Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The predicament of masculinity: Towards understanding the male's experience of infertility treatments

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The commonsense notions that associate fertility and femininity are shared by the medical establishment, and have led to the concentration of research on women in the area of fertility. While feminist critics view this state of affairs as a consequence of male domination and emphasize women's predicament, this paper focuses on men's experience in this area. It is suggested that as research and treatment traditionally focus on the woman, therapies offered to the man are relatively scarce and his non-medical part in the process places him in a marginal position. The treatment entails embarrassment and anomie. The availability of sperm donation carries its own threat of men's dispensibility. A male-inspired association of procreation with women has led to the development of female-centered infertility therapies. As a consequence men have found themselves in a disadvantaged position.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbey, B. J., Halman, L. J., & Andrews, F. M. (1992). Psychological, treatment and demographic predictors of the stress associated with infertility.Fertility and Sterility, 57(1), 122–128.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baruch, E. H. (1987). A womb of his own.Women and Health, 13(1/2), 135–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, B. J., Wilson, J. F., & Weingartner, P. J. (1991). Psychological sequelae of infertility treatments: The role of gender and sex role identification.Social Science and Medicine, 33(9), 1071–1080.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Birenbaum-Carmeli, D., Carmeli, Y. S., & Casper, R. F. Gender Discrimination in Fertility Treatments: The Underprivileged Male. Forthcoming inJournal of Reproductive Medicine

  • Bohnet, H. G., & Baukloh, V. (1989). Evaluation of endocrine parameters and semen samples: Pregnancies following conservative infertility treatment versus IVF therapy.Human Reproduction, 4(8 Suppl.), 65–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brewaeys, A., Olbrechts, H., Devroey, P., & Van Steirteghem, A. C. (1989). Counseling and selection of homosexual couples in fertility treatment.Human Reproduction, 4(7), 850–853.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Malter, H., Wright, G., Kort, H., Massey, J., & Mitchell, D. (1989). Partial zona dissection of human oocytes when failure of zona pellucida penetrations is anticipated.Human Reproduction, 4(4), 435–442.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Corea, G. (1985).The mother machine. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosignani, P. G., Walters, D. E., & Soliani, A. (1991). The ESHRE multicentre trial on the treatment of unexplained infertility: A preliminary report.Human Reproduction, 6(7), 953–958.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Cherney, A. H. (1990). Male infertility. In N. G. Kase, A. B. Weingold, and D. M. Gerson (Eds.),Principles and practice of clinical gynecology. (pp. 419–424) New York: Churchill Livingston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, J. (1975). Behavior in private places. In D. Brissett and C. Edgeley (Eds.),Life as theater: A dramaturgical sourcebook. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, V. R., & Perreault, L. (1986). Expenditures for reproduction-related health care.Journal of the American Medical Association, 225 67–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1962).Two studies in the sociology of interaction. (pp. 85–152) New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L. (1977).Woman's body, woman's right. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, K. R., Kretzer, P. A., Blackwell, R. E., & Steinkampf, M. P. (1990). Performance anxiety during infertility treatments: Effect on semen quality.Fertility and Sterility, 53(2), 337–340.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hinting, A., Comhaire, F., Vermeulen, L., Dhont, M., Vermeulen, A., & Vandekerckhove, D. (1990). Possibilities and limitations of techniques of assisted reproduction for the treatment of male infertility.Human Reproduction, 5(5), 544–548.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horbay, G. L., Cowell, C. A., & Casper, R. F. (1991). Multiple follicular recruitment and intrauterine insemination outcomes compared by age and diagnosis.Human Reproduction, 6(7), 947–952.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine and National Research Council (1986).Medically Assisted Conception—An Agenda for Research. (p. 16) Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IVF—Why is Business Booming. American Demographics, July, 42–43.

