Abstract
This article begins with a discussion of the implications of CONFINTEA VI having been organised in Brazil – the author uses the term “Brazilian effect” – and the role of social movements challenging neoliberalism. Next, drawing from the experience of Latin America, this paper analyses the counter-hegemonic practice of the new social movements. The concluding section highlights the dilemmas faced by UNESCO in trying to create a democratic and efficient process of policy-making and institutional service in adult education in the nation-states. Furthermore, the proposal of popular education portrayed by the new social movements is described as a tool for empowerment. CONFINTEA VI’s recommendation of moving from rhetoric to action in adult education programmes, practices and policies demands that we take the agendas of the new social movements in the post-neoliberalism era seriously.
Résumé
Danser sur le pont du Titanic ? Éducation des adultes, État-nation et nouveaux mouvements sociaux – Cet article commence par une discussion sur les implications de CONFINTEA VI organisée au Brésil – l’auteur utilise le terme « effet Brésil » – ainsi que sur le rôle des mouvements sociaux qui contestent le néolibéralisme. À partir de l’expérience de l’Amérique latine, l’auteur analyse ensuite la pratique des nouveaux mouvements sociaux qui s’oppose à toutes les formes d’hégémonie. Dans la dernière partie sont abordés les dilemmes auxquels est confrontée l’UNESCO dans ses efforts de créer au coeur des États-nations un mécanisme démocratique et efficace d’élaboration de politiques et de prestations institutionnelles en matière d’éducation des adultes. En outre, l’éducation populaire telle qu’elle est proposée par les nouveaux mouvements sociaux y est décrite comme un instrument d’autonomisation. La recommandation de CONFINTEA VI de passer de la parole aux actes dans les programmes, les pratiques et les politiques d’éducation des adultes exige que nous prenions au sérieux les concepts des nouveaux mouvements sociaux en cette ère post-néolibérale.
Zusammenfassung
Tanz auf dem Deck der Titanic? Erwachsenenbildung, Nationalstaat und neue soziale Bewegungen – Dieser Artikel beginnt mit einer Diskussion darüber, was es bedeutet, dass die CONFINTEA VI in Brasilien organisiert wurde – der Autor benutzt den Begriff „Brasilien-Effekt“ – und der Rolle der sozialen Bewegungen, die sich gegen den Neoliberalismus richten. Sodann wird, aufbauend auf den Erfahrungen Lateinamerikas, die gegenhegemoniale Praxis der neuen sozialen Bewegungen analysiert. Im Schlussteil wird darauf eingegangen, in welchen Dilemmata die UNESCO steckt, wenn sie versucht, einen demokratischen und effizienten Prozess für Politikgestaltung und institutionelle Dienstleistungen der Erwachsenenbildung in den Nationalstaaten zu initiieren. Zudem wird der von den neuen sozialen Bewegungen ausgearbeitete Vorschlag der Volksbildung als Ermächtigungsinstrument beschrieben. Die Empfehlung der CONFINTEA VI, bei den Programmen, der praktischen Umsetzung und den politischen Strategien im Bereich der Erwachsenenbildung den Worten nunmehr Taten folgen zu lassen, erfordert eine ernsthafte Beschäftigung mit den Vorstellungen der neuen sozialen Bewegungen in der postneoliberalen Ära.
Resumen
¿Bailando sobre la cubierta del Titanic? Educación de personas adultas, estado nacional y nuevos movimientos sociales – Este artículo comienza con un comentario sobre las implicaciones – que el autor denomina “efecto brasileño” – de que la CONFINTEA VI haya sido organizada en Brasil y el papel que desempeñan los movimientos sociales en su desafío al neoliberalismo. Luego, partiendo de la experiencia de América Latina, analiza la práctica contra-hegemónica de los nuevos movimientos sociales. En la parte final se realzan los dilemas encarados por la UNESCO en el intento de crear un proceso democrático y eficiente de delineación de políticas y servicio institucional en la educación para personas adultas dentro de los estados nacionales. Además, la propuesta de educación popular que presentan los nuevos movimientos sociales está descrita como herramienta de empoderamiento. La recomendación de la CONFINTEA VI, de pasar de la retórica a la acción en programas, prácticas y políticas de educación de personas adultas, exige que tomemos en serio las agendas de los nuevos movimientos sociales en la era del post-neoliberalismo.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Public letter sent after CONFINTEA VI.
