Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Labor market participation in France: an asymptotic least squares analysis of couples’ decisions

  • Published:
Review of Economics of the Household Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the interactions between spouses’ decisions to join the labor force. We use the asymptotic least squares method in order to estimate a system of equations with limited dependent variables. We find that when spouse’s decision-making is modeled as simultaneous, this affects primarily the man’s participation equation who appears to be positively influenced by whether the woman works or not, by the number of children and by the birth of a child. The woman’s decision to participate is not affected by whether the man participates or not and depends negatively of the number of children and the birth of a child. This implies that there is a female leadership in decisions to participate in the labor market and that the added-worker effect should be reinterpreted as a function of demography rather than unemployment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This property is required to apply Asymptotic Least Squares.

  2. The previous reference includes an application with a generalized Tobit model, an ordered Probit model and count data.

  3. Indices “i” are omitted for simplicity.

  4. This assumption can be made without loss of generality provided that the two equations include a constant term. Moreover it implies that E(v 1) = E(v 2) = 0.

  5. This is referred to as the “non-spherical” case in the literature.

  6. In theory, the number of children can be different for both spouses due to family recompositions. This would create strong muticolinearity in our application.

  7. There are five values for the number of children (none, 1, 2, 3, 4 and more) and one dummy is dropped to avoid perfect multicolinearity with the constant term (i.e., “none” is taken as the reference). The birth of a child is represented by one coefficient. This puts 5 constraints on each equation, that is 10 constraints on the system.

  8. Notice that there is always an indirect effect in a system of equations. The nationality of one person influences its labor market participation and, through this channel, the labor market participation of her (his) spouse.

  9. One value («French») is taken as the reference, so that there are only three constraints.

  10. This selection comes from the fact that we need to distinguish men from women in order to estimate the model.

  11. Due to confidentiality requirements, the matching was performed by INSEE.

  12. The broad sectoral decomposition between agriculture, industry and services was not found to be significant.

  13. See Afsa (1998).

  14. The poverty line is defined as 60% of median French monthly earnings. It corresponds to earnings of 640 Euros per month per consumption unit in 1996.

  15. Moreover, even with different identification constraints (see Table 4), we always find that women participation has a positive influence on men participation, while men participation has no significant influence on women participation (at the 5% level).

  16. However, we should mention the causality problem that exists with the estimation of the added-worker effect. As we do not take the fertility decision into account, not only the number of children may affect the labor market participation but also the woman’s expectation to be unemployed for the near future may increase her desire to be pregnant.

  17. Results of the bivariate probit are not reported but are available on request.

References

  • Afsa, C. (1998). L’allocation parentale d’éducation: Entre politique familiale et politique pour l’emploi. INSEE Première, no. 569.

  • Angrist, J. D., & Evans, W. N. (1998). Children and their parents’ labor supply: Evidence from exogenous variation in family size, The American Economic Review, 88(3), 450–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjorn, P. A., & Vuong, Q. H. (1985). Econometric modeling of a Stackelberg game with an application to labor force participation. Social Science Working Paper 577. California Institute of Technology.

  • Bjorn, P. A., & Vuong, Q. H. (1997). Modèle d’équations simultanées pour variables endogènes fictives: une formulation par la théorie des jeux avec application à la participation au marché du travail. Actualité économique: revue d’analyse économique, 73, 161–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blundell, R., Chiappori, P.-A., Magnac T., & Meghir, C. (2005). Collective labor supply: Heterogeneity and Nonparticipation. IZA Discussion Paper no. 1785.

  • Chiappori, P.-A. (1988). Rational household labor supply. Econometrica, 56, 63–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiappori, P.-A. (1992).Collective labor supply and welfare. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 437–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crépon, B., Duguet, E., & Mairesse, J. (1998). Research investment, innovation and productivity: An econometric analysis. Economics of Innovation and new Technology, 7(2), 115–158 The appendix is also available as NBER Working Paper W6696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Boca, D., Marilena, L., & Silvia, P. (2000). Employment decisions of married women: Evidence and explanations. Labour, 14(1), 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gouriéroux, C., & Monfort, A. (1996). Statistics and econometric models. Cambridge University Press (2 volumes).

  • Gouriéroux, C., Monfort, A., & Trognon, A. (1985). Moindres carrés asymptotiques. Annales de l’INSEE, 58, 91–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. J. (1978). Dummy endogenous variables in a simultaneous equation system. Econometrica, 46, 931–960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kooreman, P. (1994).Estimation of econometric models of some discrete games. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 9(3), 255–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Toqueux, J.-L., & Moreau, J. (2002). Les zones urbaines sensibles. Forte progression du chômage entre 1990 et 1999, INSEE Première n 835.

  • Lee, L.-F. (1981). Simultaneous equations models with discrete and censored dependent variables. In C. Manski & D. Mc Fadden (eds), Structural analysis of discrete data with econometric applications (pp. 346–364). MIT Press.

  • Lundberg, S. (1988).Labor supply of husbands and wives: A simultaneous equations approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 70(2), 224–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundberg, S., & Rose, E. (2002). The effects of sons and daughters on men’s labor supply and wages. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(2), 251–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manser, M., & Brown, M. (1980). Marriage and household decisionmaking: A bargaining analysis. International Economic Review, 21, 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, D., & Simonnet V. (2003). Educational track, networks and labor market outcomes. IZA Discussion Paper no. 699.

  • McElroy, M.B., & Horney, M.J. (1981). Nash-Bargained household decisions: Toward a generalization of the theory of demand. International Economic Review, 22, 333–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElroy, M.B. (1990). The empirical content of Nash-Bargained household behavior. Journal of Human Resources, 25, 559–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, A. (1998). Earnings of husbands and wives in Dual-earner Families, Monthly Labor Review, 42–48.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to François Gardes, David Margolis, Shoshana Grossbard, Olivier Donni, Benoît Rapoport, Catherine Sofer, Nathalie Picard, Olivia Ekert and Pierre Cahuc for helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Véronique Simonnet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duguet, E., Simonnet, V. Labor market participation in France: an asymptotic least squares analysis of couples’ decisions. Rev Econ Household 5, 159–179 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-007-9008-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-007-9008-z

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Navigation