Abstract
Effective Global Citizenship Education (GCED) and Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) benefit from three interrelated dimensions of learning identified by UNESCO: cognitive, social-emotional and behavioural. The latter two of these are especially relevant to mindful compassion pedagogies, and the purpose of the literature review presented here was to ascertain how well such pedagogies could cultivate GCED and ESD social and emotional behavioural competencies in preschool to secondary-level education, tertiary-level education and professional development programmes for educators. The research team analysed 37 relevant peer-reviewed research articles and reports published between 1956 and 2021. Their findings point to many possibilities for how mindful compassion practices could serve as building blocks for desired GCED and ESD competencies. However, this requires a great deal of intentionality on the part of those responsible for the design, implementation and evaluation of mindful compassion-based programmes seeking to cultivate GCED- and ESD-related behavioural competencies. In essence, curriculum designers need to provide opportunities for students to practise mindful compassion as a microskill that leads to the attainment of behavioural competencies conducive to global citizenship and sustainable development. This article summarises the researchers’ findings and posits guiding questions for educators and researchers to consider as they design and evaluate social-emotional competencies of the kind needed for GCED and ESD to be effective.
Résumé
Explorer le potentiel des pédagogies de la compassion attentive pour une éducation à la citoyenneté mondiale et au développement durable efficace – L’éducation à la citoyenneté mondiale (ECM) et l’éducation au développement durable (EDD) bénéficient des trois dimensions interdépendantes de l’apprentissage établies par l’UNESCO : cognitive, socio-émotionnelle et comportementale. Les deux dernières dimensions sont particulièrement pertinentes pour les pédagogies de la compassion attentive, et l’analyse documentaire présentée ici avait pour objectif de déterminer dans quelle mesure ces pédagogies pouvaient cultiver les compétences comportementales sociales et émotionnelles de l’éducation à la citoyenneté mondiale et de l’éducation au développement durable dans les enseignements préscolaire, secondaire et supérieur ainsi que dans les programmes de développement professionnel des éducateurs. L’équipe de recherche a analysé 37 articles et rapports de recherche pertinents évalués par des pairs et publiés entre 1956 et 2021. Leurs conclusions désignent de nombreuses possibilités d’utiliser les pratiques de compassion attentive comme éléments de base pour les compétences souhaitées en matière d’ECM et d’EDD. Toutefois, cela nécessite une solide détermination de la part des responsables de la conception, de la mise en œuvre et de l’évaluation des programmes fondés sur la compassion attentive qui cherchent à cultiver les compétences comportementales liées à l’ECM et à l’EDD. En substance, les concepteurs de programmes doivent offrir aux étudiants la possibilité de pratiquer la compassion attentive en tant que micro-compétences permettant d’acquérir des compétences comportementales propices à la citoyenneté mondiale et au développement durable. Cet article résume les conclusions des chercheures et pose des questions directrices que les éducateurs et les chercheurs doivent prendre en compte lorsqu’ils conçoivent et évaluent les compétences socio-émotionnelles nécessaires à une ECM et une EDD efficaces.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Jon Kabat-Zinn defines mindfulness as “awareness, cultivated by paying attention in a sustained and particular way: on purpose, in the present moment, and non-judgmentally” (Kabat-Zinn 2011, p. 1).
In the field of psychology, the term embodied behaviour refers to the body as a tool for healing through self-awareness, mindfulness, connection, self-regulation, finding balance and creating self-acceptance.
Established in New Haven in 1994, CASEL is a non-profit organisation now headquartered in Chicago in the United States. According to its own website, “CASEL’s mission is to help make evidence-based social and emotional learning (SEL) an integral part of education from preschool through high school”; see https://casel.org/about-us/our-mission-work/ [accessed 24 April 2023].
The Commission convened its first meeting in November 2016. Its mandate expired in 2019 with the publication of its final report (National SEAD Commission 2019).
Neurodiversity refers to evidence that human beings have a wide variety of diverse environmental experiences and personal choices and that not all human beings have the same opportunities to learn and develop (Bresciani Ludvik 2019).
The Five facet mindfulness questionnaire (FFMQ) uses a self-report assessment method to explore facets of mindfulness. The Multidimensional compassion scale (MCS) measures workplace compassion. The other two measurement tools mentioned in Figure 3 are the Beck anxiety inventory (BAI), which is a self-report measure of anxiety, and the Perceived stress scale (PSS), which measures the perception of stress.
