Abstract
Acromegaly is characterized by Growth Hormone (GH) and Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1) excess. Uncontrolled acromegaly is associated with a strongly increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), and numerous cardiovascular risk factors remain present after remission. GH and IGF-1 have numerous effects on the immune and cardiovascular system. Since endothelial damage and systemic inflammation are strongly linked to the development of CVD, and have been suggested to be present in both controlled as uncontrolled acromegaly, they may explain the presence of both micro- and macrovascular dysfunction in these patients. In addition, these changes seem to be only partially reversible after remission, as illustrated by the often reported presence of endothelial dysfunction and microvascular damage in controlled acromegaly. Previous studies suggest that insulin resistance, oxidative stress, and endothelial dysfunction are involved in the development of CVD in acromegaly. Not surprisingly, these processes are associated with systemic inflammation and respond to GH/IGF-1 normalizing treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Acromegaly is caused by excessive growth hormone (GH) secretion, generally by a pituitary adenoma, and concomitant Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1) excess. [1, 2]. GH and IGF-1 excess exerts many actions on the cardiovascular (CV) system, and CV comorbidities and disease (CVD) risk factors are common, especially in active acromegaly [3,4,5], but often persist after adequate treatment in patients with controlled disease [6,7,8,9]. Circulating IGF-1 inhibits GH secretion via direct negative feedback on the pituitary and also indirectly via stimulating hypothalamic somatostatin secretion [10]. IGF-1 has multiple systemic, autocrine, and paracrine effects, that are specific for the tissues, cellular pathways and metabolic circumstances in which they take place [11]. In addition, the GH and IGF-1/insulin signaling pathways share certain downstream elements, which facilitate the crosstalk between these pathways [11]. The interaction with other hormones and growth factors modulate the effects of IGF-1 [12].
The management of acromegaly and its associated comorbidities has improved over the last decades, resulting in a decreased incidence of macrovascular events. Some more contemporary studies reported the incidence of these macrovascular complications in patients with controlled acromegaly who are treated in expert centers to be nearly comparable to the general population, leading to a nearly restored life expectancy and a mortality risk that is comparable to the general population [8], despite the persistence of CV risk factors.
Basic research has shown that GH/IGF-1 excess has a direct negative impact on multiple components of the system that regulates endothelial function, and contributes to a pro-atherogenic environment via effects on the endothelium. Studies on preclinical and clinical markers of macrovascular damage in acromegaly patients have reported contradictory results, but endothelial and microvascular dysfunction seems to be present in acromegaly patients [13, 14]. The mechanism by which these factors impact on the risk of CVD may be different than in the general population. Despite their unclear significance regarding overt macrovascular damage in acromegaly, cardiovascular derangements represent a therapy challenge and a clinical burden, that require intensive management and negatively impact on QoL [7, 15].
In recent years, numerous publications have confirmed that systemic inflammation is strongly linked to the development of CVD [16,17,18,19]. Interestingly, also GH and IGF-1 have been shown to impact on the immune cells and the CV system [20]. Since the prevalence of endothelial dysfunction, metabolic disturbances, and hypertension remains increased in patients with controlled acromegaly compared to the general population, it has been suggested that specific traits of systemic inflammation are induced during GH/IGF-1 excess in active acromegaly and partially persist in controlled acromegaly, which may contribute to the development and persistence of CV comorbidities and hence increase the risk of macrovascular events in these patients (Figure 1) [21,22,23,24]. The aim of this review is to summarize and interpret the current knowledge on the relation between acromegaly, systemic inflammation and the pathogenesis of CVD, zooming in on the significance of microvascular inflammation and endothelial dysfunction, and on the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms in the context of acromegaly.
2 The relation between GH/IGF-1, the endothelium and CVD
2.1 The relation between GH/IGF-1 and CVD
In large population-based cohorts, IGF-1 concentrations in the normal to high-normal range are associated with a lower prevalence of CVD risk factors, and CVD-related morbidity and mortality [3, 25,26,27]. In addition, mainly anti-atherogenic and cardiovascular protective effects of IGF-1 administration have been reported [3, 6, 28,29,30]. Consequently, low and sub-physiological circulating IGF-1 levels are associated with an increased prevalence of CVD risk factors such as insulin resistance, hypertension, and with premature atherosclerosis, overt CVD and CVD-related and all-risk mortality [29, 31,32,33,34]. In contrast, supraphysiological IGF-1 levels are reported not to be protective, but rather evoke endothelial dysfunction (ED) and CVD [9, 35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42]. However, studies analyzing IGF-1 levels as an independent risk factor for CVD yielded inconclusive results [12] and therefore provide no indisputable evidence of a direct impact of IGF-1 on the process of atherosclerosis and CVD. Possibly, the associations depend on the influence of GH and IGF-1 on underlying risk factors and processes, such as hypertension, insulin resistance and inflammation, and oxidative stress [43].
Conversely, in populations with an increased risk for CVD (e.g. elderly, patients with hypertension or diabetes), an inverse relation between IGF-1 levels and blood pressure was observed, whereas in healthy populations (with IGF-1 levels in the midrange) a weak or neutral association with blood pressure was demonstrated [29, 33]. Moreover, the association between blood pressure and IGF-1 levels switched from negative to positive in cohorts with high circulating IGF-1 levels (e.g. acromegaly patients) [35]. These seemingly contradictory associations between IGF-1 levels and CVD (risk factors) can be explained by a phenomenon called ‘IGF-1 resistance’, which is observed in dysmetabolic states like obesity, hypertension and chronic kidney failure [44], and is characterized by a diminished maximal response to IGF-1 (with or without additional changes in receptor sensitivity) [45, 46]. Indeed, the expression of IGF-1R is known to be strongly dependent on local and circulating IGF-1 levels [47].
IGF-1 resistance is suggested to be caused by pro-inflammatory cytokines, high IGF-1 concentrations, and hyperglycemia [45, 46] via IGF-1 signaling disturbances or lower IGF-1 bioavailability [48, 49]. On the short-term, the presence of a compensatory protective rise in IGF-1 levels is suggested [35, 44], which is initially sufficient to maintain normal blood pressure and partially preserves endothelial function. However, on the long-term, advancing systemic inflammation and metabolic derangements augment IGF-1 resistance and ED, and suppress GH and consequent IGF-1 secretion [50]. In turn, this causes this compensatory mechanism to fail and leads to the development of overt CVD [35, 44].
The IGF-1 resistance hypothesis is supported by two meta-analyses describing an U-shaped relationship between IGF-1 levels and CVD, overall and CV mortality. Increased CVD risk and mortality was observed in both IGF-1 deficiency (e.g. Growth hormone deficiency (GHD)) and IGF-1 excess (e.g. acromegaly) groups [51, 52], whereas decreased mortality was found for IGF-I levels between 0 and +1 SD, which is suggested to be the optimal range in adults [52].
2.2 Acromegalic cardiomyopathy
The chronic cardiotoxic and remodeling effects of GH/IGF-1 overload results in concentric biventricular hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, which may lead to heart failure [3, 6, 53], especially in patients with insufficiently controlled acromegaly [54, 55]. Acromegaly treatment reverses some of the early stage morphological changes and improves cardiac function, especially when IGF-1 levels were normalized [36, 56,57,58,59].
Arrhythmias and cardiac valvular disease are also more common in acromegaly patients compared to the general population [6, 7]. Treatment is reported to decrease the incidence of arrhythmias and prevent further deterioration, but did not reverse established cardiac valve disease [7, 36, 60].
2.3 Coronary artery disease in acromegaly
Reports on the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) and the presence of coronary calcifications are inconsistent, but the prevalence of clinically apparent CAD is similar in well-controlled acromegaly patients (2.5-12%) compared to the general population [7, 61,62,63,64]. Likely, the risk of apparent CAD is a consequence of concomitant traditional CVD risk factors rather than direct effects of GH or IGF-1 [7, 36, 63], and consequently, acromegaly treatment reduces risk of CAD via amelioration of CVD risk factors [65]. However, coronary microvascular dysfunction, which has been associated with the development of macrovascular coronary disease, has been reported in patients with controlled and active acromegaly without overt CAD. The presence of coronary microvascular dysfunction correlated with IGF-1 circulating concentrations and was partially reversed by acromegaly treatment [14].
2.4 Effects of GH and IGF-1 on the endothelium
IGF-1 has also autocrine and paracrine effects on immune cells, endothelial cells (EC), and vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) [1, 11, 30]. The endothelium is a key component in the regulation of vascular homeostasis, including the recruitment and invasion of pro-inflammatory cells [30]. The production of nitric oxide (NO) by endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) by EC is crucial for the preservation of endothelial function. However, in the absence of its crucial cofactor (tetrahydrobiopterin; BH4) or substrate (l-arginine), eNOS becomes uncoupled and instead of NO, superoxide is produced. Superoxide is the precursor of most reactive oxygen species (ROS), and therefore, eNOS uncoupling is linked to the induction and progression of endothelial dysfunction and atherogenesis [66]. NO is the primary mediator of endothelium-dependent relaxation, but also inhibits platelet adhesion and aggregation, monocyte adhesion, and VSMC growth, and is thereby a negative regulator of vascular inflammation [13].
Physiological levels of IGF-1 and GH (most likely via induction of IGF-1 production) enhance eNOS expression via induction of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-Akt signaling, which increases NO production and inhibits ROS production, thereby reducing vascular tone and limiting oxidative stress and subsequent damage [3, 12, 13, 26, 28,29,30, 67]. Moreover, physiological levels of GH are reported to reduce vascular inflammation via suppression of the recruitment and activation of circulating macrophages to the vessel wall [30]. IGF-1 also improves plaque stability via improving VSMC survival, and endothelial repair through effects on endothelial progenitor cells (EPC), enhancement of fibrinolysis, and modulation of the expression of adhesion molecules. On the other hand, IGF-1 has migratory, mitogenic, proliferative and dedifferentiating effects via the induction of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway in VSMC [29, 68]. Although GHR are reported to be expressed in VSMC [69] and GH is able to induce the MAPK pathway [70], reports regarding GH inducing the MAPK pathway in VSMC are lacking.
The net effect of GH/IGF-1 on vasculature depends on the balance between the degree of activation of specific signaling pathways [29, 67, 68, 70] (Figure 1 & 2). IGF-1 expression is increased in atherosclerotic plaques [27], where it stimulates neointima formation and VSMC proliferation, induces chemotactic macrophage migration and activation, and promotes expression of cell adhesion molecules [12].
When the pro-atherosclerotic MAPK-mediated effects predominate over the beneficial PI3K-Akt-mediated effects, GH and IGF-1 negatively impact on the cardiovascular system [71] (Figure 1 & 2). This balance depends on the expression and function of GH/IGF-1, their binding proteins and receptors. In addition, circulating inflammatory, metabolic and endocrine factors, but also age, ethnicity, genetics and environmental modulation (diet, behavior) modulate the effects of GH and IGF-1 [35].
3 CVD risk factors in patients with acromegaly
Patients with acromegaly have multiple closely intertwined risk factors for CVD including hypertension, a modified body composition and an adverse metabolic profile characterized by dyslipidemia, DM and/or impaired glucose sensitivity and insulin resistance, and OSAS.
3.1 Hypertension
One third to half of the patients with acromegaly has hypertension [3, 72, 73]. Likely, the hypertrophic effects of IGF-1 and/or GH on the vessel wall, the presence of (O)SAS, and abnormalities in glucose and lipid metabolism are contributing factors [6, 74]. Moreover, GH is reported to increase the total plasma volume and renal sodium reabsorption [72], and cause ED via impaired NO production [4, 36, 73, 75]. Hypertension is only partly reversible with acromegaly treatment [7, 9, 36, 76, 77].
3.2 Metabolic profile and body composition in acromegaly
Active acromegaly is characterized by a decreased fat mass and an increased lean body mass, intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) mass and basal metabolism [23, 78, 79]. Despite the lower absolute adipose tissue (AT) mass, the GH-induced dysfunction of visceral AT and increased amount of IMAT likely play an important role in the development and persistence of insulin resistance and impaired glucose metabolism in AT and skeletal muscle in acromegaly patients [23, 78, 80, 81]. After successful treatment of acromegaly, lean mass and basal metabolism decrease and fat mass increases, predominantly in visceral and trunk AT depots [82]. In line with this, AT and skeletal muscle mass are reported to correlate with IGF-1 levels [83]. Whether the properties of the newly acquired AT are similar to those of healthy fat, is unclear.
