Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Overcoming (and Maintaining) Reproductive Difference: Similarities in the Gendered Experience of Infertility

  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The social construction of gender is based on the idea of difference, and nowhere is this difference more pronounced or essentialized than in the area of reproduction. Research reinforces such divergence, as men are seldom included in studies of reproduction, and when they are included, studies often highlight their differences from women’s experiences. While such differences do exist, it is important to have a more nuanced understanding of reproduction, including examining why there is such difference, as well as recognizing similarities. Thus, in centering rather than marginalizing men’s voices in reproduction, this study reveals the commonalities across reproductive experiences. Through 43 in-depth interviews with men and women who have experienced infertility, the findings reveal that infertility has both physical and emotional implications for men as it does for women. Ironically, men’s reconciliation with those parallels further silences their experience and perpetuates difference. Exposing such effects extends understandings of infertility, reproduction, and gender.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. ICSI, or Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection, was first used in the mid-1990s, compared to other procedures focused on women that began nearly 20 years earlier.

  2. Upon screening, I ensured that the involuntary childlessness was due to the inability to conceive or carry a child to term for at least 12 months, thereby meeting the biomedical definition of infertility.

  3. All names are pseudonyms.

  4. While the pronatalist culture of the U.S. still constructs motherhood as essential to women’s identities, it is important to note that there are variations within that importance among women (e.g., see McQuillan et al. 2008).

References

  • Almeling, Renee, and Miranda R. Waggoner. 2013. More and less than equal: How men factor in the reproductive equation. Gender and Society 27(6): 821–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Society for Reproductive Medicine. 2015. What causes infertility? http://www.reproductivefacts.org/detail.aspx?id=3018. Accessed 16 Feb 2015.

  • Andrews, Frank M., Antonia Abbey, and L. Jill Halman. 1992. Is fertility-problem stress different? The dynamics of stress in fertile and infertile couples. Fertility & Sterility 57: 1247–1253.

  • Anspach, Renee. 1993. The language of case presentation. In The sociology of health and illness: Critical perspectives, ed. P. Conrad, 320–338. New York: Worth Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, Liberty Walther. 2014. Conceiving masculinity: Male infertility, medicine, and identity. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Ann V. 2014. Misconception: Social class & infertility in America. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birenbaum-Carmeli, Daphna, Yoram S. Carmeli, and Robert F. Casper. 1995. Discrimination against men in infertility treatment. The Journal of Reproductive Medicine 40(8): 590–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmeli, Yoram S., and Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli. 1994. The predicament of masculinity: Towards understanding the male’s experience of infertility treatments. Sex Roles 30(9/10): 663–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceballo, Rosario. 1999. “The only black woman walking the face of the earth who cannot have a baby”: Two women’s stories. In Women’s untold stories: Breaking silence, talking back, voicing complexity, ed. M. Romero and A.J. Stewart, 3–19. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chachamovich, Juliana R., Eduardo Chachamovich, Helene Ezer, Marcelo P. Fleck, Daniela Knauth, and Eduardo P. Passos. 2010. Investigating quality of life and health-related quality of life in infertility: A systematic review. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology 31(2): 101–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, Kathy. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Patricia H. 1990. Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, & the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, Robert W. 1987. Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtenay, Will H. 2000. Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men’s well-being: a theory of gender and health. Social Science & Medicine 50(10): 1385–1401.

