Skip to main content
Log in

Mind the gap: semantic information constrains morphological knowledge in low SES

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Morphological knowledge plays an essential role in the acquisition of literacy skills and has therefore gained increasing attention in studies involving populations with literacy deficits, such as students from low socioeconomic status (SES) backgrounds. Previous studies have shown that fully developed morphological representations are abstract and independent of their semantic properties. However, little is known about the morphological representations of low SES adolescents. The current study examined whether the morphological knowledge of low SES adolescents is independent of semantic properties. To this end, seventy-three Hebrew-speaking 9th graders performed two morphological tasks in a within-subject design: the priming lexical judgement task that explored morphological processing, and the morphological analogies task that assessed morphological awareness. In each task, we manipulated the level of semantic relatedness between stimuli and target words and assessed participants' accuracy and response time. The results of the priming lexical judgement task revealed significant differences between high and low SES students in both accuracy and reaction times. Among high SES students' morphological priming accelerated word identification regardless of semantic information. In contrast, among low SES students, acceleration was observed only when primes and targets shared semantically related morphemes. A similar pattern of results was found in the morphological analogies task, suggesting that low SES students’ morphological representations are still semantically dependent. These results support the role of environmental factors in low SES students’ linguistic knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub.‏

  • Anglin, J. M., Miller, G. A., & Wakefield, P. C. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58, 186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apel, K., & Diehm, E. (2014). Morphological awareness intervention with kindergarteners and first and second grade students from low SES homes: A small efficacy study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413509964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baayen, R. H., & Smolka, E. (2020). Modeling morphological priming in German with naive discriminative learning. Frontiers in Communication, 5, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-On, A., & Ravid, D. (2011). Morphological analysis in learning to read pseudowords in Hebrew. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Naim, S., Marom, I., Krashin, M., Gifter, B., & Arad, K. (2017). Life with a partner with ADHD: The moderating role of intimacy. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26, 1365–1373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentin, S., & Feldman, L. B. (1990). The contribution of morphological and semantic relatedness to repetition priming at short and long lags: Evidence from Hebrew. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42, 693–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berent, I., & Shimron, J. (2002). What is a root? In J. Shimron (Ed.), Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic, root-based morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, R. A. (1987). Productivity in the lexicon: New-word formation in Modern Hebrew. Folia Linguistica, 21, 225–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyersmann, E., Iakimova, G., Ziegler, J. C., & Colé, P. (2014). Semantic processing during morphological priming: An ERP study. Brain Research, 1579, 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolozky, S. (1999). Measuring productivity in word formation: The case of Israeli Hebrew. Brill Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2001). Morphological units in the Arabic mental lexicon. Cognition, 81, 65–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2015). Structure, form, and meaning in the mental lexicon: Evidence from Arabic. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30, 955–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, P. N., Kirby, J. R., & Deacon, S. H. (2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80, 144–179. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309359353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabell, S. Q., Justice, L. M., Logan, J. A. R., & Konold, T. R. (2013). Emergent literacy profiles among prekindergarten children from low-SES backgrounds: Longitudinal considerations. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28, 608–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2013.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F. (1996). An exploratory study of morphological errors in children’s written stories. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casalis, S., Dusautoir, M., Colé, P., & Ducrot, S. (2009). Morphological effects in children word reading: A priming study in fourth graders. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 761–766. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151008X389575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chmielewski, A. K. (2019). The global increase in the socioeconomic achievement gap, 1964 to 2015. American Sociological Review, 84, 517–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colé, P., Cavalli, E., Duncan, L. G., Theurel, A., Gentaz, E., Sprenger-Charolles, L., & El-Ahmadi, A. (2018). What is the influence of morphological knowledge in the early stages of reading acquisition among low SES children? A graphical modeling approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creemers, A., Goodwin Davies, A., Wilder, R. J., Tamminga, M., & Embick, D. (2020). Opacity, transparency, and morphological priming: A study of prefixed verbs in Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 110, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.104055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, N., Rastle, K., & Ricketts, J. (2018). Morphological effects in visual word recognition: Children, adolescents, and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 44, 645–654. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Freitas, P. V., da Mota, M. M. P. E., & Deacon, S. H. (2018). Morphological awareness, word reading, and reading comprehension in Portuguese. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39, 507–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, S. H., Parrila, R., & Kirby, J. R. (2008). A review of the evidence on morphological processing in dyslexics and poor readers: A strength or weakness. In: The Sage Handbook of Dyslexia, pp 212–237.‏