3.3 Dyslipidemia
Compared to healthy controls, both unchanged [24, 84,85,86] and pro-atherogenic lipid profiles - characterized by increased concentrations of triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) and decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels - have been reported [21, 22, 65, 87,88,89] in both active and controlled acromegaly. In controlled acromegaly, lower LDL-C and TG, and higher HDL-C levels have been reported compared to active acromegaly by some studies [83, 90], but others studies reported comparable serum lipid levels [24, 83, 85, 86, 90, 91]. In active acromegaly, pro-atherogenic lipoproteine (a) (Lp(a)) levels were reported to be higher than in controlled acromegaly and healthy controls in some [88, 92, 93], but not all studies [84, 94, 95]. The different acromegaly treatment modalities have distinct effects on lipid levels, although all modalities uniformly resulted in a decrease in Lp(a) levels [76, 84, 92, 93, 96] and an increase in anti-atherogenic APOA1 levels [92, 96].
3.4 Diabetes mellitus
Insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus (DM) are common findings in acromegaly [23]. Especially patients with active acromegaly have higher circulating insulin and glucose levels compared to controls [21, 84, 87, 88, 97]. The relation between IGF-1 excess and disturbances in glucose homeostasis is further supported by the positive association between circulating IGF-1 levels and the prevalence of DM [9].
Dyslipidemia and OSAS are additional risk factors for insulin resistance that are common in acromegaly. Furthermore, altered AT distribution and AT inflammation potentially contribute [23], since systemic inflammation is directly linked to insulin resistance [84, 97]. After treatment of acromegaly, insulin resistance decreased and glucose homeostasis improved, even when IGF-1 normalization was not achieved [81]. However, somatostatin analogues, especially Pasireotide, may deteriorate glucose metabolism [7, 57, 81].
3.5 Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome
(Obstructive) sleep apnea syndrome ((O)SAS) is common with a prevalence of 44-87.5% in active and 35-58% in controlled acromegaly [98, 99]. OSAS is associated with ED, hypertension, systemic inflammation, and dysglycemia; all factors associated with an increased risk of CVD [100]. In general, acromegaly treatment had a positive effect on OSAS, but did not always result in cure [101, 102].
3.6 Preclinical markers of atherosclerosis and CVD in acromegaly
Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) is a measure of endothelial function and is reported to be lower in active acromegaly compared to matched healthy controls [38, 103, 104]. However, the vasodilator response to nitroglycerine (i.e. endothelial-independent vasodilatation) was similar, which indicates that the difference in FMD indeed displays ED in acromegaly patients [38]. The FMD of patients with controlled acromegaly is between values observed in CV matched or healthy controls and those observed in active acromegaly patients [37, 38, 57, 89, 104], which suggests that ED is only partially reversible after adequate treatment of acromegaly [57, 89, 105]. Interestingly, GHD is also associated with ED [30], which suggests an U-shaped relationship between IGF-1 and endothelial function, where both GH/IGF-1 deficiency and excess induce ED.
Macrovascular stiffening is a later, but still subclinical, stage in atherosclerosis development and can also be a sign of media sclerosis, which are both important processes leading to CVD [106, 107]. PWV can be determined by Pulse Wave Velocity (PWV) analysis. In active acromegaly, PWV is reported to be higher (indicating arterial stiffness) than in healthy controls [37, 86, 108], and PWV decreased after remission [57, 109]. However, others reported no differences between active and controlled acromegaly patients [108], or between patients and matched controls [104]. In a cross-sectional study, we observed lower PWV combined to a lower FMD in a cohort of controlled acromegaly patients with a low prevalence of (strictly controlled) hypertension and DM compared to matched controls [24].
The intima-media thickness (IMT) is a non-invasive marker of early arterial wall alterations associated with atherosclerosis. IMT is reported to be similar [108] or increased [37, 38, 87] when comparing acromegaly patients to healthy controls. Mostly, no differences were observed between patients with active acromegaly, controlled acromegaly and CV matched controls [37, 38, 108], although a recent meta-analysis reported a slightly higher IMT in active compared to controlled acromegaly patients [37].
3.7 Endothelial dysfunction and microvascular inflammation in acromegaly
Defects of endothelial function can be considered an early marker of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular dysfunction [110]. Very recently, microvascular inflammation and subsequent endothelial dysfunction have been described as a novel pathophysiological mechanism involved in the development of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction [111].
Interestingly, IGF-1 excess also leads to overexpression of cell adhesion molecules, that possess several pro-inflammatory properties, which is a feature of microvascular inflammation leading to ED. IGF-1 excess is assumed to be a complementary pathogenic factor for ED, which implies that initial endothelial damage (for example by oxidized LDL (oxLDL) or shear stress) is mandatory for the initiation of IGF-1 attenuated endothelial damage via its mitogenic properties [13].
In line with this, reduced levels of NO and eNOS expression [112, 113] and increased levels of markers of oxidative stress have been reported in active acromegaly patients [114, 115]. In addition, eNOS expression and NO levels were inversely correlated with GH/IGF-1 levels [112], whereas oxLDL levels correlated positively [115]. It has been suggested that IGF-1 excess decreases NO production via induction of insulin resistance, but this relation has not been observed in all studies [116].
Increased ROS formation causes oxidative stress by decreasing NO availability and subsequent increased levels of oxLDL, which promotes chemotaxis and activation of leukocytes (especially monocytes). Monocyte-derived macrophages that invaded the vascular wall are stimulated to form foam cells, which further fuels vascular wall inflammation and damage. Indeed, Boero et al. reported increased levels of oxLDL in active acromegaly patients and increased oxidative stress, which was also suggested by others [113, 115, 117], although increased oxidative stress or a reduced oxidative capacity was not observed in all studies [118].
Multiple studies have reported that measures of microvascular function are impaired in active acromegaly patients [14, 108, 116]. Next to functional consequences, IGF-1 also is reported to impact on microvascular structure. The most observed change observed in acromegaly is microvascular wall hypertrophy. These structural changes could also impact on microvascular function. In addition, both microvascular structure and function improve with disease control, but remain impaired in patients with controlled disease [14, 108, 116, 119, 120]. Microvascular dysfunction correlates with IGF-1 levels [14, 116]. Interestingly, microvascular dysfunction has also been observed in GHD, and improves after GH substitution therapy, providing additional evidence for the presence of a U-shaped relation between IGF-1 and endothelial damage [13, 67].
Taken together, microvascular inflammation and early atherosclerotic changes, especially ED, are more prevalent in acromegaly compared to healthy controls, and are only partly reversible with disease control. Additional factors present that may contribute to ED and CV disturbances in acromegaly patients are CV comorbidities as hypertension and metabolic disturbances, concomitant hormonal disturbances as hypogonadism, increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and expression of adhesion molecules, disturbed endothelial repair mechanisms and vascular alterations caused by proliferation of VSMC (Figure 3). However, structural changes of major vessels have not been proven to be more prevalent in well-controlled acromegaly patients than in controls.
4 Inflammation in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and CVD
In recent years it has become apparent that CVD is strongly associated with low-grade systemic inflammation [19, 121]. Low-grade vascular wall inflammation is an important player in the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis. Endothelial cell activation trigger immune cell trafficking into the vascular wall via expression of vascular cell adhesion molecules (CAMs)). These molecules attract platelets and monocytes, which migrate into the subendothelial layer and promote local inflammation. Once in the plaque, monocyte-derived macrophages become foam cells, which form a fatty streak in the arterial intimal layer and fuel local inflammation by the production of cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and chemokines as IL-8 and Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein (MCP)-1 [18, 122,123,124]. In reaction, VSMC are stimulated to proliferate and migrate into the intima, which thickens and bulges out into the arterial lumen, and may impair blood flow. VSMC synthesize collagen to form a fibrous layer that encloses the lipid core. Eventually the plaque consists of a fibrous cap, an underlying necrotic core, and many inflammatory cells. Activated macrophages produce matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) that contribute to destabilization of the plaque [18, 124]. The more advanced the plaque gets, the more vulnerable it is to rupture. Plaque rupture or plaque erosion induces platelet attachment and thrombosis, which may acutely obstruct the vessel, or cause downstream embolization by plaque particles, with subsequent ischemia in adjacent tissues [125, 126].
Despite the rising amount of knowledge on the relation between inflammation and CVD, the unresolving character of the low-grade inflammation that drives atherosclerosis remains poorly understood. In recent years, it became apparent that innate immune cells can develop long-term functional reprogramming characterized by hyperresponsiveness: trained immunity [127]. Short-term exposure to stimuli of both bacterial and non-bacterial origin can induce a long-term pro-inflammatory phenotype of monocyte-derived macrophages, both ex vivo [128, 129] as in vivo [130]. Indeed, in patients with risk factors for atherosclerosis or with established atherosclerosis, circulating monocytes have a pro-inflammatory phenotype, characterized by an increased cytokine production capacity [19, 131,132,133]. It is suggested that this concept may also apply to acromegaly [118, 134,135,136,137], since GH and IGF-1 have repeatedly been reported to impact on the immune system [20, 138, 139]. Moreover, circulating immune cells express GH and IGF-1 receptors [138, 140, 141], and macrophages and lymphocytes can produce IGF-1 [20, 142, 143].
5 GH, IGF-1 and GH/IGF-1 disturbances as modulators of inflammation
5.1 Effects of GH, IGF-1 and GH/IGF-1 disturbances on ex vivo cytokine production
Several studies have reported that GH and IGF-1 influence ex vivo cytokine production in circulating immune cells, while others found no effects. The more conflicting results concern particularly the effects of GH. The interest in studying the inflammatory effects of GH and IGF-1 initiated from the observation that high-dose GH treatment in critically ill patients, which was aimed to overcome their catabolic state, was associated with an increased mortality. It was hypothesized that supraphysiological dosages of GH increase pro-inflammatory cytokine production, either via direct effects on immune cells or via increased production of IGF-1, which might have contributed to the increased mortality in this context. Indeed, ex vivo stimulation with 200-300 ng/ml GH resulted in an increased secretion of IL-1β and interferon (IFN)-γ & IL-1β, in human macrophages and murine peritoneal macrophages respectively [135, 144]. However, stimulation with GH up to a very high concentration of 10.000 ng/ml had no stimulatory effects on TNF-α secretion, and even decreased TNF-α production in peritoneal macrophages. Interestingly, increased production of TNF-α mRNA expression and secretion was observed in human monocytes and murine peritoneal macrophages after stimulation with IGF-1 in the same experimental setting [47]. In another study, ex vivo stimulation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) with 100 ng/ml GH, which was expected to elicit a maximal response, did not affect the production of TNF-α, IL-6 and IFN-γ, either in absence or presence of co-stimulation with the Toll-like Receptor (TLR)-ligand Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) [145]. However, co-stimulation with GH and LPS induced IL-6 and TNF-α expression and secretion in whole blood (WB) [146]. In addition, co-stimulation with LPS and GH inhibited TNF-α secretion in mononuclear cells [147]. However, in PBMC from healthy donors such an effect was not observed [145, 148]. These conflicting results may be explained by the presence of a bell-shaped dose-response curve for GH [145]. The maximal effect on pro-inflammatory cytokine production has been observed with a dose of around 300 ng/ml in aforementioned studies. Another explanation for these discrepant results is the time that is required to elicit the maximal effect on cytokine production, since the changed TNF-α production was observed after 1 and 6 hours of culture. However, after 24 hours of culture, very weak or negligible effects were observed. Indeed, negative studies only measured cytokine production after 24 hours of culture. Last, the effects of GH stimulation are likely to be cell-specific, since receptor expression and intracellular signaling pathways differ between cell populations [149, 150].
