Skip to main content

Informative Versus Persuasive Advertising in a Dynamic Hotelling Monopoly

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Spatial Economics Volume I
  • 563 Accesses

Abstract

A dynamic Hotelling monopoly model is proposed, with the purpose of characterising the effects of informative and persuasive advertising in a regime of partial market coverage. The two models are solved to show the emergence of a unique saddle-point steady-state equilibrium in both cases. Then, equilibrium profits are compared to illustrate that the firm’s preferences on the type of advertising effort to be adopted strictly depend on initial conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For an overview of optimal control or dynamic programming approaches to dynamic monopoly, see Lambertini (2018, ch. 2). For more on technical details, see Chiang (1992).

  2. 2.

    The remaining solution of the second FOC, \(x=1/2-\sqrt {s/3}\), can be disregarded in view of the definition of q M.

  3. 3.

    Henceforth, the time argument will be omitted throughout the analysis of this case, for the sake of brevity.

References

  • Artle, R., & Averous, C. (1973). The telephone systems as a public good: static and dynamic aspects. Bell Journal of Economics, 4, 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonanno, G. (1987). Location choice, product proliferation and entry deterrence. Review of Economic Studies, 54, 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, A. (1992). Elements of dynamic optimization. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhebar, A., & Oren, S. (1985). Optimal dynamic pricing for expanding networks. Marketing Science, 4, 336–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, R., & Strotz, R.H. (1963). Deteminants of business investment. In Impacts of monetary policy, research studies prepared for the commission on money and credit. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. C. (1924). The dynamics of monopoly. American Mathematical Monthly, 31, 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, J. P. (1968). Adjustment costs in the theory of investment of the firm. Review of Economic Studies, 35, 47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling, H. (1929). Stability in Competition. Economic Journal, 39, 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambertini, L. (2005). Advertising in a dynamic spatial monopoly. European Journal of Operational Research, 166, 547–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambertini, L. (2007). Dynamic spatial monopoly with product development. Spatial Economic Analysis, 2, 157–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambertini, L. (2009). Capital accumulation for production in a dynamic spatial monopoly. Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 161, 226–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambertini, L. (2018). Differential games in industrial economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lambertini, L., & Orsini, R. (2004). Network externality and the coordination problem. Journal of Economics, 82, 123–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mussa, M., & Rosen, S. (1978). Monopoly and product quality. Journal of Economic Theory, 18, 301–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nerlove, M., & Arrow, K. J. (1962). Optimal advertising policy under dynamic conditions. Economica, 29, 129–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohlfs, J. (1974). A theory of interdependent demand for a communications service. Bell Journal of Economics, 5, 16–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tintner, G. (1937). Monopoly over time. Econometrica, 5, 160–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidale, M., & Wolfe, H. (1957). An operations research study of sales response to advertising. Operations Research, 5, 370–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Lambertini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lambertini, L. (2020). Informative Versus Persuasive Advertising in a Dynamic Hotelling Monopoly. In: Colombo, S. (eds) Spatial Economics Volume I. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40098-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40098-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-40097-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-40098-9

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics