Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predictors of reading skills for kindergartners and first grade students in Spanish: a longitudinal study

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated predictors of word reading and reading comprehension skills using longitudinal data from Spanish-speaking kindergartners (N = 163) and first grade students (N = 305) from high SES families in Chile. Individual differences in letter-naming fluency and phonemic segmentation fluency, but not vocabulary, were positive predictors of word reading, over time, for kindergartners. Furthermore, kindergartners with higher letter-naming fluency and phonemic segmentation fluency had a faster rate of change in word reading over time. For first graders’ reading comprehension, word reading, nonsense word fluency, and vocabulary were positively and uniquely related. However, the rate of change in the reading comprehension outcome differed over time by children’s level of vocabulary, nonsense word fluency, and word reading. These results suggest that code-related skills are important for word reading, but vocabulary might not have a direct, unique relation with word reading in a transparent orthography. In addition, phonological decoding fluency appears to contribute to reading comprehension even over and above word reading accuracy in Spanish.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. According to an anonymous reviewer, only the wealthiest 10% of the population in Chile is in private schools, and the local school personnel confirmed that these children were from high SES families. However, more specific data on parents’ income and education level were not available to the researchers.

References

  • Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adlof, S. M., Catts, H. W., & Little, T. D. (2006). Should the simple view of reading include a fluency component? Reading and Writing: An Interdiciplinary Journal, 19, 933–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aro, M., & Wimmer, H. (2003). Learning to read: English in comparison to six more regular orthographies. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 621–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, I. L., Perfetti, C. A., & McKeown, M. G. (1982). Effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on lexical access and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 506–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, D. V., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: Same or different? Psychological Bulletin, 130, 858–886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrillo, M. (1994). Development of phonological awareness and reading acquisition: A study in Spanish language. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 279–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catts, H., Hogan, T. P., & Adlof, S. M. (2005). Developmental changes in reading and reading disabilities. In H. Catts & A. Kamhi (Eds.), Connections between language and reading disabilities. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, K. D., Baker, D. L., & Good, R. H. (2006). Indicadores Dinámicos del Éxito en la Lectura 7a edicion. Retrieved March 18, 2008 from http://dibels.uoregon.edu.

  • de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (1999). Specific contributions of phonological abilities to early reading acquisition: Results from a Dutch latent variable longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 450–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durgunoglu, A. Y. (1998). Acquiring literacy in English and Spanish in the United States. In A. Y. Durgunoglu & L. T. Verhoeven (Eds.), Literacy development in a multilingual context: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 135–146). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durgunoglu, A. Y., Nagy, W. E., & Hancin-Bhatt, B. J. (1993). Cross-language transfer of phonological awareness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 453–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L. C. (1998). Grapheme–phoneme knowledge is essential for learning to read words in English. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 3–40). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fien, H., Baker, S. K., Smolkowski, K., Smith, J. L. M., Kame’enui, E. J., & Beck, C. T. (2008). Using nonsense word fluency to predict reading proficiency in kindergarten through second grade for English learners and native English speakers. School Psychology Review, 37, 391–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Catts, H., & Tomblin, J. B. (2005). Dimensions affecting the assessment of reading comprehension. In S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children’s reading comprehension and assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Compton, D. L. (2004). Monitoring early reading development in first grade: Word identification fluency vs. nonsense word fluency. Exceptional Children, 71, 7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, J. E. J., & Gonzalez, M. D. R. O. (2000). Metalinguistic awareness and reading acquisition in the Spanish language. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 3, 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (2002). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (6th ed.). Eugene: University of Oregon, Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, R. H., Simmons, D. C., & Kame’enui, E. J. (2001). The importance and utility of a continuum of fluency based indicators of foundational reading skills for third-grade students. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 257–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U., & Ziegler, J. C. (2006). Fluency, phonology and morphology: A response to commentaries on becoming literate in different languages. Developmental Science, 9, 451–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. B., Hoover, W. A., & Peterson, C. L. (1996). Some observations on a simple view of reading. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 1–13). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, B., & Risely, T. (1995). Meaningful differences in everyday parenting and intellectual development in young American children. Baltimore: Brookes.

