties from Socialism to Neoliberalism. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • New York Times. (2008). “Party Platforms - Election Guide 2008.” The New York Times. Available at: https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/elections/2008/president/issues/party-platforms/index.html. Accessed 18 Mar 2024.

  • New York Times. (2016). “Which presidential candidates are winning the money race.” The new york times. June 22.

  • Nichols, J., & vanden Heuvel, K. (2016). “Bernie Sanders: The ‘nation’ interview.” The nation. September 20

  • Obama, B. (2006). The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream. Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • OpenSecrets.org. (2016). Summary Data for Bernie Sanders, 2016 Cycle”. OpenSecrets. Piketty, Thomas, and Emmanuel Saez. 2006. “The Evolution of Top Incomes: A Historical and International Perspective. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 96(2), 200–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, Thomas, & Saez, Emmanuel. (2006). The Evolution of Top Incomes: A Historical and International Perspective. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 96(2), 200–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A. (1985). Capitalism and Social Democracy. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, D. (2016). Chris Jennings: Paradise now: The story of American utopianism [Review of the book Paradise now, The story of American utopianism, by C. Jennings]. Sexuality & Culture, 20, 1103–1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sombart, Werner. 1976[1906]. Why Is There No Socialism in the United States? Springer.

  • Street, P. (2008). Barack Obama and the Future of American Politics. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarlau, R. (2019). Occupying Schools How the Landless Workers Movement Transformed Brazilian Education. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2019). Global Warming of 1.5°C: A Special Report. United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Parijs, P. (2013). The Universal Basic Income: Why Utopian Thinking Matters, and How Sociologists Can Contribute to It. Politics & Society, 42(2), 171–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, E. O. (2010). Envisioning Real Utopias. Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This article did not receive any external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel Hetland.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hetland, G. The art of the impossible: Utopia and instrumentalism in contemporary electoral politics. Theor Soc (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-024-09546-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-024-09546-7

Keywords

Navigation