With respect to IGF-1, stimulation of murine monocytes or peritoneal macrophages with 1-1000 ng/ml IGF-1 is reported to induce TNF-α secretion in one study [47], and increased IL-1β and reduced IL-1Ra secretion in another [135]. The highest response was observed with a dose of 100 ng/ml IGF-1 [47]. Our group did not observe a significant effect of stimulation with 50-5000 ng/ml IGF-1 in PBMCs from healthy volunteers [148]. However, co-stimulation with IGF-1 (50-5000 ng/ml) and a TLR-ligand showed a linear dose-response relation and induced IL-6, IL-10, IFN-γ and TNF-α secretion in human PBMC [148, 151, 152] and monocytes [47]. In murine mast cells, co-stimulation with LPS induced IL-6 and TNF-α and reduced IL-1β protein secretion [153]. Also in whole blood from healthy volunteers, co-stimulation increased IL-6 secretion and non-significantly decreased IL-1β secretion [148]. Others found that the combination of IGF-1 and T-cell-activating PHA (phytohaemagglutinine) modestly decreased the secretion of pro-inflammatory IFN-γ, whereas it stimulated the secretion of anti-inflammatory IL-10 in human mononuclear cells. However, there were also small stimulatory effects on secretion of monocyte-derived cytokines TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8 and IL-1β [154]. Interestingly, stimulation with LPS resulted in higher production of IL-6 and TNF-α in monocytes obtained from adult GHD patients compared to controls [155]. GH substitution therapy inhibited both in vivo and ex vivo cytokine production, although not towards normal levels in all patients [138, 155].Treatment of children with severe burns with IV IGF-1/IGFBP3 for one week, which led to a fourfold increase in circulating IGF-1 levels, increased IFN-γ production and induced a Th1 cytokine response in WB, whereas the Th2 (IL-4, IL-10) response was suppressed [156].
To summarize, both GH and IGF-1 seem to impact on ex vivo cytokine production, but mainly when acting as a co-stimulus to stronger inflammatory stimuli. For GH, a bell-shaped dose-response relation was observed, in which both low and extremely high doses inhibited pro-inflammatory cytokine production or rendered only a minor stimulatory effect. For IGF-1, a linear dose-effect relation was observed, and IGF-1 predominantly induced a Th1 cytokine response (IFN-γ, IL-2). The anti-inflammatory IL-10 response that is observed after short-term, but not longer-term, stimulation is suggested to be a compensatory mechanism for the pro-inflammatory effects of GH and IGF-1 [154].
Also in whole blood obtained from patients with acromegaly, ex-vivo stimulation with TLR-ligands increased IFN-γ and lowered IL-10 secretion. In patients with active acromegaly, higher production of IL-1β compared to controlled patients was observed, next to higher production of IL-1Ra compared to controls. There were no differences between controlled patients and controls. No significant effects were found regarding production of the monocyte-derived cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α, although IGF-1 levels correlated with IL-6, IL-1β, IL-1Ra and IFN-γ secretion [24].
Importantly, long-term endogenous exposure to supraphysiological levels of GH and/or IGF-1 may affect ex-vivo stimulated cytokine production in a different way than shorter-term ex vivo exposure. Exposure to IGF-1, but not GH, induced trained immunity ex vivo and in vivo [157, 158], which is likely to account for the augmented ex vivo stimulated cytokine production from monocytes obtained from acromegaly patients, but also in cells obtained from healthy volunteers that are trained with IGF-1 ex vivo. However, the in vivo effects of GH and IGF-1 are probably more complex since interfering factors likely play a role. For example, pro-inflammatory cytokines are also known to induce GH resistance [138, 159,160,161], which hampers GH-mediated actions and IGF-1 secretion, and therefore also impact on cytokine production.
The pro-inflammatory phenotype that results in the increased ex vivo cytokine production that is observed when stimulating cells obtained from patients with GHD and acromegaly must be induced in vivo. Whereas the ex vivo dose-response curve following IGF-1 stimulation is linear, mononuclear cells obtained from patients with GHD and acromegaly both display a pro-inflammatory phenotype. Therefore, GHD-related changes in metabolic profile, receptor expression and other factors inducing systemic inflammation in these patients likely contribute to the pro-inflammatory phenotype. However, these changes are at least indirectly related to GH/IGF-1 deficiency, since GH substitution therapy is reported to reserve the pro-inflammatory phenotype [155, 162, 163].
5.2 Circulating cytokines and acute phase proteins in acromegaly
Levels of circulating markers of inflammation are the net result of the production of these markers in all involved tissues, and their subsequent clearance.
In acromegaly patients, reports on circulating inflammatory markers are conflicting. Circulating IL-6 concentrations have been reported to be similar in healthy controls and patients with either active or controlled acromegaly [24, 84, 135, 136, 162, 164]. However, IL-6 concentrations were lower in patients with active disease compared to those with controlled disease [91, 162], and were inversely correlated with IGF-1 and GH levels [162]. TNF-α concentrations were reported to be similar [165] or higher [136], IL-1 concentrations were similar [165] or not significantly higher [136], and IL-8 levels were higher in patients with active acromegaly compared to controls [136]. On the contrary, Ueland et al. reported increased circulating IL-1β concentrations with decreased anti-inflammatory IL-1Ra concentrations in patients with active acromegaly, suggesting enhanced IL-1 activity, although IL-1β and IL-1Ra mRNA expression in PBMCs from these patients was similar to controls. IL-1Ra, but not IL-1β concentrations or the IL-1β/IL-1Ra ratio, were inversely correlated with GH levels, IGF-1 levels, and total body fat mass [135].
In analogy, GHD patients displayed a pro-inflammatory phenotype with similar or increased circulating levels of IL-6 and TNF-α when compared to healthy controls; the pro-inflammatory tendency decreased or normalized after GH replacement therapy [155, 162, 163].
Patients with active acromegaly are characterized by an increased pro-inflammatory activity of both the adipocytes and adipose tissue (AT) macrophages [23, 166], despite a decreased AT mass. Since AT macrophages in healthy AT are an important source of anti-inflammatory IL-1Ra and also pro-inflammatory cytokines [166], changed AT composition and/or activity may result in the lower IL-1Ra levels and higher circulating pro-inflammatory cytokine levels that characterize patients with active acromegaly. This theory is supported by reports that ex vivo stimulation of adipocytes with GH increased inflammatory adipokine production, and that AT depots of mice with GH excess contained increased amounts of inflammatory cells [164, 167, 168].
Differences in AT mass might also explain the relatively higher circulating IL-6 levels in patients with GHD and controlled acromegaly (who are characterized by an increased AT mass) compared to patients with active acromegaly (who are characterized by a decreased AT mass) [50, 91, 162].Those patients are both characterized by an increased and pro-inflammatory transformed VAT mass, which is an important source of pro-inflammatory IL-6 [23, 84]. In addition, metabolic disturbances are common in both GHD and acromegaly [6], and may enhance systemic inflammation as was demonstrated by higher levels of circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines and a pro-inflammatory phenotype of mononuclear cells.
Pro-inflammatory cytokines stimulate the secretion of acute phase proteins (APPs) that participate in the inflammatory cascade. Class 1 APPs, such as CRP, are mainly induced by IL-1β, alone or in combination with IL-6. Class 2 includes fibrinogen, and mainly responds to IL-6, but not IL-1β [50, 169]. Increased CRP and fibrinogen levels are both associated with CVD [19, 122, 170,171,172].
Reports in non-acromegalic subjects suggest that long-term (e.g. several weeks) exposure to supraphysiological levels of GH results in increased inflammatory activity. On the contrary, exposure to physiological levels (which are aimed when treating GHD) or short-term exposure of non-GHD patients to supraphysiological GH dosages has neutral or anti-inflammatory effects [50, 67, 145], which are suggested to be mediated via reduction of oxidative stress via induction of NO synthesis [67].
Surprisingly, and opposite to the aforementioned cytokine patterns, patients with active acromegaly are reported to have lower CRP levels compared to healthy controls [21, 22, 84, 162] and controlled acromegaly patients [83, 88] in most, but not all studies [85, 89, 95, 136]. CRP levels increase following IGF-1 lowering therapy [76, 84, 91, 92], and controlled acromegaly patients display similar levels as healthy controls [85, 89, 91, 95].
The inverse relation between pro-inflammatory cytokines and class 1 APP in acromegaly may be caused by effects of GH and/or IGF-1 on the interaction between cytokines and APPs (Figure 4). Receptors for GH and IL-6 both belong to the class I cytokine receptors: they display structural similarities and share intracellular signaling pathways [50, 160, 161]. Therefore, interactions as cross-talk and antagonism are possible. In vitro, GH induces suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS) 3 expression, which inhibits IL-6 and IL-1β-induced APP production [50, 84, 169]. Also, GH and IGF-1 seem to have suppressive effects on IL-1β production, which may further attenuate class I APP production [50, 153]. The other way around, pro-inflammatory cytokines are reported to stimulate the SOCS family, of which SOCS2 is reported to inhibit GH activity (inducing GH resistance) [67].
Treatment of acromegaly normalizes the disturbed cytokine-APP signaling, leading to normalization of APP levels [87]. These findings suggest a reciprocal relation between GH/IGF-1 and pro-inflammatory cytokines, and imply that class I APP are an unsuitable marker of low-grade vascular inflammation in acromegaly [84].
On the contrary, GHD patients displayed increased circulating CRP concentrations in comparison to healthy controls, and CRP normalized after GH replacement therapy [162, 163]. Probably, the abovementioned mechanism also applies to GHD, since class I APP production is not suppressed by GH-induced SOCS3 expression.
Next to APP and cytokines, numerous other circulating inflammatory and vascular markers have been investigated in patients with acromegaly. However, inconsistent results have been reported for the majority of these markers. An overview of the current knowledge regarding those markers in patients with acromegaly is depicted in Table 1.
Summarizing, it can be stated that active acromegaly is characterized by an adverse circulating cardiovascular and inflammatory marker profile (Figure 1). Most markers improve after treatment, although controlled acromegaly patients still display an unfavourable profile compared to controls. The overall finding that IGF-1 normalization is associated with CVD risk reduction (but not normalization) [14, 65, 183], emphasizes that obtaining complete remission is important in the optimal management of CVD risk factors.
5.2.1 Klotho
α-Klotho is a circulating marker of particular interest with respect to the relationship between IGF-1, inflammation and atherosclerosis. It stimulates adipogenesis [225] and maintains endothelial function via enhancing anti-oxidative activity [226]. In addition, soluble Klotho (sKlotho) increases insulin secretion and attenuates the development of DM type 2 by improving β-cell function and survival [226]. The membrane-bound form of Klotho (mKlotho) is a co-factor for the interaction between fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23) and its receptor (FGF-23R), and modulates its role in renal calcium and phosphate homeostasis [225].
Insulin and IGF-1 induce mKlotho’s cleavage via ADAM17, rendering soluble Klotho (sKlotho). Lower amounts of mKlotho impair FGF-23 signaling, leading to hyperphosphatemia, which impairs endothelial function. Klotho is cleaved by ADAMTS17, which also cleaves the GHR, yielding a soluble GHR which acts as a GHBP. Subsequently, Klotho inhibits the IGF-1 pathway, enhances GH secretion [226], and stimulates sKlotho secretion via a positive feedback loop [226]. In addition, sKlotho interacts synergistically with basic FGF, which also induces pituitary GH secretion [226].
Administration of sKlotho attenuated inflammatory cytokine production and adhesion molecule expression in murine models with Klotho deficiency [227, 228]. Also in humans, lower sKlotho levels are associated with atherosclerosis and inflammation [226, 229]. In active, but not in controlled acromegaly, high levels of sKlotho and FGF-23 have been reported compared to controls [173]. After remission, sKlotho levels rapidly normalized [173]. The potentially beneficial effects of the high sKlotho levels on endothelial function and inflammation seem to be outweighed by negative effects of hyperphosphataemia and other disturbances related to GH/IGF-1 excess, and are insufficient to reverse the increased cardiovascular risk in acromegaly.
6 Perspective on the role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of CVD in patients with acromegaly
From the previous section it is clear that CVD risk factors, microvascular dysfunction and systemic inflammation are more prevalent in acromegaly patients, especially those with active disease, but also persist in those with controlled disease. This stresses that management of CVD needs to be improved. It is likely that GH and IGF-1 excess has a negative impact on the CV and immune system, which may contribute to the pathogenesis of CVD in patients with acromegaly. However, studies on the role of the immune system in the development of CVD in acromegaly are scarce, and both increased as well as unaltered inflammatory and cardiovascular markers have been reported [21, 22, 134, 136].