  • Deacon, S. H., Campbell, E., Tamminga, M., & Kirby, J. (2010). Seeing the harm in harmed and harmful: Morphological processing by children in Grades 4, 6, and 8. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, S. H., & Kirby, J. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just “more phonological”? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • del Prado Martín, F. M., Deutsch, A., Frost, R., Schreuder, R., De Jong, N. H., & Baayen, R. H. (2005). Changing places: A cross-language perspective on frequency and family size in Dutch and Hebrew. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 496–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, A., & Kuperman, V. (2019). Formal and semantic effects of morphological families on word recognition in Hebrew. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34, 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2009). Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: The case of prefixed words. Memory and Cognition, 37, 895–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G. J., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Klebanov, P. K. (1994). Economic deprivation and early childhood development. Child Development, 65, 296–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, L. G., & Seymour, P. H. K. (2000). Socioeconomic differences in foundation-level literacy. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 145–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duranovic, M., Gangl, M., Finke, S., Smajlagic, S., & Landerl, K. (2020). Development of morphological priming effects in reading aloud in the biscriptal Bosnian orthography. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10036-2

  • Farah, M. J., Shera, D. M., Savage, J. H., Betancourt, L., Giannetta, J. M., Brodsky, N. L., Malmud, E. K., & Hurt, H. (2006). Childhood poverty: Specific associations with neurocognitive development. Brain Research, 1110, 166–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11001841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R., Deutsch, A., & Forster, K. I. (2000). Decomposing morphologically complex words in a nonlinear morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 751–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R., Kugler, T., Deutsch, A., & Forster, K. I. (2005). Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: Principles of lexical organization in a given language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillis, S., & Ravid, D. (2002). Language-specific effects on the development of written morphology. In: Morphology 2000: Selected Papers from the 9th Morphology Meeting, Vienna, 25–27 February 2000 (Vol. 218, p. 129). John Benjamins Publishing.

  • Gonnerman, L. M., Seidenberg, M. S., & Andersen, E. S. (2007). Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in priming: Evidence for a distributed connectionist approach to morphology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, A. P., Petscher, Y., Carlisle, J. F., & Mitchell, A. M. (2017). Exploring the dimensionality of morphological knowledge for adolescent readers. Journal of Research in Reading, 40, 91–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, A. P., Petscher, Y., & Tock, J. (2020). Morphological supports: Investigating differences in how morphological knowledge supports reading comprehension for middle school students with limited reading vocabulary. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 51, 589–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Paul H Brookes Publishing.‏

  • Hemmerechts, K., Agirdag, O., & Kavadias, D. (2017). The relationship between parental literacy involvement, socioeconomic status and reading literacy. Educational Review, 69, 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2016.1164667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, R. D., Holloway, S., Price, G. G., & Dickson, W. P. (1982). Family environments and the acquisition of reading skills. In: Families as learning environments for children (pp. 87–113). Springer, Boston, MA

  • Heyer, V., & Kornishova, D. (2018). Semantic transparency affects morphological priming... eventually. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 1112–1124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, E. (2006). How social contexts support and shape language development. Developmental Review, 26, 55–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, E. (2013). Interpreting the early language trajectories of children from low-SES and language minority homes: Implications for closing achievement gaps. Developmental Psychology, 49, 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, E., Laursen, B., Tardif, T., & Bornstein, M. (2002). Socioeconomic status and parenting. Handbook of Parenting, Biology and Ecology of Parenting, 8, 231–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieffer, M. J. (2014). Morphological awareness and reading difficulties in adolescent Spanish-speaking language minority learners and their classmates. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47, 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413509968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, J. R., Deacon, S. H., Bowers, P. N., Izenberg, L., Wade-Woolley, L., & Parrila, R. (2012). Children’s morphological awareness and reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 389–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9276-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korat, O. (2009). The effect of maternal teaching talk on children’s emergent literacy as a function of type of activity and maternal education level. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30, 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesaux, N. K., Kieffer, M. J., Kelley, J. G., & Harris, J. R. (2014). Effects of academic vocabulary instruction for linguistically diverse adolescents. American Educational Research Journal, 51, 1159–1194. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214532165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levesque, K. C., Kieffer, M. J., & Deacon, S. H. (2017). Morphological awareness and reading comprehension: Examining mediating factors. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 160, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.02.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levie, R., Ben-Zvi, G., & Ravid, D. (2017). Morpho-lexical development in language impaired and typically developing Hebrew-speaking children from two SES backgrounds. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 30, 1035–1064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9711-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Children's first language acquistion from a usage-based perspective. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

  • Maguire, M. J., Schneider, J. M., Middleton, A. E., Ralph, Y., Lopez, M., Ackerman, R. A., & Abel, A. D. (2018). Vocabulary knowledge mediates the link between socioeconomic status and word learning in grade school. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 166, 679–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahony, D., Singson, M., & Mann, V. (2000). Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological relations. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 191–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2008). An electrophysiological investigation of early effects of masked morphological priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1021–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M. J., & Stevenson, J. (2004). Phonemes, rimes, vocabulary, and grammatical skills as foundations of early reading development: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 40, 665–681. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, W. E., Carlisle, J. F., & Goodwin, A. P. (2014). Morphological Knowledge and Literacy Acquisition.

  • Nagy, W., Berninger, V. W., & Abbott, R. D. (2006). Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 134–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, S. B., & Celano, D. (2001). Access to print in low-income and middle-income communities: An ecological study of four neighborhoods. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 8–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, M., Arnott, W., McIntosh, B., & Dodd, B. (2009). Phonological awareness and language intervention in preschoolers from low socioeconomic backgrounds: A longitudinal investigation. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 767–782. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151008X372492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, M., Levesque, K. C., Deacon, S. H., & da Mota, M. M. P. E. (2020). Evaluating models of how morphological awareness connects to reading comprehension: A study in Portuguese. Journal of Research in Reading, 43, 161–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabin, J., & Deacon, H. (2008). The representation of morphologically complex words in the developing lexicon. Journal of Child Language, 35, 453–465. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000907008525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rassel, A., Facon, B., & Casalis, S. (2020). Morphological awareness and learning to read: Impact of socio‐economic status in French third graders. Journal of Research in Reading.

  • Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 507–537. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960050119689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 1090–1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J. C. (1994). Court, JH, & Raven, J. (1992). Standard progressive matrices. Manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales.‏

  • Ravid, D. (2003). A developmental perspective on root perception in Hebrew and Palestinian Arabic. Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 28, 293–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D., & Bar-On, A. (2005). Manipulating written Hebrew roots across development: The interface of semantic, phonological and orthographic factors. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18, 231–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-1802-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D., & Kubi, E. (2003). What is a spelling error? The discrepancy between perception and reality. Faits De Langue, 22, 87–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D., & Malenky, A. (2001). Awareness of linear and nonlinear morphology in Hebrew: A developmental study. First Language, 21, 025–056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D., & Mashraki, Y. E. (2007). Prosodic reading, reading comprehension and morphological skills in Hebrew-speaking fourth graders. Journal of Research in Reading, 30, 140–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2007.00340.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D., & Schiff, R. (2006a). Morphological abilities in Hebrew-speaking gradeschoolers from two socioeconomic backgrounds: An analogy task. First Language, 26, 381–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regier, D. A., Kuhl, E. A., & Kupfer, D. J. (2013). The DSM-5: Classification and criteria changes. World Psychiatry, 12, 92–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts, J., Bishop, D. V., Pimperton, H., & Nation, K. (2011). The role of self-teaching in learning orthographic and semantic aspects of new words. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romeo, R. R., Segaran, J., Leonard, J. A., Robinson, S. T., West, M. R., Mackey, A. P., Yendkini, A., Rowe, M. L., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2018). Language exposure relates to structural neural connectivity in childhood. Journal of Neuroscience, 38, 7870–7877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, R., & Ravid, D. (2004). Vowel representation in written Hebrew: Phonological, orthographic and morphological contexts. In: Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17.

  • Schiff, R., & Lotem, E. (2011). Effects of phonological and morphological awareness on children’s word reading development from two socioeconomic backgrounds. First Language, 31, 139–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723710393098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, R., Raveh, M., & Fighel, A. (2012). The development of the Hebrew Mental Lexicon: When morphological representations become devoid of their meaning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 383–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2011.571327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, R., Raveh, M., & Kahta, S. (2008). The developing mental lexicon: Evidence from morphological priming of irregular Hebrew forms. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 719–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9088-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, R., & Ravid, D. (2012). Linguistic processing in Hebrew-speaking children from low and high SES backgrounds. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 1427–1448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9326-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smolka, E., Preller, K. H., & Eulitz, C. (2014). ‘Verstehen’(‘understand’) primes ‘stehen’(‘stand’): Morphological structure overrides semantic compositionality in the lexical representation of German complex verbs. Journal of Memory and Language, 72, 16–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, M., Muse, A., Wagner, R. K., Foorman, B., Petscher, Y., Schatschneider, C., Tighe, E. L., & Bishop, M. D. (2015). Examining the underlying dimensions of morphological awareness and vocabulary knowledge. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 28, 959–988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9557-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ussishkin, A., Dawson, C. R., Wedel, A., & Schluter, K. (2015). Auditory masked priming in Maltese spoken word recognition. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30, 1096–1115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Morphological processing in reading acquisition: A cross- linguistic perspective. Applied Psycholinguistics, 32, 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716411000154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (2003). WISC-IV: Administration and scoring manual. Psychological Corporation.‏

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shani Kahta.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Author declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table

Table 6 A sample stimulus in the priming task

6.

Appendix 2

See Table

Table 7 A sample stimulus in the MAT task

7.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kahta, S., Kiassi-Lebel, M., Cohen, M. et al. Mind the gap: semantic information constrains morphological knowledge in low SES. Read Writ 35, 589–615 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10198-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10198-7

Keywords

Navigation