Abstract
This paper focuses on financial subsidies introduced by the Chinese government to benefit IPO firms. Because of high uncertainty, subsidy information deepens the divergence of opinions regarding IPO firm value among investors, and the IPO issuers accordingly raise their offer prices. This paper finds that the divergence of analyst forecasts is greater and the offer prices are higher when issuers have received higher subsidies before listing. Moreover, the decrease in investors’ disagreement and market performance after listing is also serious. Compared to state-owned issuers, the influence of subsidy information on heterogeneous beliefs, offer prices, and long-run performance of non-state-owned issuers is higher. Overall, this paper extends the research regarding the pricing of political information by following heterogeneous beliefs theory. Moreover, this paper develops a new IPO pricing framework under heterogeneous beliefs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This paper discusses the construction of an IV variable below in a separate section.
References
Allen F, Faulhaber GR (1989) Signalling by underpricing in the IPO market. J Financ Econ 23:303–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(89)90060-3
Anderson EW, Ghysels E, Juergens JL (2005) Do heterogeneous beliefs matter for asset pricing? Rev Financ Stud 18:875–924. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhi026
Bai C, Wang Y (1998) Bureaucratic control and the soft budget constraint. J Comp Econ 26:41–61. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcec.1997.1506
Baron DP (1982) A model of the demand for investment banking advising and distribution services for new issues. J Financ 37:955–976. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1982.tb03591.x
Beatty RP, Ritter JR (1986) Investment banking, reputation, and the underpricing of initial public offerings. J Financ Econ 15:213–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(86)90055-3
Benveniste LM, Spindt PA (1989) How investment bankers determine the offer price and allocation of new issues. J Financ Econ 24:343–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(89)90051-2
Benveniste LM, Wilhelm WJ (1990) A comparative analysis of IPO proceeds under alternative regulatory environments. J Financ Econ 28:173–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(90)90052-2
Brogaard J, Detzel A (2015) The asset-pricing implications of government economic policy uncertainty. Manag Sci 61:3–18. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2044
Calomiris CW, Fisman R, Wang Y (2010) Profiting from government stakes in a command economy: evidence from Chinese asset sales. J Financ Econ 96:399–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.02.004
Cerqua A, Pellegrini G (2014) Do subsidies to private capital boost firms’ growth? A multiple regression discontinuity design approach. J Public Econ 109:114–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.11.005
Chen X, Lee CJ, Li J (2008) Government assisted earnings management in China. J Acc Public Policy 27:262–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2008.02.005
Chen HC, Fok RC, Kang SH (2010) Issuers’ incentives and tests of Baron’s model of IPO underpricing. Rev Quant Financ Acc 35:71–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-009-0148-5
Chirinko RS, Wilson DJ (2008) State investment tax incentives: a zero-sum game? J Public Econ 92:2362–2384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.07.005
Claessens S, Feijen E, Laeven L (2008) Political connections and preferential access to finance: the role of campaign contributions. J Financ Econ 88:554–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.11.003
Colombo MG, Croce A, Guerini M (2013) The effect of public subsidies on firms’ investment-cash flow sensitivity: transient or persistent? Res Policy 42:1605–1623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.003
Czarnitzki D, Lopes-Bento C (2013) Value for money? New microeconometric evidence on public R&D grants in Flanders. Res Policy 42:76–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.008
Duchin R, Sosyura D (2012) The politics of government investment. J Financ Econ 106:24–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.04.009
Edgerton J (2010) Investment incentives and corporate tax asymmetries. J Public Econ 94:936–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.08.010
Faccio M, Parsley DC (2009) Sudden deaths: taking stock of geographic ties. J Financ Quant Anal 44:683–718. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109009990068
Faccio M, Masulis RW, McConnell JJ (2006) Political connections and corporate bailouts. J Financ 61:2597–2635. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.01000.x
Fisman R (2001) Estimating the value of political connections. Am Econ Rev 91:1095–1102. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.4.1095
Goldman E, Rocholl J, So J (2009) Do politically connected boards affect firm value? Rev Financ Stud 22:2331–2360. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn088
Goldman E, Rocholl J, So J (2013) Politically connected boards of directors and the allocation of procurement contracts. Rev Financ 17:1–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfs039
González X, Jaumandreu J, Pazó C (2005) Barriers to innovation and subsidy effectiveness. RAND J Econ 36:930–950
Grinblatt M, Hwang CY (1989) Signalling and the pricing of new issues. J Financ 44:393–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1989.tb05063.x
Guo RJ (2005) Information collection and IPO underpricing. Rev Quant Finan Acc 25:5–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-005-3176-9
Hanlon M, Heitzman S (2010) A review of tax research. J Acc Econ 50:127–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.002
Jayachandran S (2006) The jeffords effect. J Law Econ 49:397–425. https://doi.org/10.1086/501091
Kim CF, Pantzalis C, Park JC (2012) Political geography and stock returns:the value and risk implications of proximity to political power. J Financ Econ 106:196–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.05.007
Knight B (2006) Are policy platforms capitalized into equity prices? Evidence from the Bush/gore 2000 presidential election. J Public Econ 90:751–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.06.003
Kothari SP, Warner JB (1997) Measuring long-horizon security price performance. J Financ Econ 43:301–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(96)00899-9
Mansfield E, Switzer L (1984) Effects of federal support on company-financed R and D: the case of energy. Manag Sci 30:562–571. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.5.562
Miller EM (1977) Risk, uncertainty, and divergence of opinion. J Financ 32:1151–1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1977.tb03317.x
Özçelik E, Taymaz E (2008) R&D support programs in developing countries: the Turkish experience. Res Policy 37:258–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.11.001
Pástor L, Veronesi P (2012) Uncertainty about government policy and stock prices. J Financ 67:1219–1264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01746.x
Pástor Ľ, Veronesi P (2013) Political uncertainty and risk Premia. J Financ Econ 110:520–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.08.007
Ritter JR (1991) The long-run performance of initial public offerings. J Financ 46:3–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03743.x
Rock K (1986) Why new issues are underpriced. J Financ Econ 15:187–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(86)90054-1
Shleifer A (1998) State versus private ownership. J Econ Perspect 12:133–150. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.12.4.133
Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1994) Politicians and firms. Q J Econ 109:995–1025. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118354
Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1997) A survey of corporate governance. J Financ 52:737–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x
Spatt C, Srivastava S (1991) Preplay communication, participation restrictions, and efficiency in initial public offerings. Rev Financ Stud 4:709–726. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/4.4.709
Veronesi P (2004) The peso problem hypothesis and stock market returns. J Econ Dyn Control 28:707–725. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1889(03)00041-1
Wang K, Yang G, Liu J, and Li X (2015) A study on the scrambling for IPO resources, the government subsidies and the performances of the firm. Manage World 147–157 (in Chinese)
Welch I (1989) Seasoned offerings, imitation costs, and the underpricing of initial public offerings. J Financ 44:421–449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1989.tb05064.x
White H (1980) A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48:817–838. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912934
Acknowledgements
Bo Liu gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2017QNA289). Kemin Wang gratefully acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71272072, 71572042).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, B., Wang, K. Uncertainty of political subsidy, heterogeneous beliefs, and IPO anomalies. Rev Quant Finan Acc 52, 923–951 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-018-0731-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-018-0731-8