Abstract
Background: The SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF are available for international use, but it is not clear if they measure the same constructs. We compared the psychometric properties and factor structures of these two instruments. Methods: Data were collected from a national representative sample (n=11,440) in the 2001 Taiwan National Health Interview Survey, which included Taiwan versions of the SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF. We used Cronbach’s alpha coefficient to estimate scale reliability. We conducted exploratory factor analysis to determine factor structure of the scales, and applied multitrait analysis to evaluate convergent and discriminant validity. We used standardized effect size to compare known-groups validity for health-related variables (including chronic conditions and health care utilization) and self-reported overall quality of life. Structural equation modeling was used to analyze relationships among the two SF-36 component scales (PCS and MCS) and the four WHOQOL subscales (physical, psychological, social relations, and environmental). Results: Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were acceptable (⩾0.7) for all subscales of both instruments. The factor analysis yielded two unique factors: one for the 8 SF-36 subscales and a second for the 4 WHOQOL subscales. Pearson correlations were weak (<0.3) among subscales of both instruments. Correlations for subscales hypothesized to measure similar constructs differed little from those measuring heterogeneous subscales. Effect sizes suggested greater discrimination by the SF-36 for health status and services utilization known groups, but greater discrimination by the WHOQOL for QOL-defined groups. Structural equation modeling suggested that the SF-36 PCS and MCS were weakly associated with WHOQOL. Conclusions: In this Taiwan population sample, the SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF appear to measure different constructs: the SF-36 measures health-related QOL, while the WHOQOL-BREF measures global QOL. Clinicians and researchers should carefully define their research questions related to patient-reported outcomes before selecting which instrument to use.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AL Stewart S Greenfield RD Hays et al. (1989) ArticleTitleFunctional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study JAMA 262 907–913 Occurrence Handle10.1001/jama.262.7.907 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiaA38bht1M%3D Occurrence Handle2754790
NK Aaronson BE Meyerowitz M Bard et al. (1991) ArticleTitleQuality of life research in oncology. Past achievements and future priorities Cancer 67 839–843 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6D1MfmtVQ%3D Occurrence Handle1986855
DL Patrick YP Chiang (2000) ArticleTitleMeasurement of health outcomes in treatment effectiveness evaluations: Conceptual and methodological challenges Med Care 38 II14–II25 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvntlOkug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10982087
MJ Naughton SA Shumaker (2003) ArticleTitleThe case for domains of function in quality of life assessment Qual Life Res 12 IssueIDSuppl 1 73–80 Occurrence Handle12803313
TM Gill AR Feinstein (1994) ArticleTitleA critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements JAMA 272 619–626 Occurrence Handle10.1001/jama.272.8.619 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuA3srhs1E%3D Occurrence Handle7726894
JEJ Ware (1997) Sf-36 Physical & Mental Health Summary Scales: A User’s Manual Quality Metric Boston
QualityMetric Incoporated (http://www.qualitymetric.com/products/descriptions/sflicenses.shtml). Access: 1-2-2005
InstitutionalAuthorNameThe WHOQOL Group (1995) ArticleTitleThe World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization Soc Sci Med 41 1403–1409
InstitutionalAuthorNameThe WHOQOL Group (1998) ArticleTitleDevelopment of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. The WHOQOL Group Psychol Med 28 551–558
The WHO Field Centre for the Study of Quality of Life (http://www.bath.ac.uk/whoqol/questionnaires/ethics-statement.cfm). Access: 1-2-2005
AE Bonomi DL Patrick DM Bushnell M Martin (2000) ArticleTitleValidation of the United States’ version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) instrument J Clin Epidemiol 53 1–12 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7lsFGltg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10693897
V Norholm P Bech (2001) ArticleTitleThe WHO Quality of Life (WHOQOL) Questionnaire: Danish validation study Nord J Psychiatry 55 229–235 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD387gs1Ckug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11839112
SM Skevington MS Carse AC Williams (2001) ArticleTitleValidation of the WHOQOL-100: Pain management improves quality of life for chronic pain patients Clin J Pain 17 264–275 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00002508-200109000-00013 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrktVCmsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11587119
M Amir N Lewin-Epstein G Becker D Buskila (2002) ArticleTitlePsychometric properties of the SF-12 (Hebrew version) in a primary care population in Israel Med Care 40 918–928 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00005650-200210000-00009 Occurrence Handle12395025
PC Hsiung CT Fang YY Chang MY Chen JD Wang (2005) ArticleTitleComparison of WHOQOL-BREF and SF-36 in patients with HIV infection Qual Life Res 14 141–150 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s11136-004-6252-z Occurrence Handle15789948
B Spilker DA Revicki (1996) Taxonomy of quality of life B Spilker (Eds) Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials Lippincott-Raven Publishers Philadelphia 25–31
YT Shih YT Hung HY Chang et al. (2003) ArticleTitleThe design, contents, operation and the characteristics of the respondents of the 2001 National Health Interview Survey in Taiwan Taiwan J Public Health 22 419–430
JL Fuh SJ Wang SR Lu KD Juang SJ Lee (2000) ArticleTitlePsychometric evaluation of a Chinese (Taiwanese) version of the SF-36 health survey amongst middle-aged women from a rural community Qual Life Res 9 675–683 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008993821633 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3jtl2rtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11236857