  • Culley, Lorraine, Nicky Hudson, and Frances Rapport. 2007. Using focus groups with minority ethnic communities: Researching infertility in British South Asian communities. Qualitative Health Research 17(1): 102–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culley, Lorraine, Nicky Hudson, and Maria Lohan. 2013. Where are all the men? The marginalization of men in social scientific research on infertility. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 27: 225–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, Cynthia R. 1997. Between fathers and fetuses: The social construction of male reproduction and the politics of fetal harm. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 22(3): 579–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, Cynthia R. 2006. Exposing men: The science and politics of male reproduction. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniluk, Judith C. 1997. Gender and infertility. In Infertility: Psychological issues and counseling strategies, ed. S.R. Leiblum, 103–125. Oxford, England: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudgeon, Matthew R., and Marcia C. Inhorn. 2009a. Men’s influences on women’s reproductive health: Medical anthropological perspectives. In Reconceiving the second sex: Men, masculinity, and reproduction, ed. M.C. Inhorn, T. Tjornhoj-Thomsen, H. Goldberg, and M. La Cour Mosegaard, 103–136. New York: Berghan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudgeon, Matthew R., and Marcia C. Inhorn. 2009b. Gender, masculinity, and reproduction: Anthropological perspectives. In Reconceiving the second sex: Men, masculinity, and reproduction, ed. M.C. Inhorn, T. Tjornhoj-Thomsen, H. Goldberg, and M. La Cour Mosegaard, 72–102. New York: Berghan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelmann, Robert J., and Kevin J. Connolly. 1998. Psychological state and psychological strain in relation to infertility. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 8(4): 303–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elam, Gillian, and Kevin A. Fenton. 2003. Researching sensitive issues and ethnicity: Lessons from sexual health. Ethnicity & Health 8(1): 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Jane R.W., and Karin Hammarberg. 2012. Psychological and social aspects of infertility in men: An overview of the evidence and implications for psychologically informed clinical care and future research. Asian Journal of Andrology 14: 121–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Asia. 2013. Blind to sameness: Sexpectations and the social construction of male and female bodies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gannon, Kenneth, Lesley Glover, and Paul Abel. 2004. Masculinity, infertility, stigma and media reports. Social Science & Medicine 59: 1169–1175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, Kathleen. 2001. Dilemmas of involved fatherhood. In Shifting the center: Understanding contemporary families, 2nd ed, ed. S.J. Ferguson, 50–62. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, Helene. 2009. The sex in the sperm: Male infertility and its challenges to masculinity in an Israeli-Jewish context. In Reconceiving the second sex: Men, masculinity, and reproduction, ed. M.C. Inhorn, T. Tjornhoj-Thomsen, H. Goldberg, and M. La Cour Mosegaard, 203–225. New York: Berghan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greil, Arthur L. 1991. Not yet pregnant: Infertile couples in contemporary America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greil, Arthur L., Thomas A. Leitko, and Karen L. Porter. 1988. Infertility: His and hers. Gender and Society 2(2): 172–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greil, Arthur L., Kathleen Slauson-Blevins, and Julia McQuillan. 2010. The experience of infertility: A review of recent literature. Sociology of Health & Illness 32(1): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greil, Arthur L., Julia McQuillan, Karina M. Shreffler, Katherine M. Johnson, and Kathleen S. Slauson-Blevins. 2011a. Race-ethnicity and medical services for infertility: Stratified reproduction in a population-based sample of U.S. women. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 52(4): 493–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greil, Arthur L., Julia McQuillan, and Kathleen Slauson-Blevins. 2011b. The social construction of infertility. Sociology Compass 5: 736–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadley, Robin, and Terry Hanley. 2011. Involuntarily childless men and the desire for fatherhood. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 29(1): 56–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, Karey. 2007. The infertility treadmill: Feminist ethics, personal choice, and the use of reproductive technologies. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, Florencia. 2013. “Men always adopt”: Infertility and reproduction from a male perspective. Journal of Family Issues 34(8): 1059–1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, Lisa, and Tina Miller. 2013. Mapping men’s anticipations and experiences in the reproductive realm: (in)fertility journeys. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 27: 244–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjelmstedt, Anna, Lena Andersson, Agneta Skoog-SVANBERG, Torbjörn Bergh, Jacky Boivin, and Aila Collins. 1999. Gender differences in psychological reactions to infertility among couples seeking IVF and ICSI-treatment. Acta Obstetrica Gynecologica Scandinavia 78(1): 42–48.

  • Hochschild, Arlie R. 1979. Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology 85(3): 551–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, Arlie R. 1995. Understanding the future of fatherhood. In Changing fatherhood: An interdisciplinary perspective, ed. M.C. van Dougen, G. Frinking, and M. Jacobs, 445–466. Amsterdam: Thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhorn, Marcia C. 2003. “The worms are weak”: Male infertility and patriarchal paradoxes in Egypt. Men and Masculinities 5(3): 236–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inhorn, Marcia C., and Emily A. Wentzell. 2011. Embodying emergent masculinities: Men engaging with reproductive and sexual health technologies in the Middle East and Mexico. American Ethnologist 38(4): 801–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inhorn, Marcia C., Tine Tjornhoj-Thomsen, Helene Goldberg, and Maruska la Cour Mosegaard. 2009. The second sex in reproduction? Men, sexuality and masculinity. In Reconceiving the second sex: Men, masculinity, and reproduction, ed. M.C. Inhorn, T. Tjornhoj-Thomsen, H. Goldberg, and M. La Cour Mosegaard, 1–20. New York: Berghan Books.

  • Johnson, Katherine M., and David R. Johnson. 2009. Partnered decisions? U.S. couples and medical help‐seeking for infertility. Family Relations 58(4): 431–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knijn, Trudie. 1994. Towards post-paternalism? Social and theoretical changes in fatherhood. WORC Paper/Work and Organization Research Centre (WORC) 94.

