Abstract
The likelihood that students pursue careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) depends on the extent to which they identify with these fields (i.e., STEM identity). In order for students to develop a STEM identity, it is crucial that they receive social recognition from others (e.g., family members, teachers, friends, and professionals in STEM). Yet, research that explicitly compares whose recognition is meaningful to students in developing STEM is still scarce. This study examines to what extent 134 Thai secondary school students (47 males and 87 females) perceive meaningfulness of recognition in STEM if they gain from different persons. Data were collected using a Likert-scale questionnaire and analyzed using statistical methods. The results indicate that, regardless of the students’ gender and educational levels, students similarly appreciate social recognition from friends, family members, teachers, and unspecified others. Only recognition from professionals in STEM, however, is significantly lesser meaningful than that from other kinds of persons. Moreover, students with strong STEM identities are more likely than those with weak STEM identities to appreciate social recognition. These results highlight not only the importance of recognition from those with whom students are already intimate, rather than recognition from those who work in STEM fields, but also different scaffoldings for students with varying degrees of STEM identity to see themselves as STEM persons.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amrhein, V., Trafimow, D., & Greenland, S. (2019). Inferential statistics as descriptive statistics: There is no replication crisis if we don’t expect replication. The American Statistician, 73(S1), 262–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1543137
Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2010). “Doing” science versus “being” a scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old schoolchildren’s constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94(4), 617–639. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20399
Ayhan, H. O. (2011). Non-probability sampling survey methods. In M. Lovric (Ed.). International Encyclopedia of Statistics Science (pp. 979–982). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_41
Bureau of Academic Affairs and Educational Standards. (2017). Indicators and core learning content in science according to the basic education core curriculum B.E. 2551 (revised version B.E. 2560). Press of the Agricultural Co-operative Federation of Thailand. Retrieved from https://academic.obec.go.th/images/document/1580786506_d_1.pdf
Capobianco, B. M., Diefes-Dux, H. A., Mena, I., & Weller, J. (2011). What is an engineer? implications of elementary school student conceptions for engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 304–328. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00015.x
Capobianco, B. M., Yu, J. H., & French, B. F. (2015). Effects of engineering design-based science elementary school science students’ engineering identity development across gender and grade. Research in Science Education, 45(2), 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9422-1
Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237
Chiang, I. A., Jhangiani, R. S., & Price, P. C. (2015). Research methods in psychology (2nd Canadian edition). Retrieved from https://opentextbc.ca/researchmethods
Chulavatnatol, M. (2014, October 21–22). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) for regional growth and integration. Presentation at SEAMEO Congress: southeast Asia in transition: re-thinking education, science, and culture for regional integration. Bangkok, Thailand. https://www.scbfoundation.com/stocks/82/file/1414669542z6je482.pdf
Cian, H., Dou, R., Castro, S., Palma-D’souza, E., & Martinez, A. (2022). Facilitating marginalized youths’ identification with STEM through everyday science talk: The critical role of parental caregivers. Science Education, 106(1), 57–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21688
Cronbach, L. J. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologies, 30(2), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076829
Cwik, S., & Singh, C. (2022). Self-efficacy and perceived recognition by peers, instructors, and teaching assistants in physics predict bioscience majors’ science identity. PLoS ONE, 17(9), e0273621. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273621
Dou, R., & Cian, H. (2021). The relevance of childhood science talk as a proxy for college students’ STEM identity as a Hispanic serving institution. Research in Science Education, 51(4), 1093–1105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09928-8
Dou, R., & Cian, H. (2022). Constructing STEM identity: An expanded structural model for STEM identity research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(3), 458–490. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21734
Dou, R., Hazari, Z., Dabney, K., Sonnert, G., & Sadler, P. (2019). Early informal STEM experiences and STEM identity: The importance of talking science. Science Education, 103(3), 623–637. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21499
Dou, R., Cian, H., & Espinosa-Suarez, V. (2021). Undergraduate STEM majors on and off the pre-med/health track: a STEM identity perspective. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 20(2), ar24. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-12-0281
English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3, 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1
Faikhamta, C. & Lertdechapat, K. (2021). STEM teacher education in Thailand. In T. W. Teo, A. Tan, & P. Teng (Eds.). STEM Education from Asia. (pp. 88–106). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003099888
Fakcharoenphol, W., Dahsah, C., & Wannagatesiri, T. (2022). Teacher professional development and education for STEM teaching in Thailand: challenges and recommendations. In M. M. H. Cheng, C. Buntting, & A. Jones (Eds.). Concepts and Practices of STEM Education in Asia (pp. 253–270). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2596-2_14
