Abstract
In Cambodia, just over four per cent of the population aged 6–14 and two and a half per cent of the population aged 15–24 have never attended school; in addition, dropout also remains an issue. To provide a second chance for these groups, the Cambodian Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport (MoEYS) established an equivalency programme (EP), at primary, lower secondary and upper secondary levels. Primary-level EP, the focus of this article, was launched in 2015 and offers access to flexible learning for out-of-school children, youth and adults. However, up to now, there is very little information on the effectiveness of the programme. The mixed methods study presented here aimed to examine programme outcomes in terms of learners’ knowledge and skills, their attitudes, their practical application of acquired skills, and major factors influencing learners’ learning outcomes. The author surveyed and assessed 96 EP learners’ learning outcomes and interviewed nine equivalency teachers and two non-formal education officers. His findings show that while EP curriculum contents were relevant, they are still in need of revision. Equivalency teachers’ own low educational background and insufficient teacher training lead to low teaching performance; and consequently to EP learners’ low test scores or poor learning achievement. The author identifies three factors significantly associated with learners’ learning achievement: (1) the classroom learning environment; (2) instructional practices; and (3) learning assessments that reflect classroom contexts. Among these, he found instructional practice to have the greatest influence on learning achievement. Based on these findings, the author stresses there is an urgent need for increasing attention on improving equivalency teacher quality and curriculum.
Résumé
Analyse des résultats des programmes non formels d’équivalence primaire et des principaux facteurs affectant les résultats d’apprentissage des apprenants dans la province de Pursat et à Phnom Penh, au Cambodge – Au Cambodge, un peu plus de 4 % de la population âgée de 6 à 14 ans et 2,5 % de la population âgée de 15 à 24 ans n’ont jamais été scolarisés. Afin d’offrir une seconde chance à ces groupes, le ministère cambodgien de l’Education, de la Jeunesse et des Sports (MoEYS) a mis en place un programme d’équivalence (PE) aux niveaux primaire, secondaire inférieur et secondaire supérieur. Le programme d’équivalence au niveau primaire, qui fait l’objet de cet article, a été lancé en 2015 et offre un accès à un apprentissage flexible aux enfants non scolarisés, aux jeunes et aux adultes. Cependant, jusqu’à présent, très peu d’informations existent sur l’efficacité du programme. L’étude à méthodes mixtes présentée ici visait à examiner les résultats du programme en termes de connaissances et de compétences des apprenants, leurs attitudes, leur application pratique des compétences acquises, et les principaux facteurs influençant les résultats d’apprentissage des apprenants. L’auteur a étudié et évalué les résultats d’apprentissage de 96 apprenants du PE et a interrogé neuf enseignants d’équivalence et deux responsables de l’éducation non formelle. D’après ses conclusions, le contenu du programme d’études du PE est certes pertinent, mais il nécessite encore des révisions . Le faible niveau d’éducation des enseignants d’équivalence et l’insuffisance de leur formation se traduisent par de piètres performances d’enseignement menant à des résultats de test médiocres ou de faibles résultats d’apprentissage pour les apprenants du PE. L’auteur identifie trois facteurs qui ont un impact significatif sur les résultats d’apprentissage des apprenants : (1) l’environnement d’apprentissage en classe ; (2) les pratiques pédagogiques ; et (3) les évaluations de l’apprentissage qui reflètent les contextes de la classe. Parmi ces facteurs, il a constaté que les pratiques pédagogiques avaient la plus grande influence sur les résultats de l’apprentissage. Sur la base de ces conclusions, l’auteur souligne qu’il est urgent d’accorder une plus grande attention à l’amélioration de la qualité des enseignants d’équivalence et des programmes d’études.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Children in Cambodia enter primary school (grades 1–6) when they are six years old. This is followed by three years in lower secondary school (grades 7–9) and three years in upper secondary school (grades 10–12).
Its successor, Cambodia’s current Education Strategic Plan 2019–2023 (MoEYS 2019), builds on that framework with “two overarching policies: 1) Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all; and 2) Ensure effective leadership and management of education officials at all levels” (ibid., Preface).
As Kimmo Kosonen notes, “the Khmer, whose language has been made the national and official language … comprise approximately 90% of the Cambodian population. Cambodia also has numerous ethnolinguistic minority communities … Currently available sources indicate that 23 languages are spoken in Cambodia” (Kosonen 2019, p. 216).