  • Lloyd, Mike. 1996. Condemned to be meaningful: Non-response in studies of men and infertility. Sociology of Health & Illness 18(4): 433–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorber, Judith. 1989. Choice, gift, or patriarchal bargain? Women’s consent to in vitro fertilization in male infertility. Hypatia 4(3): 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorber, Judith, and Lakshmi Bandlamudi. 1993. The dynamics of marital bargaining in male infertility. Gender and Society 7(1): 32–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malik, Sumaira H., and Neil Coulson. 2008. The male experience of infertility: A thematic analysis of an online infertility support group bulletin board. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 26(1): 18–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markens, Susan, C.H. Browner, and H. Mabel Preloran. 2003. “I’m not the one they’re sticking the needle into”: Latino couples, fetal diagnosis, and the discourse of reproductive rights. Gender and Society 17(3): 462–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsiglio, William. 1991. Male procreative consciousness and responsibility: A conceptual analysis and research agenda. Journal of Family Issues 12(3): 268–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsiglio, William, Maria Lohan, and Lorraine Culley. 2013. Framing men’s experience in the procreative realm. Journal of Family Issues 34(8): 1011–1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Emily. 1991. The egg and the sperm: How science has constructed a romance based on stereotypical male–female roles. Signs 16(3): 485–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQuillan, Julia, Arthur L. Greil, Karina M. Shreffler, and Veronica Tichenor. 2008. The importance of motherhood among women in the contemporary United States. Gender and Society 22(4): 477–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McQuillan, Julia, Arthur L. Greil, Karina M. Shreffler, Patricia A. Wonch-Hill, Kari C. Gentzler and John D. Hathcoat. 2012. Does the reason matter? Variations in childlessness concerns among U.S. women. Journal of Marriage and Family 74: 1166–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikkelsen, Alice T., Svend A. Madsen, and Peter Humaidan. 2013. Psychological aspects of male fertility treatment. Journal of Advanced Nursing 69(9): 1977–1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nachtigall, Robert D., Gay Becker, and Mark Wozny. 1992. The effects of gender-specific diagnosis on men’s and women’s response to infertility. Fertility and Sterility 57(1): 113–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noone, Jack H. and Christine Stephens. 2008. Men, masculine identities, and health care utilization. Sociology of Health & Illness 30(5): 711–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oudshoorn, Nelly. 2004. “Astronauts in the sperm world”: The renegotiation of masculine identities in discourses on male contraceptives. Men and Masculinities 6(4): 349–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry, Diana C. 2005. Women’s experiences with infertility: The fluidity of conceptualizations of ‘family’. Qualitative Sociology 28: 275–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, Penny J. 1994. Race-of-interviewer effects: A brief comment. Sociology 28(2): 547–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, Dana, and Christopher A. Faircloth. 2006. Medicalized masculinities: The missing link? In Medicalized masculinities, ed. D. Rosenfeld and C.A. Faircloth, 1–20. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, Nancy F. 1976. The motherhood mandate. Journal of Social Issues 32(3): 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, Maura, and Dana Berkowitz. 2009. Constructing gay and lesbian parent families ‘beyond the closet’. Qualitative Sociology 32: 153–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherrod, Roy A. 2006. Male infertility: The element of disguise. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services 44(10): 31–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, Catherine Richards. 2014. “I feel like a rock star”: Fatherhood for stay-at-home fathers. Fathering 12(1): 52–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, Elizabeth H., and Anjani Chandra. 2000. Use of infertility services in the United States: 1995. Family Planning Perspectives 32: 132–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, Oriel. 2004. Changing gender practices within the household: A theoretical perspective. Gender and Society 18(2): 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terry, Gareth, and Virginia Braun. 2011. “It’s kind of me taking responsibility for these things”: Men, vasectomy and ‘contraceptive economies. Feminism and Psychology 21(4): 477–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thein, Deborah, and Vincent J. Del Casino. 2012. (Un)healthy men, masculinities, and the geographies of health. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 102(5): 1146–1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Charis. 2005. Making parents: The ontological choreography of reproductive technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, Barrie. 1993. Gender play: Girls and boys in school. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Throsby, Karen, and Rosalind Gill. 2004. “It’s different for men”: Masculinity and IVF. Men and Masculinities 6(4): 330–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjornhoj-Thomsen, Tine. 2009. “It’s a bit unmanly in a way”: Men and infertility in Denmark. In Reconceiving the second sex: Men, masculinity, and reproduction, ed. M.C. Inhorn, T. Tjornhoj-Thomsen, H. Goldberg, and M. La Cour Mosegaard, 226–252. New York: Berghan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, Russell E., and Judith C. Daniluk. 1999. The end of the line: Infertile men’s experiences of being unable to produce a child. Men and Masculinities 2(1): 6–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, John, Claude Duchesne, Stephane Sabourin, Francois Bissonnette, Johanne Benoit, and Yvan Girard. 1991. Psychosocial distress and infertility: Men and women respond differently. Fertility and Sterility 55(1): 100–108.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Karin Martin and the anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on earlier versions of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ann V. Bell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bell, A.V. Overcoming (and Maintaining) Reproductive Difference: Similarities in the Gendered Experience of Infertility. Qual Sociol 38, 439–458 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-015-9315-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-015-9315-2

Keywords

Navigation