Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The development of reading and spelling abilities in the first 3 years of learning Arabic

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a cross-sectional study, we investigated the development of fluent reading and spelling in the first 3 years of learning Arabic. The goals of our study were to: (1) validate suitable measures for fluent reading and spelling in the first 3 years of learning Arabic; (2) trace the developmental course of the relationship between fluent reading and spelling in the first 3 years of learning Arabic; and (3) evaluate potential gender differences in literacy skills and intelligence in the setting. The performance of 111 native Arabic students of the first three grades was assessed for one-minute reading, spelling and Raven’s Coloured Progressive Matrices (CPM). Results showed significant developments in all measures across age. Reading fluency correlated highly with spelling measures. This association was more pronounced in the first but not in later graders. Boys performed better than girls as indicated by each of the measures used. Further analyses of first grade data indicate a potential role for the interaction of reading, gender, and CPM on the spelling scores. Based on our findings, we suggest that, in the Arabic orthography, both alphabetic and orthographic skills are adopted first for spelling. However, developing orthographic strategies in spelling does not guarantee the same transition to fluent reading processes as children in the first 3 years of learning Arabic are not yet exposed to unvowelized scripts forcing the reader to rely on orthographic strategies in order to read fluently. Moreover, our results indicate a potential role of visualization and spatial abilities in the relationship between fluent reading and spelling in the early stages of literacy acquisition, but not in later grades.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Children were randomly selected based on alphabetically-ordered lists of classes.

  2. An example of this is the phonological representation of standard/ð/as/d/in spoken Arabic.

References

  • Abu-Rabia, S. (1995). Learning to read in Arabic: Reading, syntactic, orthographic and working memory skills in normally achieving and poor Arabic readers. Reading Psychology, 16, 351–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Rabia, S. (1997). Reading in Arabic orthography: The effect of vowels and context on reading accuracy of poor and skilled native Arabic readers in reading paragraphs, sentences, and isolated words. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26, 465–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Rabia, S. (1998). Reading Arabic texts: Effects of text type, reader type and vowelization. Reading and Writing: Interdisciplinary Journal, 10, 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Rabia, S. (2000). Effects of exposure to literary Arabic on reading comprehension in a diglossic situation. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13, 147–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Rabia, S. (2001). The role of vowels in reading Semitic scripts: Data from Arabic and Hebrew. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Rabia, S. (2002). Reading in a root-based-morphology language: The case of Arabic. Journal of Research in Reading, 25, 299–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abu-Rabia, S., & Taha, H. (2004). Reading and spelling error analysis of native Arabic dyslexic readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 651–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allred, R. A. (1990). Gender differences in spelling achievement in grades 1 through 6. Journal of Educational Research, 834, 187–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azzam, R. (1993). The nature of Arabic reading and spelling errors of young children. A descriptive study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 355–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosman, A., & Van Orden, G. (1997). Why spelling is more difficult than reading. In C. A. Perfetti, L. Rieben, & M. Fayol (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages (pp. 173–194). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiarello, C., Welcome, S., Halderman, L., Towler, S., Julagay, J., Otto, R., et al. (2009). A large-scale investigation of lateralization in cortical anatomy and word reading: Are there sex differences? Neuropsychology, 23, 210–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Mimran, R. (2009). The contribution of language skills to reading fluency: A comparison of two orthographies for Hebrew. Journal of Child Language, 36, 657–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, S., Kiely, P., Crewther, D. P., Thomson, B., Laycock, R., & Crewther, S. (2005). A normative and reliability study for the Raven’s coloured progressive matrices for primary school aged children from Victoria, Australia. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 647–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. (1997). Learning to read and learning to spell are one and the same, almost. In C. A. Perfetti, L. Rieben, & M. Fayol (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages (pp. 237–269). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L., & Wilce, L. (1982). Recognition of spellings printed in lower and mixed case: Evidence for orthographic images. Journal of Literacy Research, 14, 219–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbeheri, G., & Everatt, J. (2007). Literacy ability and phonological processing skills amongst dyslexic and non-dyslexic speakers of Arabic. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 20, 273–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Hassan, S. (1979). Educated spoken Arabic in Egypt and the Levant: A critical review and related concepts. Archivum Linguisticum, 8, 112–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feingold, A. (1988). Cognitive gender differences are disappearing. American Psychologist, 43, 95–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, U. (1985). Beneath the surface of development dyslexia. In K. Patterson, J. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia (pp. 301–330). London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, S., & Greis, N. (1972). Writing Arabic. Leiden, The Netherlands: E. J. BriU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne, J. (2007). Gender differences in computerized and conventional educational tests. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutt, C., & Hughes, M. (2004). Sex differences in childhood. In R. L. Gregory (Ed.), The Oxford companion to the mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CN: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khaleefa, O., & Lynn, R. (2008). Normative data for Raven’s colored progressive matrices scale in Yemen. Psychological Reports, 103, 170–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, D. (1999). Sex and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landerl, K., & Wimmer, H. (2008). Development of word reading fluency and spelling in a consistent orthography: An 8-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 150–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landerl, K., Wimmer, H., & Moser, E. (1997). Salzburger Lese- und Rechtschreibtest [Salzburg reading and spelling test]. Bern, Switzerland: Hans Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leppänen, U., Niemi, P., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J. (2006). Development of reading and spelling Finnish from preschool to grade 1 and grade 2. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerkkanen, M., Rasku-Puttonen, H., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J. (2004). The developmental dynamics of literacy skills during the first grade. Educational Psychology, 24, 793–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, R. (1994). Sex differences in intelligence and brain size: A paradox resolved. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 257–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, R. (1999). Sex differences in intelligence and brain size: A developmental theory. Intelligence, 27, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, R., Backhoff, E., & Contreras-Niño, L. (2004). Sex differences on g, reasoning and visualization tested by the progressive matrices among 7–10 year olds: Some normative data for Mexico. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 779–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh, N. (1998). IQ and human intelligence. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, G., & Desberg, P. (1983). Development of strategies in the acquisition of reading. Journal of Reading Behavior, 9, 391–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, P. (2002). Hamburger Schreib-Probe für die Klassen 5 bis 9, [Hanmbuger Writing Sample Test for class 5 through 9] HSP 5–9 B. Hamburg, Germany: Verlag für pädagogische Medien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyler, A., & Breznitz, Z. (1998). Developmental associations between verbal and visual short-term memory and the acquisition of decoding skill. Reading and Writing, 10, 519–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millar, D., & Barber, P. (1981). Sex differences in verbal skills: Use of spelling-sound and lexical information. Current Psychological Research, 1, 121–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, K., & Landerl, K. (2009). Double dissociation between reading and spelling deficits. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 359–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prefetti, C., & Hart, L. (2001). The lexical bases of comprehension skill. In D.Gorfien (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection (pp. 67–86). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  • Raven, J. (2000). The Raven’s progressive matrices: Change and stability over culture and time. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J., Bulheller, S., Court, J., Häcker, H., & Raven, J. (2006). Coloured progressive matrices mit der parallelform des tests und der puzzle-form [Colored progressive matrices, a parallel form of the test and the puzzle form] (3rd ed.). Frankfurt, Germany: Harcourt Test Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (1997). Conclusions. In P. J. Caplan, M. Crawford, J. S. Hyde, & J. T. E. Richardson (Eds.), Gender differences in cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M., Caspi, A., Fergusson, D., Horwood, L. J., Goodman, R., Maughan, B., et al. (2004). Sex differences in developmental reading disability: New findings from 4 epidemiological studies. Journal of the American Medical Association, 291, 2007–2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2003). Linguistic distance and initial reading acquisition: The case of Arabic diglossia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 431–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2004). The impact of phonemic and lexical distance on the phonological analysis of words and pseudowords in a diglossic context. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 495–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2005). Correlates of reading fluency in Arabic: Diglossic and orthographic factors. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 18, 559–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2007). Linguistic constraints on children’s ability to isolate. phonemes in Arabic. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 605–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, P., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D., & Levin, I. (1999). Learning to read and write in Hebrew. In M. Harris, G. Hatano, M. Harris, & G. Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 89–111). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowling, M. (2000). Dyslexia: A cognitive developmental perspective (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, S., Pagnucco, J., & Suttles, C. (1996). First graders’ reading and writing instruction in traditional and process-oriented classes. Journal of Educational Research, 89, 131–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taouk, M., & Coltheart, M. (2004). The cognitive processes involved in learning to read in Arabic. Reading and Writing, 17, 27–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, B., Crewther, D., & Crewther, S. (2006). Wots that werd? Pseudowords (non-words) maybe a misleading measure of phonological skills in young learner readers. Dyslexia, 12, 289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willburger, E., & Landerl, K. (2009). Der Ein-Minuten Leseflüssigkeitstest-ein Verfahren zur Diagnose der Leistung im Wort- und Pseudowortlesen [The one-minute-Fluent Reading Test-a method for the diagnosis of word and pseudoword reading]. Tests und Trends, 7, 65–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H., & Goswami, U. (1994). The influence of orthographic consistency on reading development: Word recognition in English and German children. Cognition, 51, 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Konstanz, P.O. Box D23, 78457, Konstanz, Germany

    Wessam Mohamed & Thomas Elbert

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Fayoum, Al-Fayoum, Egypt

    Wessam Mohamed

  3. Department of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

    Karin Landerl

Authors
  1. Wessam Mohamed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas Elbert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Karin Landerl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wessam Mohamed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mohamed, W., Elbert, T. & Landerl, K. The development of reading and spelling abilities in the first 3 years of learning Arabic. Read Writ 24, 1043–1060 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9249-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9249-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation