Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the motivational incentives for writing of middle school emergent bilingual students with their peers whose first language was English. The study included 285 emergent bilingual students (146 girls, 139 boys) who were matched with 285 native English speakers (NE) on race, gender, and grade. The emergent bilingual students included two groups: students receiving English language services (EL) and students who had been reclassified as English proficient (REP). All students completed the school district’s standardized informative writing test and a survey assessing the following writing motivational incentives: curiosity, involvement, social recognition, grades, competition, emotional regulation, and relief from boredom. While the writing motivational incentives of EL and REP students were similar, one or both of these groups of emergent bilingual students had statistically higher scores than NE students on all but one of the motivational incentives for writing. NE students were more motivated than emergent bilingual students to write for better grades, and they also had higher scores on the standardized writing test. REP students scored higher on this test than EL students. While motivational incentives for writing predicted NE students’ writing performance, this was not the case for EL and REP students.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Latinx is a gender-neutral label in the United States that refers to people of Latin American cultural or race.
References
AZ Department of Education (2016). AZELLA: Arizona English language learner assessment, 2016 technical report. Retrieved from https://cms.azed.gov/home/GetDocumentFile?id=59484e9a3217e10fbc43eaa0.
Alexander, P. (2003). The development of expertise: The journey from acclimation to proficiency. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 10–14.
Bazerman, C., Berninger, V., Brandt, D., Graham, S., Langer, J., Murphy, S. Matsuda, P., Rowe, D., & Schleppegrell, M. (2018). The lifespan development of writing. Urbana, IL: National Council of English.
Beaudrie, S. (2018). On the relationship between self-concept and literacy development in the Spanish heritage context. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 34, 147–159.
Bermudez, A., & Praeter, D. (1994). Examining the effects of gender and second language proficiency on Hispanic writers’ persuasive discourse. Bilingual Research Journal, 18, 47–62.
Bruning, R., & Horn, C. (2000). Developing motivation to write. Educational Psychologist, 35, 25–38.
Cerasoli, C., Nicklin, J., & Ford, M. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrnisic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 980–1008.
Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pusuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. Model of achievement-related choices. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105–121). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
Ekholm, E., Zumbrunn, S., & De-Busk-Lane, M. (2017). Clarifying an elusive construct: A systematic review of writing attitudes. Educational Psychology Review, 30, 827–856.
Elliott, A. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievment goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169–189.
García, O. (2009). Emergent bilinguals and TESOL: What’s in a name? TESOL Quarterly, 43, 322–326.
Graham, S. (2006). Writing. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 457–478). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Graham, S. (2018a). A revised writer(s)-within-community model of writing. Educational Psychologist, 53(4), 258–279.
Graham, S. (2018b). A writer(s) within community model of writing. In C. Bazerman, V. W. Berninger, D. Brandt, S. Graham, J. Langer, S. Murphy...& M. Schleppegrell (Eds.), The lifespan development of writing, (pp. 272–325). Urbana, IL: National Council of English.
Graham, S., Capizzi, A., Harris, K. R., Hebert, M., & Morphy, P. (2014). Teaching writing to middle school students: A national survey. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27, 1015–1042.
Graham, S., Harbaugh, G., Aitken, A., Wilson, J., Wdowin, J., Ng, V., & Harris, K.R. (2019). Validation of the Writing Motivation Questionnaire with middle school students. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Graham, S., Schwartz, S., & MacArthur, C. (1993). Knowledge of writing and the composing process, attitude toward writing, and self efficacy for students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 237–249.
Han, J., & Hiver, P. (2018). Genre-based L2 writing instruction and writing-specific psychological factors: The dynamics of change. Journal of Second Language Writing, 40, 44–59.
Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1–27). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hidi, S., & Boscolo, P. (2006). Motivation and writing. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 144–157). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Kuball, Y., & Peck, S. (1997). The effect of whole language instruction on the writing development of Spanish-speaking and English-speaking kindergartners. Bilingual Research Journal, 21, 213–231.
Lanauze, M., & Snow, C. (1989). The relation between first- and second-language writing skills: Evidence from Puerto Rican elementary school children in bilingual programs. Linguistics and Education, 1, 323–339.
Lee, O., Mahotiere, M., Salinas, A., Penfield, R., & Maerten-Rivera, J. (2009). Science writing achievement among English language learners: Results of three-year intervention in urban elementary schools. Bilingual Research Journal, 32, 153–167.
Lepper, M., Corpus, J., & Iyengar, S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 184–196.
Loeb, S., Soland, J., & Fox, L. (2014). Is a good teacher a good teacher for all? Comparing value-added of teachers with their English learners and non-English learners. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36, 457–475.
McCarthey, S., & Garcia, G. (2005). English language learners’ writing practices and attitudes. Written Communication, 22, 36–75.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers (2010). Common core state standards. Washington D.C: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). National assessment of educational progress (NAEP Data Explorer), 2011 writing assessment. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/naepdata/.
Neugebauer, S., & Howard, E. (2015). Exploring associations among writing self-perceptions, writing abilities, and native language of English-Spanish two-way emersion students. Bilingual Research Journal, 38, 313–335.
O’Conner, R., Abedi, J., & Tung, S. (2012). A descriptive analysis of enrollment and achievement among English language learner students in Pennsylvania: Summary. Washington DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistannce.
O’Hallaron, C. (2014). Supporting fifth-grade ELLs’ argumentative writing development. Written Communication, 31, 304–331.
Pajares, F., Miller, M. D., & Johnson, M. J. (1999). Gender differences in writing self-beliefs of elementary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 50–61.
Perkun, R. (1993). Facets of adolescent’s academic motivation: A longitudinal expectancy-value approach. In M. Maehr & P. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 8, pp. 139–189). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Rueda, R., & Moll, L. (1994). A sociocultural perspective on motivation. In H. F. O’Neil & M. Drillings (Eds.), Motivation: Theory and design (pp. 117–140). New York, NY: Routledge.
Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.
Schiefele, U., & Schaffner, E. (2016). Factorial and construct validity of a new instrument for the assessment of reading motivation. Reading Research Quarterly, 51, 221–237.
Schiefele, U., Schaffner, E., Möller, J., & Wigfield, A. (2012). Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 427–463. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.030.
Smyth, J. (1988). Written emotional expression: Effect sizes, outcome types, and moderating variables. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 174–184.
Sturtevant, E., & Kim, G. (2009). Literacy motivation and school/non-school literacies among students enrolled in a middle school ESOL program. Literacy Research and Instruction, 49, 68–85.
Weiner, B. (1985). An attribution theory of motivation and emotions. New York, NY: Springer.
Zimmerman, B. (2011). Motivational sources and outcomes of self-regulated learning and performance. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 49–64). New York, NY: Routledge.
Zimmerman, B., & Risemberg, R. (1997). Becoming a self-regulated writer: A social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 73–101.
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by the Institute of Educational Sciences grant for the Write Ce (Grant Number R305C190007).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 8.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Camping, A., Graham, S., Ng, C. et al. Writing motivational incentives of middle school emergent bilingual students. Read Writ 33, 2361–2390 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10046-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10046-0