References
Akey, T. M. (2006). School context, student attitudes and behaviour, and academic achievement. New York, NY: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation (MDRC). Retrieved 3 May 2023 from https://www.mdrc.org/publication/student-context-student-attitudes-and-behavior-and-academic-achievement
Amitay, S., Zhang, Y.-X., Jones, P. R., & Moore, D. R. (2013). Perceptual learning: Top to bottom. Vision Research, 99, 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2013.11.006
Audi, O., Ayodo, T. M. O, Simatwa, E., & Othuon, L. A. (2014). Evaluation of facilitators’ skills in assessing the achievement of in [sic] literacy programme in Vihiga. Green Journal of Education and Training Studies, 2(3), 058–063. https://doi.org/10.15580/GJETS.2014.3.111813967
Bacia, N. (2014). The school context model: How school environments shape students’ opportunities to learn. Measuring What Matters (MWM) project series. Toronto: People for Education. Retrieved 3 May 2023 from https://peopleforeducation.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/MWM-Quality-Learning-Environments.pdf
Baddeley, A., Eysenck, M. W., & Anderson, M. C. (2015). What is memory? In A. Baddeley, M. W. Eysenck, & M. C. Anderson (Eds.), Memory (2nd ed., pp. 3–20). Hove: Psychology Press.
Beggs, C. (2016). Overview of EGRA and EGMA. Global Alliance to Monitor Learning presentation; 11 May. Washington, DC: United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Retrieved 18 May 2023 from https://gaml.uis.unesco.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2018/08/4_USAID_20160511.pdf
Bond, L. A. (1995). Norm-referenced testing and criterion-referenced testing: The differences in purpose, content, and interpretation of results. Report no. 142. Washington, DC: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
Carron, G., & Châu, T. N. (1996). The quality of primary schools in different development contexts. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved 3 May 2023 from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000105751
Carron, G., Mwiria, K., & Righa, G. (1989). The functioning and effects of the Kenya literacy program: A view from the local level. IIEP research Report no. 76. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning (UNESCO-IIEP). Retrieved 3 May 2023 from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000085078
Chang, L. Y., Plaut, D. C., & Perfetti, C. A. (2016). Visual complexity in orthographic learning: Modeling learning across writing system variations. Scientific Study of Reading, 20(1), 64–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2015.1104688
Changizi, M. A., & Shimojo, S. (2005). Character complexity and redundancy in writing systems over human history. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 272(1560), 267–275. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2942
Cockrcoft, K. (2015). The role of working memory in childhood education: Five questions and answers. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 5(1), Art. no. 347. Retrieved 13 November 2022 from https://sajce.co.za/index.php/sajce/article/view/347/86
Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (2014). Designing group work: Strategies for heterogeneous classrooms (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Colby, J. (2000). Learning outcomes in international context. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Comparative and International Education Society held 17–21 March in San Antonio, Texas.
Colby, J., & Witt, M. (2000). Defining quality in education. New York, NY: United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF).
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.
Davidson, A. L. (1999). Negotiating social differences: Youths’ assessments of educators’ strategies. Urban Education, 34(3), 338–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085999343004
Deveau, J., Lovcik, G., & Seitz, A, R. (2013). The therapeutic benefits of perceptual learning. Current trends in Neurology, 7, 39–49. Retrieved 16 August 2022 from http://www.researchtrends.net/tia/article_pdf.asp?in=0&vn=7&tid=47&aid=5312
Deveau, J., & Seitz, A. R. (2014). Applying perceptual learning to achieve practical changes in vision. Frontier in Psychology, 5, Art. no. 1166 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01166
DNFE (Department of Non-Formal Education). (2015). Consolidated report on results of NFE sub-sector 2013–2014 and future direction for 2014–2015. Phnom Penh: DNFE.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: The Continuum International Publishing Group Inc.
Fuller, B. (1986). Raising school quality in developing countries: What investments boost learning? World Bank discussion papers no. 2. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Furniss, E., & Green, P. (1993). Becoming who we are: Professional development issues for literacy teachers. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 16(3), 197–209.
Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 403–422). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kimani, G. N., Kara, A. M., & Njagi, L. W. (2013). Teacher factors influencing students’ academic achievement in secondary schools in Nyandarua County, Kenya. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(3), 1–14.