The net effect of acromegaly on inflammation and CVD seems to be influenced by disease control (GH/IGF-1 levels), concomitant metabolic disturbances, hormonal deficiencies, age and gender [104, 105], which illustrates the complex mechanisms and interactions with GH/IGF-1 and other factors. In addition, the effects of GH and IGF-1 seem to be time- and dose-dependent: in states with either subphysiological or prolonged exposure to supraphysiological GH/IGF-1 concentrations, a pro-inflammatory state and atherosclerotic changes were observed (Figure 3). On the contrary, normal to high-normal circulating concentrations or short-term exposure to mildly increased GH/IGF-1 levels exert beneficial effects (Figure 2). However, on the longer term, these beneficial effects are outweighed by GH-induced mitogenic effects on VSMC and contra-regulatory mechanisms as IGF-1 resistance.
Although some anti-atherogenic effects of IGF-1 on the endothelium have also been observed in acromegaly, as demonstrated by the lower than expected extent of atherosclerosis (i.e. lower IMT, based on risk factors, compared to controls) in active acromegaly patients [230], the pro-atherosclerotic and pro-inflammatory effects seemed to predominate on the longer term [108].
The attenuation of beneficial effects of GH and IGF-1 on the long-term may be explained by pro-inflammatory cytokines, which were reported to induce resistance to IGF-1 [45], but also reduce IGF-1 production and other potentially beneficial GH-mediated effects [231]. Although GH has been reported to inhibit pro-inflammatory cytokine production, this action seemed to be counterbalanced by the increased cytokine production in pro-inflammatory transformed AT. The lower amount of AT in active acromegaly seems insufficient to counteract the pro-inflammatory changes in the remaining AT, which also produces high amounts of unfavorable adipokines, and induces insulin resistance. The additional negative effects of GH excess on glucose homeostasis may further restrict the potential beneficial effects of IGF-1, which is supported by the observation that IGF-1 preferentially induced the pro-atherogenic MAPK pathway over the protective PI3K-Akt pathway in hyperglycemic conditions [232].
GH/IGF-1 and AT status impact on abovementioned effects since patients who develop GHD after cure of acromegaly displayed higher inflammatory markers (fibrinogen, CRP) and had an unfavorable body composition with increased AT mass compared to cured patients without GHD [192].
Besides the importance of exposure time and dose, additional factors are suggested to impact on systemic inflammation and metabolic dysregulation in acromegaly, such as the presence of OSAS. In addition, Klotho might be a link between GH/IGF-1, inflammation and metabolic dysregulation in acromegaly, since Klotho impacts on all these components (Figure 2). Moreover, a hypercoagulable state was reported in active acromegaly [93, 185, 186]. Since inflammation activates coagulation and coagulation factors in return enhance inflammatory responses [233], this hypercoagulable state may also contribute to the increased CVD risk.
Although abovementioned evidence strongly suggests that acromegaly is characterized by a pro-inflammatory state, direct evidence of the relation between acromegaly, inflammation and CVD has not been provided yet. In addition, heterogeneity regarding treatment status, comorbidities as hypertension and insulin resistance, and analytical methods likely contribute to the conflicting results that have been reported previously. Moreover, in vivo findings are not always directly comparable to the ex vivo models, given the difference in or absence of circulating GH, IGF-1, IGFBP and many other interacting factors (adipokines, insulin levels, and adhesion molecules) ex vivo. In addition, cellular signaling, paracrine and autocrine processes could also explain differences between the in vivo and the ex vivo situation, for example by downregulation of the GH receptor [234] and increased IGFBP levels [22]. Last, prolonged exposure to GH or IGF-1 excess is not easily achieved ex vivo due to the limited survival of cells and tissues in culture.
Given these uncertainties, some authors suggested alternative explanation for the presence of premature CVD, such as pressure-related arterial and left ventricular stiffening rather than atherosclerotic disease [108, 230]. However, these hypotheses are based on small numbers of observations and are not substantiated by studies discussing the underlying mechanisms.
Acromegaly treatment is associated with an amelioration of CVD risk and inflammatory status. Some pathologic features were (partially) reverted (e.g. abnormal AT mass, insulin resistance) whereas others were not. This is supported by the reported normalized mortality ratio and prevalence of apparent CAD in well-controlled acromegaly patients, but the persistence of CV comorbidities as hypertension, DM and systemic inflammation and thus the persistence of the increased CVD risk.
In order to further elucidate the relation between inflammation and, CVD in acromegaly, both comprehensive mechanistic as well as prospective research in large and homogeneous cohorts of patients with regard to metabolic features, comorbidities and treatment status, is needed.
7 Conclusions
To conclude, the effects of GH and especially IGF-1 on the immune system are versatile, and many factors impact on their cumulative effects on systemic inflammation and CVD. Inflammatory cell-mediated processes also impact on endothelial dysfunction, atherogenesis, (vascular) oxidative stress and metabolic homeostasis and vice versa. Although an independent effect of GH/IGF-1 excess on the vasculature has not been proven, the currently available evidence strongly suggests that both controlled as uncontrolled acromegaly is associated with microvascular damage and endothelial dysfunction, and also pro-inflammatory changes. The mechanisms underlying development of CVD in acromegaly likely involve metabolic disturbances, oxidative stress, and endothelial inflammation and dysfunction. Not surprisingly, these processes are all strongly associated with systemic inflammation and respond to GH/IGF-1 normalizing treatment. This implies that GH/IGF-1, inflammation and CVD are closely, but complexly, intertwined in patients with acromegaly.
References
Kooijman R, Willems M, De Haas CJ, Rijkers GT, Schuurmans AL, Van Buul-Offers SC, et al. Expression of type I insulin-like growth factor receptors on human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Endocrinology. 1992;131(5):2244–50. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo.131.5.1425423.
Ren J, Anversa P. The insulin-like growth factor I system: physiological and pathophysiological implication in cardiovascular diseases associated with metabolic syndrome. Biochem Pharmacol. 2015;93(4):409–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2014.12.006.
Colao A. The GH-IGF-I axis and the cardiovascular system: clinical implications. Clin Endocrinol. 2008;69(3):347–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03292.x.
Colao A, Ferone D, Marzullo P, Lombardi G. Systemic complications of acromegaly: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management. Endocr Rev. 2004;25(1):102–52. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2002-0022.
Melmed S, Casanueva FF, Klibanski A, Bronstein MD, Chanson P, Lamberts SW, et al. A consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly complications. Pituitary. 2013;16(3):294–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-012-0420-x.
Lombardi G, Di Somma C, Grasso LF, Savanelli MC, Colao A, Pivonello R. The cardiovascular system in growth hormone excess and growth hormone deficiency. J Endocrinol Investig. 2012;35(11):1021–9. https://doi.org/10.3275/8717.
Ramos-Levi AM, Marazuela M. Bringing Cardiovascular Comorbidities in Acromegaly to an Update. How Should We Diagnose and Manage Them? Frontiers in endocrinology. 2019;10:120. doi:10.3389/fendo.2019.00120.
Maione L, Brue T, Beckers A, Delemer B, Petrossians P, Borson-Chazot F, et al. Changes in the management and comorbidities of acromegaly over three decades: the French acromegaly registry. European journal of endocrinology / European Federation of Endocrine Societies. 2017;176(5):645–55. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-16-1064.
Gonzalez B, Vargas G, de Los Monteros ALE, Mendoza V, Mercado M. Persistence of diabetes and hypertension after multimodal treatment of acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103(6):2369–75. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2018-00325.
Moller N, Jorgensen JO. Effects of growth hormone on glucose, lipid, and protein metabolism in human subjects. Endocr Rev. 2009;30(2):152–77. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2008-0027.
Vijayakumar A, Novosyadlyy R, Wu Y, Yakar S, LeRoith D. Biological effects of growth hormone on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. Growth hormone & IGF research : official journal of the Growth Hormone Research Society and the International IGF Research Society. 2010;20(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ghir.2009.09.002.
Higashi Y, Quevedo HC, Tiwari S, Sukhanov S, Shai SY, Anwar A, et al. Interaction between insulin-like growth factor-1 and atherosclerosis and vascular aging. Front Horm Res. 2014;43:107–24. https://doi.org/10.1159/000360571.
Maffei P, Dassie F, Wennberg A, Parolin M, Vettor R. The endothelium in acromegaly. Front Endocrinol. 2019;10:437. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00437.
Tellatin S, Maffei P, Osto E, Dassie F, Famoso G, Montisci R, et al. Coronary microvascular dysfunction may be related to IGF-1 in acromegalic patients and can be restored by therapy. Atherosclerosis. 2017;269:100–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2017.12.019.
Andela CD, Scharloo M, Pereira AM, Kaptein AA, Biermasz NR. Quality of life (QoL) impairments in patients with a pituitary adenoma: a systematic review of QoL studies. Pituitary. 2015;18(5):752–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-015-0636-7.
Hansson GK, Libby P. The immune response in atherosclerosis: a double-edged sword. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6(7):508–19. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri1882.
Hansson GK, Robertson AK, Soderberg-Naucler C. Inflammation and atherosclerosis. Annu Rev Pathol. 2006;1:297–329. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pathol.1.110304.100100.
Swirski FK, Nahrendorf M. Leukocyte behavior in atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction, and heart failure. Science. 2013;339(6116):161–6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230719.
Ridker PM, Everett BM, Thuren T, MacFadyen JG, Chang WH, Ballantyne C, et al. Antiinflammatory therapy with Canakinumab for atherosclerotic disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(12):1119–31. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1707914.
Spadaro O, Camell CD, Bosurgi L, Nguyen KY, Youm YH, Rothlin CV, et al. IGF1 shapes macrophage activation in response to Immunometabolic challenge. Cell Rep. 2017;19(2):225–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2017.03.046.
Boero L, Manavela M, Gomez Rosso L, Insua C, Berardi V, Fornari MC, et al. Alterations in biomarkers of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in active acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol. 2009;70(1):88–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03323.x.
Boero L, Manavela M, Merono T, Maidana P, Gomez Rosso L, Brites F. GH levels and insulin sensitivity are differently associated with biomarkers of cardiovascular disease in active acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol. 2012;77(4):579–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2012.04414.x.
Olarescu NC, Bollerslev J. The impact of adipose tissue on insulin resistance in acromegaly. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2016;27(4):226–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2016.02.005.
Wolters TLC, van der Heijden C, van Leeuwen N, Hijmans-Kersten BTP, Netea MG, Smit JW, et al. Persistent inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in patients with treated acromegaly. Endocrine connections. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1530/EC-19-0430.
Higashi Y, Sukhanov S, Anwar A, Shai SY, Delafontaine P. Aging, atherosclerosis, and IGF-1. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2012;67(6):626–39. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/gls102.
Bach LA. Endothelial cells and the IGF system. J Mol Endocrinol. 2015;54(1):R1–13. https://doi.org/10.1530/JME-14-0215.
Clemmons DR. Modifying IGF1 activity: an approach to treat endocrine disorders, atherosclerosis and cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007;6(10):821–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2359.
Isgaard J, Arcopinto M, Karason K, Cittadini A. GH and the cardiovascular system: an update on a topic at heart. Endocrine. 2015;48(1):25–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-014-0327-6.
Ezzat VA, Duncan ER, Wheatcroft SB, Kearney MT. The role of IGF-I and its binding proteins in the development of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2008;10(3):198–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1326.2007.00709.x.
Higashi Y, Gautam S, Delafontaine P, Sukhanov S. IGF-1 and cardiovascular disease. Growth hormone & IGF research : official journal of the Growth Hormone Research Society and the International IGF Research Society. 2019;45:6–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ghir.2019.01.002.
Sukhanov S, Higashi Y, Shai SY, Vaughn C, Mohler J, Li Y, et al. IGF-1 reduces inflammatory responses, suppresses oxidative stress, and decreases atherosclerosis progression in ApoE-deficient mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27(12):2684–90. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.156257.
Akanji AO, Smith RJ. The insulin-like growth factor system, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular disease risk. Metab Syndr Relat Disord. 2012;10(1):3–13. https://doi.org/10.1089/met.2011.0083.
Lam CS, Chen MH, Lacey SM, Yang Q, Sullivan LM, Xanthakis V, et al. Circulating insulin-like growth factor-1 and its binding protein-3: metabolic and genetic correlates in the community. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30(7):1479–84. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.203943.
Schutte AE, Conti E, Mels CM, Smith W, Kruger R, Botha S, et al. Attenuated IGF-1 predicts all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a black population: a five-year prospective study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016;23(16):1690–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487316661436.
Schutte AE, Volpe M, Tocci G, Conti E. Revisiting the relationship between blood pressure and insulin-like growth factor-1. Hypertension. 2014;63(5):1070–7. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.03057.
Sharma MD, Nguyen AV, Brown S, Robbins RJ. Cardiovascular Disease in Acromegaly. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2017;13(2):64-7. doi:10.14797/mdcj-13-2-64.
Parolin M, Dassie F, Martini C, Mioni R, Russo L, Fallo F, et al. Preclinical markers of atherosclerosis in acromegaly: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pituitary. 2018;21(6):653–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-018-0911-5.
Brevetti G, Marzullo P, Silvestro A, Pivonello R, Oliva G, di Somma C, et al. Early vascular alterations in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(7):3174–9. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.87.7.8643.
Colao A, Auriemma RS, Pivonello R, Galdiero M, Lombardi G. Medical consequences of acromegaly: what are the effects of biochemical control? Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2008;9(1):21–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-007-9062-0.
Lombardi G, Galdiero M, Auriemma RS, Pivonello R, Colao A. Acromegaly and the cardiovascular system. Neuroendocrinology. 2006;83(3-4):211–7. https://doi.org/10.1159/000095530.
Pivonello R, Auriemma RS, Grasso LF, Pivonello C, Simeoli C, Patalano R, et al. Complications of acromegaly: cardiovascular, respiratory and metabolic comorbidities. Pituitary. 2017;20(1):46–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-017-0797-7.
Vitale G, Pivonello R, Lombardi G, Colao A. Cardiovascular complications in acromegaly. Minerva Endocrinol. 2004;29(3):77–88.
AS Koegelenberg, R Schutte, W Smith, AE Schutte. Bioavailable IGF-1 and its Relation to the Metabolic Syndrome in a Bi-Ethnic Population of Men and Women. Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme. 2016;48(2):130-6. doi:10.1055/s-0035-1559768.
Imrie H, Abbas A, Viswambharan H, Rajwani A, Cubbon RM, Gage M, et al. Vascular insulin-like growth factor-I resistance and diet-induced obesity. Endocrinology. 2009;150(10):4575–82. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2008-1641.
O'Connor JC, McCusker RH, Strle K, Johnson RW, Dantzer R, Kelley KW. Regulation of IGF-I function by proinflammatory cytokines: at the interface of immunology and endocrinology. Cell Immunol. 2008;252(1-2):91–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellimm.2007.09.010.
Kuan Y, Surman J, Frystyk J, El Nahas AM, Flyvbjerg A, Haylor JL. Lack of effect of IGF-I on the glomerular filtration rate in non-diabetic patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. Growth hormone & IGF research : official journal of the Growth Hormone Research Society and the International IGF Research Society. 2009;19(3):219–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ghir.2008.10.002.
Renier G, Clement I, Desfaits AC, Lambert A. Direct stimulatory effect of insulin-like growth factor-I on monocyte and macrophage tumor necrosis factor-alpha production. Endocrinology. 1996;137(11):4611–8. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo.137.11.8895324.
Rosenfeld RG, Hintz RL. Characterization of a specific receptor for somatomedin C (SM-C) on cultured human lymphocytes: evidence that SM-C modulates homologous receptor concentration. Endocrinology. 1980;107(6):1841–8. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo-107-6-1841.
Rosenfeld RG, Dollar LA. Characterization of the somatomedin-C/insulin-like growth factor I (SM-C/IGF-I) receptor on cultured human fibroblast monolayers: regulation of receptor concentrations by SM-C/IGF-I and insulin. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1982;55(3):434–40. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-55-3-434.
Andreassen M, Frystyk J, Faber J, Kristensen LO. GH activity and markers of inflammation: a crossover study in healthy volunteers treated with GH and a GH receptor antagonist. European journal of endocrinology / European Federation of Endocrine Societies. 2012;166(5):811–9. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-11-1009.
Jing Z, Hou X, Wang Y, Yang G, Wang B, Tian X, et al. Association between insulin-like growth factor-1 and cardiovascular disease risk: evidence from a meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2015;198:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.06.114.
Burgers AM, Biermasz NR, Schoones JW, Pereira AM, Renehan AG, Zwahlen M, et al. Meta-analysis and dose-response metaregression: circulating insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and mortality. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(9):2912–20. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-1377.
Sacca L, Napoli R, Cittadini A. Growth hormone, acromegaly, and heart failure: an intricate triangulation. Clin Endocrinol. 2003;59(6):660–71. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2265.2003.01780.x.
Colao A, Grasso LFS, Di Somma C, Pivonello R. Acromegaly and heart failure. Heart Fail Clin. 2019;15(3):399–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hfc.2019.03.001.
Guo X, Fu H, Pang H, Xing B. Risk of left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic and systolic dysfunction in acromegaly: a meta-analysis. J Clin Neurosci. 2018;48:28–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2017.10.067.
Goldberg MD, Vadera N, Yandrapalli S, Frishman WH. Acromegalic cardiomyopathy: an overview of risk factors, clinical manifestations, and therapeutic options. Cardiol Rev. 2018;26(6):307–11. https://doi.org/10.1097/CRD.0000000000000215.
Annamalai AK, Webb A, Kandasamy N, Elkhawad M, Moir S, Khan F, et al. A comprehensive study of clinical, biochemical, radiological, vascular, cardiac, and sleep parameters in an unselected cohort of patients with acromegaly undergoing presurgical somatostatin receptor ligand therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(3):1040–50. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-3072.
Maison P, Tropeano AI, Macquin-Mavier I, Giustina A, Chanson P. Impact of somatostatin analogs on the heart in acromegaly: a metaanalysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(5):1743–7. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2006-2547.
Heidarpour M, Shafie D, Aminorroaya A, Sarrafzadegan N, Farajzadegan Z, Nouri R, et al. Effects of somatostatin analog treatment on cardiovascular parameters in patients with acromegaly: a systematic review. J Res Med Sci. 2019;24:29. https://doi.org/10.4103/jrms.JRMS_955_18.
Colao A, Spinelli L, Marzullo P, Pivonello R, Petretta M, Di Somma C, et al. High prevalence of cardiac valve disease in acromegaly: an observational, analytical, case-control study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(7):3196–201. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2002-021099.
Bogazzi F, Battolla L, Spinelli C, Rossi G, Gavioli S, Di Bello V, et al. Risk factors for development of coronary heart disease in patients with acromegaly: a five-year prospective study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(11):4271–7. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2007-1213.
Akutsu H, Kreutzer J, Wasmeier G, Ropers D, Rost C, Mohlig M, et al. Acromegaly per se does not increase the risk for coronary artery disease. European journal of endocrinology / European Federation of Endocrine Societies. 2010;162(5):879–86. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-09-0945.
Schofl C, Petroff D, Tonjes A, Grussendorf M, Droste M, Stalla G, et al. Incidence of myocardial infarction and stroke in acromegaly patients: results from the German acromegaly registry. Pituitary. 2017;20(6):635–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-017-0827-5.
Cannavo S, Almoto B, Cavalli G, Squadrito S, Romanello G, Vigo MT, et al. Acromegaly and coronary disease: an integrated evaluation of conventional coronary risk factors and coronary calcifications detected by computed tomography. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(10):3766–72. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2005-2857.
Berg C, Petersenn S, Lahner H, Herrmann BL, Buchfelder M, Droste M, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors in patients with uncontrolled and long-term acromegaly: comparison with matched data from the general population and the effect of disease control. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(8):3648–56. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2009-2570.
Hong FF, Liang XY, Liu W, Lv S, He SJ, Kuang HB, et al. Roles of eNOS in atherosclerosis treatment. Inflamm Res. 2019;68(6):429–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00011-019-01229-9.
D Caicedo, O Diaz, P Devesa, J Devesa. Growth Hormone (GH) and Cardiovascular System. International journal of molecular sciences. 2018;19(1). doi:10.3390/ijms19010290.
LeRoith D, Werner H, Beitner-Johnson D, Roberts CT Jr. Molecular and cellular aspects of the insulin-like growth factor I receptor. Endocr Rev. 1995;16(2):143–63. https://doi.org/10.1210/edrv-16-2-143.
Simard M, Manthos H, Giaid A, Lefebvre Y, Goodyer CG. Ontogeny of growth hormone receptors in human tissues: an immunohistochemical study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81(8):3097–102. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.81.8.8768881.
Brooks AJ, Waters MJ. The growth hormone receptor: mechanism of activation and clinical implications. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2010;6(9):515–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2010.123.
Hirai H, Kanaya R, Maeda M, Qungfang D, Ina K, Hayashi T. The role of insulin growth factor on atherosclerosis and endothelial function: the effect on hyperlipidemia and aging. Life Sci. 2011;88(9-10):425–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2010.12.021.
Palmeiro CR, Anand R, Dardi IK, Balasubramaniyam N, Schwarcz MD, Weiss IA. Growth hormone and the cardiovascular system. Cardiol Rev. 2012;20(4):197–207. https://doi.org/10.1097/CRD.0b013e318248a3e1.
Vitale G, Pivonello R, Auriemma RS, Guerra E, Milone F, Savastano S, et al. Hypertension in acromegaly and in the normal population: prevalence and determinants. Clin Endocrinol. 2005;63(4):470–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2005.02370.x.
Andrioli M, Scacchi M, Carzaniga C, Vitale G, Moro M, Poggi L, et al. Thyroid nodules in acromegaly: the role of elastography. Journal of ultrasound. 2010;13(3):90–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jus.2010.09.008.
Moller J, Jorgensen JO, Marqversen J, Frandsen E, Christiansen JS. Insulin-like growth factor I administration induces fluid and sodium retention in healthy adults: possible involvement of renin and atrial natriuretic factor. Clin Endocrinol. 2000;52(2):181–6.
Reyes-Vidal C, Fernandez JC, Bruce JN, Crisman C, Conwell IM, Kostadinov J, et al. Prospective study of surgical treatment of acromegaly: effects on ghrelin, weight, adiposity, and markers of CV risk. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(11):4124–32. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-2259.
Carmichael JD, Broder MS, Cherepanov D, Chang E, Mamelak A, Said Q, et al. The association between biochemical control and cardiovascular risk factors in acromegaly. BMC Endocr Disord. 2017;17(1):15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-017-0166-6.
Freda PU, Shen W, Heymsfield SB, Reyes-Vidal CM, Geer EB, Bruce JN, et al. Lower visceral and subcutaneous but higher intermuscular adipose tissue depots in patients with growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor I excess due to acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(6):2334–43. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2007-2780.
Guo X, Gao L, Shi X, Li H, Wang Q, Wang Z, et al. Pre- and postoperative body composition and metabolic characteristics in patients with acromegaly: a prospective study. Int J Endocrinol. 2018;2018:4125013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4125013.
Szendroedi J, Zwettler E, Schmid AI, Chmelik M, Pacini G, Kacerovsky G, et al. Reduced basal ATP synthetic flux of skeletal muscle in patients with previous acromegaly. PLoS One. 2008;3(12):e3958. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003958.
Ferrau F, Albani A, Ciresi A, Giordano C, Cannavo S. Diabetes secondary to acromegaly: physiopathology. Clinical Features and Effects of Treatment Frontiers in endocrinology. 2018;9:358. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00358.
CM Reyes-Vidal, H Mojahed, W Shen, Z Jin, F Arias-Mendoza, JC Fernandez et al. Adipose Tissue Redistribution and Ectopic Lipid Deposition in Active Acromegaly and Effects of Surgical Treatment. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2015:jc20151917.
Reid TJ, Jin Z, Shen W, Reyes-Vidal CM, Fernandez JC, Bruce JN, et al. IGF-1 levels across the spectrum of normal to elevated in acromegaly: relationship to insulin sensitivity, markers of cardiovascular risk and body composition. Pituitary. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-015-0657-2.
Sesmilo G, Fairfield WP, Katznelson L, Pulaski K, Freda PU, Bonert V, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors in acromegaly before and after normalization of serum IGF-I levels with the GH antagonist pegvisomant. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(4):1692–9. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.87.4.8364.
Topaloglu O, Sayki Arslan M, Turak O, Ginis Z, Sahin M, Cebeci M, et al. Three noninvasive methods in the evaluation of subclinical cardiovascular disease in patients with acromegaly: epicardial fat thickness, aortic stiffness and serum cell adhesion molecules. Clin Endocrinol. 2014;80(5):726–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.12356.
Smith JC, Lane H, Davies N, Evans LM, Cockcroft J, Scanlon MF, et al. The effects of depot long-acting somatostatin analog on central aortic pressure and arterial stiffness in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(6):2556–61. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2002-021746.
Colao A, Spiezia S, Cerbone G, Pivonello R, Marzullo P, Ferone D, et al. Increased arterial intima-media thickness by B-M mode echodoppler ultrasonography in acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol. 2001;54(4):515–24.
Vilar L, Naves LA, Costa SS, Abdalla LF, Coelho CE, Casulari LA. Increase of classic and nonclassic cardiovascular risk factors in patients with acromegaly. Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. 2007;13(4):363–72. https://doi.org/10.4158/EP.13.4.363.
Akgul E, Tokgozoglu SL, Erbas T, Kabakci G, Aytemir K, Haznedaroglu I, et al. Evaluation of the impact of treatment on endothelial function and cardiac performance in acromegaly. Echocardiography. 2010;27(8):990–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8175.2010.01179.x.
Hekimsoy Z, Ozmen B, Ulusoy S. Homocysteine levels in acromegaly patients. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2005;26(6):811–4.
Verhelst J, Velkeniers B, Maiter D, Haentjens P, T'Sjoen G, Rietzschel E, et al. Active acromegaly is associated with decreased hs-CRP and NT-proBNP serum levels: insights from the Belgian registry of acromegaly. European journal of endocrinology / European Federation of Endocrine Societies. 2013;168(2):177–84. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-12-0753.
Delaroudis SP, Efstathiadou ZA, Koukoulis GN, Kita MD, Farmakiotis D, Dara OG, et al. Amelioration of cardiovascular risk factors with partial biochemical control of acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol. 2008;69(2):279–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03181.x.
J Wildbrett, M Hanefeld, K Fucker, T Pinzer, S Bergman, G Siegert et al. Anomalies of lipoprotein pattern and fibrinolysis in acromegalic patients: relation to growth hormone levels and insulin-like growth factor I. Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association. 1997;105(6):331-5. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1211774.
Dimopoulou C, Sievers C, Wittchen HU, Pieper L, Klotsche J, Roemmler J, et al. Adverse anthropometric risk profile in biochemically controlled acromegalic patients: comparison with an age- and gender-matched primary care population. Pituitary. 2010;13(3):207–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-010-0218-7.
Potter BJ, Beauregard C, Serri O. Serum markers of cardiovascular risk in patients with acromegaly before and after six months of treatment with octreotide LAR. Pituitary. 2008;11(1):49–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-007-0067-1.
Olarescu NC, Heck A, Godang K, Ueland T, Bollerslev J. The metabolic risk in patients newly diagnosed with acromegaly is related to fat distribution and circulating Adipokines and improves after treatment. Neuroendocrinology. 2016;103(3-4):197–206. https://doi.org/10.1159/000371818.
Hochberg I, Tran QT, Barkan AL, Saltiel AR, Chandler WF, Bridges D. Gene expression signature in adipose tissue of acromegaly patients. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0129359. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129359.
Vouzouneraki K, Franklin KA, Forsgren M, Warn M, Persson JT, Wik H, et al. Temporal relationship of sleep apnea and acromegaly: a nationwide study. Endocrine. 2018;62(2):456–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-018-1694-1.
Wolters TLC, Roerink S, Drenthen LCA, van Haren-Willems J, M Wagenmakers, Smit JWA et al. The Course of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome in Patients With Acromegaly During Treatment. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2020;105(1). doi:10.1210/clinem/dgz050.
Uyar M, Davutoglu V. An update on cardiovascular effects of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. Postgrad Med J. 2016;92(1091):540–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2016-134093.
Castellani C, Francia G, Dalle Carbonare L, Ferrari M, Viva E, Cerini R, et al. Morphological study of upper airways and long-term follow-up of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in acromegalic patients. Endocrine. 2016;51(2):308–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-015-0659-x.
Davi MV, Dalle Carbonare L, Giustina A, Ferrari M, Frigo A, Lo Cascio V, et al. Sleep apnoea syndrome is highly prevalent in acromegaly and only partially reversible after biochemical control of the disease. European journal of endocrinology / European Federation of Endocrine Societies. 2008;159(5):533–40. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-08-0442.
Baykan M, Erem C, Gedikli O, Hacihasanoglu A, Erdogan T, Kocak M, et al. Impairment in flow-mediated vasodilatation of the brachial artery in acromegaly. Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre. 2009;18(3):228–32. https://doi.org/10.1159/000204355.
Yaron M, Izkhakov E, Sack J, Azzam I, Osher E, Tordjman K, et al. Arterial properties in acromegaly: relation to disease activity and associated cardiovascular risk factors. Pituitary. 2016;19(3):322–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-016-0710-9.
Sakai H, Tsuchiya K, Nakayama C, Iwashima F, Izumiyama H, Doi M, et al. Improvement of endothelial dysfunction in acromegaly after transsphenoidal surgery. Endocr J. 2008;55(5):853–9.
Lanzer P, Boehm M, Sorribas V, Thiriet M, Janzen J, Zeller T, et al. Medial vascular calcification revisited: review and perspectives. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(23):1515–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu163.
Bruno RM, Bianchini E, Faita F, Taddei S, Ghiadoni L. Intima media thickness, pulse wave velocity, and flow mediated dilation. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2014;12:34. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-12-34.
Paisley AN, Banerjee M, Rezai M, Schofield RE, Balakrishnannair S, Herbert A, et al. Changes in arterial stiffness but not carotid intimal thickness in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(5):1486–92. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2010-2225.
Sakai K, Busby WH Jr, Clarke JB, Clemmons DR. Tissue transglutaminase facilitates the polymerization of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) and leads to loss of IGFBP-1's ability to inhibit insulin-like growth factor-I-stimulated protein synthesis. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(12):8740–5. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M008359200.
Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Bull C, Robinson J, Deanfield JE. Endothelium-dependent dilation in the systemic arteries of asymptomatic subjects relates to coronary risk factors and their interaction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24(6):1468–74.
Paulus WJ. Unfolding discoveries in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(7):679–82. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcibr1913825.
Ronconi V, Giacchetti G, Mariniello B, Camilletti A, Mantero F, Boscaro M, et al. Reduced nitric oxide levels in acromegaly: cardiovascular implications. Blood Press. 2005;14(4):227–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/08037050510034293.
P Anagnostis, ZA Efstathiadou, S Gougoura, SA Polyzos, E Karathanas, P Dritsa et al. Oxidative stress and reduced antioxidative status, along with endothelial dysfunction in acromegaly. Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme. 2013;45(4):314-8. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1323765.
Nishizawa H, Handayaningsih AE, Iguchi G, Cho Y, Takahashi M, Yamamoto M, et al. Enhanced oxidative stress in GH-transgenic rat and acromegaly in humans. Growth hormone & IGF research : official journal of the Growth Hormone Research Society and the International IGF Research Society. 2012;22(2):64–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ghir.2012.02.001.
Boero L, Cuniberti L, Magnani N, Manavela M, Yapur V, Bustos M, et al. Increased oxidized low density lipoprotein associated with high ceruloplasmin activity in patients with active acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol. 2010;72(5):654–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03685.x.
Krsek M, Prazny M, Marek J, Skrha J, Justova V, Lacinova Z. The relationship between serum levels of insulin-like growth factor-I and its binding proteins and microvascular function in acromegalic patients. Growth hormone & IGF research : official journal of the Growth Hormone Research Society and the International IGF Research Society. 2002;12(1):54–9.
Ilhan M, Turgut S, Turan S, Demirci Cekic S, Ergen HA, Korkmaz Dursun G, et al. The assessment of total antioxidant capacity and superoxide dismutase levels, and the possible role of manganese superoxide dismutase polymorphism in acromegaly. Endocr J. 2018;65(1):91–9. https://doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.EJ17-0300.
Ozkan C, Altinova AE, Cerit ET, Yayla C, Sahinarslan A, Sahin D, et al. Markers of early atherosclerosis, oxidative stress and inflammation in patients with acromegaly. Pituitary. 2014;18(5):621–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-014-0621-6.
Paisley AN, Izzard AS, Gemmell I, Cruickshank K, Trainer PJ, Heagerty AM. Small vessel remodeling and impaired endothelial-dependent dilatation in subcutaneous resistance arteries from patients with acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(4):1111–7. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2008-0948.
Rizzoni D, Porteri E, Giustina A, De Ciuceis C, Sleiman I, Boari GE, et al. Acromegalic patients show the presence of hypertrophic remodeling of subcutaneous small resistance arteries. Hypertension. 2004;43(3):561–5. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.HYP.0000114604.52270.05.
Daiber A, Steven S, Weber A, Shuvaev VV, Muzykantov VR, Laher I, et al. Targeting vascular (endothelial) dysfunction. Br J Pharmacol. 2017;174(12):1591–619. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.13517.
Soeki T, Sata M. Inflammatory biomarkers and atherosclerosis. Int Heart J. 2016;57(2):134–9. https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.15-346.
Ridker PM. From C-reactive protein to Interleukin-6 to Interleukin-1: moving upstream to identify novel targets for Atheroprotection. Circ Res. 2016;118(1):145–56. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306656.
Moore KJ, Sheedy FJ, Fisher EA. Macrophages in atherosclerosis: a dynamic balance. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13(10):709–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3520.
Vacek TP, Rehman S, Neamtu D, Yu S, Givimani S, Tyagi SC. Matrix metalloproteinases in atherosclerosis: role of nitric oxide, hydrogen sulfide, homocysteine, and polymorphisms. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2015;11:173–83. https://doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S68415.
Brown RA, Shantsila E, Varma C, Lip GY. Current understanding of Atherogenesis. Am J Med. 2017;130(3):268–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.10.022.
MG Netea, LAB Joosten, E Latz, KHG Mills, G Natoli, HG Stunnenberg et al. Trained immunity: A program of innate immune memory in health and disease. Science. 2016;352(6284):aaf1098. doi:ARTN aaf109810.1126/science.aaf1098.
Arts RJW, Carvalho A, La Rocca C, Palma C, Rodrigues F, Silvestre R, et al. Immunometabolic pathways in BCG-induced trained immunity. Cell Rep. 2016;17(10):2562–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.11.011.
Bekkering S, Blok BA, Joosten LA, Riksen NP, van Crevel R, Netea MG. In vitro experimental model of trained innate immunity in human primary monocytes. Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI. 2016;23(12):926–33. https://doi.org/10.1128/CVI.00349-16.
Christ A, Gunther P, Lauterbach MAR, Duewell P, Biswas D, Pelka K, et al. Western diet triggers NLRP3-dependent innate immune reprogramming. Cell. 2018;172(1-2):162–75e14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.12.013.
van der Valk FM, Bekkering S, Kroon J, Yeang C, Van den Bossche J, van Buul JD, et al. Oxidized phospholipids on lipoprotein(a) elicit Arterial Wall inflammation and an inflammatory monocyte response in humans. Circulation. 2016;134(8):611–24. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.020838.
Bekkering S, van den Munckhof I, Nielen T, Lamfers E, Dinarello C, Rutten J, et al. Innate immune cell activation and epigenetic remodeling in symptomatic and asymptomatic atherosclerosis in humans in vivo. Atherosclerosis. 2016;254:228–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.10.019.
Bekkering S, Stiekema LCA, Bernelot Moens S, Verweij SL, Novakovic B, Prange K, et al. Treatment with statins does not revert trained immunity in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Cell Metab. 2019;30(1):1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2019.05.014.
Ucler R, Aslan M, Atmaca M, Alay M, Ademoglu EN, Gulsen I. Evaluation of blood neutrophil to lymphocyte and platelet to lymphocyte ratios according to plasma glucose status and serum insulin-like growth factor 1 levels in patients with acromegaly. Human & experimental toxicology. 2015;35(6):608–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0960327115597313.
Ueland T, Fougner SL, Godang K, Lekva T, Schurgers LJ, Scholz H, et al. Associations between body composition, circulating interleukin-1 receptor antagonist, osteocalcin, and insulin metabolism in active acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(1):361–8. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2009-0422.
Arikan S, Bahceci M, Tuzcu A, Gokalp D. Serum tumour necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-8 levels in acromegalic patients: acromegaly may be associated with moderate inflammation. Clin Endocrinol. 2009;70(3):498–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03362.x.
Karci AC, Canturk Z, Tarkun I, Cetinarslan B. Matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2) levels are increased in active acromegaly patients. Endocrine. 2017;57(1):148–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-017-1283-8.
Szalecki M, Malinowska A, Prokop-Piotrkowska M, Janas R. Interactions between the growth hormone and cytokines - a review. Adv Med Sci. 2018;63(2):285–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advms.2018.03.001.
Lohr J, Grotevendt A, Nauck M, Volzke H, Wallaschofski H, Friedrich N. Relation of insulin-like growth factor-I and IGF binding protein 3 with markers of inflammation: results of a population-based study. Clin Endocrinol. 2014;80(1):148–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.12241.
Wit JM, Kooijman R, Rijkers GT, Zegers BJ. Immunological findings in growth hormone-treated patients. Horm Res. 1993;39(3-4):107–10.
Stuart CA, Meehan RT, Neale LS, Cintron NM, Furlanetto RW. Insulin-like growth factor-I binds selectively to human peripheral blood monocytes and B-lymphocytes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991;72(5):1117–22. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-72-5-1117.
Arkins S, Rebeiz N, Biragyn A, Reese DL, Kelley KW. Murine macrophages express abundant insulin-like growth factor-I class I Ea and Eb transcripts. Endocrinology. 1993;133(5):2334–43. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo.133.5.8404686.
Colao A, Ferone D, Marzullo P, Lombardi G. Acromegaly and immune function. NeuroImmune Biology. 2002;2:247–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1567-7443(02)80021-7.
Sodhi A, Tripathi A. Prolactin and growth hormone induce differential cytokine and chemokine profile in murine peritoneal macrophages in vitro: involvement of p-38 MAP kinase, STAT3 and NF-kappaB. Cytokine. 2008;41(2):162–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cyto.2007.11.007.
Zarkesh-Esfahani SH, Kolstad O, Metcalfe RA, Watson PF, von Laue S, Walters S, et al. High-dose growth hormone does not affect proinflammatory cytokine (tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-6, and interferon-gamma) release from activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells or after minimal to moderate surgical stress. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(9):3383–90. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.85.9.6823.
Uronen-Hansson H, Allen ML, Lichtarowicz-Krynska E, Aynsley-Green A, Cole TJ, Hoiden-Guthenberg I, et al. Growth hormone enhances proinflammatory cytokine production by monocytes in whole blood. Growth hormone & IGF research : official journal of the Growth Hormone Research Society and the International IGF Research Society. 2003;13(5):282–6.
Haeffner A, Thieblemont N, Deas O, Marelli O, Charpentier B, Senik A, et al. Inhibitory effect of growth hormone on TNF-alpha secretion and nuclear factor-kappaB translocation in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated human monocytes. J Immunol. 1997;158(3):1310–4.
Wolters TLC, Netea MG, Hermus AR, Smit JW, Netea-Maier RT. IGF1 potentiates the pro-inflammatory response in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells via MAPK. J Mol Endocrinol. 2017;59(2):129–39. https://doi.org/10.1530/JME-17-0062.
Ishihara K, Hirano T. Molecular basis of the cell specificity of cytokine action. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002;1592(3):281–96.
Froesch ER, Schmid C, Schwander J, Zapf J. Actions of insulin-like growth factors. Annu Rev Physiol. 1985;47:443–67. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ph.47.030185.002303.
Kooijman R, Coppens A, Hooghe-Peters E. Igf-I inhibits spontaneous apoptosis in human granulocytes. Endocrinology. 2002;143(4):1206–12. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo.143.4.8725.
Tu W, Cheung PT, Lau YL. IGF-I increases interferon-gamma and IL-6 mRNA expression and protein production in neonatal mononuclear cells. Pediatr Res. 1999;46(6):748–54.
Hochdorfer T, Kuhny M, Zorn CN, Hendriks RW, Vanhaesebroeck B, Bohnacker T, et al. Activation of the PI3K pathway increases TLR-induced TNF-alpha and IL-6 but reduces IL-1beta production in mast cells. Cell Signal. 2011;23(5):866–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2011.01.012.
Kooijman R, Coppens A. Insulin-like growth factor-I stimulates IL-10 production in human T cells. J Leukoc Biol. 2004;76(4):862–7. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.0404248.
Serri O, St-Jacques P, Sartippour M, Renier G. Alterations of monocyte function in patients with growth hormone (GH) deficiency: effect of substitutive GH therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(1):58–63. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.84.1.5374.
Wolf SE, Woodside KJ, Ramirez RJ, Kobayashi M, Suzuki F, Herndon DN. Insulin-like growth factor-I/insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 alters lymphocyte responsiveness following severe burn. J Surg Res. 2004;117(2):255–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4804(03)00305-6.
Bekkering S, Arts RJW, Novakovic B, Kourtzelis I, van der Heijden C, Li Y, et al. Metabolic induction of trained immunity through the mevalonate pathway. Cell. 2018;172(1-2):135–46e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.11.025.
Edwards CK 3rd, Lorence RM, Dunham DM, Arkins S, Yunger LM, Greager JA, et al. Hypophysectomy inhibits the synthesis of tumor necrosis factor alpha by rat macrophages: partial restoration by exogenous growth hormone or interferon gamma. Endocrinology. 1991;128(2):989–6. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo-128-2-989.
De Benedetti F, Bozzola M. Reciprocal interactions between the GH/IGF-I system and cytokines. NeuroImmune Biology. 2002:27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1567-7443(02)80006-0.
Wang P, Li N, Li JS, Li WQ. The role of endotoxin, TNF-alpha, and IL-6 in inducing the state of growth hormone insensitivity. World J Gastroenterol. 2002;8(3):531–6. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v8.i3.531.
Denson LA, Held MA, Menon RK, Frank SJ, Parlow AF, Arnold DL. Interleukin-6 inhibits hepatic growth hormone signaling via upregulation of cis and Socs-3. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2003;284(4):G646–54. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.00178.2002.
Andreassen M, Vestergaard H, Kristensen LO. Concentrations of the acute phase reactants high-sensitive C-reactive protein and YKL-40 and of interleukin-6 before and after treatment in patients with acromegaly and growth hormone deficiency. Clin Endocrinol. 2007;67(6):909–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02986.x.
Sesmilo G, Biller BM, Llevadot J, Hayden D, Hanson G, Rifai N, et al. Effects of growth hormone administration on inflammatory and other cardiovascular risk markers in men with growth hormone deficiency. A randomized, controlled clinical trial. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133(2):111–22.
Olarescu NC, Ueland T, Lekva T, Dahl TB, Halvorsen B, Aukrust P, et al. Adipocytes as a source of increased circulating levels of nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase/visfatin in active acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(4):1355–62. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-2417.
Longobardi S, Di Somma C, Di Rella F, Angelillo N, Ferone D, Colao A, et al. Bone mineral density and circulating cytokines in patients with acromegaly. J Endocrinol Investig. 1998;21(10):688–93.
Zeyda M, Farmer D, Todoric J, Aszmann O, Speiser M, Gyori G, et al. Human adipose tissue macrophages are of an anti-inflammatory phenotype but capable of excessive pro-inflammatory mediator production. Int J Obes. 2007;31(9):1420–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803632.
Olarescu NC, Ueland T, Godang K, Lindberg-Larsen R, Jorgensen JO, Bollerslev J. Inflammatory adipokines contribute to insulin resistance in active acromegaly and respond differently to different treatment modalities. European journal of endocrinology / European Federation of Endocrine Societies. 2014;170(1):39–48. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-13-0523.
Benencia F, Harshman S, Duran-Ortiz S, Lubbers ER, List EO, Householder L, et al. Male bovine GH transgenic mice have decreased adiposity with an adipose depot-specific increase in immune cell populations. Endocrinology. 2015;156(5):1794–803. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2014-1794.
Wu X, Herndon DN, Wolf SE. Growth hormone down-regulation of Interleukin-1beta and Interleukin-6 induced acute phase protein gene expression is associated with increased gene expression of suppressor of cytokine signal-3. Shock. 2003;19(4):314–20.
Koenig W. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein and atherosclerotic disease: from improved risk prediction to risk-guided therapy. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168(6):5126–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.07.113.
Ridker PM. A test in context: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(6):712–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.11.037.
Fibrinogen Studies C, Danesh J, Lewington S, Thompson SG, Lowe GD, Collins R, et al. Plasma fibrinogen level and the risk of major cardiovascular diseases and nonvascular mortality: an individual participant meta-analysis. Jama. 2005;294(14):1799–809. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.294.14.1799.
Jawiarczyk-Przybylowska A, Halupczok-Zyla J, Bolanowski M. Soluble alpha-Klotho - a new marker of acromegaly? Endokrynol Pol. 2016;67(4):390–6. https://doi.org/10.5603/EP.a2016.0048.
Yurekli BS, Kutbay NO, Aksit M, Suner A, Simsir IY, Seckiner S, et al. Acromegaly is associated with high fibroblast growth factor-21 levels. J Endocrinol Investig. 2019;42(1):53–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-018-0885-1.
J Halupczok-Zyla, A Jawiarczyk-Przybylowska, M Skrzypski, MZ Strowski, M Bolanowski. Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 in Patients with Acromegaly. Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association. 2017;125(10):649-54. doi:10.1055/s-0043-115647.
Kirilov G, Zacharieva S, Alexandrov AS, Lozanov V, Mitev V. Increased plasma endothelin level as an endothelial marker of cardiovascular risk in patients with active acromegaly: a comparison with plasma homocysteine. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 2009;31(7):457–61. https://doi.org/10.1358/mf.2009.31.7.1406701.
Lombardi M, Scattina I, Sardella C, Urbani C, Marciano E, Signori S, et al. Serum factors associated with precancerous colonic lesions in acromegaly. J Endocrinol Investig. 2013;36(8):545–9. https://doi.org/10.3275/8812.
Schmid C, Wiesli P, Bernays R, Bloch K, Zapf J, Zwimpfer C, et al. Decrease in sE-selectin after pituitary surgery in patients with acromegaly. Clin Chem. 2004;50(3):650–2. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2003.028779.
Paisley AN, O'Callaghan CJ, Lewandowski KC, Parkinson C, Roberts ME, Drake WM, et al. Reductions of circulating matrix metalloproteinase 2 and vascular endothelial growth factor levels after treatment with pegvisomant in subjects with acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91(11):4635–40. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2005-2589.
Silha JV, Krsek M, Hana V, Marek J, Weiss V, Jezkova J, et al. The effects of growth hormone status on circulating levels of vascular growth factors. Clin Endocrinol. 2005;63(1):79–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2005.02303.x.
Y Nagai, H Ando, E Nohara, H Yamashita, T Takamura, K Kobayashi. Plasma levels of vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with acromegaly. Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme. 2000;32(8):326-9. doi:10.1055/s-2007-978645.
Bozok Cetintas V, Zengi A, Tetik A, Karadeniz M, Ergonen F, Kucukaslan AS, et al. Does apolipoprotein E genotype affect cardiovascular risk in subjects with acromegaly? Endocrine. 2012;41(3):465–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-011-9585-8.
A Amado, F Araujo, D Carvalho. Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Acromegaly: What's the Impact of Disease Control? Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association. 2018. doi:https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-124668.
Landin-Wilhelmsen K, Tengborn L, Wilhelmsen L, Bengtsson BA. Elevated fibrinogen levels decrease following treatment of acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol. 1997;46(1):69–74.
Erem C, Nuhoglu I, Kocak M, Yilmaz M, Sipahi ST, Ucuncu O, et al. Blood coagulation and fibrinolysis in patients with acromegaly: increased plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), decreased tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), and an inverse correlation between growth hormone and TFPI. Endocrine. 2008;33(3):270–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-008-9088-4.
Colak A, Yilmaz H, Temel Y, Demirpence M, Simsek N, Karademirci I, et al. Coagulation parameters and platelet function analysis in patients with acromegaly. J Endocrinol Investig. 2016;39(1):97–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-015-0300-0.