  • Holopainen, L., Ahonen, T., & Lyytinen, H. (2001). Predicting delay in reading achievement in a highly transparent language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 401–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez, J. E. (1997). A reading-level match study of phonemic processes underlying reading disabilities in a transparent orthography. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9, 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, T. C., & Kirby, J. R. (2006). The contribution of naming speed to the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 339–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katzir, T., Kim, Y.-S., Wolf, M., O’Brien, B., Kennedy, B., Lovett, M., et al. (2006). Reading fluency: The whole is more than the parts. Annals of Dyslexia, 56, 51–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.-S. (2009). The foundation of literacy skills in Korean: The relationship between letter-name knowledge and phonological awareness and their relative contribution to literacy skills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 907–931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y.-S. (2010). Considering linguistic and orthographic features in early literacy acquisition: Evidence from Korean. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Kim, Y.-S. (in press). Relations of emergent literacy skill development with conventional literacy skill development in Korean. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal.

  • LaBerge, D., & Samuels, J. S. (1974). Towards a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognition, 6, 293–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landerl, K., & Wimmer, H. (2008). Development of word reading fluency and spelling in a consistent orthography: An 8-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 150–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landerl, K., Wimmer, H., & Frith, U. (1997). The impact of orthographic consistency on dyslexia: A German-English comparison. Cognition, 63, 315–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, V., & Wimmer, H. (2002). Phoneme awareness and pathways into literacy: A comparison of German and American children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 653–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manrique, A. M. B., & Signorini, A. (1994). Phonological awareness, spelling and reading abilities in Spanish-speaking children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 429–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride-Chang, C. (1999). The ABCs of the ABCs: The development of letter-name and letter-sound knowledge. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45, 285–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. S., & Felton, R. H. (1999). Repeated reading to enhance fluency: Old approaches and new directions. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 283–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Sandoval, A. F., Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2005). Batería III Woodcock-Muñoz. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M. J., & Stevenson, J. (2004). Phonemes, rimes and language skills as foundations of early reading development: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 40, 663–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Näslund, J. C., & Schneider, W. (1996). Kindergarten letter knowledge, phonological skills, and memory processes: Relative effects on early literacy. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 62, 30–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Beyond phonological skills: Broader language skills contribute to the development of reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 27, 342–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Child Health, Human Development: National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oney, B., & Durgunoglu, A. Y. (1997). Beginning to read in Turkish: A phonologically transparent orthography. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts, J., Nation, K., & Bishop, D. V. (2007). Vocabulary is important for some but not all reading skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 235–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riedel, B. W. (2007). The relation between DIBELS, reading comprehension, and vocabulary in urban first-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 546–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchey, K. D., & Speece, D. L. (2006). From letter names to word reading: The nascent role of sublexical fluency. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 301–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, T. A., Christo, C., & Shefelbine, J. A. (2010). Word recognition. In M. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. Moje, & P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. IV). London: Routledge (in press).

  • Rolla San Francisco, A., Arias, M., & Villers, R. (2005). Quality early childhood education in Costa Rica? Policy, practice, outcomes and challenges. Early Years, 25, 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrano, F., & Defior, S. (2008). Dyslexia speed problems in a transparent orthography. Annals of Dyslexia, 58, 81–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. L. (2004). Knowing letter names and learning letter sounds: A causal connection. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 213–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Signorini, A. (1997). Word reading in Spanish: A comparison between skilled and less skilled beginning readers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 319–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. E., Porche, M. V., Tabors, P., & Harris, S. (2007). Is literacy enough?: Pathways to academic success for adolescents. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speece, D. L., Mills, C., Ritchey, K. D., & Hillman, E. (2003). Initial evidence that letter fluency tasks are valid indicators of early reading skill. Journal of Special Education, 36, 223–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stage, S. A., Sheppard, J., Davidson, M. M., & Browning, M. M. (2001). Prediction of first-graders’ growth in oral reading fluency using kindergarten letter fluency. Journal of School Psychology, 39, 225–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strasser, K., & Lissi, M. R. (2009). Home and instruction effects on emergent literacy in a sample of Chilean kindergarten children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 175–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tharp, R.G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing schools to life. American Educator, 13(2), 20–25, 46–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Burgess, S., & Hecht, S. (1997). Contributions of phonological awareness and rapid automatic naming ability to the growth of word-reading skills in second- to fifth-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 161–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2003). The role of letter names in the acquisition of literacy. In R. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 31, pp. 105–135). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R., Tincoff, R., Rodriguez, K., Mouzaki, A., & Francis, D. J. (1998). The foundations of literacy: Learning the sounds of letters. Child Development, 69, 1524–1540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, S. A., & Ferreiro, E. (1999). Writing development: A neglected variable in the consideration of phonological awareness. Harvard Educational Review, 69, 395–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walley, A. C., Metsala, J. L., & Garlock, V. M. (2003). Spoken vocabulary growth: Its role in the development of phoneme awareness and early reading ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H., Mayringer, H., & Landerl, K. (1998). Poor reading: A deficit in skill-automatization or a phonological deficit? Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 321–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. (1999). The “Double-Deficit Hypothesis” for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M., & Denkla, M. B. (2005). RAN and RAS tests. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

  • Wolf, M., & Katzir-Cohen, T. (2001). Reading fluency and its intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 211–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young-Suk Kim.

Appendix A

Appendix A

Model specifications for grade 1 model

$$ \begin{gathered} {\text{Reading}}\;{\text{Comprehension}}_{ij} = \left( \begin{gathered} \gamma {}_{00} + \gamma {}_{10}{\text{Time}}{}_{ij} + \gamma {}_{01}{\text{{Female}}_{i}} + \gamma {}_{02}{\text{{Treatment}}_{i}} \hfill \\ + \gamma {}_{20}{\text{Word}}\;{\text{Reading}}{}_{ij} \hfill \\ + \gamma {}_{30}{\text{Nonsense}}\;{\text{Word}}\;{\text{Fluency}}{}_{ij} \hfill \\ + \gamma {}_{40}{\text{Vocabulary}}{}_{ij} \hfill \\ + \gamma {}_{50}{\text{Word}}\;{\text{Reading}}_{ij} \times {\text{Time}}{}_{ij} \hfill \\ + \gamma {}_{60}{\text{Nonsense}}\;{\text{Word}}\;{\text{Fluency}}_{ij} \times {\text{Time}}{}_{ij} \hfill \\ + \gamma_{70} {\text{Vocabulary}}_{ij} \times {\text{Time}}_{ij} \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right) + \left( {\zeta {}_{0i} + \zeta {}_{1i}{\text{Time}}{}_{ij} + \varepsilon {}_{ij}} \right) \hfill \\ \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$

where \( \varepsilon {}_{ij}\sim N(0,\sigma {}_{\varepsilon }^{2} )\;{\text{and}}\;\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\zeta {}_{0i}} \\ {\zeta {}_{1i}} \\ \end{array} } \right]\sim N\left( {\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} 0 \\ 0 \\ \end{array} } \right],\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\sigma {}_{0}^{2} } & {\sigma {}_{01}} \\ {\sigma {}_{10}} & {\sigma {}_{1}^{2} } \\ \end{array} } \right]} \right) \).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, YS., Pallante, D. Predictors of reading skills for kindergartners and first grade students in Spanish: a longitudinal study. Read Writ 25, 1–22 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9244-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9244-0

Keywords

Navigation