Abstract
The study examined: (a) the role of phonological, grammatical, and rapid automatized naming (RAN) skills in reading and spelling development; and (b) the component processes of early narrative writing skills. Fifty-seven Turkish-speaking children were followed from Grade 1 to Grade 2. RAN was the most powerful longitudinal predictor of reading speed and its effect was evident even when previous reading skills were taken into account. Broadly, the phonological and grammatical skills made reliable contributions to spelling performance but their effects were completely mediated by previous spelling skills. Different aspects of the narrative writing skills were related to different processing skills. While handwriting speed predicted writing fluency, spelling accuracy predicted spelling error rate. Vocabulary and working memory were the only reliable longitudinal predictors of the quality of composition content. The overall model, however, failed to explain any reliable variance in the structural quality of the compositions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
There are clearly important differences between syntactic and morphological processing skills and possibly clear differences also in their relationship with literacy skills. However, empirical distinction between these two metalinguistic skills becomes much more complicated within the context of agglutinating languages where a single word may correspond to a whole sentence or phrase. For instance, the Turkish word <gidebileceklerse> means ‘if they are going to be able to go’. For this reason, in this paper, the generic terms grammatical and morphosyntactic awareness were used and the relevant research evidence based on both syntactic and morphological processing skills have been reported.
References
Abbot, R. D., & Berninger, V. W. (1993). Structural equation modeling of relationships among developmental skills and writing skills in primary- and intermediary-grade writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 478–508.
Babayiğit, S. (2009). Reading and spelling in transparent alphabetic orthographies: Points of convergence, divergence and arising issues. In C. Wood & V. Connelly (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on reading and spelling, Routledge, UK (in press).
Babayiğit, S., & Stainthorp, R. (2007). Preliterate phonological awareness and early literacy skills in Turkish. Journal of Research in Reading, 30, 394–413.
Barnett, A., Stainthorp, R., Henderson, S., & Scheib, B. (2006). Handwriting policy and practice in English primary schools: An exploratory study (issues in practices). London: London Institute of Education, University of London.
Bereiter, C. (1980). Development in writing. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 73–93). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Berko, J. (1958). The child’s learning of English morphology. Word, 14, 150–177.
Berninger, V. W. (1996). Multiple constraints and shared subsystems in writing acquisition. In V. W. Berninger (Ed.), Reading and writing acquisition. A developmental neuropsychological approach (pp. 129–152). Oxford: Westview Press.
Berninger, V. W. (1999). Coordinating transcription and text generation in working memory during composing: Automatic and constructive processes. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 99–112.
Berninger, V. W., Yates, C., Cartwright, A., Rutberg, J., Remy, E., & Abbot, R. (1992). Lower-level developmental skills in beginning writing. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4, 257–280.
Bishop, D. V. M., & Clarkson, B. (2003). Written language as a window into residual language deficits: A study of children with persistent and residual speech and language impairments. Cortex, 39, 215–237.
Bowey, J. A. (2005). Grammatical sensitivity: Its origins and potential contribution to early word reading skill. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 90, 318–343.
Bruce, D. J. (1964). The analysis of word sounds by young children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 34, 158–169.
Bryant, P., & Nunes, T. (2004). Morphology and spelling. In T. Nunes & P. Bryant (Eds.), Handbook of literacy (pp. 91–118). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading ability. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189–209). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 169–190.
Carlisle, J. F., & Nomanbhoy, D. M. (1993). Phonological and morphological awareness in the first graders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 177–195.
Carlisle, J. F., Stone, C. A., & Katz, L. A. (2001). The effects of phonological transparency on reading derived words. Annals of Dyslexia, 51, 249–274.
Cragg, L., & Nation, J. K. (2006). Exploring written narrative in children with poor reading comprehension. Educational Psychology, 26, 55–72.
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 19, 450–466.
de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (1999). Specific contributions of phonological abilities to early reading acquisition: Results from a Dutch latent variable longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 450–476.
Defior, S., Alegria, J., Titos, R., & Martos, F. (2007). Using morphology when spelling in a shallow orthographic system: The case of Spanish. Cognitive Development, 23, 204–215.
Demircan, Ö. (2001). Türkçenin ses dizimi [the Turkish phonology] (2nd ed.). Istanbul, Türkiye: Der Yayınları.
Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1974). Rapid automatised naming of pictured objects, colours, letters, and numbers by normal children. Cortex, 10, 186–202.
Dufva, M., Niemi, P., & Voeten, M. J. M. (2001). The role of phonological memory, word recognition, and comprehension skills in reading development: From preschool to grade 2. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 91–117.
Durgunoğlu, A. Y. (2003). Recognising morphologically complex words in Turkish. In E. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words: Cross-language studies (pp. 81–92). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Durgunoğlu, A. Y., & Öney, B. (1999). A cross-linguistic comparison of phonological awareness and word recognition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11, 281–299.
Ekmekçi, F. Ö. (1986). The significance of word order in the acquisition of Turkish. In D. I. Slobin & K. Zimmer (Eds.), Studies in Turkish linguistics (pp. 265–273). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fey, E. D., Catts, H., Proctor-Williams, K., Toblin, J. B., & Zhang, X. (2004). Oral and written story composition skills of children with language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1301–1318.
Flower, L. S., & Hayes, J. R. (1980). The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 31–50). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Georgiou, G., Parilla, R., & Papadopoulos, T. (2008). Predictors of word decoding and reading fluency across languages varying in orthographic consistency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 566–580.
Graham, S. (1999). Handwriting and spelling instruction for students with learning disabilities: A review. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 78–98.
Graham, S., Berninger, V. W., Abbot, R. D., Abbot, S. P., & Whitaker, D. (1997). Role of mechanics in composing of elementary school students: A new methodological approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 170–182.
Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2000). Writing development: Introduction to the special issue. Educational Psychologist, 35, 1.
Griffin, T. M., Hemphill, L., Camp, L., & Wolf, D. P. (2004). Oral discourse in the preschool years and later literacy skills. First Language, 24, 123–147.
Jones, M. W., Obregón, M., Louise Kelly, M., & Branigan, H. P. (2008). Elucidating the component processes involved in dyslexic and non-dyslexic reading fluency: An eye-tracking study. Cognition, 109, 389–407.
Joshi, R. M., & Aaron, P. G. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of orthography and literacy. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437–447.
Juel, C., Griffith, P. L., & Gough, P. B. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 243–255.
Juul, H., & Elbro, C. (2004). The links between grammar and spelling: A cognitive hurdle in deep orthographies? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 17, 915–942.
Kellogg, R. T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In M. C. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 57–71). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Landerl, K., & Wimmer, H. (2008). Development of word reading fluency and spelling in a consistent orthography: An 8-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 150–161.
Lehtonen, A., & Bryant, E. P. (2005). Active players or just passive bystanders? The role of morphemes in spelling development in a transparent orthography. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 137–155.
Lyytinen, H., Erskine, J. M., Tolvanen, A., Torppaa, M., Poikkeus, A.-M., & Lyytinen, P. (2006). Trajectories of reading development: A follow-up from birth to school age of children with and without risk for dyslexia. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52, 514–546.
Lyytinen, P., & Lyytinen, H. (2004). Growth and predictive relations of vocabulary and inflectional morphology in children with and without familial risk of dyslexia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 397–411.
Mackie, C., & Dockrell, J. E. (2004). The nature of written language deficits in children with SLI. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 1469–1483.
Maki, H. S., Voeten, M. M., Vauras, M. M. S., & Poskiparta, E. H. (2001). Predicting writing skill development with word recognition and preschool readiness skills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 643–672.
McCutchen, D. (2000). Knowledge, processing, and working memory: Implications for a theory of writing. Educational Psychologist, 35, 13–23.
McCutchen, D., Covill, A., Hoyne, S. H., & Mildes, K. (1994). Individual differences in writing: Implications of translating fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 256–266.
Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M., & Stevenson, J. (2004). Phonemes, rimes, vocabulary, and grammatical skills as foundations of early reading development: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 40, 665–681.
Muter, V., & Snowling, M. (1997). Grammar and phonology predict spelling in middle childhood. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9, 407–425.
Nikolopoulos, D., Goulandris, N., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. (2006). The cognitive bases of learning to read and spell in Greek: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 1–17.
Nunes, T., Bryant, E. P., & Bindman, M. (1997). Learning to spell regular and irregular verbs. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9, 427–449.
Olinghouse, N. G. (2008). Student- and instruction-level predictors of narrative writing in third-grade students. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 3–26.
Öney, B., & Durgunoğlu, A. (1997). Beginning to read in Turkish: A phonologically transparent orthography. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 1–15.
Paris, S. G. (2005). Reinterpreting the development of reading skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 184–202.
Patel, T. K., Snowling, M., & de Jong, P. (2004). A cross-linguistic comparison of children learning to read in English and Dutch. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 785–797.
Pattison, H. M., & Collier, J. (1992). Methodological issues in the investigation of spelling and spelling development. In C. M. Sterling & C. Robson (Eds.), Psychology, spelling, and education (pp. 100–113). Clevendon, UK: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Perfetti, C. A. (1997). The psycholinguistics of spelling and reading. In C. A. Perfetti, L. Rieben, & M. Fayol (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages (pp. 21–38). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Powell, D., Stainthorp, R., Stuart, M., Garwood, H., & Quinlan, P. (2007). An experimental comparison between rival theories of rapid automatized naming performance and its relationship to reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 98, 46–68.
Raven, J. C. (1967). Standard progressive matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.
Rispen, J. E., McBride-Chang, C., & Reitsma, P. (2008). Morphological awareness and early and advanced word recognition and spelling in Dutch. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 587–607.
Savage, R., & Frederickson, N. (2005). Evidence of a highly specific relationship between rapid automatic naming of digits and text-reading speed. Brain and Language, 93, 152–159.
Savaşır, L., & Şahin, N. (1995). Wechsler çocuklar için zeka ölçeği (WISC-R) [Wechsler intelligence scales for children-revised]. Ankara, Turkey: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayını.
Senechal, M., Basque, M., & Leclaire, T. (2006). Morphological knowledge as revealed in children’s spelling accuracy and reports of spelling strategies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 95, 231–254.
Silven, M., Poskiparta, E., Niemi, P., & Voeten, M. J. M. (2007). Precursors of reading skills from infancy to first grade in Finnish: Continuity and change in a highly inflected language. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 516–531.
Singson, M., Mahony, D., & Mann, V. (2000). The relation between reading ability and morphological skills: Evidence from derivational suffixes. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 219–252.
Swanson, H. L., & Berninger, V. W. (1996). Individual differences in children’s working memory and writing skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 358–385.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). London: Allyn and Bacon.
Titos, R., Defior, S., Alegria, J., & Martos, F. J. (2003). The use of morphological resources in Spanish orthography: The case of the verb. In R. M. Joshi, C. K. Leong, & B. L. J. Kaczmarek (Eds.), Literacy acquisition: The role of phonology, morphology and orthography (pp. 113–118). Oxford: IOS Press.
Treiman, R., & Kessler, B. (2005). Writing systems and spelling development. In M. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading (pp. 120–134). Oxford: Blackwell.
van Bon, W. H. J., & van Leeuwe, J. F. J. (2003). Assessing phonemic awareness in kindergarten: The case for the phoneme recognition task. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 195–219.
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., Hecht, S. A., Barker, T. A., Burgess, S. R., et al. (1997). Changing relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 33, 468–479.
Wechsler, D. (2005). Wechsler individual achievement test (2nd ed.). London, UK: Harcourt Publishers.
Wimmer, H., & Mayringer, H. (2002). Dysfluent reading in the absence of spelling difficulties: A specific disability in regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 272–277.
Wolf, M., Bowers, P. G., & Biddle, K. (2000). Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 387–407.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the participating teachers, parents, and children from the 23 Nisan Primary School and Karaoğlanoğlu Primary School for their willing participation and cooperation. Many thanks also go to Mrs. Arzu Cankoy and Mrs. Ülfet Canseç for their help with the scoring of the written compositions of the children. Finally, we would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers and Prof. C. Hulme for their insightful suggestions on an earlier draft of the paper. Preparation of this paper was supported by a Postdoctoral Fellowship Award given by the Economic and Social Research Council (UK).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
All the data for this study were collected as part of Dr. Babayiğit’s doctoral research at the Institute of Education, University of London, UK.
Appendices
Appendix A
Appendix B
Scoring the composition writing-structure
-
a.
Appropriate sequencing:
-
0)
Incorrect
-
1)
Correct
-
0)
-
b.
Sentence Structure
-
0)
Majority of sentences are incomplete, fragments or run-ons.
-
1)
One or two incomplete sentences. Majority of sentences are complete.
-
2)
Every sentence is a complete sentence.
-
0)
-
c.
Sentence variety
-
0)
Repeating
-
1)
Varied
-
0)
-
d.
Complexity of sentence structure
-
0)
All simple sentences.
-
1)
One sentence with one subordinate clause.
-
2)
Two or more sentences with one subordinate clause in each.
-
3)
One sentence with two or more subordinate clauses, and one or more sentences with one subordinate clause in each.
-
4)
Two or more sentences with multiple subordinate clauses in each.
-
0)
-
e.
Linking expression (and, or but, while, then, before, suddenly)
-
0)
No linking expressions
-
1)
Two or fewer linking expression of the same kind. E.g., if only one type of linking word such as AND is used.
-
2)
Three or four linking expressions. At least one is a word other than AND.
-
3)
Five or more linking expressions. At least three are a word other than AND.
-
0)
-
f.
Consistency of tense
-
0)
Switching of tense
-
1)
Tense is appropriate and consistent
-
0)
-
g.
Grammar
-
0)
Very poor grammar that makes interpretation difficult
-
1)
Some grammar errors that sometimes interfere with meaning or interpretation
-
2)
A few errors but do not detract the overall quality of expression
-
3)
Error free
-
0)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Babayiğit, S., Stainthorp, R. Component processes of early reading, spelling, and narrative writing skills in Turkish: a longitudinal study. Read Writ 23, 539–568 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9173-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9173-y