The International Committee included Ação Educativa, the Asian South Pacific Bureau of Adult Education (ASPBAE), the Latin American Council for Adult Education (CEAAL) the Latin American Campaign for the Right to Education (CLADE), the International Council of Adult Education (ICAE) and the African Platform/La Plateforme Africaine/A Plataforma Africana. The Organising Committee in Brazil included the National Campaign for the Right to Education, the National Confederation of Agriculture Workers (CONTAG), the Workers’ Union (CUT), MOVA Forum, the Paulo Freire Institute, the Landless Movement (MST), the Popular Education Network of Women from Latin America and the Caribbean and the Fórum EJA Paulista. The Local Organising Committee included the Associação Paraense de Apoio ás Comunidades Carentes (APACC), the Associação Regional das Casas Familiares Rurais do Pará (ARCAFAR), the State Council of Education (CEE), the Centro de Defensa do Negro do Pará (CEDENPA), the Commission for the Pan-Amazonia (DETRAN/PA), the Empresa de Assisténsia Técnica e Extensão Rural do Pará (EMATER), the Facultade de Amazónia (FAMA), the Fórum da Amazónia Oriental (FAOR), the Fórum EJA Pará, the Fórum Paraense de Economia Solidária, the Fórum Paraense de Educação do Campo (FPEC), the Instituto Federal do Pará (IFPA), the Grupo de Mulheres da Area Central (GEMPAC), the Instituto Amazónia Solidária e Sustentável (IAMAS), the Instituto Saber Ser Amazónia Ribeirinha (ISSAR), the Núcleo de Educação Paulo Freire/NEP-UEPA, the Rede de Educação Cidadã (RECID), the Rede Cidadania Solidária, the Secretariat of Education of the State of Pará (SEDUC), the Secretariat of Government (SEGOV), the Sindicato Nacional dos Servidores Federais da Educação Básica, Profissional e Tecnológica, the Sindicato dos Pedagogos, the University of the State of Pará (UEPA), the Federal University of Pará (UFPA), the Federal University of Amapá (UNIFAP), the Popular University (UNIPOP). And there were a host of other supporters, including the African Network Campaign on Education for All (ANCEFA), the Arab Network for Literacy and Adult Education, (ANLAE), the Caribbean Regional Council of Adult Education (CARCAE), the European Association for Education of Adults (EAEA), the African Women’s Development and Communication Network (FEMNET), the North American Alliance for Popular and Adult Education (NAPAAE), the Pan African Association for Literacy and Adult Education (PALAAE) and the Africa Reflect Network (PAMOJA).
In total 154 countries contributed reports to UNESCO which were integrated into GRALE.
Utopia is a term used here in the sense of philosopher Paul Ricœur, as ucronia, that is, the symbolic representation of a time reconfigured by narrative fiction. In the realm of social sciences, Immanuel Wallerstein has resorted to a term he coined, “utopistics,” as a way to evaluate the historical choices of the twenty-first century (Teodoro and Torres 2007, p. 1).
References
Antikainen, A. (2005). Empowerment and control: A state intervention into participation in adult education in Finland. European Education, 37(2), 21–31.
Antikainen, A. (2006). In search of the Nordic Model in education. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 229–243.
Antikainen, A., Harinen, P., & Torres, C. A. (Eds.). (2006). In from the margins: Adult education, work and civil society. The Hague: Sense.
Apple, M. W. (2004). Ideology and curriculum (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Arnove, R. (1986). Education and revolution in Nicaragua. New York: Praeger Publishers.
Arnove, R. F., & Torres, C. A. (1995). Adult education and state policy in Latin America: The contrasting cases of Mexico and Nicaragua. Comparative Education, 31(3), 311–325.
Carnoy, M., & Levin, H. (Eds.). (1985). Schooling and work in the democratic state. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Carnoy, M., & Samoff, J. (1990). With M. A. Burris, A. Johnston & C. A. Torres (Eds.), Education and Social Transition in the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Dale, R. (2000). Globalization and education: Demonstrating a “common world education culture” or locating a “globally structured educational agenda”? Educational Theory, 50(4), 427–448.
Daly, K., Schugurensky, D., & Lops, K. (Eds.). (2009). Learning democracy by doing: Alternative practices in citizenship learning and participatory democracy. Toronto: Transformative Learning Centre, OISE/UT.
Desjardins, R., Rubenson, K., & Milana, M. (2006). Unequal chances to participate in adult learning: International perspectives. Paris: UNESCO, IIEP.
Dialogue. (2010). Interview with Carlos Piñeiro Iñiguez, Monday 12 July 2010, p. 12. Accessed December 15, 2010, from http://www.pagina12.com.ar/diario/dialogos/21-149326-2010-07-12.html.
Faure, E., et al. (1972). Learning to be. Paris: UNESCO.
Freire, P. (1968). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.
Freire, P. (1997). El grito manso, Paulo Freire en la Universidad de San Luis. San Luis, Argentina: Universidad de San Luis, Siglo XXI.
Freire, P. (1998). Politics and Education. Los Angeles UCLA Latin American Center Publications. Translated by Pia Lindquist Wong, with an introduction entitled “The Political Pedagogy of Paulo Freire” by Carlos Alberto Torres.
Gadotti, M. (2010). Foro social mundial. Em Processo. São Paulo, Brazil: IPF.
Gadotti, M., & Torres, C. A. (Eds.). (1993). Educación popular: Crisis y perspectivas. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Miño y Dávila Editores.
Gadotti, M., & Torres, C. A. (2009). Paulo Freire: Education for development. Development and change, 40(6), 1255–1267.
Galbraith, J. K. (1954). The Great Crash, 1929 (p. xx). Cambridge: Houghton Mifflin Co.
Hake, B. J. (2006). Late modernity and learning society: problematic articulations between social arenas, organisations and individuals. In R. V. Castro, A. V. Sancho, & P. Guimarães (Eds.), Adult education. New routes in a new landscape (pp. 31–56). Braga, Portugal: Unit for Adult Education of the University of Minho.
Hinzen, H. (2007). CONFINTEA VI—The UNESCO International Conference on Adult Education in the context of MGDS, EFA, UNLD, LIFE and DESD. Convergence, 40(3/4), 265–283.
International Civil Society Forum (FISC). (2009). What is the FISC? Accessed December 15, 2010, from http://www.fisc2009.org/eng/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=17&Itemid=2.
Jones, L., & Torres, C. A. (2010). The struggle for memory and social justice education: Popular education and social movements reclaiming Latin American Civil Society. In P. Rose (Ed.), Achieving education for all through public-private partnerships?: Non-state provision of education in developing countries. London: Routledge.
Kettunen, P. (2004). The Nordic model and consensual competitiveness in Finland. In A. M. Castén, et al. (Eds.), Between sociology and history. Essays on microhistory, collective action and nation-building. Helsinki: SKS.
Knoll, J. H. (2007). The history of the UNESCO International Conferences on Adult Education. Convergence, 40(3/4), 21–41.
Lima, L. C. (2010a). On the right hand of lifelong education. Unpublished paper presented to a meeting of ICAE, Germany.
Lima, L. C. (2010b). Do FISC para a CONFINTEA VI, em Belém do Pará. Associação O Direito de Aprender Accessed December 15, 2010, from http://www.direitodeaprender.com.pt.
Matynia, E. (2009). Performative democracy. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
Meyer, J., Kamens, D., & Benavot, A. (1992). School knowledge for the masses: World models and national primary curricular categories in the twentieth century. Philadelphia: Falmer.
Milani, C. R. S. & Laniado, R. N. (2006). Transnational social movements and the globalization agenda: A methodological approach based on the analysis of the World Social Forum. Working Paper 5, December 2006. The Edelstein Center for Social Research. Accessed December 15, 2010, from http://www.edelsteincenter.org.
Morrow, R., & Torres, C. A. (1995). Social theory and education: A critique of theories of social and cultural reproduction. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
O’Cadiz, P., Torres, C. A., & Wong, P. (1998). Education and democracy: Paulo Freire, social movements, and educational reform in São Paulo. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Olmos, L., Van Heertum, R., & Torres, C. A. (Eds.). (2010). In the shadows of neoliberal globalization: Educational reform in the last 25 years in comparative perspective. Oak Park, IL: Bentham Books.
Rizvi, F. (2006). Imagination and the globalization of educational policy research. Globalization, Societies and Education, 4(2), 193–206.
Robertson, S. L. (2003). WTO/GATS and the global education services industry. Globalization, Societies and Education, 1(3), 259–266.
Schugurensky, D., & Torres, C. A. (1994). Adult education and political education: Lessons from comparative, cross-national research in Cuba, México, Nicaragua, and Tanzania. In B. Claussen (Ed.), Aspects of globalization and internationalization of political education. Hamburg: Krämer.
Teodoro, A. (2003). Educational policies and new ways of governance in a transnationalization period. In C. A. Torres & A. Antikainen (Eds.), The international handbook on the sociology of education. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Teodoro, A., & Torres, C. A. (2007). Introduction. Critique and utopia in the sociology of education. In C. A. Torres & A. Teodoro (Eds.), Critique and utopia: New developments in the sociology of education (pp. 1–8). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
Torres, C. A. (1989). Political culture and state bureaucracy in Mexico: The case of adult education. International Journal of Educational Development, 9(1), 53–68.
Torres, C. A. (1991). The state, nonformal education, and socialism in Cuba, Nicaragua. Comparative Education Review, 39(1), 1–27.
Torres, C. A. (1995a). State and education revisited: Why educational researchers should think politically about education. Review of Research in Education, 21, 255–331.
Torres, C. A. (1995b). Estado, políticas públicas e educação de adultos. In M. Gadotti & J. E. Romão (Eds.), Educação de Jovens e Adultos. Teoria, prática e proposta. São Paulo, Brazil: Cortez Editora and Paulo Freire Institute.
Torres, C. A. (1996). Adult education and instrumental rationality: A critique. International Journal of Educational Development, 16(2), 195–206.
Torres, C. A. (2009a). Globalizations and education: Collected essays on class, race, gender, and the state. New York: Teachers College Press.
Torres, C. A. (2009b). Education and globalization. New York: Routledge.
Torres, C. A., & Puiggrós, A. (1995). The state and public education in Latin America. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Torres, C. A., & Schugurensky, D. (1994). The politics of adult education in comparative perspective: Models, rationalities and adult education policy implementation in Canada, Mexico and Tanzania. Comparative Education, 30(2), 131–152.
Torres, C. A., & Schugurensky, D. (1995). A therapeutic model of adult education in Canada: Skills and academic upgrading programs in the province of Alberta. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 14(2), 144–161.
UIL (UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning) (2009). Global Report on Adult Learning and Education. Hamburg: UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning.
UIL (UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning) (2010). The Belém Framework for Action. Harnessing the power and potential of adult learning and education for a viable future. Hamburg: UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning.
Zibechi, R. (2003). Los Movimientos sociales latinoamericanos: tendencias y desafíos. In OSAL, Observatorio de América Latina, 9(January 2003), 185–188.
Zibechi, R. (2007). La educación en los Movimientos Sociales. FLAPE. Foro Latinoamericano de Políticas Educativas. Available from www.foro-latino.org/flape/…/MovSociales/educacion_en_los_mov_sociales.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Torres, C.A. Dancing on the deck of the Titanic? Adult education, the nation-state and new social movements. Int Rev Educ 57, 39–55 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-011-9193-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-011-9193-0