Advertisement

Review of Economics of the Household

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 939–970 | Cite as

Women’s employment and the decline of home cooking: Evidence from France, 1985–2010

  • Fabrice EtiléEmail author
  • Marie Plessz
Article

Abstract

We here investigate the extent to which labour-market changes explain the decline in the time spent home cooking by married women in France between 1985 and 2010. Using time use data and Oaxaca-Blinder decompositions, we find that rising women’s employment and observed wages together account for about 60% of the fall in the time married women spent cooking. We then use a semi-parametric matching technique to construct an implicit wage rate, which better reflects the change in labour-market incentives that individuals face. The rise in women’s implicit wages explains no more than 20% of the decline in their cooking time, while the wage of their partner has no effect. Changing labour-market incentives are thus far from being the main driver of the decline in home-cooking. We also find evidence that home cooking continues to be structured by the gendered social norm of the “proper family meal”.

JEL Codes

D13 I18 J22 

Keywords

Cooking Household production Labour supply Wages Gender 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the referees and editors for their comments and suggestions, Andrew Clark and seminar participants at Monash University (Centre for Health Economics), Toulouse School of Economics (Food policy seminar), Oxford (Worshop on time use surveys) and the INRA-DID’IT annual workshop. We acknowledge funding from Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique’s Metaprogram DID’IT.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11150_2018_9423_MOESM1_ESM.docx (143 kb)
Supplementary Material

References

  1. Aguiar, M., & Hurst, E. (2005). Consumption versus Expenditure. Journal of Political Economy, 113(5), 919–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguiar, M., & Hurst, E. (2007). Measuring Trends in Leisure: The Allocation of Time over Five Decades. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 969–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, P. M., Butcher, K. F., & Levine, P. B. (2003). Maternal employment and overweight children. Journal of Health Economics, 22(3), 477–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Apps, P. F., & Rees, R. (1997). Collective labor supply and household production. Journal of Political Economy, 105(1), 178–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnet-Verzat, C., Pailhé, A., & Solaz, A. (2011). Spending time together: the impact of children on couples’ leisure synchronization. Review of Economics of the Household, 9(4), 465–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker, G. S. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. The Economic Journal, 75(299), 493–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bertrand, M., Kamenica, E., & Pan, J. (2015). Gender Identity and Relative Income within Households. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(2), 571–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bittmann, S. (2015). Ressources économiques des femmes et travail domestique des conjoints: quels effets pour quelles tâches? Economie et Statistique, 478(1), 305–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blinder, A. S. (1973). Wage discrimination: reduced form and structural estimates. Journal of Human Resources, 8(4), 436–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bloemen, H. G., & Stancanelli, E. G. (2014). Market hours, household work, child care, and wage rates of partners: an empirical analysis. Review of Economics of the Household, 12(1), 51–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bozon, M. (1991). Women and the age gap between spouses: an accepted domination? Population: An English Selection, 3, 113–148.Google Scholar
  12. Brousse, C. (2015). La vie quotidienne en France depuis 1974. Les enseignements de l’enquête Emploi du temps. Economie et Statistique, 478-480, 79–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Browning, M., Chiappori, P.-A., & Weiss, Y. (2014). Economics of the Family. New-York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cawley, J., & Liu, F. (2012). Maternal employment and childhood obesity: a search for mechanisms in time use data. Economics & Human Biology, 10(4), 352–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Charles, N., & Kerr, M. (1988). Women, food, and families. Manchester University Press, Manchester.Google Scholar
  16. Chiappori, P. A., & Lewbel, A. (2015). Gary Becker’s A theory of the allocation of time. The Economic Journal, 125(583), 410–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cutler, D.M., & Glaeser, E.L., & Shapiro, J.M. (2003). Why Have Americans Become MoreObese? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17(3), 93–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davis, G. C. (2014). Food at home production and consumption: implications for nutrition quality and policy. Review of Economics of the Household, 12(3), 565–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davis, G.C., & You, W. (2011). Not enough money or not enough time to satisfy the Thrifty Food Plan? A cost difference approach for estimating a money–time threshold.Food Policy, 36(2), 101–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davis, G. C., & You, W. (2010). The time cost of food at home: general and food stamp participant profiles. Applied Economics, 42(20), 2537–2552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. de V. Cavalcanti, T. V., & Tavares, J. (2008). Assessing the “Engines of Liberation”: home appliances and female labor force participation. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(1), 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Duguet, E., & Simonnet, V. (2007). Labor market participation in France: an asymptotic least squares analysis of couples’decisions. Review of Economics of the Household, 5(2), 159–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Edo, A., & Toubal, F. (2017). Immigration and the gender wage gap. European Economic Review, 92, 196–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fertig, A., Glomm, G., & Tchernis, R. (2009). The connection between maternal employment and childhood obesity: inspecting the mechanisms. Review of Economics of the Household, 7(3), 227–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fjellström, C. (2009). The family meal in Europe. In H. L. Meiselman (Ed.), Meals in science and practice: interdisciplinary research and business applications (pp. 219–235). Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Frazis, H., & Stewart, J. (2012). How to think about time-usedata: what inferences can we make about long-and short-run time use from time diaries? Annals of Economics and Statistics, 105-106, 231–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gardeazabal, J., & Ugidos, A. (2004). More on identification in detailed wage decompositions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(4), 1034–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gershuny, J. (2000). Changing times: work and leisure in postindustrial society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Gershuny, J. (2003). Changing times: work and leisure in postindustrial society. Oxford University Press on Demand, Manchester.Google Scholar
  30. Goldin, C. (2006). The quiet revolution that transformed women’s employment, education, and family. National Bureau of Economic Research, Manchester.Google Scholar
  31. Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (2007). Long-run changes in the US wage structure: narrowing, widening, polarizing. National Bureau of Economic Research, Manchester.Google Scholar
  32. Greenwood, J., Seshadri, A., & Yorukoglu, M. (2005). Engines of liberation. The Review of Economic Studies, 72(1), 109–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grignon, C., & Grignon, C. (2009). French meals. In H. L. Meiselman (Ed.), Meals in science and practice: interdisciplinary research and business applications (pp. 343–358). Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Grossbard-Shechtman, A. (1984). a theory of allocation of time in markets for labour and marriage. The Economic Journal, 94(376), 863–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Grossbard-Shechtman, S. (2003). A consumer theory with competitive markets for work in marriage. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 31(6), 609–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hamermesh, D. S. (2007). Time to eat: household production under increasing income inequality. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 89(4), 852–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hamermesh, D. S. (2010). Incentives, time use and BMI: the roles of eating, grazing and goods. Economics & Human Biology, 8(1), 2–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. E. (1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. The Review of Economic Studies, 64(4), 605–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. INSEE (1986). Enquête Emploi du Temps 1985–1986. In I. N. d. l. S. e. d. E. Economiques (Ed.): ADISP (Centre Maurice Halbwachs).Google Scholar
  40. INSEE (2010). Enquête Emploi du Temps 2009-2010. In I. N. d. l. S. e. d. E. Economiques (Ed.). Paris: ADISP (Centre Maurice Halbwachs).Google Scholar
  41. Jann, B. (2008). The Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition for linear regression models. The Stata Journal, 8(4), 453–479.Google Scholar
  42. Kimmel, J., & Connelly, R. (2007). Mothers’ time choices caregiving, leisure, home production, and paid work. Journal of Human Resources, 42(3), 643–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kohara, M., & Kamiya, Y. (2016). Maternal employment and food produced at home: evidence from Japanese data. Review of Economics of the Household, 14(2), 417–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kooreman, P., & Kapteyn, A. (1987). A disaggregated analysis of the allocation of time within the household. The Journal of Political Economy, 95(2), 223–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Laroque, G., & Salanié, B. (2002). Labour market institutions and employment in France. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 17(1), 25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Le Bigot Macaux, A. (2001). Eat to live or live to eat? Do parents and children agree? Public Health Nutrition, 4(1a), 141–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Liu, E., Hsiao, C., Matsumoto, T., & Chou, S. (2009). Maternal full-time employment and overweight children: parametric, semi-parametric, and non-parametric assessment. Journal of Econometrics, 152(1), 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McIntosh, W., Dean, W., Torres, C., Anding, J., Kubena, K., & Nayga, R. (2009). The American family meal. In H. L. Meiselman (Ed.), Meals in science and practice: interdisciplinary research and business applications (pp. 190–235). Cambridge, UK: Woodhead Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Moisio, R., Arnould, E. J., & Price, L. L. (2004). Between mothers and markets constructing family identity through homemade food. Journal of Consumer Culture, 4(3), 361–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mulligan, C. B., & Rubinstein, Y. (2008). Selection, investment, and women’s relative wages over time. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(3), 1061–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Murcott, A. (1982). On the social significance of the “cooked dinner” in South Wales. Social Science Information, 21(4–5), 677–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Oaxaca, R. (1973). Male–female wage differentials in urban labor markets. International Economic Review, 14(3), 693–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. OECD. (2007). OECD Economic Surveys: France 2007. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  54. Pettinger, C., Holdsworth, M., & Gerber, M. (2006). Meal patterns and cooking practices in Southern France and Central England. Public Health Nutrition, 9(08), 1020–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Piketty, T. (2006). Les hauts revenus en France au XXe siècle. Hachette Littératures, Manchester.Google Scholar
  56. Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2014). Inequality in the long run. Science, 344(6186), 838–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Plessz, M., & Gojard, S. (2015). Fresh is best? Social position, cooking, and vegetable consumption in France. Sociology, 49(1), 172–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pollak, R. A. (2005). Bargaining power in marriage: earnings, wage rates and household production. National Bureau of Economic Research, Manchester.Google Scholar
  59. Pollak, R. A., & Wachter, M. L. (1975). The relevance of the household production function and its implications for the allocation of time. The Journal of Political Economy, 83(2), 255–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rapoport, B., Sofer, C., & Solaz, A. (2011). Household production in a collective model: some new results. Journal of Population Economics, 24(1), 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ricroch, L. (2011). Les moments agréables de la vie quotidienne. INSEE Première (1378).Google Scholar
  62. Smith, L., Ng, S., & Popkin, B. (2013). Trends in US home food preparation and consumption: analysis of national nutrition surveys and time use studies from 1965–1966 to 2007–2008. Nutrition Journal, 12(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sofer, C., & Thibout, C. (2015). La division du travail selon le genre est-elle efficiente? Une analyse à partir de deux enquêtes Emploi du temps. Economie et Statistique, 478, 273–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stancanelli, E., & Soest, A. V. (2012). Retirement and home production: a regression discontinuity approach. The American Economic Review, 102(3), 600–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stewart, J. (2013). Tobit or not tobit? Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 38(3), 263–290.Google Scholar
  66. Sullivan, O. (2011). An end to gender display through the performance of housework? A review and reassessment of the quantitative literature using insights from the qualitative literature. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 3(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Vermeulen, F. (2002). Collective household models: principles and main results. Journal of Economic Surveys, 16(4), 533–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. von Hinke Kessler Scholder, S. (2008). Maternal employment and overweight children: does timing matter? Health Economics, 17(8), 889–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Warde, A., Cheng, S.-L., Olsen, W., & Southerton, D. (2007). Changes in the practice of eating a comparative analysis of time-use. Acta Sociologica, 50(4), 363–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yun, M.-S. (2004). Decomposing differences in the first moment. Economics Letters, 82(2), 275–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Paris School of Economics and INRA, 48 Boulevard JourdanParisFrance
  2. 2.Centre Maurice Halbwachs (EHESS, ENS, CNRS, PSL Research University) and INRAParisFrance

Personalised recommendations