Kaluzny M, Bolanowski M, Daroszewski J, Szuba A. The role of fibrinogen and CRP in cardiovascular risk in patients with acromegaly. Endokrynol Pol. 2010;61(1):83–8.
Colao A, Spinelli L, Cuocolo A, Spiezia S, Pivonello R, di Somma C, et al. Cardiovascular consequences of early-onset growth hormone excess. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(7):3097–104. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.87.7.8573.
A Sartorio, M Cattaneo, P Bucciarelli, B Bottasso, S Porretti, P Epaminonda et al. Alterations of haemostatic and fibrinolytic markers in adult patients with growth hormone deficiency and with acromegaly. Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association. 2000;108(7):486-92. doi:10.1055/s-2000-8145.
Ozkan H, Celik O, Hatipoglu E, Kantarci F, Kadioglu P. Procalcitonin can be used as a marker of premature atherosclerosis in acromegaly. Pituitary. 2012;15(3):358–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-011-0327-y.
Colao A, Marzullo P, Lombardi G. Effect of a six-month treatment with lanreotide on cardiovascular risk factors and arterial intima-media thickness in patients with acromegaly. European journal of endocrinology / European Federation of Endocrine Societies. 2002;146(3):303–9.
Lin E, Wexler TL, Nachtigall L, Tritos N, Swearingen B, Hemphill L, et al. Effects of growth hormone deficiency on body composition and biomarkers of cardiovascular risk after definitive therapy for acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol. 2012;77(3):430–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2012.04361.x.
Silha JV, Krsek M, Hana V, Marek J, Jezkova J, Weiss V, et al. Perturbations in adiponectin, leptin and resistin levels in acromegaly: lack of correlation with insulin resistance. Clin Endocrinol. 2003;58(6):736–42.
S Gurbulak, F Akin, E Yerlikaya, GF Yaylali, S Topsakal, H Tanriverdi et al. Adiponectin and Cardiac Hypertrophy in Acromegaly. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2016;25(3):449-55. doi:10.17219/acem/35639.
Sieminska L, Lenart J, Cichon-Lenart A, Niedziolka D, Marek B, Kos-Kudla B, et al. Serum adiponectin levels in patients with acromegaly. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2005;19(112):514–6.
Ronchi CL, Corbetta S, Cappiello V, Morpurgo PS, Giavoli C, Beck-Peccoz P, et al. Circulating adiponectin levels and cardiovascular risk factors in acromegalic patients. European journal of endocrinology / European Federation of Endocrine Societies. 2004;150(5):663–9.
Fukuda I, Hizuka N, Ishikawa Y, Itoh E, Yasumoto K, Murakami Y, et al. Serum adiponectin levels in adult growth hormone deficiency and acromegaly. Growth hormone & IGF research : official journal of the Growth Hormone Research Society and the International IGF Research Society. 2004;14(6):449–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ghir.2004.06.005.
Lam KS, Xu A, Tan KC, Wong LC, Tiu SC, Tam S. Serum adiponectin is reduced in acromegaly and normalized after correction of growth hormone excess. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(11):5448–53. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2003-032023.
Sucunza N, Barahona MJ, Resmini E, Fernandez-Real JM, Ricart W, Farrerons J, et al. A link between bone mineral density and serum adiponectin and visfatin levels in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(10):3889–96. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2009-0474.
Ciresi A, Amato MC, Pizzolanti G, Giordano C. Serum visfatin levels in acromegaly: correlation with disease activity and metabolic alterations. Growth hormone & IGF research : official journal of the Growth Hormone Research Society and the International IGF Research Society. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ghir.2015.07.002.
P Wiesli, R Bernays, M Brandle, C Zwimpfer, H Seiler, J Zapf et al. Effect of pituitary surgery in patients with acromegaly on adiponectin serum concentrations and alanine aminotransferase activity. Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry. 2005;352(1-2):175-81. doi:10.1016/j.cccn.2004.09.022.
Turgut S, Topsakal S, Ata MT, Herek D, Akin F, Ozkan S, et al. Leptin receptor gene polymorphism may affect subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with acromegaly. Avicenna J Med Biotechnol. 2016;8(3):145–50.
Gurbulak S, Yaylali GF, Yerlikaya E, Akin F, Topsakal S, Tanrverdi H, et al. Resistin and leptin levels in acromegaly: lack of correlation with echocardiographic findings. J Investig Med. 2013;61(3):582–5. https://doi.org/10.2310/JIM.0b013e3182823390.
Grottoli S, Gasco V, Mainolfi A, Beccuti G, Corneli G, Aimaretti G, et al. Growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor I axis, glucose metabolism, and lypolisis but not leptin show some degree of refractoriness to short-term fasting in acromegaly. J Endocrinol Investig. 2008;31(12):1103–9.
Jarkovska Z, Rosicka M, Marek J, Hana V, Weiss V, Justova V, et al. Plasma levels of total and active ghrelin in acromegaly and growth hormone deficiency. Physiol Res. 2006;55(2):175–81.
Cappiello V, Ronchi C, Morpurgo PS, Epaminonda P, Arosio M, Beck-Peccoz P, et al. Circulating ghrelin levels in basal conditions and during glucose tolerance test in acromegalic patients. European journal of endocrinology / European Federation of Endocrine Societies. 2002;147(2):189–94.
Miyakawa M, Tsushima T, Murakami H, Isozaki O, Demura H, Tanaka T. Effect of growth hormone (GH) on serum concentrations of leptin: study in patients with acromegaly and GH deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83(10):3476–9. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.83.10.5161.
Damjanovic SS, Petakov MS, Raicevic S, Micic D, Marinkovic J, Dieguez C, et al. Serum leptin levels in patients with acromegaly before and after correction of hypersomatotropism by trans-sphenoidal surgery. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(1):147–54. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.85.1.6296.
Roemmler J, Otto B, Arafat AM, Bidlingmaier M, Schopohl J. Influence of pegvisomant on serum ghrelin and leptin levels in acromegalic patients. European journal of endocrinology / European Federation of Endocrine Societies. 2010;163(5):727–34. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-10-0344.
Bolanowski M, Milewicz A, Bidzinska B, Jedrzejuk D, Daroszewski J, Mikulski E. Serum leptin levels in acromegaly--a significant role for adipose tissue and fasting insulin/glucose ratio. Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research. 2002;8(10):CR685–9.
Isozaki O, Tsushima T, Miyakawa M, Demura H, Seki H. Interaction between leptin and growth hormone (GH)/IGF-I axis. Endocr J. 1999;46(Suppl):S17–24.
Tan KC, Tso AW, Lam KS. Effect of Sandostatin LAR on serum leptin levels in patients with acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol. 2001;54(1):31–5.
J Roemmler, B Otto, B Steffin, M Bidlingmaier, J Schopohl. Serum leptin and ghrelin levels in active and inactive acromegalic patients during an oral glucose tolerance test. Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association. 2009;117(3):135-41. doi:10.1055/s-2008-1078739.
Baldelli R, Durante C, D'Amico E, Diacono F, Tamburrano G, Casanueva FF. Serum leptin levels in acromegalic patients before and during somatostatin analogs therapy. J Endocrinol Investig. 2003;26(12):1219–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03349161.
Parkinson C, Whatmore AJ, Yates AP, Drake WM, Brabant G, Clayton PE, et al. The effect of pegvisomant-induced serum IGF-I normalization on serum leptin levels in patients with acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol. 2003;59(2):168–74.
Adachi K, Tsutsui H, Kashiwamura S, Seki E, Nakano H, Takeuchi O, et al. Plasmodium berghei infection in mice induces liver injury by an IL-12- and toll-like receptor/myeloid differentiation factor 88-dependent mechanism. J Immunol. 2001;167(10):5928–34.
Wasko R, Jaskula M, Komarowska H, Zamyslowska H, Sowinski J, Waligorska-Stachura J. Ghrelin concentrations in acromegalic patients in relation to the administered therapy. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2006;27(1-2):162–8.
Isidro ML, Nemina R, Garcia-Buela J, Sangiao-Alvarellos S, Cordido F. Effect of oral glucose on acylated and total ghrelin secretion in acromegalic patients. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2007;28(5):596–603.
Jaskula M, Wasko R, Komarowska H, Dziubandowska A, Sowinski J. Serum ghrelin levels and disturbances of the lipid profile in patients with acromegaly. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2009;30(2):245–55.
Kozakowski J, Rabijewski M, Zgliczynski W. Lowered ghrelin levels in acromegaly-normalization after treatment. Endokrynol Pol. 2005;56(6):862–70.
Kawamata T, Inui A, Hosoda H, Kangawa K, Hori T. Perioperative plasma active and total ghrelin levels are reduced in acromegaly when compared with in nonfunctioning pituitary tumours even after normalization of serum GH. Clin Endocrinol. 2007;67(1):140–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02851.x.
Komarowska H, Brominska B, Sawicka-Gutaj N, Jaskula-Switek M, Wasko R, Ruchala M et al. Association of total, acylated and unacylated ghrelin with apolipoprotein A1 and insulin concentrations in acromegalic patients. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2019. doi:10.17219/acem/97403.
Freda PU, Reyes CM, Conwell IM, Sundeen RE, Wardlaw SL. Serum ghrelin levels in acromegaly: effects of surgical and long-acting octreotide therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(5):2037–44. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2002-021683.
Muhammad A, Delhanty PJD, Huisman M, Visser JA. Jan van der Lelij a, Neggers S. the Acylated/Unacylated ghrelin ratio is similar in patients with acromegaly during different treatment regimens. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(7):2425–32. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2017-00147.
Schmid C, Neidert MC, Tschopp O, Sze L, Bernays RL. Growth hormone and Klotho. J Endocrinol. 2013;219(2):R37–57. https://doi.org/10.1530/JOE-13-0285.
Rubinek T, Modan-Moses D. Klotho and the growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor 1 Axis: novel insights into complex interactions. Vitam Horm. 2016;101:85–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.vh.2016.02.009.
H Hui, Y Zhai, L Ao, JC Cleveland, Jr., H Liu, DA Fullerton et al. Klotho suppresses the inflammatory responses and ameliorates cardiac dysfunction in aging endotoxemic mice. Oncotarget. 2017;8(9):15663-76. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.14933.
Chen J, Fan J, Wang S, Sun Z. Secreted Klotho attenuates inflammation-associated aortic valve fibrosis in senescence-accelerated mice P1. Hypertension. 2018;71(5):877–85. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10560.
Martin-Nunez E, Donate-Correa J, Lopez-Castillo A, Delgado-Molinos A, Ferri C, Rodriguez-Ramos S, et al. Soluble levels and endogenous vascular gene expression of KLOTHO are related to inflammation in human atherosclerotic disease. Clin Sci. 2017;131(21):2601–9. https://doi.org/10.1042/CS20171242.
Otsuki M, Kasayama S, Yamamoto H, Saito H, Sumitani S, Kouhara H, et al. Characterization of premature atherosclerosis of carotid arteries in acromegalic patients. Clin Endocrinol. 2001;54(6):791–6.
Zhao Y, Xiao X, Frank SJ, Lin HY, Xia Y. Distinct mechanisms of induction of hepatic growth hormone resistance by endogenous IL-6, TNF-alpha, and IL-1beta. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2014;307(2):E186–98. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00652.2013.
Radhakrishnan Y, Shen X, Maile LA, Xi G, Clemmons DR. IGF-I stimulates cooperative interaction between the IGF-I receptor and CSK homologous kinase that regulates SHPS-1 phosphorylation in vascular smooth muscle cells. Mol Endocrinol. 2011;25(9):1636–49. https://doi.org/10.1210/me.2011-0035.
Levi M, van der Poll T. Inflammation and coagulation. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(2 Suppl):S26–34. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181c98d21.
Leung K, Rajkovic IA, Peters E, Markus I, Van Wyk JJ, Ho KK. Insulin-like growth factor I and insulin down-regulate growth hormone (GH) receptors in rat osteoblasts: evidence for a peripheral feedback loop regulating GH action. Endocrinology. 1996;137(7):2694–702. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo.137.7.8770888.
Funding
The writing of this manuscript was partially funded by an unrestricted grant from Ipsen Pharmaceuticals.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wolters, T.L.C., Netea, M.G., Riksen, N.P. et al. Acromegaly, inflammation and cardiovascular disease: a review. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 21, 547–568 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-020-09560-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-020-09560-x