King, S., & Pressley, J. (2020). All Children Reading-Cambodia: Student performance in early literacy. Midterm impact report. Washington, DC: United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Asia Bureau. Retrieved 16 August 2022 from https://earlygradereadingbarometer.org/pdf/Cambodia_2019_ACR.pdf
Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy. New York, NY: Cambridge, The Adult Education Company.
Kosonen, K. (2019). Language education policy in Cambodia. In A. Kirkpatrick & A. J. Liddicoat (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of language education policy in Asia (pp. 216–228). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315666235-15
Mamun, A. A., & Rahman, K. A. (2013). Non-formal education in improving quality of life of underprivileged children. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(1), 11–20.
McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (1993). Contexts that matter for teaching and learning: Strategic opportunities for meeting the nation’s educational goals. Stanford, CA: Center for Research on the Context of Secondary School Teaching (CRC).
Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 424–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.424
MoEYS (Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport). (2006). Teacher’s guidebook for self-study level literacy text-book for Khmer language and Mathematics. Phnom Penh: MoEYS.
MoEYS. (2008). Policy on non-formal education equivalency programme. Phnom Penh: MoEYS. Retrieved 3 May 2023 from https://nepcambodia.org/2018/06/30/policy-on-non-formal-education-equivalency-programme/
MoEYS. (2011a). Primary equivalency programme curriculum for child workers and out-of-school children. Phnom Penh: Department of Non-Formal Education (DNFE).
MoEYS. (2011b). Self-study level literacy textbook for Khmer language. Phnom Penh: MoEYS.
MoEYS. (2013). Guideline on implementation of non-formal education equivalency programme. Phnom Penh: MoEYS.
MoEYS. (2014). Education strategic plan 2014–2018. Phnom Penh: MoEYS. Retrieved 3 May 2023 from https://www.globalpartnership.org/sites/default/files/2015_02_cambodia_education_sector_plan.pdf
MoEYS. (2016). Mid-term review report in 2016 of the Education Strategic Plan 2014–2018 and projection to 2020. Phnom Penh: Ministry of Education Youth and Sport. Retrieved 15 May 2023 from http://www.globalpartnership.org/content/mid-term-review-education-sector-strategic-plan-cambodia
MoEYS. (2019). Education strategic plan 2019–2023. Phnom Penh: MoEYS. Retrieved 4 May 2023 from https://www.globalpartnership.org/node/document/download?file=document/file/2019-10-education_sector_plan-cambodia.pdf
MoEYS. (2022). Public education statistics and indicators 2021–2022. Phnom Penh: MoEYS. Retrieved 30 May 2023 from http://moeys.gov.kh/en/news-updates/public-education-statistics-indicators-2021-2022/
MoP/NIS (Ministry of Planning/National Institute of Statistics). (2015). Cambodia socio-economic survey 2014. Phnom Penh: NIS, supported by the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida). Retrieved 3 May 2023 from https://www.nis.gov.kh/nis/CSES/Final%20Report%20CSES%202014.pdf
MoP/NIS (2022). Report of Cambodia socio-economic survey 2021. Phnom Penh: NIS, supported by the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida). Retrieved 4 May 2023 from https://www.nis.gov.kh/nis/CSES/Final%20Report%20of%20Cambodia%20Socio-Economic%20Survey%202021_EN.pdf
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Ruddock, G. J., O’Sullivan, C. Y., & Preuschoff, C. P. (2009a). TIMSS 2011 assessment frameworks. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). Retrieved 3 May 2023 from https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2011/downloads/TIMSS2011_Frameworks.pdf
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Kennedy, A. M., Trong, K. L., & Sainsbury, M. (2009b). PIRLS 2011 assessment framework. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). Retrieved 3 May 2023 from https://timssandpirls.bc.edu/pirls2011/downloads/PIRLS2011_Framework.pdf
Nasreen, A., & Naz, A. (2013). A study of factors effecting academic achievement of prospective teachers. Journal of social science for policy implications, 1(1), 23–31.