JF Lu HM Tseng YJ Tsai (2003) ArticleTitleAssessment of health-related quality of life in Taiwan (I): Development and psychometric testing of SF-36 Taiwan version Taiwan J Public Health 22 501–511
CT Fang PC Hsiung CF Yu MY Chen JD Wang (2002) ArticleTitleValidation of the World Health Organization quality of life instrument in patients with HIV infection Qual Life Res 11 753–762 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1020870402019 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38jhvFOqtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12482159
G Yao CW Chung CF Yu JD Wang (2002) ArticleTitleDevelopment and verification of validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version J Formos Med Assoc 101 342–351 Occurrence Handle12101852
KR Popper (2002) Science: Conjectures and refutations KR Poper (Eds) Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge Routledge New York 33–58
PM Fayers D Machin (2000) Scores and measurements: Validity, reliability, sensitivity PM Fayers D Machin (Eds) Quality of Life: Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation John Wiley & Sons West Sussex, UK 45–71
S Sharma (1996) Confirmatory Factor Analysis S Sharma (Eds) Applied Multivariate Techniques John Wiley & Sons West Sussex, UK 90–143
GL Albrecht PJ Devlieger (1999) ArticleTitleThe disability paradox: High quality of life against all odds Soc Sci Med 48 977–988 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00411-0 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1Mzhs12htA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10390038
LB Meuleners AH Lee CW Binns A Lower (2003) ArticleTitleQuality of life for adolescents: Assessing measurement properties using structural equation modelling Qual Life Res 12 283–290 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1023221913292 Occurrence Handle12769141
InstitutionalAuthorNameThe WHOQOL Group (1998) ArticleTitleThe World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties Soc Sci Med 46 1569–1585 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00009-4
E Diener EM Suh RE Lucas HL Smith (1999) ArticleTitleSubjective well-being: Three decades of progress Psychol Bull 125 276–302 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276
JE Ware SuffixJr (1987) ArticleTitleStandards for validating health measures: Definition and content J Chronic Dis 40 473–480 Occurrence Handle3298292
M Bullinger R Anderson D Cella N Aaronson (1993) ArticleTitleDeveloping and evaluating cross-cultural instruments from minimum requirements to optimal models Qual Life Res 2 451–459 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00422219 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuB3MvjvFY%3D Occurrence Handle8161979
R Veenhoven (2000) ArticleTitleThe four quality of life. Ordering concepts and measures of the good life J Happiness Stud 1 IssueID1 1–39
N Abramson (1996) ArticleTitleQuality of life: Who can make the judgment? Am J Med 100 365–366 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9343(97)89497-1 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB3c3osFI%3D Occurrence Handle8629684
A Spiro SuffixIII R Bosse (2000) ArticleTitleRelations between health-related quality of life and well-being: The gerontologist’s new clothes? Int J Aging Hum Dev 50 297–318 Occurrence Handle11087109
R Arnold AV Ranchor R Sanderman GI Kempen J Ormel TP Suurmeijer (2004) ArticleTitleThe relative contribution of domains of quality of life to overall quality of life for different chronic diseases Qual Life Res 13 883–896 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:QURE.0000025599.74923.f2 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2czjtFWqtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle15233502
SM Skevington M Lotfy KA O’Connell (2004) ArticleTitleThe World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group Qual Life Res 13 299–310 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c7ovF2itQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle15085902
JP Browne CA O’Boyle HM McGee et al. (1994) ArticleTitleIndividual quality of life in the healthy elderly Qual Life Res 3 235–244 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00434897 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqC3M7ktl0%3D Occurrence Handle7812276
R Berzon RD Hays SA Shumaker (1993) ArticleTitleInternational use, application and performance of health-related quality of life instruments Qual Life Res 2 367–368 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00422214 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuB3MvjvVM%3D Occurrence Handle8161974
GH Guyatt DH Feeny DL Patrick (1993) ArticleTitleMeasuring health-related quality of life Ann Intern Med 118 622–629 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC1Mbht1E%3D Occurrence Handle8452328
A Montazeri CR Gillis J McEwen (1996) ArticleTitleMeasuring quality of life in oncology: Is it worthwhile? I. Meaning, purposes and controversies Eur J Cancer Care (Engl.) 5 159–167 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiB2M%2Fgt1U%3D
SM Hunt (1997) ArticleTitleThe problem of quality of life Qual Life Res 6 205–212 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiA2s%2FmvFU%3D Occurrence Handle9226977
A Leplege S Hunt (1997) ArticleTitleThe problem of quality of life in medicine JAMA 278 47–50 Occurrence Handle10.1001/jama.278.1.47 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiA2M%2Fps1Y%3D Occurrence Handle9207338
CA McHorney JE Ware SuffixJr AE Raczek (1993) ArticleTitleThe MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs Med Care 31 247–263 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC1MnisVI%3D Occurrence Handle8450681
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, IC., Wu, A.W. & Frangakis, C. Do the SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF Measure the Same Constructs? Evidence from the Taiwan Population*. Qual Life Res 15, 15–24 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-8486-9
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-8486-9