Tables 1–4 (providing author name[s] & publication year; mindful compassion practices; frequency, duration, and time and location of engagement; facilitator(s); age group; research evaluation assessment and findings) are available at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1eE39JdF17-FC0s5Crd7CNT4Mxa-ppTFZ/edit
References
The 37 items which were included in our random literature review (summarised in supplementary Tables 1–4 located on an external platform; the link is provided in footnote 7) are marked with an asterisk
Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191105283504
*Benavot, A. (2014). Education for sustainable development in primary and secondary education. Background paper for the DESD unit at UNESCO headquarters. Paris: UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1978.9283
Berg, J., Nolan, E., Yoder, N., Osher, D., & Mart, A. (2019). Social- emotional competencies in context: Using social-emotional learning frameworks to build educators’ understanding. Establishing Practical Social-Emotional Competence Assessments Work Group: Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning. Frameworks Brief 2. Chicago, IL: CASEL. Retrieved 6 June 2023 from https://measuringsel.casel.org/wpcontent/uploads/2019/02/Frameworks-C.2-.pdf
Bresciani Ludvik, M. J. (2015). Foreword. In R. P. Bingham, D. A. Bureau, & A. G. Duncan, (Eds), Leading assessment for student success:Ten tenets that change culture and practice in student affairs (pp. vii-ix). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.
*Bresciani Ludvik, M. J. (2017). Leveraging neuroscience and education to prevent youth aggression and violence. US-China Education Review B, September 2017, 7(9), 401–433. https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-6248/2017.09.001
*Bresciani Ludvik, M. J. (2018). Outcomes-based program review: Closing achievement gaps in- and outside the classroom with alignment to predictive analytics and performance metrics (2nd edn). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Bresciani Ludvik, M. J. (2019). What makes a performance indicator an equity-driven, high-performance indicator? Assessment Update, 31(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/au.30163
Bresciani Ludvik, M. J. (2021). Equity-driven high achievement: Assessment of student learning and development. Washington, DC: NASPA.
*Bresciani Ludvik, M. J., & Eberhart, T. L. (2018a). How mindful compassion practices can cultivate social and emotional learning. New Delhi: Mahatma Ghandi Institute for Peace and Sustainability (UNESCO MGIEP). Retrieved 20 April 2023 from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373705/PDF/373705eng.pdf.multi
*Bresciani Ludvik, M. J., & Eberhart, T. L. (2018b). Positively transforming minds within educational systems: An inner-directed inquiry process for educators and the students they serve. Redwood City, CA: PublishDrive online book publishing platform.
*CASEL (Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning) (2017). Core SEL competencies [dedicated webpage]. Chicago, IL: CASEL. Retrieved 30 August 2019 from https://casel.org/core-competencies/
*Casey, B. J., Jones, R. M., & Hare, T. A. (2008). The adolescent brain. Annals of New York Academic Science, 1124(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1440.010
*Damasio, A. (2005). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York, NY: Penguin.
*Damasio, A. (2012). Self comes to mind: Constructing the conscious brain. New York, NY: Random House.
*Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Huston, A. C., Klebanov, P., Pagani, L. S., Feinstein, L., Engel, M., Brooks-Gunn, J., Sexton, H., Duckworth, K., & Japel, C. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1428–1446. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428
Duraiappah, A. K., van Atteveldt, N., Buil, J. M., Singh, K., & Wu, R. (2022). Reimagining education: The International Science and Evidence based Education Assessment. Summary for decision makers (SDM). New Delhi: UNESCO MGIEP. Retrieved 18 November 2022 from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380985
*Durlak, J., Weissberg, R., Dymnicki, A., Taylor, R., & Schellinger, K. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
*Figner, B., Mackinlay, R., Wilkening, F., & Weber, E. (2009). Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: Age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card Task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(3), 709–730. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014983
*Glanz, K., & Bishop, D. B. (2010). The role of behavioral science theory in development and implementation of public health interventions. Annual Rev Public Health, 31, 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103604
*Glanz, K., Rimer, B. K., & Viswanath, K. (Eds) (2008). Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice (4th edn). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
*Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General psychology, 2(3), 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271
*Gross, J. J., & Thompson, R. A. (2007). Emotion regulation: Conceptual foundations. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 3–24). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
*Holland, P., & Gallagher, M. (1999). Amygdala circuitry in attentional and representational processes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(2), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613%2898%2901271-6
Jazaieri, H., McGonigal, K., Jinpa, T., Doty, J. R., Gross, J. J., & Goldin, P. R. (2014). A randomized controlled trial of compassion cultivation training: Effects on mindfulness, affect, and emotion regulation. Motivation and Emotion, 38(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-013-9368-z
Jinpa, G. T. (2010). Compassion cultivation training (CCT): Instructor’s manual (unpublished manuscript, conceptualised in collaboration with a team of clinical psychologists and research scientists at Stanford University and the support of the university’s Center for Compassion and Altruism Research and Education [CCARE]).
