Abstract
In this paper, we empirically analyze weekly advertising policies of manufacturing firms in consumer goods markets. We assume firms engage in persuasive advertising, thus policies of firms affect the goodwill of a brand. We introduce a demand and a goodwill production function. A simple transformation of the demand function allows us to identify not only the demand parameters but also the parameters of the goodwill production function. We reconstruct the unobserved goodwill levels using these parameters and past advertising levels. We restrict our attention to Markov Perfect Equilibrium (MPE) strategies which are functions of payoff relevant state variables. Without imposing further restrictions on the dynamic competitive environment, we investigate the relationship between observed advertising strategies—which are assumed to be MPE—and payoff relevant state variables by means of several reduced form specifications. The most important determinant of advertising intensity turns out to be goodwill. We demonstrate that controlling for an advertising campaign significantly improves the explanatory power of the model.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Basar, T., & Oldser, G. (1982). Dynamic noncooperative game theory. New York: Academic Press.
Berry, S. T. (1994). Estimating discrete choice models of product differentiation. RAND Journal of Economics, 25, 242–262.
Besanko, D., Gupta S., & Jain D. (1998). Logit demand estimation under competitive pricing behavior: An equilibrium framework. Management Science, 44 (Part 1 of 2), 1533–1547.
Bresnahan, T. F. (1989). Empirical studies of industries with market power. In: R. Schmalensee and R. D. Willig (eds.), Handbook of industrial organization, (pp. 1011–1057) Amsterdamm: Elsevier Science Publisher B. V.
Cardell, N. S. (1991). Variance components structures for the extreme value and logistic distributions. Mimeo, Washington State University.
Cheng, F., & Sethi, S. (1999). A periodic review inventory model with demand influenced by promotion decisions. Management Science, 45, 1510–1523.
Chintagunta, P. K., & Vilcassim, N. J. (1992). An empirical investigation of advertising strategies in a dynamic duopoly. Management Science, 38, 1230–1244.
Christen, M., Gupta, S., Porter, J. C., Staelin, R., & Wittink, D. R. (1997). Using market-level data to understand promotion effects in a nonlinear model. Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 322–334.
Deal, K. R. (1979). Optimizing advertising expenditures in a dynamic duopoly. Operations Research, 27, 682–692.
Doraszelski, U., & Markovich, S. (2004). Advertising dynamics and competitive advantage. Working Paper, July 30, 2004.
Dube, J.-P., Hitsch, G. J., & Manchanda, P. (2005). An empirical model of advertising dynamics. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 3, 107–144.
Erickson, G. M. (1985). A model of advertising competition. Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 297–304.
Erickson, G. M. (1992). Empirical analysis of closed-loop duopoly advertising strategies. Management Science, 38, 1732–1749.
Erickson, G. M. (1995). Advertising strategies in a dynamic oligopoly. Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 233–237.
Espinosa, M. P., & Mariel, P. (2001). A model of optimal advertising expenditures in a dynamic duopoly. Atlantic Economic Journal, 29, 135–161.
Feinberg, F. M. (2001). On continuous-time optimal advertising under S-shaped response. Management Science, 47, 1476–1487.
Fruchter, G. E., & Kalish, S. (1997). Closed-loop advertising strategies in a duopoly. Management Science, 43, 54–63.
Hahn, M., & Hyun, J. (1991). Advertising cost interactions and the optimality of pulsing. Management Science, 37, 157–169.
Hall, G., & Rust, J. (2000). The (S,s) rule is an optimal trading strategy in a class of commodity price speculation problems. Working Paper, March 2000.
Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46, 1251–1271.
Klapper, D., & Doganoglu, T. (2004). Product Variety and Competitive Pricing in Consumer Goods Markets. mimeo.
Mahajan, V., & Muller, E. (1986). Advertising pulsing policies for generating awareness for new products. Marketing Science, 5, 89–111.
Maskin, E., & Tirole, J. (1988). A theory of dynamic oligopoly, I: Overview and quantity competition with large fixed costs. Econometrica, 56, 549–569.
McFadden, D. (1978). Modelling the choice of residential location. In: Karlqvist, A., Lundqvist, L., Snickars, F. and Weibull, J. (eds.), Spatial interaction theory and planning models (pp. 75–96). Amsterdam: North Holland.
Mesak, H. I. (1999). On the generalizability of advertising pulsation monopoly results to an oligopoly. European Journal of Operational Research, 117, 429–449.
Mesak, H. I., & Calloway, J. A. (1995a). A pulsing model of advertising competition: a game theoretic approach. part a—theoretical foundation. European Journal of Operational Research, 86, 231–248.
Mesak, H. I., & Calloway, J. A. (1995b). A pulsing model of advertising competition: A game theoretic approach, part b—empirical application and findings. European Journal of Operational Research, 86, 422–433.
Mesak, H. I., & Darrat, A. F. (1992). On comparing alternative advertising policies of pulsation. Decision Sciences, 32, 541–564.
Pakes, A., & McGuire, P. (1994). Computing markov-perfect nash equilibria: numerical implications of a dynamic differentiated product model. RAND Journal of Economics, 25, 555–589.
Rao, R. C. (1990). Impact of competition on strategic marketing decisions. In: G. Day, B. Weitz and R. Wensley (eds.), Interface of marketing and strategy. JAI Press, Greenwich. CT 1990.
Sasieni, M. W. (1971). Optimal advertising expenditure. Management Science, 18 (Part II), 64–72.
Sasieni, M. W. (1989). Optimal advertising strategies. Marketing Science, 8, 358–370.
Sorger, G. (1988). Competitive dynamic advertising: A modification of the case game. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 13, 55–80.
Sudhir, K. (2001). Structural analysis of manufacturer pricing in the presence of a strategic retailer. Marketing Science, 20, 244–264.
Tellis, G. J. and Weiss, D. L. (1995). Does TV advertising really affect sales? the role of measures, models, and data aggregation. Journal of Advertising, 24, 1–12.
Vakratsas, D. and Ambler, T. (1999). How advertising works: what do we really know? Journal of Marketing, 63, 26–43.
Vakratsas, D., Feinberg, F. M., Bass, F. M. and Kalyanaram, G. (2004). The shape of advertising response functions revisited: a model of dynamic probabilistic thresholds. Marketing Science, 23, 109–119.
Villas-Boas, J. M. (1993). Predicting advertising pulsing policies in an oligopoly: a model and empirical test. Marketing Science, 12, 88–102.
Villas-Boas, J. M. and Winer, R. S. (1999). Endogeneity in ‘brand choice models. Management Science, 45, 1324–1338.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
JEL Classification L13 . C73 . M30 . M37
I would like to thank Volkswagen Stiftung for the generous financial support which made this research possible.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Doganoglu, T., Klapper, D. Goodwill and dynamic advertising strategies. Quant Market Econ 4, 5–29 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11129-006-6558-y
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11129-006-6558-y