Falloon, G., Hatzigianni, M., Bower, M., Forbes, A., & Stevenson, M. (2020). Understanding K-12 STEM education: A framework for developing STEM literacy. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(3), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09823-x
Finson, K. D. (2002). Drawing a scientist: What we do and do not know after fifty years of drawings. School Science and Mathematics, 102(7), 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb18217.x
Galloway, A. (2005). Non-probability sampling. In K. Kempf-Leonard (Ed.). Encyclopedia of Social Measurement (pp. 859–864). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-369398-5/00382-0
Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25(1), 99–125. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X025001099
Gobo, G. (2008). Re-conceptualizing generalization: old issues in a new frame. In P. Alasuutari, L. Bickman, & J. Brannen (Eds.). SAGE Handbook of Social Research Methods (pp. 193–213). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446212165
Godwin, A., & Potvin, G. (2017). Pushing and pulling Sara: A case study of the contrasting influences of high school and university experiences on engineering agency, identity, and participation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(4), 439–462. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21372
Grimalt-Alvaro, C., Couso, D., Boxixadera-Planas, E., & Godec, S. (2022). “I see myself as a STEM person”: Exploring high school students’ self-identification with STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 59(5), 720–745. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21742
Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Shanahan, M. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(8), 978–1003. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20363
Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge University Press.
Hughes, R. M., Nzekwe, B., & Molyneaux, K. J. (2013). The single sex debate for girls in science: a comparison between two informal science program on middle school students’ STEM identity formation. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 1979–2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9345-7
Hughes, R., Schellinger, J., & Roberts, K. (2021). The role of recognition in disciplinary identity for girls. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(3), 420–455. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21665
Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology [IPST]. (2014). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics education: STEM education. Retrieved from https://www.scimath.org/ebook-stem/download/2491/13056/88
Jackson, M. C., Leal, C. C., Zambrano, J., & Thoman, D. B. (2019). Talking about science interests: The importance of social recognition when students talk about their interests in STEM. Social Psychology of Education, 22(1), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-018-9469-3
Kim, K. S. (2022). Methodology of non-probability sampling in survey research. American Journal of Biomedical Science and Research, 15(6), 616–618. https://doi.org/10.34297/AJBSR.2022.15.002166
Kim, A. Y., Sinatra, G. M., & Seyranian, V. (2018). Developing a STEM identity among young women: A social identity perspective. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 589–625. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318779957
Ladachart, L., Phothong, W., Suaklay, N., & Ladachart, L. (2020). Thai elementary science teachers’ images of “engineer(s)” at work. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(6), 631–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1743563
Ladachart, L., Radchanet, V., Phornprasert, W., & Phothong, W. (2023). Eighth-grade students’ content learning and STEM identity as a result of design-based learning. International Journal of Educational Reform. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879231153626
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3<296::AID-TEA1007>3.0.CO;2-R
Lertdechapat, K., & Faikhamta, C. (2021). Enhancing pedagogical content knowledge for STEM teaching of teacher candidates through lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 10(4), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-03-2021-0020
Liddell, T. M., & Kruschke, J. K. (2018). Analyzing ordinal data with metric models: What could possibly go wrong? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 328–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.08.009
Luo, T., & So, W. W. M. (2023). Elementary students’ perceptions of STEM professionals. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33(4), 1369–1388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09791-w
Martin-Hansen, L. (2018). Examining ways to meaningfully support students in STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0150-3
Martin-Paez, T., Aguilera, D., Perales-Palacios, F. J., & Vilchez-Gonzalez, J. M. (2019). What are we talking about when we talk about STEM education? a review of literature. Science Education, 103(4), 799–822. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21522
Martins, I., Baptista, M., & Reis, P. (2021). Students’ images of STEM professionals: a study in the Portugues context. Education 3-13, 51(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2021.1955945
McComas, W. F., & Burgin, S. R. (2020). A critique of “STEM” education: Revolution-in-the-making, passing fad, or instructional imperative? Science and Education, 29(4), 805–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00138-2
McDonald, M. M., Zeigler-Hill, V., Vrabel, J. K., & Escobar, M. (2019). A single-item measure for assessing STEM identity. Frontiers in Education, 4, 78. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00078
Moote, J., Archer, L., DeWitt, J., & MacLeod, E. (2020). Comparing students’ engineering and science aspirations from age 10 to 16: Investigating the role of gender, ethnicity, cultural capital, and attitudinal factors. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20302
Morton, T. R., & Parsons, E. C. (2018). #BlackGirlMagic: The identity conceptualization of Black women in undergraduate STEM education. Science Education, 102(6), 1363–1393. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21477
National Research Council. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. The National Academies Press.
Paul, K. M., Maltese, A. V., & Valdivia, D. S. (2020). Development and validation of the role of identity surveys in engineering (RIS-E) and STEM (RIS-STEM) for elementary students. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00243-2
Picker, S. H., & Berry, J. S. (2000). Investigating pupils’ images of mathematicians. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43(1), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017523230758
Promboon, S., Finley, F. N., & Kaweekijmanee, K. (2018). The evolution and current status of STEM education in Thailand: Policy directions and recommendations. In G. W. Fry (Ed.). Education in Thailand: An old elephant in search of a new mahout (pp. 423–459). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7857-6_17
Promkatkeaw, T., Seetee, N., & Dahsah, C. (2022). Fostering STEM education for early childhood in Thailand. In M. M. H. Cheng, C. Buntting, & A. Jones (Eds.). Concepts and Practices of STEM Education in Asia (pp. 101–116). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2596-2_6
Roberts, K., & Hughes, R. (2022). Recognition matters: The role of informal science education programs in developing girls’ science identity. Journal for STEM Education Research, 5(2), 214–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-022-00069-3
Rodriguez, S., Cunningham, K., & Jordan, A. (2019). STEM identity development for Latinas: The role of self- and outside recognition. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 18(3), 254–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538192717739958
Rodriguez, S., Pilcher, A., & Garcia-Tellez, N. (2021). The influence of familismo on Latina student STEM identity development. Journal of Latinos and Education, 20(2), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348431.2019.1588734
Rodriguez, L. (2018). From interest to identity: creating and nurturing STEM kids in middle school. Science Scope, 42(3), 79–85. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26611869
Simpson, A., & Bouhafa, Y. (2020). Youths’ and adults’ identity in STEM: A systematic literature review. Journal for STEM Education Research, 3(2), 167–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-020-00034-y
Sjaastad, J. (2012). Sources of inspiration: The role of significant persons in young people’s choice of science in higher education. International Journal of Science Education, 34(10), 1615–1636. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.590543
So, W. W. M., Chen, Y., & Chow, C. F. (2022). Primary school students’ interests in STEM careers: How conceptions of STEM professionals and gender moderation influence. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09599-6
Srikoom, W., Hanuscin, D. L., & Faikhamta, C. (2017). Perceptions of in-service teachers toward teaching STEM in Thailand. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 18(2), Article number 6. https://www.eduhk.hk/apfslt/download/v18_issue2_files/srikoom.pdf
Starr, C. R., Hunter, L., Dunkin, R., Honig, S., Palomino, R., & Leaper, C. (2020). Engaging in science practices in classrooms predicts increases in undergraduates’ STEM motivation, identity, and achievement: A short-term longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(7), 1093–1118. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21623
Talafian, H., Moy, M. K., Woodard, M. A., & Foster, A. N. (2019). STEM identity exploration through an immersive learning environment. Journal of STEM Education Research, 2(2), 105–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-019-00018-7
Teo, T. W., Faikhamta, C., & Lau, S. Y. M. (2023). Investigating the instructional leadership of STEM educators in Thailand. Research in Integrated STEM Education, 1(1), 117–146. https://doi.org/10.1163/27726673-bja00007
Vasinayanuwatana, T., Teo, T. W., & Ketsing, J. (2021). Shura-infused STEM professional learning community in an Islamic school in Thailand. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 16(1), 109–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-020-09990-8
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
Yoon, S. Y., Dyehouse, M., Lucietto, A. M., Disfes-Dux, H. A., & Capobianco, B. M. (2014). The effects of integrated science, technology, and engineering education on elementary students’ knowledge and identity development. School Science and Mathematics, 114(8), 380–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12090
Yuenyong, C. (2019). Lesson learned of building up community of practice for STEM education in Thailand. AIP Conference Proceeding, 2081, 020002. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5093997
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by Thailand Science Research and Innovation and the University of Phayao (Grant Number: FF66-RIM112). It was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles approved by the University of Phayao’s Human Ethics Committee (Code Number UP-HEC 2.1/043/64).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ladachart, L., Sriboonruang, O. & Ladachart, L. Whose recognition is meaningful in developing a STEM identity? A preliminary exploration with Thai secondary school students. Res Sci Educ (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10151-4
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10151-4