*Jones, S. M., & Bouffard, S. M. (2012). Social and emotional learning in schools: From programs to strategies and commentaries. Social Policy Report, 26(4), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2379-3988.2012.tb00073.x
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2011). Mindfulness for beginners: Reclaiming the present moment – and your life. Louisville, CO: Sounds True.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2013). Touchscape. Mindfulness, 4(4), 389–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-013-0252-4
*Kensler, L. A. W., & Uline, C. L. (2019). Educational restoration: A foundational model inspired by ecological restoration. International Journal of Educational Management, 33(6), 1198–1218. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2018-0095
*McChesney, J. (1998). Whole-school reform. ERIC Digest, 124. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED427388.pdf
*Mowrer, O. H. (1960). Learning theory and behavior. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1037/10802-000
*NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine) (2017). Supporting students’ college success: The role of assessment of intrapersonal and interpersonal competencies. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24697
*NASEM (2018). How people learn II: Learners, contexts, and cultures. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24783
National SEAD Commission (National Commission on Social, Emotional, and Academic Development) (2019). From a nation at risk to a nation at hope: Recommendations from the National Commission on Social, Emotional, & Academic Development. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute. Retrieved 20 April 2023 from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED606337.pdf
*Remmel, E. (2008). Constructing cognition [book review]. American Scientist, 96(1), 80–82.
*Rolls, E. T. (1999). The brain and emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
*Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective. Boston, MA: Pearson.
*Spear, L. P. (2013). Adolescent neurodevelopment. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52(202), S7–S13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.05.006
*Spence, K. W. (1956). Behavior theory and conditioning. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/10029-000
*Stanszus, L., Fischer, D., Böhme, T., Frank, P., Fritzsche, J., Geiger, S., Harfensteller, J., Grossman, P. & Schrader, U. (2017). Education for sustainable consumption through mindfulness training: Development of a consumption-specific intervention. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 19(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1515/jtes-2017-0001
*Steinberg, L., Graham, S., O’Brien, L., Woolard, J., Cauffman, E., & Banich, M. (2009). Age differences in future orientation and delay discounting. Child Development, 80(1), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01244.x
*Stepanek Lockhart, A. (2016). Non-formal and informal programs and activities that promote the acquisition of knowledge and skills in areas of Global Citizenship Education (GCED) and Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). Background paper prepared for the 2016 Global education monitoring report. Paris: UNESCO: Retrieved 20 April 2023 from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245625/PDF/245625eng.pdf.multi
*Taylor, R. D., Oberle, E., Durlak, J. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2017). Promoting positive youth development through school‐based social and emotional learning interventions: A meta‐analysis of follow‐up effects. Child Development, 88(4), 1156–1171. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12864
*UN (United Nations) (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York: UN. Retrieved 20 April 2023 from https://sdgs.un.org/sites/default/files/publications/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) (2017). Education transforms lives. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved 8 May 2023 from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247234
*UNESCO (2019). Educational content up close: Examining the learning dimensions of Education for Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship Education. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved 20 April 2023 from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000372327/PDF/372327eng.pdf.multi
*Wals, A., & Kieft. G. (2010). Education for sustainable development: Research overview. Stockholm: Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida). Retrieved 20 April 2023 from https://cdn.sida.se/publications/files/sida61266en-education-for-sustainable-developmentresearch-overview.pdf
*Zelazo, P. D., & Cunningham, W. (2007). Executive function: Mechanisms underlying emotion regulation. In J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 135–158). New York, NY: Guilford.
*Zelazo, P.D., Blair, C.B., & Willoughby, M. T. (2016). Executive function: Implications for education (NCER 2017–2000). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Research (NDER), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved 20 April 2023 from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED570880.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ludvik, M.B., Wills-Jackson, C., Eberhart, T.L. et al. Exploring the potential of mindful compassion pedagogies for effective global citizenship education and education for sustainable development. Int Rev Educ 69, 275–297 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-023-10009-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-023-10009-x