  • Jequier, A. M. (1990). Andrology: A new sub-specialty. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 97(11), 969–972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karow, A. M., Jr. (1982). Family secrets: Who is to know about AID?New England Journal of Medicine, 306 372.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kedem, P., Mikulincer, M., Nathanson, Y. E., & Bartoov, B. (1990). Psychological Aspects of Male Infertility.British Journal of Medical Psychology, 63(pt. 1), 73–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, W. (1989). Andrologic indications forin vitro fertilization: Is there a true therapeutic gain? (English abstract).Hatarzt, 40(12), 741–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasker, J. N., & Borg, S. (1987).In search of motherhood. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Strauss, C. (1963). The Effectiveness of Symbols in Levi-Strauss, C.Structural anthropology. (pp. 186–205). New York and London: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahlstedt, P., & Greenfield, D. (1989). Assisted reproductive technology with donor gametes: The need for patient preparation.Fertility and Sterility, 52(6), 908–914.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mahlstedt, P. P., & Probasco, K. A. (1991). Sperm Donors: Their attitudes towards providing medical and psychological information for recipient couples and donor offspring.Fertility and Sterility, 56(4), 747–753.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mazor, M. D. (1984). Emotional reactions to infertility. In Mazor, M. D., & Simons, H. (Eds.),Infertility: Medical, emotional and social considerations. New York: Human Sciences Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meacham, R. B., & Lipshultz, L. I. (1991). Assisted reproductive technologies for male factor infertility.Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 3(5), 656–661.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meerabeau, L. (1991). Husband's participation in fertility treatment: They also serve who only stand and wait.Sociology of Health and Illness, 13(3), 369–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscucci, O. (1990).The science of women: Gynecology and gender in England, 1800–1929. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, W. D. (1985). Reproductive impairments in the U.S., 1965–1982. Demography, 22, 415–430.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nachtigall, R. D., Becker, G., & Wozny, M. (1992). The effects of gender-specific diagnosis on men's and women's response to infertility. Fertility and Sterility, 57(1), 113–121.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oldereid, N. B., Rui, H., & Purvis, K. (1990). Male partners in infertile couples, personal attitudes and contact with the Norwegian health service.Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine, 18(3), 207–211.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oldinger, E. (1988). Psychological support to childless couples in Finland. Don't forget the husband in infertility treatments (English abstract).Nordisk Medicin, 103(11), 310–311.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Palermo, G., Devroey, P., Camus, M., De Grauwe, E., Khan, I., Staeaaen, C., Wisanto, A., & Van Steirteghem, A. C. (1989). Zygote intra-fallopian transfer as an alternative treatment for male infertility.Human Reproduction, 4(4), 412–415.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pines, D. (1990). Emotional aspects of infertility and its remedies.International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 71 561–568.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Powledge, T. (1987). Reproductive technologies and the bottom line.Women and Health, 13(1/2), 203–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, R. (1985). The social and psychological consequences of secrecy in artificial insemination by donor programmes.Social Science and Medicine, 21(4), 391–396.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, R. (1987). Technology and motherhood: Reproductive choice reconsidered.Signs, 12 512–529.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruddick, W. (1987). A short answer to “who decides.”Women and Health,13(1/2).

  • Ruzek, S. B. (1979).The women's health movement. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scully, D. (1980).Men control women's health. Boston: Hughton Mifflin Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S., Saphire, D. G., & Stone, W. H. (1990). Changes in American AID practice during the past decade.International Journal of Fertility, 35(5), 284–291.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sigman, M. (1991). Assisted reproductive techniques for the treatment of male factor infertility.Rhode Island Medical Journal, 74(12), 591–596.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, A. L., Tennen, H., Affleck, G., & Mendola, R. (1991). Cognitive appraisal and adjustment to infertility.Women and Health, 17(3), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanway, A. (1980).Why us? London: Granada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickler, J. (1992). The new reproductive technology: Problem or solution?Sociology of Health and Illness, 14(1), 111–132.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Summey, P., & Hurst, M. (1986a). Obs/gyn on the rise: The evolution of professional ideology in the 20th century (Part I).Women and Health, 11(1), 133–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summey, P., & Hurst, M. (1986b). Obs/gyn on the rise: The evolution of professional ideology in the 20th century (Part II).Women and Health, 11(2), 103–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. J. (1990). When is enough enough.Fertility and Sterility, 54(5), 772–774.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tournaye, H., Camus, M., Khan, I., Staeaaen, C., Van Steirteghem, A. C., & Devroey, P. (1991). In vitro fertilization, gamete or zygote intrafallopian transfer for the treatment of male infertility.Human Reproduction, 6(2), 263–266.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, B. R. (1981). Grounding the alienation of self and body: A critical pheonomenological analysis of the patient in Western medicine.sociology of Health and Illness, 3(2), 188–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J., Duchesne, C., Sabourin, S., Bissonnette, F., Benoit, J., & Girard, Y. (1991). Psychological distress and infertility: Men and women respond differently.Fertility and Sterility, 55(1), 100–108.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Haifa University, Israel

    Yoram S. Carmeli

  2. Hebrew University, Israel

    Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli

Authors
  1. Yoram S. Carmeli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carmeli, Y.S., Birenbaum-Carmeli, D. The predicament of masculinity: Towards understanding the male's experience of infertility treatments. Sex Roles 30, 663–677 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544669

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544669

Keywords

Search

Navigation