Nilsen, T., & Gustafsson, J.-E. (2016). Teacher quality, instructional quality and student outcomes: Relationship across countries, cohorts and time. IEA Research for Education series, vol. 2. Cham: Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41252-8
NIS (National Institute of Statistics). (2020). General population census of the Kingdom of Cambodia 2019: National report on final census results. Phnom Penh: NIS Ministry of Planning. Retrieved 4 May 2023 from https://www.nis.gov.kh/nis/Census2019/Final%20General%20Population%20Census%202019-English.pdf
Ololube, N. P., & Egbezor, D. E. (2012). A critical assessment of the role/importance of non-formal eduation to human and national development in Nigeria: Future trends. International Journal of Scientific Research in Education, 5(2), 71–93.
OECD (Organisation for Economic and Co-operation and Development). (1996). Lifelong learning for all: Meeting of the Education Committee at Ministerial Level, 16–17 January. Paris: OECD. Retrieved 3 May 2023 from http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/97779
Price, G. R., & Ansari, D. (2013). Dyscalculia: Characteristics, causes, and treatments. Numeracy, 6(1), Art. no. 2. https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.6.1.2
Ryan, J. (2023). Introducing the Self-Administered EGRA And EGMA (SA-EGRA/ SA-EGMA), RTI International SharEd, 10 March [online article]. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTI International. Retrieved 18 May 2023 from https://shared.rti.org/content/introducing-self-administered-egra-and-egma-sa-egra-sa-egma-0
Schulz, W., Ainley, J., Fraillon, J., Losito, B., & Agrusti, G. (2016). IEA international civic and citizenship education study 2016: Assessment framework. Cham: Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39357-5
Seitz, A. R. (2017). Perceptual learning. Current Biology, 27(13), PR631–R636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.053
Shuttleworth, E., & Shutteworth, C. (2017). An assessment of early grade teaching quality in Cambodia. Battambang: SeeBeyondBorders. Retrieved 12 November 2022 from https://data.opendevelopmentmyanmar.net/my/library_record/an-assessment-of-early-grade-teaching-quality-in-cambodia
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). (2004). Education for all: The quality imperative. EFA Global Monitoring Report 2005. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved 3 May 2023 from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000137333
UNESCO. (2006). Equivalency programmes (EPs) for promoting lifelong learning. Bangkok: UNESCO Bangkok. Retrieved 3 May 2023 from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000149605
UNESCO. (2010). Achieving EFA through equivalency programmes in Asia-Pacific: A regional overview with highlights from India, Indonesia, Thailand and the Philippines. Bangkok: UNESCO Bangkok. Retrieved 3 May 2023 from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000214109
UNESCO. (2012). Asia-Pacific regional guide to equivalency program. Bangkok: UNESCO Bangkok. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000216086
USAID (United States Agency for International Development). (2015). Data for education programming in Asia and Middle East: Assessment of early grade reading in the education sector in Cambodia. Phnom Penh: USAID Cambodia. Retrieved 12 November 2022 from https://www.globalreadingnetwork.net/resources/data-education-programming-asia-and-middle-east-assessment-early-grade-reading-education
Walker, C. B. (1979). CSE criterion-referenced test handbook. Los Angeles, CA: Center for the Study of Evaluation (CSE).
Watson, L. (2003). Lifelong learning in Australia. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.
Wolf, R. M. (2005). Quantitative research in educational planning: Judging educational research based on experiments and surveys, module 4. Paris: IIEP/UNESCO. Retrieved 3 May 2023 from https://www.iiep.unesco.org/fr/publication/judging-educational-research-based-experiments-and-surveys-module-4
Acknowledgement
I would like to extend my gratitude to my main supervisor Dr Nakaya Ayami, who spent her valuable time and energy providing me with helpful comments and ideas which became very useful inputs for my research. My profound thanks are also extended to my other two supervisors, Dr Maki Takayoshi and Dr Miwa Chiaki for their insightful comments how to improve this study. This study was subsidised by the Project for Human Resource Development Scholarship by Japanese Grant Aid (JDS). I highly appreciate the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport in Cambodia, the Municipal/Provincial Office of Education, Youth and Sport in Phnom Penh and Pursat province, District offices of Education, school principals, and equivalency programme teachers in the selected locations for their cooperation and facilitation in the data collection process. I would like to thank all the equivalency programme learners who took part in the tests and survey during my data collection. Their contribution and participation have helped make this study successful.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lang, S. An analysis of non-formal primary equivalency programme outcomes and major factors affecting learners’ learning achievements in Pursat province and Phnom Penh, Cambodia. Int Rev Educ 69, 351–378 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-023-10010-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-023-10010-4