The association between cumulative adversity and mental health: considering dose and primary focus of adversity
- 702 Downloads
The study addressed the dose–response model in the association of cumulative adversity with mental health.
Data of 1,725 participants aged 50+ were drawn from the Israeli component of the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe. Measures included an inventory of potentially traumatic events, distress (lifetime depression, depressive symptoms), and well-being (quality of life, optimism/hope).
The maximal effect of cumulative trauma emerged in the contrast between 0–2 and 3+ events, where the higher number of events related to higher distress but also to higher well-being. While self-oriented adversity revealed no, or negative, association with well-being, other-oriented adversity revealed a positive association.
The study suggests an experiential dose of cumulative adversity leading to a co-activation of distress and well-being. The source of this co-activation seems to be other-oriented adversity.
KeywordsDose–response Cumulative adversity Self-oriented adversity Other-oriented adversity SHARE-Israel
The Israeli component of the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe was funded by the US National Institute on Aging (R21 AG2516901), by the German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development (G.I.F.), and by the National Insurance Institute of Israel. We are grateful to Howard Litwin for facilitating our study with the data. We thank Rany Abend for his assistance.
- 9.Harvey, P. D., & Yehuda, R. (1999). Strategies to study risk for the development of PTSD. In R. Yehuda (Ed.), Risk factors for posttraumatic stress disorder (pp. 1–22). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
- 15.American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar
- 18.Kira, I., Lewandowski, L., Somers, C. L., et al. (in press). The effects of trauma types, cumulative trauma, and PTSD on IQ in two highly traumatized adolescent groups. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy.Google Scholar
- 23.Royse, D., Rompf, E. L., & Dhooper, S. S. (1993). Childhood trauma and adult life satisfaction. Journal of Applied Social Sciences, 17, 179–189.Google Scholar
- 24.Litwin, H., & Sapir, E. V. (2008). Israel: Diversity among population groups. In A. Börsch-Supan, A. Brugiavini, H. Jürges, et al. (Eds.), First results from the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe (2004–2007): Starting the longitudinal dimension (pp. 93–98). Mannheim: Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Aging.Google Scholar
- 34.United Nations Educational Cultural Scientific Organisation (UNESCO). (1997). International standard classification of education 1997. Geneva: UNESCO.Google Scholar
- 35.Brickman, P., & Coates, D. (1987). Commitment and mental health. In C. B. Wortman & R. Sorrentino (Eds.), Commitment, conflict, and caring (pp. 222–276). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- 41.Updegraff, J. A., & Taylor, S. E. (2000). From vulnerability to growth: Positive and negative effects of stressful life events. In J. Harvey & E. Miller (Eds.), Loss and trauma: General and close relationship perspectives (pp. 3–28). Philadelphia, PA: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
- 43.Larsen, J. T., Hemenover, S. H., Norris, C. J., et al. (2003). Turning adversity to advantage: On the virtues of the coactivation of positive and negative emotions. In L. G. Aspinwall & U. M. Staudinger (Eds.), A psychology of human strengths: Fundamental questions and future directions for a positive psychology (pp. 211–225). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 45.Ryff, C. D., Singer, B., Love, G. D., et al. (1998). Resilience in adulthood and later life: Defining features and dynamic processes. In J. Lomranz (Ed.), Handbook of aging and mental health: An integrative approach (pp. 69–99). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar